do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-109/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 3 December 2014  — DG v ENISA (Civil service — Temporary staff — Termination of contract — No statement of reasons — Failure to comply with the reports procedure — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, damages, economic rights, indemnification, payment, servant (EU), staff assessment








C_2015026EN.01004302.xml










26.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/43





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 3 December 2014 — DG v ENISA
(Case F-109/13) (1)

((Civil service - Temporary staff - Termination of contract - No statement of reasons - Failure to comply with the reports procedure - Manifest error of assessment))
(2015/C 026/56)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: DG (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (represented initially by P. Empadinhas, acting as Agent, and by C. Meidanis, lawyer, and subsequently by P. Empadinhas and S. Purser, acting as Agents, and by C. Meidanis, lawyer)

Re:

Application to annul the decision to dismiss the applicant, to order her reinstatement and the payment of the financial benefits that should have been paid to her from the end of her contract, after deduction of any income received during the same period, together with interest calculated at 3 points above the rate fixed by the ECB, and for compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1)


Dismisses the action.










2)


Declares that DG is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security.






(1)  OJ C 15, 18.1.2014, p. 21.
Case T-806/14: Action brought on 3 December 2014 — August Storck v OHIM (Representation of a square-shaped packaging in white and blue)
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015046EN.01005901.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/59





Action brought on 3 December 2014 — August Storck v OHIM (Representation of a square-shaped packaging in white and blue)
(Case T-806/14)
(2015/C 046/76)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: August Storck KG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, I. Rohr, T. Melchert and A. Richter, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark (Representation of a packaging in the shape of a square) — International registration No 1 169 244 designating the European Union

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2014 in Case R 644/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the contested decision;










—


Order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-315/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 December 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Mechelen — Belgium) — Criminal proceedings against Edgard Jan De Clercq and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom to provide services — Articles 56 TFEU and 57 TFEU — Directive 96/71/EC — Article 3(1) and (10) — Directive 2006/123/EC — Article 19 — National legislation requiring the person to whom posted employees or trainees are deployed to declare those who are unable to submit the acknowledgement of receipt of the declaration which should have been made to the host Member State by their employer established in another Member State — Criminal penalty)
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative formalities, fraud, labour mobility, prevention of delinquency, provision of services, traineeship, wage earner, working conditions








C_2015046EN.01001001.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/10





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 December 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Mechelen — Belgium) — Criminal proceedings against Edgard Jan De Clercq and Others
(Case C-315/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom to provide services - Articles 56 TFEU and 57 TFEU - Directive 96/71/EC - Article 3(1) and (10) - Directive 2006/123/EC - Article 19 - National legislation requiring the person to whom posted employees or trainees are deployed to declare those who are unable to submit the acknowledgement of receipt of the declaration which should have been made to the host Member State by their employer established in another Member State - Criminal penalty))
(2015/C 046/12)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Mechelen

Parties in the main proceedings

Edgard Jan De Clercq, Emiel Amede Rosa De Clercq, Nancy Genevieve Wilhelmina Rottiers, Ermelinda Jozef Martha Tampère, Thermotec NV

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 56 TFEU and 57 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which the recipient of services performed by workers posted by a service provider established in another Member State is required to declare to the competent authorities, before those workers begin to work, the data identifying those workers who are unable to submit proof of the declaration which their employer should have made to the competent authorities of that host Member State prior to the commencement of that provision of services, since such legislation is capable of being justified as safeguarding an overriding ground of public interest, such as the protection of workers or the combating of social security fraud, on condition that it is established that that legislation is appropriate for ensuring the attainment of the legitimate objective or objectives pursued and that it does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve them, these being matters for the referring court to determine.


(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7460 — Scholz Recycling/Thyssen Alfa Rohstoffhandel/Noris Metallrecycling JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, metal waste, metallurgical industry, raw material








C_2014433EN.01001701.xml










3.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 433/17





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7460 — Scholz Recycling/Thyssen Alfa Rohstoffhandel/Noris Metallrecycling JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 433/06)






1.


On 21 November 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Scholz Recycling GmbH (‘Scholz Recycling’ of Germany) and Thyssen ALFA Rohstoffhandel München GmbH (‘Thyssen ALFA Rohstoffhandel’ of Germany) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Noris Metallrecycling GmbH (‘Noris Metallrecycling’ of Germany) by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Scholz Recycling: active in the collection, processing and trading of ferrous and non-ferrous scrap and steel.
—   for Thyssen ALFA Rohstoffhandel: active in the recycling and trading of secondary raw materials for steel plants and foundries.
—   for Noris Metallrecycling: will be active in the collection, processing and trading of non-ferrous and iron-nickel alloy scrap.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7460 — Scholz Recycling/Thyssen Alfa Rohstoffhandel/Noris Metallrecycling JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Ireland, Irish Sea, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014433EN.01000701.xml










3.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 433/7





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2014/C 433/04)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


24.10.2014




Duration


24.10.2014-31.12.2014




Member State


Ireland




Stock or Group of stocks


PLE/7HJK.




Species


Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)




Zone


VIIh, VIIj and VIIk




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


72/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-689/14 P: Order of the General Court of 3 December 2014  — ENISA v Psarras
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: accountant, damages, dismissal, indemnification, rights of the defence, servant (EU), termination of a contract








C_2015056EN.01003103.xml










16.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 56/31





Order of the General Court of 3 December 2014 — ENISA v Psarras
(Case T-689/14 P) (1)

(2015/C 056/45)
Language of the case: Greek
The President of the Appeal Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.7417 — Sime Darby / New Britain Palm Oil)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: cattle, economic concentration, energy industry, engine, industrial equipment, meat product, merger control, property development, sugar, vegetable oil








C_2014433EN.01000101.xml










3.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 433/1





Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.7417 — Sime Darby / New Britain Palm Oil)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 433/01)
(Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004)
On 31 October 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between Sime Darby Bhd and New Britain Palm Oil Limited. On 27 November 2014, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.
Case T-272/13: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2014  — Max Mara Fashion Group v OHIM — Mackays Stores (M&Co.) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark M&Co. — Earlier Community and national figurative marks MAX&Co. — Earlier national word mark MAX&CO. — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015026EN.01002601.xml










26.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/26





Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2014 — Max Mara Fashion Group v OHIM — Mackays Stores (M&Co.)
(Case T-272/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark M&Co. - Earlier Community and national figurative marks MAX&Co. - Earlier national word mark MAX&CO. - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 026/31)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Max Mara Fashion Group Srl (Turin, Italy) (represented by: F. Terrano, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Mackays Stores Ltd (Renfrew, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Gould and K. Passmore, Solicitors, J. Baldwin, Barrister, and M. Howe QC)

Re:

Action for the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 March 2013 (Case R 1199/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Max Mara Fashion Group Srl and Mackays Stores Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Max Mara Fashion Group Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Case C-555/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo N ° 6 de Murcia (Spain) lodged on 3 December 2014  — IOS Finance EFC SA v Servicio Murciano de Salud
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, administrative formalities, debt, payment, trading operation








C_2015056EN.01001001.xml










16.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 56/10





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 6 de Murcia (Spain) lodged on 3 December 2014 — IOS Finance EFC SA v Servicio Murciano de Salud
(Case C-555/14)
(2015/C 056/12)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 6 de Murcia

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: IOS Finance EFC SA

Defendant: Servicio Murciano de Salud

Questions referred

‘‘Regard being had to Articles 4(1), 6 and 7(2) and (3) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 (1) on combating late payment in commercial transactions:






1)


Must Article 7(2) of the directive be interpreted as meaning that a Member State may not make recovery of the principal debt conditional on the waiver of the right to interest for late payment?










2)


Must Article 7(3) of the directive be interpreted as meaning that a Member State may not make recovery of the principal debt conditional on the waiver of the right to compensation for recovery costs?










3)


Should the answer to those two questions be in the affirmative, where the debtor is a contracting authority, can it rely on the freedom of contract of the parties in order to avoid its obligation to pay interest for late payment and compensation for recovery costs?’






(1)  OJ 2011 L 48, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1014/2014 of 22 July 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2328/2003, (EC) No 861/2006, (EC) No 1198/2006 and (EC) No 791/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 1255/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regards to the content and construction of a common monitoring and evaluation system for the operations funded under the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund ( OJ L 283, 27.9.2014 )
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU control, European fisheries fund, aquaculture, common fisheries policy, financial control, maritime law, shipping policy, sustainable development








L_2014347EN.01004601.xml










3.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 347/46







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1014/2014 of 22 July 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2328/2003, (EC) No 861/2006, (EC) No 1198/2006 and (EC) No 791/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 1255/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regards to the content and construction of a common monitoring and evaluation system for the operations funded under the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 283 of 27 September 2014
)


On page 16, in the Annex, Part II ‘Output indicators’, Section ‘Union priority 4 — Increasing employment and territorial cohesion (Number of projects, except 1)’:
for:







‘1.


Number of local development strategies implemented’




;read:







‘1.


Number of local development strategies selected’




;on page 17, in the Annex, Part III ‘Result indicators’, Section ‘Union priority 1 — Promoting environmentally sustainable, resource efficient, innovative, competitive and knowledge based fisheries’:
for:







‘5.


Change in fuel efficiency of fish capture (in litres of fuel/EUR landed catch)’




;read:







‘5.


Change in fuel efficiency of fish capture (in litres of fuel/tonnes landed catch)’




;on page 19, in the Annex, Part III ‘Result indicators’, Section ‘Union priority 4 — Increasing employment and territorial cohesion’:
for:







‘1.


Employment created (FTE) in the aquaculture sector’




;read:







‘1.


Employment created (FTE)’




;on page 19, in the Annex, Part III ‘Result indicators’, Section ‘Union priority 4 — Increasing employment and territorial cohesion’:
for:







‘2.


Employment maintained (FTE) in the aquaculture sector’




;read:







‘2.


Employment maintained (FTE)’




.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,05 % on 1 December 2014 — Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-12-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest








C_2014433EN.01000601.xml










3.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 433/6





Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
0,05 % on 1 December 2014
Euro exchange rates (2)

2 December 2014
(2014/C 433/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2424




JPY


Japanese yen


148,08




DKK


Danish krone


7,4406




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79360




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2795




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2040




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,6970




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,605




HUF


Hungarian forint


306,93




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1637




RON


Romanian leu


4,4288




TRY


Turkish lira


2,7655




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4720




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4125




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,6348




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5884




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6242




KRW


South Korean won


1 382,24




ZAR


South African rand


13,7499




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6413




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6755




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 272,20




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2705




PHP


Philippine peso


55,649




RUB


Russian rouble


66,2670




THB


Thai baht


40,825




BRL


Brazilian real


3,1875




MXN


Mexican peso


17,4172




INR


Indian rupee


76,8834






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.