do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-482/12: Order of the General Court of 9 January 2015 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Application initiating proceedings — Disregard of formal requirements — Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-01-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, enforcement of ruling, provision of documents








C_2015073EN.01003401.xml










2.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/34






Order of the General Court of 9 January 2015 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission
(Case T-482/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Application initiating proceedings - Disregard of formal requirements - Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)
(2015/C 073/44)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV (Rosbach, Germany) (represented by: H.-H. Heyland, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and T. Scharf, acting as Agents, assisted initially by R. Van der Hout and A. Krämer, and subsequently by R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission refusing to grant the applicant full access to the documents in the file relating to the contract LIEN 97-2011 and, in the alternative, application for partial annulment of the Commission’s decision of 28 August 2012 in response to the applicant’s letter of 27 July 2012 requesting that the Commission comply with the judgment of 22 May 2012 in Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission, T-300/10, EU:T:2012:247.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections  Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty
Date: 2015-01-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Berlin, Germany, State aid, control of State aid, farming sector, livestock, slaughter of animals








C_2015005EN.01000601.xml










9.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 5/6





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)
(2015/C 005/02)







Date of adoption of the decision


07.11.2014




Aid number


SA.38916 (2014/N)




Member State


Germany




Region


BERLIN


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


BERLIN: Entfernung und Beseitigung von Falltieren




Legal basis


Gesetz zur Ausführung des Tierkörperbeseitigungsgesetzes vom 6.11.1997
Gesetz zur Änderung des Gesetzes zur Ausführung des Tierkörperbeseitiugungsgesetzes vom 28.3.2002
Gesetz zur Änderung des Gesetzes zur Ausführung des Tierkörperbeseitigungsgesetzes




Type of measure


Scheme


—




Objective


Fallen stock




Form of aid


Subsidised services




Budget


Overall budget: EUR 1,82 (in millions)
Annual budget: EUR 0,26 (in millions)




Intensity


66,6 %




Duration (period)


until 31.12.2020




Economic sectors


AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY AND FISHING




Name and address of the granting authority







Senatsverwaltung für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz; Referat: V B; Herr Dr. Zucker




Salzburger Straße 21-25; D-10820 Berlin








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7427 — Macquarie/Nippon Yusen Kaisha/NYK Ports) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-01-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Canada, United States, economic concentration, harbour installation, investment company, logistics, maritime transport, merger control, transport company, transport infrastructure








C_2015004EN.01001501.xml










9.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/15





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7427 — Macquarie/Nippon Yusen Kaisha/NYK Ports)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 4/03)






1.


On 19 December 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Macquarie Infrastructure Partners III, L.P. (‘MIP III’, United States of America), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Macquarie Group (Australia), and NYK Group Americas Inc. (‘NYK Group Americas’, United States of America), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nippon Yusen Kaisha (Japan), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of NYK Ports LLC (United States of America) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


MIP III, an investment fund focused on investments in infrastructure and related assets in the United States of America and Canada,










—


NYK Group Americas offers marine transportation and global logistics services in North America,










—


NYK Ports LLC, currently solely controlled by NYK Group Americas, operates marine terminals and provides stevedoring services in ports located in the United States of America and Canada.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7427 — Macquarie/Nippon Yusen Kaisha/NYK Ports, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-9/15: Action brought on 9 January 2015  — Ball Europe v OHIM — Crown Hellas Can
Date: 2015-01-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, processing industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015089EN.01003202.xml










16.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/32





Action brought on 9 January 2015 — Ball Europe v OHIM — Crown Hellas Can
(Case T-9/15)
(2015/C 089/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Ball Europe GmbH (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Renck, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Crown Hellas Can SA (Athens, Greece)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Proprietor of the design at issue: the applicant

Design at issue: Community design No 230 990-0006

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2014 in Case R 1408/2012-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the defendant and — in the event of a formal intervention — also the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002.
Case F-3/15: Action brought on 9 January 2015  — ZZ and ZZ v Commission
Date: 2015-01-09
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, social-security contribution, transfer of pension rights








C_2015096EN.01002502.xml










23.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/25





Action brought on 9 January 2015 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission
(Case F-3/15)
(2015/C 096/32)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the Commission’s decisions rejecting the applicants’ requests for repayment of a portion of the contributions to the European Union pension scheme which were deducted from their pay and the request to reassess the credit relating to the transfer of pension rights, acquired before their entry into service, to the EU scheme.

Form of order sought







—


Declare inapplicable Article 22 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations in the version in force since 1 November 2014;










—


annul the contested decisions;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.
Case T-11/15: Action brought on 9 January 2015 — Internet Consulting v OHIM — Autonomous Province of Bolzano-Alto Adige (SUEDTIROL)
Date: 2015-01-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, digital technology, registered trade mark, theory of marketing, trade-mark law








C_2015073EN.01005001.xml










2.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/50






Action brought on 9 January 2015 — Internet Consulting v OHIM — Autonomous Province of Bolzano-Alto Adige (SUEDTIROL)
(Case T-11/15)
(2015/C 073/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Internet Consulting GmbH (Brunico, Italy) (represented by: L. Miori and A. Bertella, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Autonomous Province of Bolzano-Alto Adige (Bolzano, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Internet Consulting GmbH

Trade mark at issue: Word mark ‘SUEDTIROL’ — Community trade mark No 2 826 931

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2014 in Case R 574/2013-G

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul or alter in full the contested decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2014, notified on 13 November 2014, refusing in any event the application for a declaration of invalidity submitted by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano in respect of the Community trade mark Suedtirol;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal before OHIM and the costs of the present proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement and/or misapplication of Articles 5 and 56 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;










—


Infringement and misapplication of Articles 7(1)(c), 12 and 52 of that regulation.
Case C-498/14 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — (Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.) v (Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility — Child abduction — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 11(7) and (8))
Date: 2015-01-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: child protection, illegal restraint, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, matrimonial law, parental responsibility




C_2015073EN.01000802.xml










2.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/8






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — RG (*1) v SF (*1)

(Case C-498/14 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility - Child abduction - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Article 11(7) and (8))
(2015/C 073/11)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: RG (*1)


Defendant: SF (*1)


Operative part of the judgment

Article 11(7) and (8) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, must be interpreted as not precluding, as a general rule, a Member State from allocating to a specialised court the jurisdiction to examine questions of return or custody with respect to a child in the context of the procedure set out in those provisions, even where proceedings on the substance of parental responsibility with respect to the child have already, separately, been brought before a court or tribunal.


(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  OJ C 16, 19.1.2015.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-01-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015004EN.01000101.xml










9.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

8 January 2015
(2015/C 4/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1768




JPY


Japanese yen


141,00




DKK


Danish krone


7,4398




GBP


Pound sterling


0,78110




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4340




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2010




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,0280




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,865




HUF


Hungarian forint


317,05




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2902




RON


Romanian leu


4,4878




TRY


Turkish lira


2,7181




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4518




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3905




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1265




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5113




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5753




KRW


South Korean won


1 291,62




ZAR


South African rand


13,6912




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3152




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6745




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 877,39




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1890




PHP


Philippine peso


52,908




RUB


Russian rouble


72,3732




THB


Thai baht


38,693




BRL


Brazilian real


3,1774




MXN


Mexican peso


17,3087




INR


Indian rupee


73,6300






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.