do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-4/15: Action brought on 8 January 2015  — Beiersdorf v OHIM (Q10)
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015065EN.01005302.xml










23.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/53





Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Beiersdorf v OHIM (Q10)
(Case T-4/15)
(2015/C 065/73)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Beiersdorf AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Renck and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Q10’ — Application for registration No 11 480 837

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2014 in Case R 2050/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 32(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Baltic Sea, Germany, North Sea, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2015003EN.01000302.xml










8.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 3/3





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2015/C 3/04)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


14.12.2014




Duration


14.12.2014–31.12.2014




Member State


Germany




Stock or Group of stocks


COD/03AN.




Species


Cod (Gadus Morhua)




Zone


Skagerrak




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


81/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Baltic Sea, EU waters, Germany, North Sea, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2015003EN.01000401.xml










8.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 3/4





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2015/C 3/05)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


14.12.2014




Duration


14.12.2014–31.12.2014




Member State


Germany




Stock or Group of stocks


HAD/3A/BCD




Species


Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)




Zone


IIIa, Union waters of Subdivisions 22-32




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


82/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case C-3/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2015  — Alexandra Stück v Swiss International Air Lines AG
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Switzerland, agreement (EU), airline, carriage of passengers, indemnification, interpretation of the law








C_2015118EN.01001402.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/14





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2015 — Alexandra Stück v Swiss International Air Lines AG
(Case C-3/15)
(2015/C 118/19)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Alexandra Stück

Defendant: Swiss International Air Lines AG

Question referred

Is the Agreement on air transport between the Swiss Confederation and the European Community (1) of 21 June 1999, as amended by Decision No 2/2010 of the Community/Switzerland Air Transport Committee (2) of 26 November 2010, to be interpreted as meaning that Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (3) [‘the Air Passenger Rights Regulation’] is applicable, in accordance with Article 3(1)(b), also to passengers departing from an airport located in a third country to an airport in Switzerland with a Swiss air carrier?


(1)  OJ 2002 L 114, p. 73.

(2)  Decision No 2/2010 of the Joint Community/Switzerland Air Transport Committee set up under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport of 26 November 2010 replacing the Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport, OJ 2010 L 347, p. 54.

(3)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Baltic Sea, Denmark, EU waters, North Sea, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2015003EN.01000301.xml










8.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 3/3





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2015/C 3/03)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


11.12.2014




Duration


11.12.2014–31.12.2014




Member State


Denmark




Stock or group of stocks


LIN/3A/BCD.




Species


Ling (Molva molva)




Zone


IIIa; Union waters of IIIbcd




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


80/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-6/15: Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Ice Mountain Ibiza/OHIM — Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club (ocean ibiza)
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, leisure, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015073EN.01004702.xml










2.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/47






Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Ice Mountain Ibiza/OHIM — Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club (ocean ibiza)
(Case T-6/15)
(2015/C 073/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL (San Antonio, Spain) (represented by: J. L. Gracia Albero, lawyer, and F. Miazzetto, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club, SL (Puerto Banús, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ocean ibiza’ — Application for registration No 10 610 525

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2014 in Case R 2207/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM dated 8 October 2014 in Case R 2207/2013-1 so as to reject the opposition filed by Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club, SL and grant the application for a Community trade mark No 10 610 525 ‘ocean ibiza’ (mixed) in Class 41; and










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings as well as all those incurred to date in the earlier proceedings before the Opposition Division and the First Board of Appeal of OHIM that have led to the present application.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case F-2/15: Action brought on 8 January 2015 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, indemnification








C_2015096EN.01002501.xml










23.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/25





Action brought on 8 January 2015 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-2/15)
(2015/C 096/31)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Véghely, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision refusing the applicant an installation allowance and a daily subsistence allowance and application to order the Commission to pay those allowances with interest.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the Commission’s decision of 4 March 2014 insofar as it refuses to grant him the installation allowance and daily subsistence allowance provided for in Article 5(1) and Article 10(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations;










—


order the Commission to pay him the installation allowance and daily subsistence allowance on taking up his appointment, together with interest from the dates on which those amounts became payable pursuant to Annex VII to the Staff Regulations; and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015003EN.01000101.xml










8.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 3/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

7 January 2015
(2015/C 3/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1831




JPY


Japanese yen


141,17




DKK


Danish krone


7,4421




GBP


Pound sterling


0,78230




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3989




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2011




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,1500




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,783




HUF


Hungarian forint


319,53




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3108




RON


Romanian leu


4,4978




TRY


Turkish lira


2,7547




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4660




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3996




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1743




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5275




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5844




KRW


South Korean won


1 304,28




ZAR


South African rand


13,8588




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3512




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6753




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 041,65




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2376




PHP


Philippine peso


53,363




RUB


Russian rouble


75,0000




THB


Thai baht


38,912




BRL


Brazilian real


3,1679




MXN


Mexican peso


17,4803




INR


Indian rupee


74,7423






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-8/15: Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Auyantepui Corp. v OHIM — Magda Rose (Mr Jones)
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, public limited company, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015118EN.01003101.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/31





Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Auyantepui Corp. v OHIM — Magda Rose (Mr Jones)
(Case T-8/15)
(2015/C 118/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Auyantepui Corp., SA (Panama, Panama) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Magda Rose GmbH & Co. KG (Vienna, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Mr Jones’ — Application for registration No 10 669 794

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 October 2014 in Case R 49/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the contested decision and grant the application for the trade mark;










—


Order OHIM and the other party, should it intervene, to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Notice of open competition
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, assistant, competition (EU), secretarial staff








C_2015003EN.01000501.xml










8.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 3/5





NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION
(2015/C 3/06)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition
EPSO/AST-SC/03/15
Secretaries/Clerks (grades SC1 and SC2)
in the following fields:






1)


Administrative support










2)


Financial support










3)


Secretarial support




The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 3 A of 8 January 2015.
Further information can be found on EPSO’s website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/
Case T-58/13: Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2015  — Club Hotel Loutraki and Others v Commission (State aid — Operation of Video Lottery Terminals — Grant by the Hellenic Republic of an exclusive licence — Decision finding no State aid — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Serious difficulties — Procedural rights of the interested parties — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection — Advantage — Joint assessment of the notified measures)
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Greece, State aid, control of State aid, game of chance, right to justice, trade licence








C_2015056EN.01001501.xml










16.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 56/15





Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2015 — Club Hotel Loutraki and Others v Commission
(Case T-58/13) (1)

((State aid - Operation of Video Lottery Terminals - Grant by the Hellenic Republic of an exclusive licence - Decision finding no State aid - Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Serious difficulties - Procedural rights of the interested parties - Obligation to state reasons - Right to effective judicial protection - Advantage - Joint assessment of the notified measures))
(2015/C 056/19)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Club Hotel Loutraki AE (Loutraki, Greece); Vivere Entertainment AE (Athens, Greece); Theros International Gaming, Inc. (Patra, Greece); Elliniko Casino Kerkyras (Athens); Casino Rodos (Rhodes, Greece); Porto Carras AE (Alimos, Greece); Kazino Aigaiou AE (Syros, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna and K. Boskovits, acting as Agents); and Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou AE (OPAP) (Athens, Greece) (represented: initially by K. Fountoukakos-Kyriakakos, Solicitor, L. Van den Hende and M. Sánchez Rydelski, lawyers, and subsequently by M. Petite and A. Tomtsis, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 6777 final of 3 October 2012 on State aid SA.33  988 (2011/N) — Greece — Arrangements for the extension of OPAP’s exclusive right to operate 13 games of chance and the granting of an exclusive licence to operate 35  000 Video Lottery Terminals for a period of 10 years.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Club Hotel Loutraki AE, Vivere Entertainment AE, Theros International Gaming, Inc., Elliniko Casino Kerkyras, Casino Rodos, Porto Carras AE and Kazino Aigaiou AE to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou AE (OPAP);










3)


Orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.
Case T-5/15: Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Ice Mountain Ibiza/OHIM — Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club (ocean beach club ibiza)
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, leisure, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015073EN.01004701.xml










2.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/47






Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Ice Mountain Ibiza/OHIM — Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club (ocean beach club ibiza)
(Case T-5/15)
(2015/C 073/58)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL (San Antonio, Spain) (represented by: J. L. Gracia Albero and F. Miazzetto, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club, SL (Puerto Banús, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ocean beach club ibiza’ — Application for registration No 10 610 491

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2014 in Case R 2292/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM dated 8 October 2014 in Case R 2292/2013-1 so as to reject the opposition filed by Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club, SL and grant the application for a Community trade mark No 10 610 491 ‘ocean beach club ibiza’ (mixed) in Class 41; and










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings as well as all those incurred to date in the earlier proceedings before the Opposition Division and the First Board of Appeal of OHIM that have led to the present application.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-7/15: Action brought on 8 January 2015  — Leopard v OHIM — Smart Market (LEOPARD true racing)
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, sports body, trade-mark law








C_2015081EN.01002401.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/24





Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Leopard v OHIM — Smart Market (LEOPARD true racing)
(Case T-7/15)
(2015/C 081/31)
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: Leopard SA (Howald, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Lê Dai, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Smart Market, SLU (Alcantarilla, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘LEOPARD true racing’ — Application for registration No 10 139 202

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 October 2014 in Case R 1866/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul in part the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Special Report No 20/2014 — ‘Has ERDF support to SMEs in the area of e-commerce been effective?’
Date: 2015-01-08
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, aid to undertakings, electronic commerce, small and medium-sized enterprises








C_2015003EN.01000201.xml










8.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 3/2





Special Report No 20/2014
‘Has ERDF support to SMEs in the area of e-commerce been effective?’
(2015/C 3/02)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 20/2014 ‘Has ERDF support to SMEs in the area of e-commerce been effective?’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu
A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:





European Court of Auditors




Publications (PUB)




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




Tel. +352 4398-1




E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu




or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.