do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014443EN.01001001.xml










11.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 443/10





Euro exchange rates (1)

10 December 2014
(2014/C 443/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2392




JPY


Japanese yen


147,33




DKK


Danish krone


7,4397




GBP


Pound sterling


0,78975




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3276




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2024




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,8765




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,618




HUF


Hungarian forint


307,21




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,45280




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1619




RON


Romanian leu


4,4430




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8000




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4846




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4186




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,6059




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6034




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6263




KRW


South Korean won


1 369,94




ZAR


South African rand


14,2430




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6526




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6680




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 298,55




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3088




PHP


Philippine peso


55,250




RUB


Russian rouble


67,2763




THB


Thai baht


40,658




BRL


Brazilian real


3,2105




MXN


Mexican peso


17,8541




INR


Indian rupee


76,9233






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-498/13: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Vincci Hoteles (NAMMU) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark NAMMU — Relative ground for refusal — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22(2) to (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, manufactured goods, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015034EN.01003701.xml










2.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/37





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Vincci Hoteles (NAMMU)
(Case T-498/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark NAMMU - Relative ground for refusal - Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22(2) to (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))
(2015/C 034/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, T. Boddien, and M. Maier, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Vincci Hoteles SA (Alcobendas, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013 (Case R 611/2012-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Vincci Hoteles SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2014/844/EU, Euratom of 26 November 2014 authorising Malta to use certain approximate estimates for the calculation of the VAT own resources base ( OJ L 343, 28.11.2014 )
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Malta, VAT, VAT resource, carriage of passengers, distribution of the tax burden, provision of services, water supply








L_2014354EN.01008901.xml










11.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 354/89







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2014/844/EU, Euratom of 26 November 2014 authorising Malta to use certain approximate estimates for the calculation of the VAT own resources base

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 28 November 2014
)


On page 33, in the preamble:
for:

‘Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 of 29 May 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (1), and in particular the second indent of Article 6(3) thereof,
Whereas:’
;read:

‘Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 of 29 May 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (1), and in particular the second indent of Article 6(3) thereof,
After consulting the Advisory Committee on Own Resources,
Whereas:’
.
Case F-21/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2014  — Iliopoulou v Europol (Civil service — Europol staff — Europol Convention — Europol Staff Regulations — Decision 2009/371/JHA — Application of the Conditions of Employment to Europol staff — Non-renewal of a temporary fixed-term contract — Refusal to grant a temporary contract for an indefinite term)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, Europol, regulations for civil servants, temporary employment, work contract








C_2015034EN.01004902.xml










2.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/49





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — Iliopoulou v Europol
(Case F-21/14) (1)

((Civil service - Europol staff - Europol Convention - Europol Staff Regulations - Decision 2009/371/JHA - Application of the Conditions of Employment to Europol staff - Non-renewal of a temporary fixed-term contract - Refusal to grant a temporary contract for an indefinite term))
(2015/C 034/59)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Hariklia Iliopoulou (Wassenaar, Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Police Office (represented by: J. Arnould and D. Neumann, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision to not renew, for an indefinite duration, the applicant’s fixed-term contract and to order Europol to pay her the difference between the amount of remuneration to which she would have been entitled had she continued to carry out her duties and the unemployment benefits or any other allowance in lieu which she has received.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application is dismissed.










2.


The European Police Office shall bear its own costs and is ordered to cover half of the costs incurred by Ms Iliopoulou.










3.


Ms Iliopoulou shall bear half of her own costs.






(1)  OJ C 184 of 16/6/2014, p. 42.
Case T-189/13: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — PP Nature-Balance Lizenz v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Active substance tolperisone — Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Commission decision ordering the Member States to vary the national marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing the active substance at issue — Burden of proof — Proportionality)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: market approval, medicinal product, pharmaceutical legislation, principle of proportionality, public safety








C_2015034EN.01003601.xml










2.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/36





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — PP Nature-Balance Lizenz v Commission
(Case T-189/13) (1)

((Medicinal products for human use - Active substance tolperisone - Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC - Commission decision ordering the Member States to vary the national marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing the active substance at issue - Burden of proof - Proportionality))
(2015/C 034/41)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: PP Nature-Balance Lizenz GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Ambrosius, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially B. R. Killmann and M. Šimerdová, then B. R. Killmann and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2013) 369 (final) of 21 January 2013 concerning, in the framework of Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the marketing authorisations for the medicinal products for human use which contain the active substance ‘tolperisone’

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders PP Nature-Balance Lizenz GmbH to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 164, 8.6.2103.
Case T-102/13: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Heli-Flight v EASA (Civil aviation — Application for approval of flight conditions for a Robinson R66 helicopter — Rejection decision of the EASA — Action for annulment — Scope of the Board of Appeal’s review — Scope of the Court’s review — Action for failure to act — Non-contractual liability)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: air safety, air traffic, civil aviation, helicopter, technical standard








C_2015046EN.01004601.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/46





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Heli-Flight v EASA

(Case T-102/13) (1)

((Civil aviation - Application for approval of flight conditions for a Robinson R66 helicopter - Rejection decision of the EASA - Action for annulment - Scope of the Board of Appeal’s review - Scope of the Court’s review - Action for failure to act - Non-contractual liability))
(2015/C 046/56)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG (Reichelsheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Kittner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (represented by: T. Masing and C. Eckart, lawyers)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the decision of the EASA of 13 January 2012 rejecting the applicant’s application for approval of flight conditions submitted for a Robinson R66 helicopter (serial number 0034); secondly, application for a declaration that the EASA failed to act concerning the processing of the applicant’s applications of 11 July 2011 and 10 January 2012 concerning that helicopter and, thirdly, claim that the EASA should make good the damage that the applicant considers it has suffered because of that rejection decision and that alleged failure to act.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
Case T-259/12: Order of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Alban Giacomo v Commission
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: bolt and screw industry, fine, glass, restriction on competition








C_2015056EN.01003001.xml










16.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 56/30





Order of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Alban Giacomo v Commission
(Case T-259/12) (1)

(2015/C 056/41)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
Case C-677/13: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 December 2014  — European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 1999/31/EC — Articles 6(a), 8, 9(a) to (c), 11(1) and 12 — Directive 2008/98/EC — Articles 13, 23 and 36(1) — Waste management — Placing of waste in landfill — No valid landfill authorisation — Malfunctions in the operation of the landfill site)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Greece, infringement of EU law, prevention of pollution, unauthorised dumping, waste disposal








C_2015046EN.01001501.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/15





Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
(Case C-677/13) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 1999/31/EC - Articles 6(a), 8, 9(a) to (c), 11(1) and 12 - Directive 2008/98/EC - Articles 13, 23 and 36(1) - Waste management - Placing of waste in landfill - No valid landfill authorisation - Malfunctions in the operation of the landfill site))
(2015/C 046/20)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Patakia and E. Sanfrutos Cano, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Skandalou, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares, as regards the Kiato landfill site, that:






—


by failing to take the necessary measures to ensure that waste management at the Kiato landfill site is carried out without endangering human health and without harming the environment and to ensure that the abandonment, dumping or uncontrolled management of waste at said landfill site is prohibited, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 13 and 36(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives;










—


by tolerating the operation of the said landfill site without a valid permit complying with the conditions and content laid down for the grant of such a permit and, consequently, without the holder of the waste or the operator of the said landfill site being able to prove, before or at the time of delivery of the waste, that the waste can be accepted at the site in accordance with the conditions set out in the permit, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 8, 9(a) to (c) and 11(1)(a) of Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste and Article 23 of Directive 2008/98; and










—


in failing to ensure that, during the operational phase of a landfill, the operator implements the control and monitoring programme referred to in Annex III to Directive 1999/31, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(a) of that directive.














2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Case T-251/11: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Austria v Commission (State aid — Electricity — Aid for energy-intensive businesses — Austrian Green Electricity Act — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — State resources — State imputability — Selective nature — General Block Exemption Regulation — Misuse of power — Equal treatment)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, energy industry, equal treatment, renewable energy








C_2015046EN.01004201.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/42





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Austria v Commission
(Case T-251/11) (1)

((State aid - Electricity - Aid for energy-intensive businesses - Austrian Green Electricity Act - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - State resources - State imputability - Selective nature - General Block Exemption Regulation - Misuse of power - Equal treatment))
(2015/C 046/50)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer, J. Bauer, acting as Agents, assisted by T. Rabl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: V. Kreuschitz and T. Maxian Rusche, then by T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by: S. Behzadi-Spencer and S. Ossowski, then by S. Behzadi-Spencer and L. Christie, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/528/EU of 8 March 2011 on State Aid C-24/09 (ex N 446/08) — State aid for energy-intensive businesses under the Green Electricity Act in Austria (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 42).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs;










3.


Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.
Case F-31/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 11 December 2014  — Colart and Others v Parliament (Civil Service — Staff representation — Staff committee — Staff Committee elections — Rules on staff representation at the European Parliament — Competence of the Committee of Tellers — Complaints procedure before the Committee of Tellers — Publication of the election results — Complaint brought before the Committee of Tellers — Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — No prior complaint before the appointing authority — Matter referred directly to the Tribunal — Inadmissibilty)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, election, workers' representation








C_2015034EN.01004801.xml










2.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/48





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — Colart and Others v Parliament
(Case F-31/14) (1)

((Civil Service - Staff representation - Staff committee - Staff Committee elections - Rules on staff representation at the European Parliament - Competence of the Committee of Tellers - Complaints procedure before the Committee of Tellers - Publication of the election results - Complaint brought before the Committee of Tellers - Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - No prior complaint before the appointing authority - Matter referred directly to the Tribunal - Inadmissibilty))
(2015/C 034/57)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Philippe Colart (Bastogne, Belgium) and Others (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and S. Alves, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the elections for the Staff Committee of the European Parliament which were held in autumn 2013 and the results of which were published on 28 November 2013.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action as inadmissible;










2.


Declares that Mr Colart and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex are to bear half of their own costs;










3.


Declares that the European Parliament is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay half of the costs incurred by the applicants.






(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014, p. 45.
Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on measuring instruments (Withdrawal of the publication of the references to normative documents drawn up by OIML and the list of the parts thereof corresponding to the essential requirements)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EC conformity marking, European standard, measuring equipment, metrology, taxi, technical standard








C_2014443EN.01000601.xml










11.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 443/6





Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on measuring instruments (1)

(Withdrawal of the publication of the references to normative documents drawn up by OIML and the list of the parts thereof corresponding to the essential requirements)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 443/02)
The publication of the reference concerning taximeters (MI-007) in relation to OIML R21, edition 2007 (2), is withdrawn as of 180 days after the date of this publication. EC type examination certificates issued on the basis of this normative document before its withdrawal remain valid until the end of their validity without any restriction on the placing on the market or the putting into use of instruments of this type.


(1)  OJ L 135, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

(2)  OJ C 268, 10.11.2009, p. 1.
Case C-99/14 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 December 2014  — Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeals — State aid — Decision 2010/787/EU — Aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines — Conditions for considering that aid compatible with the internal market — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, cessation of trading, coal mining, control of State aid, mining operation








C_2015065EN.01001701.xml










23.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/17





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) v Council of the European Union, European Commission
(Case C-99/14 P) (1)

((Appeals - State aid - Decision 2010/787/EU - Aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines - Conditions for considering that aid compatible with the internal market - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court))
(2015/C 065/24)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) (represented by: K. Desai, solicitor, and S. Cisnal de Ugarte, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Florindo Gijón and P. Mahnič Bruni, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, É. Gippini Fournier and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders La Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.
Case C-253/14 P: Appeal brought on 26 May 2014 by FTI Touristik GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 21 March 2014 in Case T-81/13 FTI Touristik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, travel agency








C_2015046EN.01001602.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/16





Appeal brought on 26 May 2014 by FTI Touristik GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 21 March 2014 in Case T-81/13 FTI Touristik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-253/14 P)
(2015/C 046/22)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: FTI Touristik GmbH (represented by: A. Parr, Rechtsanwältin)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its order of 11 December 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.7468 — Oji Holdings/Itochu Corporation/Sales and Production JVs)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-12-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Japan, economic concentration, electrical energy, energy industry, merger control, pulp and paper industry








C_2014443EN.01000602.xml










11.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 443/6





Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.7468 — Oji Holdings/Itochu Corporation/Sales and Production JVs)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 443/03)
(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)
On 27 November 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between Oji Green Resources Co., Ltd and Itochu Enex Co., Ltd. On 5 December 2014, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.