do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-107/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2014  — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Retired official — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Pension deduction — Examination of the incriminating witness by the Disciplinary Board — Failure to hear from the official concerned — Failure to respect the right to be heard)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, administrative sanction, damages, disciplinary proceedings, indemnification, pension scheme, redemption








C_2014421EN.01005202.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/52





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission
(Case F-107/13) (1)

((Staff case - Officials - Retired official - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary measure - Pension deduction - Examination of the incriminating witness by the Disciplinary Board - Failure to hear from the official concerned - Failure to respect the right to be heard))
2014/C 421/73
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: José Antonio de Brito Sequeira Carvalho (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: É. Boigelot and R. Murru, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Subject-matter of proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission to impose a disciplinary measure on the applicant under Article 9(2) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations and requests for damages for the non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered and reimbursement of amounts already deducted.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1)


Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 14 March 2013 imposing on Mr de Brito Sequeira Carvalho, for disciplinary reasons, a deduction of one third of his net monthly pension amount for a period of two years.










2)


Dismisses the remainder of the action.










3)


Order the European Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by M. de Brito Sequeira Carvalho.






(1)  OJ 2004 C 24, p. 41.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSP of 20 January 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus ( OJ L 16, 21.1.2014 )
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, economic sanctions, international sanctions, removal








L_2014297EN.01004101.xml










15.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 297/41







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSP of 20 January 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 16 of 21 January 2014
)


On page 33, Annex:
for:


                     ‘In the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP, entry No. 210 shall be replaced by the following:’
                  
,read:


                     ‘In the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP, entry No 199 shall be replaced by the following:’
                  
;on page 33, Annex, table, first column:
for:


                     ‘210’
                  
,read:


                     ‘199.’
                  
.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 699/2014 of 24 June 2014 on the design of the common logo to identify persons offering medicinal products for sale at a distance to the public and the technical, electronic and cryptographic requirements for verification of its authenticity ( OJ L 184, 25.6.2014 )
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European symbol, Internet site, distance selling, fraud, hypertext, information society, medicinal product, technical specification








L_2014297EN.01004102.xml










15.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 297/41







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 699/2014 of 24 June 2014 on the design of the common logo to identify persons offering medicinal products for sale at a distance to the public and the technical, electronic and cryptographic requirements for verification of its authenticity

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 184 of 25 June 2014
)


On page 6, in Article 3, second paragraph:
for:

‘The information transit between the websites authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products at a distance to the public by means of information society services and the websites hosting the national lists shall be secured through appropriate means.’
,read:

‘The information transit between the websites of the persons authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products at a distance to the public by means of information society services and the websites hosting the national lists shall be secured through appropriate means.’
.
Case F-110/14: Action brought on 15 October 2014  — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: regulations for civil servants, transfer of pension rights








C_2015026EN.01004602.xml










26.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/46





Action brought on 15 October 2014 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-110/14)
(2015/C 026/61)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision to credit the applicant’s pension in the European Union’s pension scheme pursuant to the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought







—


Declare that Article 9 of the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII is unlawful and, therefore, inapplicable,










—


annul the decision of 24 May 2013 to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service, in the context of the transfer of those rights into the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union, pursuant to general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011,










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Case C-246/14: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti, Sezione Giurisdizionale per la Regione Puglia — Italy) — Vittoria De Bellis, Diana Perrone, Cesaria Antonia Villani v Istituto Nazionale di Previdenza per i Dipendenti dell’Amministrazione Pubblica (INPDAP) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — National legislation providing, with retroactive effect, for a reduction in pension entitlements — Purely internal situation — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, administrative transparency, pension scheme








C_2015016EN.01001301.xml










19.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/13






Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti, Sezione Giurisdizionale per la Regione Puglia — Italy) — Vittoria De Bellis, Diana Perrone, Cesaria Antonia Villani v Istituto Nazionale di Previdenza per i Dipendenti dell’Amministrazione Pubblica (INPDAP)
(Case C-246/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - National legislation providing, with retroactive effect, for a reduction in pension entitlements - Purely internal situation - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
(2015/C 016/19)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte dei Conti, Sezione Giurisdizionale per la Regione Puglia

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Vittoria De Bellis, Diana Perrone, Cesaria Antonia Villani

Defendant: Istituto Nazionale di Previdenza per i Dipendenti dell’Amministrazione Pubblica (INPDAP)

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to reply to the questions referred by the Corte dei conti, sezione giurisdizionale per la Regione Puglia (Italy), by decision of 28 April 2014 (Case C-246/14).


(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1343/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area COM(2014) 457 final — 2014/0213 COD
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea, catch area, conservation of fish stocks, evaluation of resources, exploitation of resources, fishery resources, fishing agreement, resources of the sea, sustainable development








C_2015012EN.01011601.xml










15.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 12/116





Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1343/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area
COM(2014) 457 final — 2014/0213 COD
(2015/C 012/19)
On 17 July 2014, the European Parliament and on 31 July 2014, the Council respectively decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43(2) of the TFEU, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1343/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area

COM(2014) 457 final — 2014/0213 COD.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 502nd plenary session of 15 and 16 October 2014 (meeting of 15 October 2014), by 172 votes with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 15 October 2014.


The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Henri MALOSSE
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences’ COM(2014) 476 final — 2014/0218 (COD)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: administrative sanction, disclosure of information, exchange of information, road safety, traffic offence








C_2015012EN.01011501.xml










15.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 12/115





Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences’
COM(2014) 476 final — 2014/0218 (COD)
(2015/C 012/18)
On 29 July 2014, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 194(2) of the TFEU, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences

COM(2014) 476 final — 2014/0218 (COD)
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 502nd plenary session of 15 and 16 October 2014 (meeting of 15 October), by 172 votes to 1 with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 15 October 2014.


The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Henri MALOSSE
Case T-663/13: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2014  — Court of Auditors v BF (Appeal — Civil service — Recruitment — Appointment to a post of Director of Human Resources — Rejection of application — Obligation to state reasons in the report tabled by the Pre-selection Committee)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, appointment of staff, candidate, managing director, staff








C_2014421EN.01004101.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/41





Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2014 — Court of Auditors v BF
(Case T-663/13) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Recruitment - Appointment to a post of Director of Human Resources - Rejection of application - Obligation to state reasons in the report tabled by the Pre-selection Committee))
2014/C 421/57
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy and J. Vermer, agents)

Other party to the proceedings: BF (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 October 2013 in Case F-69/11 BF v Court of Auditors, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


dismisses the appeal;










2.


orders the Court of Auditors of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr BF in connection with the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Case F-15/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge Chamber) of 15 October 2014  — De Bruin v Parliament (Civil Service — Probationer — Article 34 of the Staff Regulations — Report on the probationary period — Extension of the probationary period — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Grounds for dismissal — Performance — Hasty performance of tasks — Manifest errors of assessment — Irregularities in the procedure — Period given to the Reports Committee to deliver its opinion)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, probationary period, report, staff assessment








C_2014421EN.01005301.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/53





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — De Bruin v Parliament
(Case F-15/14) (1)

((Civil Service - Probationer - Article 34 of the Staff Regulations - Report on the probationary period - Extension of the probationary period - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Grounds for dismissal - Performance - Hasty performance of tasks - Manifest errors of assessment - Irregularities in the procedure - Period given to the Reports Committee to deliver its opinion))
2014/C 421/74
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Evert Anton De Bruin (Lent, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Dean and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Parliament to terminate the applicant’s employment contract at the end of the extension period of his probationary period.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr De Bruin to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.






(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014, p. 40.
Case F-23/11 RENV: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — AY v Council (Civil service — Officials — Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside — Promotion — 2010 promotion procedure — Consideration of comparative merits — Decision not to promote the applicant)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, indemnification, pay scale, promotion








C_2014431EN.01004701.xml










1.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/47





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — AY v Council
(Case F-23/11 RENV) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside - Promotion - 2010 promotion procedure - Consideration of comparative merits - Decision not to promote the applicant))
(2014/C 431/74)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: AY (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A.F. Jensen, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Council’s decision not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted to Grade AST 9 under the 2010 promotion procedure and compensation for the non-material harm suffered. Case T-167/12 P referred back by the General Court after appeal.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Declares that AY is to bear his own costs incurred in Cases F-23/11, T-167/12 P and F-23/11 RENV respectively and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in Case F-23/11;










3.


Declares that the Council of the European Union is to bear its own costs incurred in Cases T-167/12 P and F-23/11 RENV.






(1)  OJ C 226, 30/07/2011, p. 31.
Case C-471/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 15 October 2014  — Seattle Genetics Inc.
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Community certification, EU law - national law, market approval, medicinal product








C_2014462EN.01001602.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/16





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 15 October 2014 — Seattle Genetics Inc.
(Case C-471/14)
(2014/C 462/26)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Seattle Genetics Inc.

Defendant authority: Österreichisches Patentamt

Questions referred







1.


Is the date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the Community pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products determined according to Community law or does that provision refer to the date on which the authorisation takes effect under the law of the Member State in question?










2.


If the Court’s answer is that the date referred to in Question 1 is determined by Community law, which date must be taken into account — the date of authorisation or the date of notification?






(1)  OJ 2009 L 152, p. 1.
Case F-86/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — Robert van de Water v Parliament (Civil service — Rights and obligations of officials — Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Article 16 of the Staff Regulations — Compatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution — Prohibition)
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, Ukraine, consultancy, head of government, self-employment, staff regulations (EU), termination of employment








C_2014431EN.01004702.xml










1.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/47





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — Robert van de Water v Parliament
(Case F-86/13) (1)

((Civil service - Rights and obligations of officials - Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service - Article 16 of the Staff Regulations - Compatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution - Prohibition))
(2014/C 431/75)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Robert van de Water (Grimbergen, Belgium) (represented by: P. Bentley QC, barrister, and R. Bäuerle, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Chemaï and M. Dean, Agents)

Re:

The application to annul the decision prohibiting the applicant from taking up an appointment as an adviser to the Prime Minister of Ukraine for a period of two years as from the date of termination of his functions with the European Parliament

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Declares that Mr van de Water is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the Parliament.






(1)  OJ C 336, 16/11/2013, p. 31.
Special Report No 14/2014 ‘How do the EU institutions and bodies calculate, reduce and offset their greenhouse gas emissions?’
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU institution, environmental protection, greenhouse gas, reduction of gas emissions








C_2014364EN.01000301.xml










15.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 364/3





Special Report No 14/2014 ‘How do the EU institutions and bodies calculate, reduce and offset their greenhouse gas emissions?’
(2014/C 364/03)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 14/2014 ‘How do the EU institutions and bodies calculate, reduce and offset their greenhouse gas emissions?’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu
A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:





European Court of Auditors




Publications (PUB)




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




Tel. +352 4398-1




E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu




or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-10-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014364EN.01000101.xml










15.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 364/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

14 October 2014
(2014/C 364/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2646




JPY


Japanese yen


135,29




DKK


Danish krone


7,4445




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79450




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1585




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2079




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,2900




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,545




HUF


Hungarian forint


306,65




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2032




RON


Romanian leu


4,4127




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8809




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4475




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4223




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,8091




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6085




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6120




KRW


South Korean won


1 347,42




ZAR


South African rand


14,0042




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7466




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6555




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 448,97




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1376




PHP


Philippine peso


56,747




RUB


Russian rouble


51,6102




THB


Thai baht


41,116




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0360




MXN


Mexican peso


16,9924




INR


Indian rupee


77,7236






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.