do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-326/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Rita van Caster, Patrick van Caster v Finanzamt Essen-Süd (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of capital — Article 63 TFEU — Taxation of income from investment funds — Investment fund’s obligations to communicate and publish certain information — Flat-rate taxation of income from investment funds which do not comply with communication and publication obligations)
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: free movement of capital, interpretation of the law, investment company, tax system








C_2014439EN.01000301.xml










8.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 439/3





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Rita van Caster, Patrick van Caster v Finanzamt Essen-Süd
(Case C-326/12) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Article 63 TFEU - Taxation of income from investment funds - Investment fund’s obligations to communicate and publish certain information - Flat-rate taxation of income from investment funds which do not comply with communication and publication obligations))
(2014/C 439/03)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Rita van Caster, Patrick van Caster

Defendant: Finanzamt Essen-Süd

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings which provides that the failure by a non-resident investment fund to comply with the obligations to communicate and publish certain information required by that legislation, which are applicable without distinction to resident and non-resident investment funds alike, resulting in the flat-rate taxation of the income which the taxpayer earns from that investment fund, since that legislation does not allow the taxpayer to provide evidence or information that could prove the actual size of that income.


(1)  OJ C 303, 6.10.2012.
Case C-222/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Teleklagenævnet — Denmark) — TDC A/S v Erhvervsstyrelsen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/22/EC — Article 32 — Additional mandatory services — Compensation mechanism for the cost associated with providing those services — Meaning of ‘court or tribunal’ for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Denmark, consumer protection, indemnification, provision of services, telecommunications industry, transmission network








C_2014439EN.01000401.xml










8.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 439/4





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Teleklagenævnet — Denmark) — TDC A/S v Erhvervsstyrelsen
(Case C-222/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive 2002/22/EC - Article 32 - Additional mandatory services - Compensation mechanism for the cost associated with providing those services - Meaning of ‘court or tribunal’ for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))
(2014/C 439/05)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Teleklagenævnet

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: TDC A/S

Defendant: Erhvervsstyrelsen

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Teleklagenævnet (Denmark) in its decision of 22 April 2013.


(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Case C-541/13: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Douane Advies Bureau Rietveld v Hauptzollamt Hannover (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union and common customs tariff — Tariff classification — Heading 3822 — Concept of ‘diagnostic or laboratory reagents’  — Indicators of exposure to a predetermined target temperature)
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, customs union, product quality








C_2014439EN.01001202.xml










8.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 439/12





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Douane Advies Bureau Rietveld v Hauptzollamt Hannover
(Case C-541/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union and common customs tariff - Tariff classification - Heading 3822 - Concept of ‘diagnostic or laboratory reagents’ - Indicators of exposure to a predetermined target temperature))
(2014/C 439/17)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Douane Advies Bureau Rietveld

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hannover

Operative part of the judgment

Heading 3822 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex 1 to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 of 5 October 2010, must be interpreted as meaning that temperature indicators, such as the products marketed under the names ‘WarmMark’ and ‘ColdMark’, which, by the effect of a change in colour caused by the variation in volume of the liquids that they contain, indicate, irreversibly, whether a temperature higher or lower than a specified threshold has been reached, are not covered by that heading.


(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2014.
Case C-522/13: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Ferrol — Spain) — Ministerio de Defensa, Navantia SA v Concello de Ferrol (Request for a preliminary ruling — Competition — State aid — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concept of ‘State aid’  — Property tax on immovable property — Tax exemption)
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, property tax, tax exemption, trading operation








C_2014439EN.01001201.xml










8.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 439/12





Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Ferrol — Spain) — Ministerio de Defensa, Navantia SA v Concello de Ferrol
(Case C-522/13) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Competition - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Property tax on immovable property - Tax exemption))
(2014/C 439/16)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Ferrol

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Ministerio de Defensa, Navantia SA

Defendant: Concello de Ferrol

Operative part of the judgment

On a proper construction of Article 107(1) TFEU, the exemption from property tax of a plot of land belonging to the State and made available to an undertaking whose capital is wholly State-owned and which produces, from that plot of land, goods and services that may be traded between Member States on markets open to competition may constitute State aid prohibited by that provision. It is for the referring court, however, to determine whether, in the light of all the relevant evidence in the dispute before it, assessed by reference to the interpretative guidance provided by the Court of Justice of the European Union, that tax exemption falls to be categorised as State aid within the meaning of that provision.


(1)  OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.
Case C-565/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hovrätten för Västra Sverige — Sweden) — criminal proceedings against Ove Ahlström, Lennart Kjellberg, Fiskeri Ganthi AB, Fiskeri Nordic AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — External relations — Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco — Exclusion of any possibility for Community vessels to carry out fishing activities in Moroccan fishing zones on the basis of a licence issued by the Moroccan authorities without the intervention of the competent European Union authorities)
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Morocco, agreement (EU), fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing industry, vessel








C_2014439EN.01001301.xml










8.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 439/13





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hovrätten för Västra Sverige — Sweden) — criminal proceedings against Ove Ahlström, Lennart Kjellberg, Fiskeri Ganthi AB, Fiskeri Nordic AB
(Case C-565/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - External relations - Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco - Exclusion of any possibility for Community vessels to carry out fishing activities in Moroccan fishing zones on the basis of a licence issued by the Moroccan authorities without the intervention of the competent European Union authorities))
(2014/C 439/18)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Hovrätten för Västra Sverige

Parties in the criminal proceedings in the main proceedings

Ove Ahlström, Lennart Kjellberg, Fiskeri Ganthi AB, Fiskeri Nordic AB

Operative part of the judgment

The Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco, approved on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EC) No 764/2006 of 22 May 2006, in particular Article 6 of that agreement, must be interpreted as excluding any possibility for Community vessels to carry out fishing activities in Moroccan fishing zones on the basis of a licence issued by the Moroccan authorities without the intervention of the competent European Union authorities.


(1)  OJ C 15, 18.1.2014.
Case F-105/14: Action brought on 9th October 2014 — ZZ v ENISA
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: competition (EU), lawyer








C_2015007EN.01005301.xml










12.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/53





Action brought on 9th October 2014 — ZZ v ENISA
(Case F-105/14)
(2015/C 007/64)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision not to retain the applicant’s candidacy for the post of ‘legal officer’ (vacancy notice ENISA-TA-AD-2013-05).

Form of order sought







—


Annul the contested decision;










—


order the Defendant to bear the costs.
Case C-171/14 P: Appeal brought on 7 April 2014 by Eleonora Giulia Calvi against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 31 March 2014 in Case T-159/14 Eleonora Giulia Calvi v European Court of Human Rights
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Court of Human Rights, jurisdiction, powers of the institutions (EU)








C_2015007EN.01001201.xml










12.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/12





Appeal brought on 7 April 2014 by Eleonora Giulia Calvi against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 31 March 2014 in Case T-159/14 Eleonora Giulia Calvi v European Court of Human Rights
(Case C-171/14 P)
(2015/C 007/16)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Eleonora Giulia Calvi (represented by: M. Schirò and G. Crespi, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Court of Human Rights
By order of 9 October 2014, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded.
Case C-467/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 October 2014  — Industries chimiques du fluor (ICF) v European Commission (Appeals — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — World market in aluminium fluoride — Rights of the defence — Content of the statement of objections — Calculation of the amount of the fine — 2006 guidelines for the calculation of fines — Point 18 — Total value of sales of goods or services in relation to the infringement — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable time period — Reduction of the amount of the fine)
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aluminium, fine, market-sharing agreement, restriction on competition, rights of the defence








C_2015046EN.01001301.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/13





Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 October 2014 — Industries chimiques du fluor (ICF) v European Commission
(Case C-467/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - World market in aluminium fluoride - Rights of the defence - Content of the statement of objections - Calculation of the amount of the fine - 2006 guidelines for the calculation of fines - Point 18 - Total value of sales of goods or services in relation to the infringement - Obligation to state reasons - Reasonable time period - Reduction of the amount of the fine))
(2015/C 046/16)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Industries chimiques du fluor (ICF) (represented by: P. Wytinck and D. Gillet, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and N. von Lingen, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Industries chimiques du fluor (ICF) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 336, 16.11.2013.
Case C-268/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Elena Petru v Casa Județeană de Asigurări de Sănătate Sibiu, Casa Națională de Asigurări de Sănătate (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 22(2), second subparagraph — Health insurance — Hospital treatment provided in another Member State — Prior authorisation refused — Lack of medication and basic medical supplies and infrastructure)
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: health insurance, hospitalisation, medical device, medicinal product, right to health








C_2014439EN.01000502.xml










8.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 439/5





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Elena Petru v Casa Județeană de Asigurări de Sănătate Sibiu, Casa Națională de Asigurări de Sănătate
(Case C-268/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 22(2), second subparagraph - Health insurance - Hospital treatment provided in another Member State - Prior authorisation refused - Lack of medication and basic medical supplies and infrastructure))
(2014/C 439/07)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Elena Petru

Defendants: Casa Județeană de Asigurări de Sănătate Sibiu, Casa Națională de Asigurări de Sănătate

Operative part of the judgment

The second subparagraph of Article 22(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 592/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that the authorisation necessary under Article 22(1)(c)(i) of that regulation cannot be refused where it is because of a lack of medication and basic medical supplies and infrastructure that the hospital care concerned cannot be provided in good time in the insured person’s Member State of residence. The question whether that is impossible must be determined by reference to all the hospital establishments in that Member State that are capable of providing the treatment in question and by reference to the period within which the treatment could be obtained in good time.


(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014356EN.01000501.xml










9.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 356/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

8 October 2014
2014/C 356/04

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2645




JPY


Japanese yen


136,97




DKK


Danish krone


7,4442




GBP


Pound sterling


0,78700




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1322




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2132




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1945




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,480




HUF


Hungarian forint


307,92




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1919




RON


Romanian leu


4,4108




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8992




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4416




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4131




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,8080




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6210




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6173




KRW


South Korean won


1 360,58




ZAR


South African rand


14,1770




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7624




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6440




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 490,74




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1388




PHP


Philippine peso


56,673




RUB


Russian rouble


50,5925




THB


Thai baht


41,238




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0246




MXN


Mexican peso


17,0353




INR


Indian rupee


77,6300






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Special Report No 15/2014 ‘The External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added value’
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: external border of the EU, financial aid, fund (EU)








C_2014356EN.01000601.xml










9.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 356/6





Special Report No 15/2014 ‘The External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added value’
2014/C 356/05
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 15/2014 ‘The External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added value’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu
A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:





European Court of Auditors




Publications (PUB)




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




Tel. +352 4398-1




e-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu




or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.
2014/707/CFSP: Political and Security Committee Decision EULEX KOSOVO/2/2014 of 9 October 2014 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: Kosovo, appointment of members, common security and defence policy, fact-finding mission, rule of law








L_2014295EN.01005901.xml










11.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 295/59








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EULEX KOSOVO/2/2014
of 9 October 2014
         
on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (1), EULEX KOSOVO

(2014/707/CFSP)



THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,


Having regard to the Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO (2), and in particular Article 12(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 12(2) of Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.












(2)


On 17 June 2014, the PSC adopted Decision EULEX KOSOVO/1/2014 (3) extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of EULEX KOSOVO until 14 October 2014.












(3)


On 12 June 2014, the Council adopted decision 2014/349/CFSP (4) amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP and extending the duration of EULEX KOSOVO until 14 June 2016.












(4)


On 25 September 2014, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Ambassador Gabriele MEUCCI as Head of Mission of EULEX KOSOVO for the period from 15 October 2014 to 14 June 2015,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Ambassador Gabriele MEUCCI is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) for the period from 15 October 2014 to 14 June 2015.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from 15 October 2014.




Done at Brussels, 9 October 2014.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

W. STEVENS
            





(1)  The designation ‘Kosovo’ is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/99 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of Independence.

(2)  
            OJ L 42, 16.2.2008, p. 92.

(3)  Political and Security Committee Decision EULEX KOSOVO/1/2014 of 17 June 2014 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO (OJ L 180, 20.6.2014, p. 17).

(4)  Council Decision 2014/349/CFSP of 12 June 2014 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO (OJ L 174, 13.6.2014, p. 42).
Case C-641/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2014  — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (Appeal — Cohesion Fund — Reduction of financial assistance — Public works contracts — Directive 93/37/EEC — Award criteria — Experience of previous works — Qualitative selection criteria)
Date: 2014-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Cohesion Fund, award of contract, financial aid, works contract








C_2014439EN.01001401.xml










8.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 439/14





Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2014 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission
(Case C-641/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Cohesion Fund - Reduction of financial assistance - Public works contracts - Directive 93/37/EEC - Award criteria - Experience of previous works - Qualitative selection criteria))
(2014/C 439/20)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.