do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-4/15: Action brought on 12 January 2015  — ZZ and Others v Commission
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, damages, indemnification, pay, social-security benefit, wage indexing








C_2015096EN.01002601.xml










23.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/26





Action brought on 12 January 2015 — ZZ and Others v Commission
(Case F-4/15)
(2015/C 096/33)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, N. Flandin and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the Commission decisions to apply to the applicants’ salaries and pensions the adjustments provided under Regulation Nos 422/2014 and 423/2014 respectively for the years 2011 and 2012 and the claim for damages for the material loss suffered.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the contested decisions and, in so far as it is necessary, the decisions rejecting the claims;










—


order the defendant to pay the applicants the arrears of remuneration corresponding to an adjustment of their salaries and pensions at the rate of 1,7 % in 2011 and 2012, in damages for the financial material loss, together with interest for delayed payment at the European Central Bank rate plus 2 points, from the date of the judgment to be delivered;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2015007EN.01000101.xml










12.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/1





Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 007/01)

Last publication


OJ C 462, 22.12.2014


Past publications


OJ C 448, 15.12.2014


OJ C 439, 8.12.2014


OJ C 431, 1.12.2014


OJ C 421, 24.11.2014


OJ C 409, 17.11.2014


OJ C 395, 10.11.2014

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Case C-7/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Essen (Germany) lodged on 12 January 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Kanapathippilai Kanageswaran
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, economic sanctions, international sanctions, organisation, terrorism








C_2015127EN.01000901.xml










20.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/9





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Essen (Germany) lodged on 12 January 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Kanapathippilai Kanageswaran
(Case C-7/15)
(2015/C 127/13)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Essen

Party to the main proceedings

Kanapathippilai Kanageswaran

Question referred

Is the inclusion of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in the list referred to in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (1) for the period from 9 September 2007 to 24 May 2009 inclusive, in particular on the basis of the Council Decisions of 29 May 2006 (2006/379/EC) (2), 28 June 2007 (2007/445/EC) (3), 20 December 2007 (2007/868/EC) (4), 15 July 2008 (2008/583/EC) (5), and 26 January 2009 (2009/62/EC) (6), invalid?


(1)  OJ 2001 L 344, p. 70.

(2)  OJ 2006 L 144, p. 21.

(3)  OJ 2007 L 169, p. 58.

(4)  OJ 2007 L 340, p. 100.

(5)  OJ 2008 L 188, p. 21.

(6)  OJ 2009 L 23, p. 25.
Case C-4/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 12 January 2015 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën; other party: Argos Supply Trading BV
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Netherlands, customs regulations, economic situation, interpretation of the law, outward processing, raw material








C_2015107EN.01001901.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/19






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 12 January 2015 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën; other party: Argos Supply Trading BV
(Case C-4/15)
(2015/C 107/26)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant in cassation: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Other party: Argos Supply Trading BV

Question referred

In an examination of the economic conditions governing an outward processing customs procedure, must the term ‘Community processors’ in Article 148(c) of the Customs Code (1) be interpreted as also covering Community producers of basic products or intermediate products identical to those processed, as non-Community goods, in the processing operation?


(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1).
Case C-6/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State van België (Belgium) lodged on 12 January 2015  — TNS Dimarso NV v Vlaams Gewest
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative transparency, award of contract, equal treatment, interpretation of the law, invitation to tender, provision of services, supplies contract, works contract








C_2015118EN.01001501.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/15





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State van België (Belgium) lodged on 12 January 2015 — TNS Dimarso NV v Vlaams Gewest
(Case C-6/15)
(2015/C 118/20)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State van België

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: TNS Dimarso NV

Defendant: Vlaams Gewest

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 53(2) of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, both in isolation and in conjunction with the scope of the principles laid down by European law concerning equality and transparency in the field of public procurement, be interpreted as meaning that, if the contract is awarded to the tenderer who submits the most economically advantageous tender from the point of view of the contracting authority, the contracting authority is always required to establish in advance, and indicate in the contract notice or contract documents, the method of assessment or the weighting rules, irrespective of their scope, predictability or commonness, in the light of which the tenders will be assessed in accordance with the award criteria or subcriteria,










2.


or, if no such general obligation exists, that there are circumstances, such as, inter alia, the scope, unpredictability or uncommonness of these weighting rules, in which this obligation does apply?






(1)  OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.
Case C-1/15 SA: Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order brought on 12 January 2015 — La Chaine hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL v European Commission
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, deduction at source, seizure of goods








C_2015073EN.01002001.xml










2.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/20






Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order brought on 12 January 2015 — La Chaine hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL v European Commission
(Case C-1/15 SA)
(2015/C 073/27)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: La Chaine hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL (represented by: J. Steyt, avocat)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Declare the present application to be admissible and well founded;




Consequently:






—


primarily, authorise the applicant to maintain and continue the attachment order already served and to serve other attachment orders on the European Union/European Commission for all sums, funds, assets or objects generally that it has or will subsequently have in its possession, owes or will subsequently owe for any reason and on any grounds whatever to the Democratic Republic of Congo;










—


in the alternative, authorise the applicant to maintain and continue the attachment order already served and to serve other attachment orders on the European Union/European Commission for all sums, funds, assets or objects generally that it has or will subsequently have in its possession, owes or will subsequently owe on the basis of a private contract to the Democratic Republic of Congo;




In any event:






—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-12/15: Action brought on 13 January 2015  — Banco Santander and Santusa v Commission
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, bank, control of State aid, principle of legal certainty








C_2015081EN.01002402.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/24





Action brought on 13 January 2015 — Banco Santander and Santusa v Commission
(Case T-12/15)
(2015/C 081/32)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Banco Santander, SA (Santander, Spain) and Santusa Holding, SL (Boadilla del Monte, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and J. Panero Rivas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:






—


admit and uphold the grounds for annulment set out in this application;










—


annul Article 1 of the contested decision in so far as it declares that the new administrative interpretation of Article 12 TRLIS [texto refundido de la Ley del Impuesto sobre Sociedades (consolidated version of the Spanish law on corporate tax)] adopted by the Spanish administration must be regarded as State aid which is incompatible with the internal market;










—


annul Article 4.1 of the contested decision in so far as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the alleged aid scheme as described in Article 1;










—


annul parts 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Article 4 of the contested decision in so far as they require the Kingdom of Spain to recover the amounts considered by the Commission to be State aid;










—


in the alternative, limit the scope of the recovery obligation imposed on the Kingdom of Spain in Article 4.2 of the contested decision in the same terms as in the First and Second Decisions; and










—


order to the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and principal arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-826/14 Spain v Commission.
The applicants claim, in particular, that the Commission erred in law in the legal classification of the measure as State aid, in the identification of the beneficiary of the measure and in the characterisation of the administrative interpretation as State aid distinct from that examined in the Commission’s decisions, and that it breached the principles of the protection of legitimate expectations, of estoppel and of legal certainty.
Case C-5/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 12 January 2015 — AK (*) v Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to the courts, insurance contract, interpretation of the law




C_2015107EN.01001902.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/19






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 12 January 2015 —  AK (*1) v Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand
(Case C-5/15)
(2015/C 107/27)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: AK (*1)


Defendants: Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand

Question referred

Must the term ‘inquiry or proceedings’ in Article 4(1)(a) of Council Directive 87/344/EEC (1) of 22 June 1987 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to legal expenses insurance be interpreted as also covering the objection stage before the CIZ [Netherlands Medical Care Assessment Centre], in which any person who has received a negative decision from the CIZ on a request for an assessment may lodge a notice of objection with the CIZ, requesting that the decision be reviewed?


(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  OJ 1987 L 185, p. 77.
Case T-259/14: Order of the General Court of 12 January 2015 — Luxembourg v Commission
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: access to information, branch of activity, exchange of information, financial control, intellectual property








C_2015073EN.01005002.xml










2.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/50






Order of the General Court of 12 January 2015 — Luxembourg v Commission
(Case T-259/14) (1)

(2015/C 073/62)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case T-258/14: Order of the General Court of 12 January 2015  — Luxembourg v Commission
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to information, exchange of information, infringement of EU law, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence, tax inspection








C_2015081EN.01002901.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/29





Order of the General Court of 12 January 2015 — Luxembourg v Commission
(Case T-258/14) (1)

(2015/C 081/37)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Fifth Chamber (extended composition) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case F-49/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 January 2015  — DQ and Others v European Parliament
Date: 2015-01-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: examination, psychological harassment, staff assessment








C_2015081EN.01003003.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/30





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 January 2015 — DQ and Others v European Parliament
(Case F-49/14) (1)

(2015/C 081/40)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 292, 1/9/14, p. 62.