do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-328/13: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014  — Tameio Pronoias Prosopikou Trapezis Kyprou v Commission and ECB (Action for annulment — Cyprus stability support programme — Declaration of the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus — Erroneous identification of the defendant in the application — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Cyprus, aid for restructuring, bank, stability programme








C_2014448EN.01002202.xml










15.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 448/22





Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Tameio Pronoias Prosopikou Trapezis Kyprou v Commission and ECB
(Case T-328/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Cyprus stability support programme - Declaration of the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus - Erroneous identification of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility))
(2014/C 448/29)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Tameio Pronoias Prosopikou Trapezis Kyprou (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: E. Efstathiou, K. Efstathiou and K. Liasidou, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P. Keppenne and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, acting as Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the declaration of the Eurogroup of 25 March 2013 concerning, inter alia, the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Tameio Pronoias Prosopikou Trapezis Kyprou is ordered to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
Case T-26/14 P: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014  — Schönberger v Court of Auditors (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2011 promotion year — Guiding multiplication rates — Inter partes proceedings)
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, equal treatment, judgment of the Court (EU), promotion








C_2014421EN.01004102.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/41





Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Schönberger v Court of Auditors
(Case T-26/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2011 promotion year - Guiding multiplication rates - Inter partes proceedings))
2014/C 421/58
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Peter Schönberger (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: O. Mader, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: B. Schäfer and I. Ní Riagáin Düro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 November 2013 in Schönberger v Court of Auditors (F-14/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:167), seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 November 2013 in Schönberger v Court of Auditors (F-14/12);










2.


Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 93, 29.3.2014.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7342 — Alcoa/Firth Rixson)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, metallurgical industry








C_2014366EN.01002301.xml










16.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 366/23





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7342 — Alcoa/Firth Rixson)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 366/07






1.


On 8 October 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Alcoa Inc. (‘Alcoa’, United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Firth Rixson (United Kingdom) by way of purchase of shares. The same concentration was already notified to the Commission on 11 September 2014, but subsequently withdrawn on 8 October 2014.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Alcoa: engineering and manufacturing of lightweight metals, including aluminium, titanium, nickel and cobalt products, for aerospace, automotive, power generation and other applications,
—   for Firth Rixson: manufacturing of engineered products, in particular specialty metals, seamless rolled and flash-welded rings, disks, closed and open die forgings and extruded forgings for aerospace, power generation, oil and gas and other applications.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7342 — Alcoa/Firth Rixson, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case T-177/10: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014  — Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission (State aid — Electricity — Preferential tariff — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Advantage — Obligation to state reasons — Amount of the aid — New aid)
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, price of energy








C_2014421EN.01002702.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/27





Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission
(Case T-177/10) (1)

((State aid - Electricity - Preferential tariff - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Obligation to state reasons - Amount of the aid - New aid))
2014/C 421/37
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl (Portoscuso, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, T. Müller-Ibold, F. Salerno, G. Scassellati Sforzolini and G. Rizza, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Gippini Fournier, agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and S. Fiorentino, avvocato dello Stato)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/460/EC of 19 November 2009 relating to State Aid C 38/A/04 (ex NN 58/2004) and C 36/B/2006 (ex NN 38/2006) granted by Italy in favour of Alcoa Trasformazioni (OJ 2010, L 227, p. 62).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the application for interim measures;










3.


Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.
Case T-459/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014  — Larrañaga Otaño v OHIM (GRAPHENE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark GRAPHENE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2014421EN.01004001.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/40





Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Larrañaga Otaño v OHIM (GRAPHENE)
(Case T-459/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark GRAPHENE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 421/55
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Joseba Larrañaga Otaño (San Sebastián, Spain) and Mikel Larrañaga Otaño (San Sebastián) (represented by: F. Bueno Salamero, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 June 2013 (Case R 210/2013-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign GRAPHENE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Joseba Larrañaga Otaño and Mikel Larrañaga Otaño to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Spain, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014366EN.01000302.xml










16.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 366/3





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
2014/C 366/04
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


16.9.2014




Duration


16.9.2014–31.12.2014




Member State


Spain




Stock or Group of stocks


BSF/8910




Species


Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo)




Zone


EU and international waters of VIII, IX and X




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


54/DSS






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-332/13: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014  — Christodoulou and Stavrinou v Commission and ECB (Action for annulment — Support programme for stability in Cyprus — Statement by the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus — Incorrect designation of the defendant in the application — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Cyprus, aid for restructuring, bank, stability programme








C_2014448EN.01002501.xml










15.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 448/25





Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Christodoulou and Stavrinou v Commission and ECB
(Case T-332/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Support programme for stability in Cyprus - Statement by the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus - Incorrect designation of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility))
(2014/C 448/33)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicants: Chrisanthi Christodoulou (Paphos, Cyprus) and Maria Stavrinou (Larnaka, Cyprus) (represented by: E. Efstathiou, K. Efstathiou and K. Liasidou, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P. Keppene, M. Konstantinidis, Agents) and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, Agents, and W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the statement of the Eurogroup of 25 March 2013 concerning, inter alia, the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Mrs Chrisanthi Christodoulou and Mrs Maria Stavrinou are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB).






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, Belgium, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014366EN.01000301.xml










16.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 366/3





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
2014/C 366/03
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


13.9.2014




Duration


13.9.2014–31.12.2014




Member State


Belgium




Stock or group of stocks


HKE/8ABDE.




Species


Hake (Merluccius merluccius)




Zone


VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


48/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-129/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014  — Alpiq RomIndustries and Alpiq RomEnergie v Commission (State aid — Electricity — Preferential tariffs — Decision to open the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU — Action for annulment — Act not subject to appeal — Aid measure implemented in full prior to the date on which the action was brought — Inadmissible)
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Romania, State aid, control of State aid, electricity supply, price of energy, terms for aid








C_2014421EN.01003601.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/36





Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Alpiq RomIndustries and Alpiq RomEnergie v Commission
(Case T-129/13) (1)

((State aid - Electricity - Preferential tariffs - Decision to open the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU - Action for annulment - Act not subject to appeal - Aid measure implemented in full prior to the date on which the action was brought - Inadmissible))
2014/C 421/49
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Alpiq RomIndustries Srl (Bucarest, Romania) and Alpiq RomEnergie Srl (Bucarest) (represented by: H. Wollmann and F. Urlesberger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier, T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2012) 2542 final of 25 April 2012 to open the proceedings provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU concerning State Aid SA 33451 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Romania — Preferential tariffs in contracts between Hidroelectrica SA and electricity suppliers.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Alpiq RomIndustries Srl and Alpiq RomEnergie Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1269/2012 of 21 December 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 585/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless steel pipes, of iron or steel, originating, inter alia, in Russia, following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 ( OJ L 357, 28.12.2012 )
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Russia, Ukraine, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), iron and steel product, originating product, tube








L_2014298EN.01006301.xml










16.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 298/63







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1269/2012 of 21 December 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 585/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless steel pipes, of iron or steel, originating, inter alia, in Russia, following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 357 of 28 December 2012
)


On the cover, in the table of contents, and on page 1, in the title:
for:


                     ‘Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1269/2012 of 21 December 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 585/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless steel pipes, of iron or steel, originating, inter alia, in Russia, following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009’
                  
,read:


                     ‘Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1269/2012 of 21 December 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 585/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating, inter alia, in Russia, following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009’
                  
.
Case T-297/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014  — Junited Autoglas Deutschland v OHIM — Belron Hungary (United Autoglas) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark United Autoglas — Earlier national figurative mark AUTOGLASS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, general mechanical engineering, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014421EN.01003702.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/37





Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Junited Autoglas Deutschland v OHIM — Belron Hungary (United Autoglas)
(Case T-297/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark United Autoglas - Earlier national figurative mark AUTOGLASS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 421/51
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Rajh and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Belron Hungary Kft — Zug Branch (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: L. Christy, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2013 (Case R 206/2012-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Belron Hungary Kft — Zug Branch and Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.
Case T-444/12: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014  — Novartis v OHIM — Tenimenti Angelini (LINEX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark LINEX — Earlier national word mark LINES PERLA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 76(1), in fine, of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-10-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, health care, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vineyard








C_2014421EN.01003202.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/32





Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Novartis v OHIM — Tenimenti Angelini (LINEX)
(Case T-444/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark LINEX - Earlier national word mark LINES PERLA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 76(1), in fine, of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2014/C 421/44
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Tenimenti Angelini SpA (Montalcino, Italy) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 August 2012 (Case R 414/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Tenimenti Angelini SpA and Novartis AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 August 2012 (Case R 414/2011-4);










2)


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the applicant;










3)


Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 399, 22.12.2012.