do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-166/13: Order of the General Court of 14 October 2014  — Ben Ali v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia — Freezing of funds — Extension — Consequences of an annulment of earlier freezing of funds measures — No need to adjudicate — Non-contractual liability — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2014-10-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Tunisia, common foreign and security policy, contractual liability, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2014448EN.01002101.xml










15.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 448/21





Order of the General Court of 14 October 2014 — Ben Ali v Council
(Case T-166/13) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia - Freezing of funds - Extension - Consequences of an annulment of earlier freezing of funds measures - No need to adjudicate - Non-contractual liability - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2014/C 448/27)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali (Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, France) (represented by: A. de Saint Rémy, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and A. De Elera, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, an application for annulment of Council Decision 2013/72/CFSP of 31 January 2013 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2011 L 32, p. 20), in so far as that decision concerns the applicant and, secondly, an application for the payment of damages

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the pleas seeking annulment of Council Decision 2013/72/CFSP of 31 January 2013 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia, in so far as that decision concerns Mr Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali.










2.


The remainder of the action is dismissed.










3.


Mr Ben Ali and the Council of the European Union are each ordered to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7380 — EQT Infrastructure/Immomutua/ACVIL JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-10-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, investment company, merger control, parking area, real estate business








C_2014362EN.01000401.xml










14.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 362/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7380 — EQT Infrastructure/Immomutua/ACVIL JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 362/02
On 7 October 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the Spanish language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7380. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Opinion 1/13: Opinion of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 October 2014  — European Commission (Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction — Accession of third States — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Exclusive external competence of the European Union — Risk of undermining the uniform and consistent application of EU rules and the proper functioning of the system which they establish)
Date: 2014-10-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: accession to an agreement, child protection, children's rights, external competence (EU), third country, trafficking in human beings








C_2014462EN.01000401.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/4





Opinion of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 October 2014 — European Commission
(Opinion 1/13) (1)

((Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU - Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction - Accession of third States - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Exclusive external competence of the European Union - Risk of undermining the uniform and consistent application of EU rules and the proper functioning of the system which they establish))
(2014/C 462/05)
Language of the case: all the official languages

Applicant

European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the Opinion

The exclusive competence of the European Union encompasses the acceptance of the accession of a third State to the Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction concluded in The Hague on 25 October 1980.


(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
Case C-470/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunal Supremo — Sala Tercera Contencioso-Administrativo (Spain) lodged on 14 October 2014  — Entidad de Gestión de Derechos de los Productores Audiovisuales (EGEDA) and Others v Administración del Estado and Others
Date: 2014-10-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: copyright, information society, national budget








C_2015007EN.01001301.xml










12.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/13





Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunal Supremo — Sala Tercera Contencioso-Administrativo (Spain) lodged on 14 October 2014 — Entidad de Gestión de Derechos de los Productores Audiovisuales (EGEDA) and Others v Administración del Estado and Others
(Case C-470/14)
(2015/C 007/18)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo, Sala Tercera Contencioso-Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Entidad de Gestión de Derechos de los Productores Audiovisuales (EGEDA), Derechos de Autor de Medios Audiovisuales (DAMA) and Visual Entidad de Gestión de Artistas Plásticos (VEGAP)

Defendants: Administración del Estado, Asociación Multisectorial de Empresas de la Electrónica, las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, de las Telecomunicaciones y de los contenidos Digitales (AMETIC), Entidad de Gestión, Artistas, Intérpretes o Ejecutantes y Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE), Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI), Sociedad General de Autores y Editores (SGAE), Centro Español de Derechos Reprográficos (CEDRO) and Artistas Intérpretes, Sociedad de Gestión (AISGE)

Questions referred







1)


Is a scheme for fair compensation for private copying compatible with Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29 (1) where the scheme, while taking as a basis an estimate of the harm actually caused, is financed from the General State Budget, it thus not being possible to ensure that the cost of that compensation is borne by the users of private copies?










2)


If the first question is answered in the affirmative, is the scheme compatible with Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29 where the total amount allocated by the General State Budget to fair compensation for private copying, although it is calculated on the basis of the harm actually caused, has to be set within the budgetary limits established for each financial year?






(1)  Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.
Joined Cases C-12/13 P and C-13/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 October 2014  — Gérard Buono and Others (C-12/13 P) and Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens and Others (C-13/13 P) v European Commission (Appeals — Common fisheries policy — Fishing quotas — Emergency measures adopted by the Commission — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU — Conditions — Actual and certain harm)
Date: 2014-10-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: catch quota, common fisheries policy, damages, fishing rights








C_2014462EN.01000402.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/4





Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 October 2014 — Gérard Buono and Others (C-12/13 P) and Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens and Others (C-13/13 P) v European Commission
(Joined Cases C-12/13 P and C-13/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Common fisheries policy - Fishing quotas - Emergency measures adopted by the Commission - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU - Conditions - Actual and certain harm))
(2014/C 462/06)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellants: Gérard Buono, Jean-Luc Buono, Roger Louis Paul Del Ponte, Serge Antoine Di Rocco, Jean Gérald Lubrano, Jean Lubrano, Jean Lucien Lubrano, Fabrice Marin, Robert Marin (represented by: A. Arnaud and P.-O. Koubi-Flotte, avocats) (C-12/13 P), Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens, Marc Carreno, Jean Louis Donnarel, Jean-François Flores, Gérald Jean Lubrano, Hervé Marin, Nicolas Marin, Sébastien Marin, Jean-Marc Penniello, Serge Antoine José Perez (represented by: C. Bonnefoi, avocate) (C-13/13 P)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeals brought in Cases C-12/13 P and C-13/13 P;










2.


Orders Gérard Buono, Jean-Luc Buono, Roger Del Ponte, Serge Antoine Di Rocco, Jean Gérald Lubrano, Jean Lubrano, Jean Lucien Lubrano, Fabrice Marin and Robert Marin to pay the costs in Case C-12/13 P and the Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens, Marc Carreno, Jean-Louis Donnarel, Jean-François Flores, Gérald Jean Lubrano, Hervé Marin, Nicolas Marin, Sébastien Marin and Serge Antoine José Perez to pay the costs in Case C-13/13 P.






(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.