do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-221/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Trento — Italy) — Teresa Mascellani v Ministero della Giustizia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 97/81/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Conversion of part-time employment relationship to full-time employment relationship without the worker’s consent)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European social policy, framework agreement, part-time employment, work contract








C_2014462EN.01000601.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/6





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Trento — Italy) — Teresa Mascellani v Ministero della Giustizia
(Case C-221/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 97/81/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Conversion of part-time employment relationship to full-time employment relationship without the worker’s consent))
(2014/C 462/09)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Trento

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Teresa Mascellani

Defendant: Ministero della Giustizia

Operative part of the judgment

The Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded on 6 June 1997 which is annexed to Council Directive 1997/81/EC of 15 December 1997, concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, in particular Clause 5.2 thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, it does not preclude national legislation pursuant to which the employer may order the conversion of a part-time employment relationship into a full-time employment relationship without the consent of the worker concerned.


(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Case C-331/13: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Ilie Nicolae Nicula v Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Sibiu, Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Repayment of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of EU law)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: infringement of EU law, primacy of EU law, tax rebate








C_2014462EN.01000702.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/7





Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Ilie Nicolae Nicula v Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Sibiu, Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu
(Case C-331/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Repayment of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of EU law))
(2014/C 462/12)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ilie Nicolae Nicula

Defendants: Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Sibiu, Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu

Operative part of the judgment

EU law must be interpreted as precluding a system of repayment of a tax levied in breach of EU law such as the system at issue in the main proceedings.


(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.
Case T-515/12: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2014  — El Corte Inglés v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark The English Cut — Earlier national word and Community figurative marks El Corte Inglés — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No likelihood of association — Connection between the signs — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, shopping centre, trade-mark law








C_2014421EN.01003301.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/33





Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2014 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM
(Case T-515/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark The English Cut - Earlier national word and Community figurative marks El Corte Inglés - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No likelihood of association - Connection between the signs - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2014/C 421/45
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: El Corte Inglés (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela, J.L Rivas Zurdo and I. Munilla Muñoz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: The English Cut SL (Málaga, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 September 2012 (Case R 1673/2011-1) relating to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés SA and The English Cut S.L.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders El Corte Inglés SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
Case F-55/10 RENV: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — Moschonaki v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Referral back to the Tribunal after annulment — Recruitment — Vacancy notice internal to the institution — Eligibility conditions in the vacancy notice — Appointing authority’s discretion)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, candidate, damages, indemnification, job access, job vacancy, library








C_2014421EN.01004601.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/46





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — Moschonaki v Commission
(Case F-55/10 RENV)
((Civil service - Officials - Referral back to the Tribunal after annulment - Recruitment - Vacancy notice internal to the institution - Eligibility conditions in the vacancy notice - Appointing authority’s discretion))
2014/C 421/63
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Chrysanthe Moschonaki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Referral back after annulment — Application to annul the decision refusing to take into consideration the applicant’s candidature for a post as assistant librarian and for an order that the Commission pays her a sum by way of compensation for the material and non-material harm suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of 30 September 2009 by which the European Commission rejected Ms Moschonaki’s candidature for the post of ‘[a]ssistant [l]ibrarian/[d]ocumentalist’;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay Ms Moschonaki the sum of EUR 5  000;










3.


Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Ms Moschonaki in Cases F-55/10, T-476/11 P and F-55/10 RENV.
Case C-417/12 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2014  — Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission (Appeals — EAGGF — Setting-aside of land — Remote-sensing controls — Green cover of parcels set aside — Financial corrections)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EAGGF, remote sensing, utilised agricultural area








C_2014462EN.01000201.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/2





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission
(Case C-417/12 P) (1)

((Appeals - EAGGF - Setting-aside of land - Remote-sensing controls - Green cover of parcels set aside - Financial corrections))
(2014/C 462/02)
Language of the case: Danish

Parties


Appellant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: V. Pasternak Jørgensen, acting as Agent, assisted by J. Pinborg and P. Biering, advokaterne)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agent, assisted by T. Ryhl, advokat)

Interveners in support of the applicant: French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and C. Candat, acting as Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. de Ree and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents), Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Leppo, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by U. Persson, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs;










3.


Orders the French Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 373, 1.12.2012.
Case C-65/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2014  — European Parliament v European Commission (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Implementing Decision 2012/733/EU — EURES network — Implementing power of the European Commission — Scope — Article 291(2) TFEU)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU employment policy, EURES, application of EU law, power of implementation








C_2014462EN.01000501.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/5





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — European Parliament v European Commission
(Case C-65/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Implementing Decision 2012/733/EU - EURES network - Implementing power of the European Commission - Scope - Article 291(2) TFEU))
(2014/C 462/07)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Tamás and J. Rodrigues, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Enegren and C. Zadra, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.
Case T-262/13: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2014  — Skysoft Computersysteme v OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting Group and Sky IP International (SKYSOFT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SKYSOFT — Earlier Community word mark SKY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, telecommunications industry, trade-mark law








C_2014421EN.01003701.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/37





Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2014 — Skysoft Computersysteme v OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting Group and Sky IP International (SKYSOFT)
(Case T-262/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SKYSOFT - Earlier Community word mark SKY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 421/50
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Skysoft Computersysteme GmbH (Kleinmachnow, Germany) (represented by: P. Ehrlinger and T. Hagen, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (Isleworth, United Kingdom); and Sky IP International Ltd (Isleworth) (represented by J. Barry and S. Wright, solicitors, and P. Roberts, barrister)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2013 (Case R 2503/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and Sky IP International Ltd, on one side, and Skysoft Computersysteme GmbH, on the other.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Skysoft Computersysteme GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to a reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels (codification) (COM(2014) 466 final — 2014/0216 COD)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: dangerous substance, fuel, product quality, sulphur








C_2015012EN.01011701.xml










15.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 12/117





Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to a reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels (codification)
(COM(2014) 466 final — 2014/0216 COD)
(2015/C 012/20)
On 8 September 2014 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 192(1) of the TFEU, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to a reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels (codification)

COM(2014) 466 final — 2014/0216 COD.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 502nd plenary session of 15 and 16 October 2014 (meeting of 15 October), by 150 votes to 1 with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 15 October 2014.


The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Henri MALOSSE
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7353 — Airbus/Safran/JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aeronautical industry, aerospace industry, economic concentration, merger control








C_2014364EN.01004201.xml










15.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 364/42





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7353 — Airbus/Safran/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 364/05)






1.


On 8 October 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Airbus Group N.V. (‘Airbus’, the Netherlands) and the undertaking Safran S.A. (‘Safran’, France) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a newly created company constituting a joint venture.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Airbus: active on a worldwide basis in space (space launchers and satellites), defence, aircraft and helicopters,
—   for Safran: active on a worldwide basis in aerospace propulsion (launcher and satellite propulsion), defence and security and aircraft equipment.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified concentration could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7353 — Airbus/Safran/JV to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case C-561/13: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 — Czech Republic) — Hoštická a.s., Jaroslav Haškovec, Zemědělské družstvo Senice na Hané v Česká republika — Ministerstvo zemědělství (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Support schemes — Establishment of support schemes in the new Member States — Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Article 143ba — Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 — Article 126 — Separate sugar payment — Decoupling of that payment from production — Meaning of ‘the criteria adopted by the relevant Member States in 2006 and 2007’  — Representative period)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aid to agriculture, single payment scheme, sugar








C_2014462EN.01001001.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/10





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 — Czech Republic) — Hoštická a.s., Jaroslav Haškovec, Zemědělské družstvo Senice na Hané v Česká republika — Ministerstvo zemědělství
(Case C-561/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy - Support schemes - Establishment of support schemes in the new Member States - Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 - Article 143ba - Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 - Article 126 - Separate sugar payment - Decoupling of that payment from production - Meaning of ‘the criteria adopted by the relevant Member States in 2006 and 2007’ - Representative period))
(2014/C 462/16)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Hoštická a.s., Jaroslav Haškovec, Zemědělské družstvo Senice na Hané

Defendant: Česká republika — Ministerstvo zemědělství

Operative part of the judgment

Article 126(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘the criteria adopted by the relevant Member States in 2006 and 2007’ includes the marketing year which the Member States must choose before 30 April 2006 as the representative period for the grant of the separate sugar payment, under Article 143ba(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001, as amended by Council Regulations (EC) No 319/2006 of 20 February 2006, No 2011/2006 of 19 December 2006 and No 2012/2006 of 19 December 2006.


(1)  OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.
Case C-323/13: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2014  — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directives 1999/31/EC and 2008/98/EC — Management plan — Adequate and integrated network of disposal installations — Obligation to put in place waste treatment providing the best result for human health and environmental protection)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, environmental protection, health care, infringement of EU law, waste disposal








C_2014462EN.01000701.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/7





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — European Commission v Italian Republic
(Case C-323/13) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directives 1999/31/EC and 2008/98/EC - Management plan - Adequate and integrated network of disposal installations - Obligation to put in place waste treatment providing the best result for human health and environmental protection))
(2014/C 462/11)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin, E. Sanfrutos Cano and A. Alcover San Pedro, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by G. Fiengo, avvocato dello Stato)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that the Italian Republic,






—


by not taking all necessary measures to ensure that part of the municipal waste going to the landfills of the Rome SubATO, excluding the Cecchina landfill, and to those of the Latina SubATO undergoes treatment, including a proper sorting of the various fractions of the waste and the stabilisation of the organic fraction, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 1(1), in conjunction with Article 6(a), of Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, and Articles 4 and 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives,










—


and by failing to establish in the region of Lazio an integrated and adequate network of waste management installations which takes into account best available techniques, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/98;














2.


Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.