do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-307/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2014  — Capella v OHIM — Oribay Mirror Buttons (ORIBAY) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community figurative mark ORIBAY ORIginal Buttons for Automotive Yndustry — Admissibility of the application for revocation)
Date: 2014-12-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015034EN.01003602.xml










2.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/36





Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Capella v OHIM — Oribay Mirror Buttons (ORIBAY)
(Case T-307/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community figurative mark ORIBAY ORIginal Buttons for Automotive Yndustry - Admissibility of the application for revocation))
(2015/C 034/42)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Capella EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented: initially by M. Holtorf, subsequently by A. Theis, and lastly by F. Henkel, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by G. Schneider, and subsequently by J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Oribay Mirror Buttons, SL (San Sebastián, Spain) (represented by: A. Velázquez Ibañez, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 March 2013 (Case R 164/2012-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Capella EOOD and Oribay Mirror Buttons, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 March 2013 (Case R 164/2012-4);










2)


Declares that OHIM is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Capella EOOD;










3)


Declares that Oribay Mirror Buttons, SL is to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Case C-261/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 December 2014  — Peter Schönberger v European Parliament (Appeal — Petition addressed to the European Parliament — Decision to file the petition — Action for annulment — Concept of a ‘challengeable act’ )
Date: 2014-12-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: judicial proceedings, petition, powers of the institutions (EU)








C_2015046EN.01000801.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/8





Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 December 2014 — Peter Schönberger v European Parliament
(Case C-261/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Petition addressed to the European Parliament - Decision to file the petition - Action for annulment - Concept of a ‘challengeable act’))
(2015/C 046/10)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Peter Schönberger (represented by: O. Mader, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: U. Rösslein and E. Waldherr, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the appeal;










2)


Orders Mr Peter Schönberger to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Case T-90/10: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2014  — Ferriere Nord v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Competence of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Finding of an infringement — Fines — Repeated infringements — Extenuating circumstances — Cooperation — Full jurisdiction)
Date: 2014-12-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: concrete, deadline for payment, fine, fixing of prices, infringement of EU law, restriction on competition, rights of the defence








C_2015034EN.01002402.xml










2.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/24





Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Ferriere Nord v Commission
(Case T-90/10) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils - Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Fixing of prices and payment terms - Limiting or controlling output or sales - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Competence of the Commission - Rights of the defence - Finding of an infringement - Fines - Repeated infringements - Extenuating circumstances - Cooperation - Full jurisdiction))
(2015/C 034/27)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Ferriere Nord SpA (Osoppo, Italy) (represented by: W. Viscardini and G. Donà, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by R. Sauer and B. Gencarelli, and subsequently by M. Sauer and R. Striani, acting as Agents, assisted by M. Moretto, lawyer)

Re:

Primarily, application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 7492 final of 30 September 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 65 [CS] (Case COMP/37.956 — Reinforcing bars, readoption), as amended by Commission Decision C(2009) 9912 final of 8 December 2009, and in the alternative application for partial annulment of that decision and application for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Fixes the amount of the fine imposed on Ferriere Nord SpA at EUR 3 4 21  440;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders Ferriere Nord to bear its own costs and to pay three-quarters of the costs incurred by the European Commission; orders the Commission to bear one-quarter of its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.