do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-460/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 6 October 2014  — Johannes Evert Antonius Massar v DAS Nederlandse Rechtsbijstand Verzekeringsmaatschappij NV
Date: 2014-10-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative procedure, dismissal, insurance contract, legal aid








C_2014448EN.01001201.xml










15.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 448/12





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 6 October 2014 — Johannes Evert Antonius Massar v DAS Nederlandse Rechtsbijstand Verzekeringsmaatschappij NV
(Case C-460/14)
(2014/C 448/15)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Johannes Evert Antonius Massar

Defendant: DAS Nederlandse Rechtsbijstand Verzekeringsmaatschappij NV

Questions referred







1)


Must the term ‘inquiry’ in Article 4(1)(a) of Council Directive 87/344/EEC (1) of 22 June 1987 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to legal expenses insurance be interpreted as covering the procedure before the UWV [Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen (Employee Insurance Agency)], in which the employer requests a dismissal permit in order to bring to an end the employment contract with the employee (who is covered by legal expenses insurance)?










2)


If the answer to Question 1 depends on the characteristics of the specific procedure, in combination, if necessary, with the facts and circumstances of the case, on the basis of which characteristics, facts and circumstances must the national court then determine whether that procedure is to be regarded as constituting an inquiry within the meaning of Article 4(1)(a) of the Directive?






(1)  OJ 1987 L 185, p. 77.
Case F-102/14: Action brought on 6 October 2014  — ZZ v OHIM
Date: 2014-10-06
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: competition (EU), contract terms, designated employment








C_2015007EN.01005101.xml










12.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/51





Action brought on 6 October 2014 — ZZ v OHIM
(Case F-102/14)
(2015/C 007/61)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Heinrich Tettenborn)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of OHIM to apply the clause contained in the applicant’s contract of employment — which provides for a termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that the applicant is not placed on the reserve list of the next general selection procedure organised by EPSO for its functional group and specialising in industrial property — to selection procedures OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, and a claim for damages for the non-material damage arising from that decision

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the decision of OHIM, which was communicated to the applicant by letter from OHIM dated 28 November 2003, to apply the clause contained in Article 5 of the applicant’s contract of employment — which provides for a termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that the applicant is not placed on the reserve list of the next general selection procedure organised by EPSO for its functional group and specialising in industrial property — to selection procedures OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, which were published on 31 October 2013;










—


order OHIM to pay to the applicant damages of an appropriate amount at the discretion of the Court for the non-material damage arising from the decision of OHIM referred to in paragraph 1 above; and










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1053/2014 of 6 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for plaice in VIIh, VIIj and VIIk by vessels flying the flag of Belgium
Date: 2014-10-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, Belgium, EU waters, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2014292EN.01000401.xml










8.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 292/4








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1053/2014
of 6 October 2014
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for plaice in VIIh, VIIj and VIIk by vessels flying the flag of Belgium


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 (2) lays down quotas for 2014.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2014.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 October 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


38/TQ43




Member State


Belgium




Stock


PLE/7HJK.




Species


Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)




Zone


VIIh, VIIj and VIIk




Closing date


10.9.2014
Case T-710/14: Action brought on 6 October 2014 — Herbert Smith Freehills v Council
Date: 2014-10-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, exchange of information, provision of documents, tobacco industry








C_2014409EN.01006301.xml










17.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/63





Action brought on 6 October 2014 — Herbert Smith Freehills v Council
(Case T-710/14)
2014/C 409/84
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Herbert Smith Freehills LLP (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Wytinck, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Decision 18/c/01/14 of the Council of the European Union of 23 July 2014; and










—


order the Council to pay the costs of the applicant in the present proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

By its present action, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Council’s Decision 18/c/01/14 of 24 July 2014 whereby the Council refused the applicant’s confirmatory application for access under Regulation No 1049/2001 (1) to certain documents related to the adoption of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC (2).
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Council infringed Article 4(2), second indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001 in that i) not all documents identified by the Council fall within the scope of the exception relating to the protection of legal advice; and ii) there is an overriding public interest in the disclosure of the documents identified pursuant to the applicant’s access to documents request.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the Council infringed Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001 in so far as it did not provide partial access to the documents requested.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment with regard to the scope of the applicant’s request for access to documents.






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

(2)  OJ 2014 L 127, p. 1.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1054/2014 of 6 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for megrims in Union waters of IIa and IV by vessels flying the flag of Belgium
Date: 2014-10-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, EU waters, North Sea, Norwegian Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2014292EN.01000601.xml










8.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 292/6








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1054/2014
of 6 October 2014
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for megrims in Union waters of IIa and IV by vessels flying the flag of Belgium


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 (2) lays down quotas for 2014.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2014.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 October 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


39/TQ43




Member State


Belgium




Stock


LEZ/2AC4-C




Species


Megrims (Lepidorhombus spp.)




Zone


Union waters of IIa and IV




Closing date


10.9.2014
Case F-103/14: Action brought on 6 October 2014  — ZZ v OHIM
Date: 2014-10-06
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: competition (EU), contract terms, designated employment








C_2015007EN.01005201.xml










12.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/52





Action brought on 6 October 2014 — ZZ v OHIM
(Case F-103/14)
(2015/C 007/62)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Heinrich Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action for annulment of the defendant’s decision to apply to the competitions OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13 the clause contained in the applicant’s contract of employment, which provides for the termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that she is not included in the reserve list of the next open competition organised by EPSO for her function group with the specialisation ‘industrial property’, and claim for compensation in respect of the non-material damage caused to her.

Form of order sought







—


Annul OHIM’s decision, of which the applicant was informed by OHIM’s letter of 28 November 2003, to apply to competitions OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, the notices for which were published on 31 October 2013, the clause contained in Article 5 of the applicant’s contract of employment, which provides for the termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that she is not included in the reserve list of the next open competition organised by EPSO for her function group with the specialisation ‘industrial property’;










—


Order OHIM to pay the applicant compensation of an appropriate amount, to be left to the discretion of the Court, in respect of the non-material damage caused to her by the decision of OHIM referred to in the first head of claim, and










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1055/2014 of 6 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in IIIa and IV; Union waters of IIa, IIIb, IIIc and Subdivisions 22-32 by vessels flying the flag of Belgium
Date: 2014-10-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, Belgium, EU waters, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2014292EN.01000801.xml










8.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 292/8








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1055/2014
of 6 October 2014
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in IIIa and IV; Union waters of IIa, IIIb, IIIc and Subdivisions 22-32 by vessels flying the flag of Belgium


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 (2) lays down quotas for 2014.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2014.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 October 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


40/TQ43




Member State


Belgium




Stock


MAC/2A34.




Species


Mackerel (Scomber scombrus)




Zone


IIIa and IV; Union waters of IIa, IIIb, IIIc and Subdivisions 22-32




Closing date


10.9.2014
Case F-101/14: Action brought on 6 October 2014  — ZZ v OHIM
Date: 2014-10-06
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: competition (EU), contract terms, designated employment








C_2015007EN.01005002.xml










12.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/50





Action brought on 6 October 2014 — ZZ v OHIM
(Case F-101/14)
(2015/C 007/60)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Heinrich Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action for annulment of the defendant’s decision to apply to the competitions OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13 the clause contained in the applicant’s contract of employment, which provides for the termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that she is not included in the reserve list of the next open competition organised by EPSO for her function group with the specialisation ‘industrial property’, and claim for compensation in respect of the non-material damage caused to her.

Form of order sought







—


Annul OHIM’s decision, of which the applicant was informed by OHIM’s letter of 28 November 2003, to apply to competitions OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, the notices for which were published on 31 October 2013, the clause contained in Article 5 of the applicant’s contract of employment, which provides for the termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that she is not included in the reserve list of the next open competition organised by EPSO for her function group with the specialisation ‘industrial property’;










—


Order OHIM to pay the applicant compensation of an appropriate amount, to be left to the discretion of the Court, in respect of the non-material damage caused to her by the decision of OHIM referred to in the first head of claim, and










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2014-10-06
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2014351EN.01000101.xml










6.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/1





Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 351/01

Last publication


OJ C 339, 29.9.2014


Past publications


OJ C 329, 22.9.2014


OJ C 315, 15.9.2014


OJ C 303, 8.9.2014


OJ C 292, 1.9.2014


OJ C 282, 25.8.2014


OJ C 261, 11.8.2014

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu