do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-131/14: Action brought on 16 November 2014  — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2014-11-16
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: remuneration of work, work schedule








C_2015007EN.01006102.xml










12.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/61





Action brought on 16 November 2014 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-131/14)
(2015/C 007/80)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to increase the salary of the applicant, who is a member of the contract staff, following the increase in working hours to 40 hours a week as a result of the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations on 1 January 2014.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:






—


Annul his salary slip in respect of January 2014 in so far as it records and lays down discrimination in terms of salary between himself and a colleague who, working in the same sector as he is and with less responsibility than him, is better paid in terms of gross salary than he is;










—


Order the defendant to pay all the costs of the proceedings.
Case C-516/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 17 November 2014  — Barlis 06 — Investimentos Imobiliários e Turísticos SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
Date: 2014-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, consumer information, interpretation of the law, invoicing, provision of services, public service








C_2015034EN.01001101.xml










2.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/11





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 17 November 2014 — Barlis 06 — Investimentos Imobiliários e Turísticos SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
(Case C-516/14)
(2015/C 034/11)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Barlis 06 — Investimentos Imobiliários e Turísticos SA

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Question referred

Must Article 226(6) of the VAT Directive (1) be interpreted as permitting the Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira [Portuguese Tax and Customs Authority] to regard as insufficient a description on an invoice which states ‘legal services rendered from such a date until the present date’ or merely ‘legal services rendered until the present date’, where that body may, in accordance with the principle of collaboration, obtain the additional information which it deems necessary to confirm the existence and detailed characteristics of the relevant transactions?


(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax.

OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.