do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-195/13: Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015  — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató (CAMEA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CAMEA — Earlier international word mark BALEA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetics industry, health care, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015065EN.01003102.xml










23.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/31





Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató (CAMEA)
(Case T-195/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark CAMEA - Earlier international word mark BALEA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 065/43)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties


Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: B. Beinert, O. Bludovsky and T. Strack, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Németh, P. Geroulakos and V. Melgar, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft (Szada, Hungary) (represented by: A. Krajnyák, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 January 2013 (Case R 452/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG and V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft.

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


dismisses the action.










2.


orders dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Corrigendum to Clean Sky Joint Undertaking — Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013 ( OJ C 408, 15.11.2014 )
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail
Subjects: European Joint Undertaking, air quality, financial year, publication of accounts








C_2015010EN.01000401.xml










14.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/4





Corrigendum to Clean Sky Joint Undertaking — Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 408 of 15 November 2014
)
(2015/C 10/04)
On page 4:

for:

‘http://www.acer.europa.eu/The_agency/Organisation/Administrative_Board/Pages/Opinions.aspx’,


read:

‘http://www.cleansky.eu/content/homepage/reference-documents’.
Case C-12/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 14 January 2015  — Universal Music International Holding BV v Michael Tétreault Schilling and Others
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: conflict of jurisdiction, damages, interpretation of the law, offence








C_2015089EN.01001201.xml










16.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/12





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 14 January 2015 — Universal Music International Holding BV v Michael Tétreault Schilling and Others
(Case C-12/15)
(2015/C 089/13)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Universal Music International Holding BV

Respondents: Michael Tétreault Schilling, Irwin Schwartz, Josef Brož

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (1) be interpreted as meaning that the ‘place where the harmful event occurred’ can be construed as being the place in a Member State where the damage occurred, if that damage consists exclusively of financial damage which is the direct result of unlawful conduct which occurred in another Member State?










2.


If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative:






(a)


What criterion or what perspectives should the national court apply, when assessing its jurisdiction on the basis of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, in order to determine whether in the present case there has been financial damage which is the direct result of unlawful conduct (‘initial financial damage’ or ‘direct financial damage’) or whether there has been financial damage which is the result of initial damage which occurred elsewhere or damage which has resulted from damage which occurred elsewhere (‘consequential damage’ or ‘derived financial damage’)?










(b)


What criterion or what perspectives should the national court apply, when assessing its jurisdiction on the basis of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, in order to determine where, in the present case, the financial damage — whether it be direct or derived financial damage — occurred or is deemed to have occurred?














3.


If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: must Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 be interpreted as meaning that the national court which is required to determine whether it has jurisdiction pursuant to that regulation in the present case is obliged, when making its determination, to proceed on the basis of the relevant submissions of the claimant or applicant in that regard, or is it obliged also to take into account the arguments put forward by the defendant to refute those submissions?






(1)  Council Regulation of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/52 of 14 January 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 686/2012 as regards the rapporteur Member State for the active substance mecoprop-P  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, chemical product, herbicide, plant health control








L_2015009EN.01002701.xml










15.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 9/27








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/52
of 14 January 2015
         
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 686/2012 as regards the rapporteur Member State for the active substance mecoprop-P
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 686/2012 (2) allocates the evaluation of each active substance to a rapporteur Member State and a co-rapporteur Member State. Upon request of the applicant and in agreement with the Member States concerned, it is considered necessary to change the rapporteur Member State for mecoprop-P while respecting the balance as regards the distribution of the responsibilities and the work between Member States. The evaluation for the purposes of the renewal procedures for mecoprop-P should from now on be allocated to the United Kingdom.












(2)


Implementing Regulation (EU) No 686/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly.












(3)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
In the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 686/2012 the entry for the active substance mecoprop-P is replaced by the following:







Active substance


Rapporteur Member State


Co-rapporteur Member State




‘Mecoprop-P


UK


IE’






Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.




Done at Brussels, 14 January 2015.


For the Commission


The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 686/2012 of 26 July 2012 allocating to Member States, for the purposes of the renewal procedure, the evaluation of the active substances whose approval expires by 31 December 2018 at the latest (OJ L 200, 27.7.2012, p. 5).
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/67 (EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2015) of 14 January 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: EU police mission, Mali, Sahel, appointment of members, peacekeeping








L_2015011EN.01007201.xml










17.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 11/72








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/67 (EUCAP SAHEL MALI/1/2015)
of 14 January 2015
         
extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)


THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP of 15 April 2014 on the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (1), and in particular Article 7(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Decision 2014/219/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the EUCAP Sahel Mali mission, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.












(2)


On 26 May 2014, the PSC adopted Decision EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2014 (2), appointing Mr Albrecht CONZE as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali from 26 May 2014 to 14 January 2015.












(3)


The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed to extend the mandate of Mr Albrecht CONZE as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 January 2015 to 14 June 2015,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The mandate of Mr Albrecht CONZE as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali is hereby extended until 14 June 2015.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 14 January 2015.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

W. STEVENS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 113, 16.4.2014, p. 21.

(2)  Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2014 of 26 May 2014 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (OJ L 164, 3.6.2014, p. 43).
Case C-412/14: Order of the President of the Court of 14 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Dagmar Wedel, Rudi Wedel v Condor Flugdienst GmbH
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, traveller








C_2015146EN.01003204.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/32





Order of the President of the Court of 14 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Dagmar Wedel, Rudi Wedel v Condor Flugdienst GmbH
(Case C-412/14) (1)

(2015/C 146/43)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 448, 15.12.2014.
Case C-171/13: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv) v M.S. Demirci and Others (Request for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Social security for migrant workers — Waiver of residence clauses — Supplementary benefits granted under national legislation — Residence requirement — Application to Turkish former workers — Turkish nationals having acquired the nationality of the host Member State)
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Türkiye, association agreement (EU), migrant worker, residence permit, social security








C_2015073EN.01000401.xml










2.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/4






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv) v M.S. Demirci and Others
(Case C-171/13) (1)

(Request for a preliminary ruling - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Social security for migrant workers - Waiver of residence clauses - Supplementary benefits granted under national legislation - Residence requirement - Application to Turkish former workers - Turkish nationals having acquired the nationality of the host Member State)
(2015/C 073/04)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv)

Defendants: M.S. Demirci, D. Cetin, A.I. Önder, R. Keskin, M. Tüle, A. Taskin

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of Decision No 3/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the application of the social security schemes of the Member States of the European Communities to Turkish workers and members of their families, viewed also in the light of Article 59 of the Additional Protocol signed on 23 November 1970 in Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 of 19 December 1972, must be interpreted as meaning that nationals of a Member State who have been duly registered as belonging to the labour force of that Member State as Turkish workers cannot, on the ground that they have retained Turkish nationality, rely on Article 6 of Decision No 3/80 to object to a residence requirement provided for by the legislation of that Member State in order to receive a special non-contributory benefit within the meaning of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 647/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 April 2005.


(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.
Case T-507/13: Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015  — SolarWorld and Others v Commission (Actions for annulment — Dumping — Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from China — Acceptance of an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding — Community industry — Absence of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, economic support, import (EU), originating product, semi-metal, solar collector








C_2015081EN.01001901.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/19





Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — SolarWorld and Others v Commission
(Case T-507/13) (1)

((Actions for annulment - Dumping - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from China - Acceptance of an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding - Community industry - Absence of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
(2015/C 081/24)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: SolarWorld AG (Bonn, Germany); Brandoni solare SpA (Castelfidardo, Italy); Global Sun Ltd (Sliema, Malta); Silicio Solar, SAU (Madrid, Spain); Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, SA (Puertollano, Spain) (represented by: L. Ruessmann, lawyer, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, T. Maxian Rusche and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)

Re:

Action for the annulment of Commission Decision 2013/423/EU of 2 August 2013 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2013 L 209, p. 26), and of Commission Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU of 4 December 2013 confirming the acceptance of an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China for the period of application of definitive measures (OJ 2013 L 325, p. 214).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


SolarWorld AG, Brandoni solare SpA, Global Sun Ltd, Silicio Solar, SAU and Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, SA shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
Case T-166/12: Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015  — Bolívar Cerezo v OHIM — Renovalia Energy (RENOVALIA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark RENOVALIA — Earlier national word marks RENOVA ENERGY and RENOVAENERGY — Partial refusal to register — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015081EN.01001801.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/18





Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — Bolívar Cerezo v OHIM — Renovalia Energy (RENOVALIA)
(Case T-166/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark RENOVALIA - Earlier national word marks RENOVA ENERGY and RENOVAENERGY - Partial refusal to register - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2015/C 081/23)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Juan Bolívar Cerezo (Granada, Spain) (represented by: I. Barroso Sánchez-Lafuente, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Renovalia Energy, SA (Villarobledo, Spain) (represented by: A. Velázquez Ibáñez, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 January 2012 (Case R 663/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Renovalia Energy, SA and Mr Juan Bolívar Cerezo.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed;










2.


Mr Juan Bolívar Cerezo is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Iran, Pakistan, United Arab Emirates, anti-dumping legislation, countervailing charge, originating product, plastics








C_2015010EN.01000301.xml










14.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/3





Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures
(2015/C 10/03)
1.   As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury.
Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Certain polyethylene terephthalate


Iran
Pakistan
United Arab Emirates


Countervailing duty


Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 (OJ L 254, 29.9.2010, p. 10).


30.9.2015






(1)  OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Information on the signing and the provisional application of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Madagascar and the European Community
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Madagascar, agreement (EU), financial compensation of an agreement, fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing rights, interim agreement (EU), protocol to an agreement, sea fishing, signature of an agreement








L_2015008EN.01000102.xml










14.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 8/1







Information on the signing and the provisional application of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Madagascar and the European Community

The European Union and the Republic of Madagascar signed, on 23 December 2014 in Brussels, the Protocol (1) setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Madagascar and the European Community.
The Protocol accordingly applies provisionally from 1 January 2015 pursuant to Article 15 thereof.


(1)  
            OJ L 365, 19.12.2014, p. 8.
Corrigendum to European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority — Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013 ( OJ C 408, 15.11.2014 )
Date: 2015-01-14
Institutions: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
Subjects: EU office or agency, financial year, pension scheme, publication of accounts








C_2015010EN.01000601.xml










14.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/6





Corrigendum to European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority — Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 408 of 15 November 2014
)
(2015/C 10/06)
On page 11:

for:

‘http://www.acer.europa.eu/The_agency/Organisation/Administrative_Board/Pages/Opinions.aspx’,


read:

‘https://eiopa.europa.eu/about-eiopa/budget-accounts/index.html’.