do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-142/11 DEP: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 December 2014  — Erik Simpson v Council (Civil service — Procedure — Taxation of costs)
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, administrative competition, damages, indemnification, promotion








C_2015026EN.01004501.xml










26.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/45





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 December 2014 — Erik Simpson v Council
(Case F-142/11 DEP) (1)

((Civil service - Procedure - Taxation of costs))
(2015/C 026/58)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Erik Simpson (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A.F. Jensen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 9 after he had passed Open Competition EPSO/AD/113/07 ‘Heads of Unit (AD 9) in the field of translation who have Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak and Slovene as their main language’ and an application for compensation.

Operative part of the order

The total amount of costs to be reimbursed by the Council of the European Union to Mr Simpson by way of recoverable costs in Case F-142/11 is fixed in the amount of EUR 8  600, to be increased by any value added tax due on that amount.


(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 26.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1276/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic applies
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Central African Republic, data processing, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2014432EN.01000501.xml










2.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/5





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1276/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic applies
(2014/C 432/04)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).
The legal basis for this processing operation is Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1276/2014 (3).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation EU) No 224/2014 (4) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1276/2014.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (5).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 70, 11.3.2014, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 346, 2.12.2014, p. 19.

(4)  OJ L 70, 11.3.2014, p. 1.

(5)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Case C-549/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 2 December 2014  — Finn Frogne A/S v Rigspolitiet ved Center for Beredskabskommunikation
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, interpretation of the law, invitation to tender, services contract, supplies contract, works contract








C_2015056EN.01000801.xml










16.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 56/8





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 2 December 2014 — Finn Frogne A/S v Rigspolitiet ved Center for Beredskabskommunikation
(Case C-549/14)
(2015/C 056/10)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Højesteret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Finn Frogne A/S

Defendant: Rigspolitiet ved Center for Beredskabskommunikation

Question referred

Is Article 2 of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, read in conjunction with the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Pressetext Nachrichtenagentur v Austria, C-454/06, ECR, ECLI:EU:C:2008:351, and Wall v La ville de Francfort-sur-le-Main and Frankfurter Entsorgungs- und Service (FES), C-91/08, ECR, ECLI:EU:C:2010:182, to be interpreted as meaning that a settlement agreement which introduces limitations on and amendments to the services to be provided as originally agreed by the parties under a contract previously put out to tender and also mutual agreement to waive application of remedies for breach in order to avoid a subsequent litigation constitutes a contract which in itself requires a tendering procedure, in a situation where the original contract has become distressed?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014432EN.01000601.xml










2.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/6





Euro exchange rates (1)

1 December 2014
(2014/C 432/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2469




JPY


Japanese yen


147,62




DKK


Danish krone


7,4401




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79270




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2562




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2028




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,6745




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,626




HUF


Hungarian forint


306,43




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1782




RON


Romanian leu


4,4335




TRY


Turkish lira


2,7673




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4681




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4213




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,6691




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5838




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6285




KRW


South Korean won


1 381,40




ZAR


South African rand


13,7542




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6742




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6758




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 317,53




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2720




PHP


Philippine peso


55,869




RUB


Russian rouble


65,2758




THB


Thai baht


40,958




BRL


Brazilian real


3,1991




MXN


Mexican peso


17,3472




INR


Indian rupee


77,3564






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: EU Official Journal, administrative competition, job vacancy








CA2014432EN.01000301.xml










2.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 432/3





REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS
(2014/C 432 A/02)
Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.






5


 




6


 




11


 




19


 




21


 




26


 




27


 




30


(PL)




35


 




41


(DE/EN/FR)




42


 




43


 




46


 




47


 




48


 




55


 




56


 




60


 




62


 




65


 




73


(DE/EN/FR)




74


 




81


 




88


 




92


(DE/EN/FR)




97


 




98


 




99


 




108


 




109


 




116


 




119


 




133


 




134


 




136


 




137


(DE/EN/FR)




140


 




145


 




152


 




160


 




163


 




164


 




176


 




178


 




180


 




182


 




185


 




186


 




188


 




195


 




207


 




209


(DE/EN/FR)




211


 




217


 




219


 




242


 




254


 




255


 




256


(LV)




258


(RO)




262


(EN)




267


(SL)




270


(FR)




272


(DA)




274


(IT)




277


 




283


 




289


(DE/EN/FR)




293


(NL)




295


(MT)




297


 




299


 




304


 




321


(DE/EN/FR)




325


(SL)




332


 




334


 




340


 




342


(EN)




352


 




354


 




358


 




366


 




376


 




378


(SV)




381


 




384


 




385


(PT)




390


(HR)




391


 




410


 




412


 




425


(EN/IT/LT)




427


 




432
Case T-75/13: Judgment of the General Court of 2 December 2014  — Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma v OHIM — Nepentes Pharma (Momarid) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark Momarid — Earlier Community word mark LONARID — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relevant public — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015026EN.01002502.xml










26.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/25





Judgment of the General Court of 2 December 2014 — Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma v OHIM — Nepentes Pharma (Momarid)
(Case T-75/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Momarid - Earlier Community word mark LONARID - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Relevant public - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 026/30)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG (Ingelheim, Germany) (represented initially by: V. von Bomhard and D. Slopek, and subsequently by V. von Bomhard, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Nepentes Pharma sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: C. Bercial Arias, K. Dimidjian-Lecompte and C. Casalonga, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 November 2012 (Case R 2292/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG and Nepentes S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 November 2012 (Case R 2292/2011-4) as regards ‘chemicals for pharmaceutical use’;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.
Call for competition for the selection of the T2S Board non-central bank members and the creation of a reserve list — Ref.: PRO-000373
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: European Central Bank, appointment of members, competition (EU), decision-making body (EU)








CA2014432EN.01000101.xml










2.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 432/1





Call for competition for the selection of the T2S Board non-central bank members and the creation of a reserve list
Ref.: PRO-000373
(2014/C 432 A/01)
With this call for competition, the European Central Bank (ECB) is launching the process for the selection of the T2S Board non-central bank members and the creation of a reserve list.
1.   Background information

In line with the Treaty and the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, the Eurosystem will offer its T2S services to central securities depositories (CSDs) in Europe. The overall objective of T2S is to facilitate post-trading integration by supporting core, borderless and neutral pan-European cash and securities settlement in central bank money so that CSDs can provide their customers with harmonised and commoditised settlement services in an integrated technical environment with cross-border capabilities.
The T2S Board includes members who provide the perspective of the clients/users of T2S services without being associated with any specific client/user (i.e. non-central bank members). These members do not have a voting right.
The ECB organises this call for competition for the selection of non-central bank members for the T2S Board and the creation of a reserve list for their replacement.
2.   Place of performance of services

The place of provision of services is mainly at the ECB premises, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, and involves travel to other European locations.
3.   Type of procedure: call for competition

The ECB invites applications with a view to select two candidates as non-central bank members of the T2S Board and to create a reserve list for their replacement. The selection is solely based on the quality of the applications made.
The procedure shall be governed by Annex IV to Decision ECB/2012/6 of the European Central Bank of 29 March 2012 on the establishment of the TARGET2-Securities Board and repealing Decision ECB/2009/6 (1).
4.   Complete documentation

The complete documentation (in English version) laying down, inter alia, the criteria for the inclusion on the list and the conditions for submission of applications can be downloaded from the ECB website under the following link:

Documentation for the call for competition:

http://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/t2s/progress/pdf/2014-11-05_call_for_expression_of_interest.pdf

T2S website: http://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/t2s/about/spotlight/html/index.en.html


(1)  OJ L 117, 1.5.2012, p. 13.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7470 — Schibsted/Telenor/SoBazaar JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Internet, economic concentration, means of communication, merger control, telecommunications industry








C_2014432EN.01000701.xml










2.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/7





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7470 — Schibsted/Telenor/SoBazaar JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 432/06)






1.


On 24 November 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Schibsted ASA (‘Schibsted’, Norway) and Telenor ASA (‘Telenor’, Norway) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of SoBazaar AS (‘SoBazaar’, Norway), a newly created company constituting a joint venture, by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Schibsted: various activities in the media sector, including print and online media,
—   for Telenor: various services in the fields of telecommunications, television, broadcasting and internet,
—   for SoBazaar: online social fashion platform that Telenor currently operates under the brand SOBAZAAR.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7470 — Schibsted/Telenor/SoBazaar JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case F-110/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 2 December 2014  — Migliore v Commission (Promotion — Certification procedure — 2013 procedure — Exclusion of the applicant from the definitive list of officials authorised to follow the training programme — Article 45a of the Staff Regulations)
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Community certification, European official, regulations for civil servants, teaching curriculum, vocational training








C_2015026EN.01004401.xml










26.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/44





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 2 December 2014 — Migliore v Commission
(Case F-110/13) (1)

((Promotion - Certification procedure - 2013 procedure - Exclusion of the applicant from the definitive list of officials authorised to follow the training programme - Article 45a of the Staff Regulations))
(2015/C 026/57)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Nunzio Migliore (Sterrebeek, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Tymen and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision excluding the applicant from the list of candidates authorised to participate in the ‘certification’ training programme in 2013.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Declares that Mr Migliore is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014, p. 41.
Case T-661/11: Judgment of the General Court of 2 December 2014  — Italy v Commission (EAGGF — ‘Guarantee’ Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Milk products — Assigned revenue — Key controls — Lateness — Flat-rate financial correction — Legal basis — Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002  — Recurrence)
Date: 2014-12-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, EAGGF, Italy, agricultural quota, aid to agriculture, milk product, terms for aid








C_2015026EN.01002501.xml










26.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/25





Judgment of the General Court of 2 December 2014 — Italy v Commission
(Case T-661/11) (1)

((EAGGF - ‘Guarantee’ Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Milk products - Assigned revenue - Key controls - Lateness - Flat-rate financial correction - Legal basis - Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 - Recurrence))
(2015/C 026/29)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and G. Aiello and P. Grasso, avvocati dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2011/689/EC of 14 October 2011 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2011 L 270, p. 33), in so far as it imposes on the Italian Republic a flat-rate financial correction of EUR 7 0 9 12  382 in respect of irregularities in controls concerning milk quotas, found in the Italian regions of Abruzzo, Lazio, Marche, Puglia, Sardinia, Calabria, Friuli Venezia Guilia and Valle d’Aosta, in the years 2004/2005, 2005/2006 and 2006/2007.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.