do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-476/12: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Documents relating to installations of the applicant situated in Germany and concerned by the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Partial refusal of access — Environmental information — Second sentence of Article 6(1) of Regulation No 1367/2006 — Exception relating to protection of the decision-making process — Documents originating from a Member State — Objection by the Member State — Article 4(3) and (5) of Regulation No 1049/2001)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, EU Member State, Germany, access to EU information, provision of documents








C_2015034EN.01003301.xml










2.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/33





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland v Commission
(Case T-476/12) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Documents relating to installations of the applicant situated in Germany and concerned by the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Partial refusal of access - Environmental information - Second sentence of Article 6(1) of Regulation No 1367/2006 - Exception relating to protection of the decision-making process - Documents originating from a Member State - Objection by the Member State - Article 4(3) and (5) of Regulation No 1049/2001))
(2015/C 034/37)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland GmbH (Aix-la-Chapelle, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and C. Dittrich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by P. Costa de Oliveira and H. Krämer, subsequently by H. Krämer and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment, first, of the Commission’s implied decision of 4 September 2012 and, in the alternative, of the Commission’s implied decision of 25 September 2012 and, secondly, of the Commission’s decision of 17 January 2013, refusing to grant full access to the list sent by the Federal Republic of Germany to the Commission, in the framework of the procedure set out in Article 15(1) of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 130, p. 1), to the extent that that document contains information relating to certain installations of the applicant, situated in German territory, relating to provisional allocations and activities and capacity levels in relation to carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions between 2005 and 2010, the efficiency of the installations and the annual emission quotas provisionally allocated for the period between 2013 and 2020.

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland GmbH shall bear the costs.






(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.
Case T-712/13: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Monster Energy v OHIM (REHABILITATE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark REHABILITATE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015046EN.01005201.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/52





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Monster Energy v OHIM (REHABILITATE)
(Case T-712/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark REHABILITATE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 046/66)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Monster Energy Company (Corona, California, United States) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 October 2013 (Case R 609/2013-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign REHABILITATE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Monster Energy Company to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.
Case C-575/14 P: Appeal brought on 11 December 2014 by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2014 in Case T-340/07 RENV: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: contractual liability, indemnification, project management, project of common interest, provision of services








C_2015065EN.01002501.xml










23.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/25





Appeal brought on 11 December 2014 by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2014 in Case T-340/07 RENV: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission
(Case C-575/14 P)
(2015/C 065/35)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: M. Sfyri, I. Ampazis, Lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the judgment of the General Court under appeal.










—


order the Commission to make good damage suffered by the Appellant as a result of the Commission’s failure to comply with contractual obligations in the context of the performance of the EDC-53007 EEBO/27873 contract relating to the project entitled ‘e-Content Exposure and Business Opportunities’. More particularly, order the Commission to pay the amount of 1 72  588,62 EUR, representing all the costs incurred by the Appellant concerning all the work which was engaged by the Appellant before the termination of the contract of 16 May 2003 and delivered by the Appellant in compliance to its contractual obligations. Subsidiarily, in case the Court of Justice considers that the Appellant had to cease any work as of 16 May 2003, order the Commission to pay at least the amount of 1 27  076,48 EUR, representing all the costs incurred or engaged to by the Appellant lawfully and in strict compliance to the terms of its contract, until such date.










—


order the Commission to pay the Appellant’s legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the initial procedure and the current Appeal, even if the current Appeal is rejected as well as those of the current Appeal, in case it is accepted.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant founds its Appeal on the fact that the General Court distorted the clear sense of the evidence before it, by interpreting incorrectly Annex II ‘General Conditions’ of the EDC-53007 EEBO/27873 contract, by undermining the probative value of the submitted cost statement and, consequently, by assessing incorrectly that the documents produced by the Appellant were not appropriate and sufficient to prove that the costs stated in them actually incurred for the implementation of the project.
Case F-80/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 December 2014  — CZ v ESMA (Civil service — Recruitment — Temporary agents — Extension of the probation period — Dismissal at the end of the probation period)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, dismissal, servant (EU), traineeship








C_2015034EN.01004701.xml










2.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/47





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — CZ v ESMA
(Case F-80/13) (1)

((Civil service - Recruitment - Temporary agents - Extension of the probation period - Dismissal at the end of the probation period))
(2015/C 034/55)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CZ (represented by: O. Kress and S. Bassis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (represented by: R. Vasileva, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Firstly, annulment of the decision to extend the applicant’s probation period and of the subsequent decision to dismiss him and, secondly, application for compensation for the harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Securities and Markets Authority to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by CZ.






(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013, p. 51.
Case T-235/12: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — CEDC International v OHIM — Underberg (Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for three-dimensional Community mark — Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle — Earlier national three-dimensional mark — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 75, Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Discretion granted by Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015046EN.01004402.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/44





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — CEDC International v OHIM — Underberg (Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle)
(Case T-235/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for three-dimensional Community mark - Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle - Earlier national three-dimensional mark - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 75, Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Discretion granted by Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons))
(2015/C 046/54)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: CEDC International sp. z o.o. (Oborniki Wielkopolskie, Poland) (represented by: M. Siciarek, G. Rząsa and J. Mrozowski, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Underberg AG (Dietlikon, Switzerland) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2012 (Case R 2506/2010-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Przedsiębiorstwo Polmos Białystok (Spółka Akcyjna) and Underberg AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 March 2012 (Case R 2506/2010-4);










2)


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by CEDC International sp. z o.o.;










3)


Orders Underberg AG to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.
Case T-480/12: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Coca-Cola v OHIM — Mitico (Master) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Master — Earlier Community figurative marks Coca-Cola and earlier national figurative mark C — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Similarity of the signs — Evidence relating to the commercial use of the mark applied for)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015046EN.01004501.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/45





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Coca-Cola v OHIM — Mitico (Master)
(Case T-480/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Master - Earlier Community figurative marks Coca-Cola and earlier national figurative mark C - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Similarity of the signs - Evidence relating to the commercial use of the mark applied for))
(2015/C 046/55)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: The Coca-Cola Company (Atlanta, Georgia, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, D. Stone and L. Ritchie, Solicitors, and S. Baran, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Modern Industrial & Trading Investment Co. Ltd (Mitico) (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: A.-I. Malami, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 August 2012 (Case R 2156/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between The Coca-Cola Company and Modern Industrial & Trading Investment Co. Ltd (Mitico).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 29 August 2012 (Case R 2156/2011-2);










2)


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by The Coca-Cola Company;










3)


Orders Modern Industrial & Trading Investment Co. Ltd (Mitico) to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
Case T-440/13: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — ‘Millano’ Krzysztof Kotas v OHIM (Shape of a box of chocolates) (Community trade mark — Application for three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a box of chocolates — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015046EN.01004901.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/49





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — ‘Millano’ Krzysztof Kotas v OHIM (Shape of a box of chocolates)
(Case T-440/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for three-dimensional Community trade mark - Shape of a box of chocolates - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 046/61)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Zakład Wyrobów Cukierniczych ‘Millano’ Krzysztof Kotas (Przeźmierowo, Poland) (represented by: B. Kański, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 May 2013 (Case R 755/2012-2) concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting in the shape of a box of chocolates as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Zakład Wyrobów Cukierniczych ‘Millano’ Krzysztof Kotas to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).






(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Case T-10/09 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Formula One Licensing v OHIM — ESPN Sports Media (F1-LIVE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark F1-LIVE — Earlier Community figurative mark F1 and national and international word marks F1 Formula 1 — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, automatic game, motor car, registered trade mark, simulation, sport, trade-mark law








C_2015046EN.01004101.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/41





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Formula One Licensing v OHIM — ESPN Sports Media (F1-LIVE)
(Case T-10/09 RENV) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark F1-LIVE - Earlier Community figurative mark F1 and national and international word marks F1 Formula 1 - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)))
(2015/C 046/49)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Formula One Licensing BV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Klingberg and K. Sandberg, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: ESPN Sports Media Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. de Haan, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 October 2008 (Case R 7/2008-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Racing-Live and Formula One Licensing BV.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 16 October 2008 (Case R 7/2008-1).










2)


Orders OHIM and ESPN Sports Media Ltd to pay the costs incurred by Formula One Licensing BV in the proceedings before the General Court and the Court of Justice, and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM.






(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.
Case T-619/13 P: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Faita v EESC (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Psychological harassment — Lack of assistance and a breach of the duty of care — Error of law — Right of defence)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, indemnification, psychological harassment, rights of the defence








C_2015046EN.01005102.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/51





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Faita v EESC
(Case T-619/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Psychological harassment - Lack of assistance and a breach of the duty of care - Error of law - Right of defence))
(2015/C 046/65)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Carla Faita (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, assisted by M. Troncoso Ferrer and F. M. Hislaire, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2013 in Faita v EESC (F-92/11, ECR — SC, EU:F:2013:130), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Ms Carla Faita to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC).






(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2014/847/EU, Euratom of 26 November 2014 amending Decision 90/176/Euratom, EEC authorizing France not to take into account certain categories of transactions and to use certain approximate estimates for the calculation of the VAT own resources base ( OJ L 343, 28.11.2014 )
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, VAT, VAT resource, carriage of passengers, distribution of the tax burden, liberal profession, provision of services








L_2014354EN.01008902.xml










11.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 354/89







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2014/847/EU, Euratom of 26 November 2014 amending Decision 90/176/Euratom, EEC authorizing France not to take into account certain categories of transactions and to use certain approximate estimates for the calculation of the VAT own resources base

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 28 November 2014
)


On page 39, in the preamble:
for:

‘Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 of 29 May 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (1), and in particular the second indent of Article 6(3) thereof,
Whereas:’
;read:

‘Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 of 29 May 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (1), and in particular the second indent of Article 6(3) thereof,
After consulting the Advisory Committee on Own Resources,
Whereas:’
.
Case T-304/13 P: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — van der Aat and Others v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Remuneration — Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other EU staff — Weighting applicable to officials and agents employed in Varese — Articles 64 to 65a of the Staff Regulations — Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Regulation (EU) No 1239/2010 — Duty to state reasons — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, access to information, regulations for civil servants, remuneration of work, servant (EU), social-security benefit








C_2015046EN.01004801.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/48





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — van der Aat and Others v Commission
(Case T-304/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other EU staff - Weighting applicable to officials and agents employed in Varese - Articles 64 to 65a of the Staff Regulations - Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Regulation (EU) No 1239/2010 - Duty to state reasons - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Manifest error of assessment))
(2015/C 046/59)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellants: Chris van der Aat (Besozzo, Italy) and the other officials and EU staff whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: S. Orlandi, D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall and D. Martin, and subsequently by J. Curall and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2013 in van der Aat and Others v Commission (F-111/11, ECR — SC, EU:F:2013:42), seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Chris van der Aat and the other officials and EU staff whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment to bear their own costs and those incurred by the Commission in the present proceedings;










3.


Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs in the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 245, 24.8.2013.