do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-446/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — France) — Société Fonderie 2A v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sixth VAT Directive — Article 8(1)(a) — Determination of the place of supply of goods — Supplier established in a Member State other than the Member State in which the person to whom the goods are supplied is established — Processing of the goods in the Member State where the person to whom the goods are supplied is established)
Date: 2014-10-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, VAT, basis of tax assessment, delivery, provision of services








C_2014421EN.01001501.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/15





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — France) — Société Fonderie 2A v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances
(Case C-446/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Sixth VAT Directive - Article 8(1)(a) - Determination of the place of supply of goods - Supplier established in a Member State other than the Member State in which the person to whom the goods are supplied is established - Processing of the goods in the Member State where the person to whom the goods are supplied is established))
2014/C 421/20
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d'État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Société Fonderie 2A

Defendant: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

Operative part of the judgment

Article 8(1)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995, must be interpreted as meaning that the place of supply of goods sold by a company established in a Member State to a person established in another Member State, and on which the vendor, to make them fit to be supplied, has had finishing work carried out by a service provider established in that other Member State, before having them dispatched by the service provider to the person to whom they are being supplied, must be deemed to be in the Member State where the latter is established.


(1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.
Case C-47/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Martin Grund v Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Common rules for direct support schemes — Single payment scheme — Definition of ‘permanent pasture’  — Land used to grow grass and other herbaceous forage not part of the system of crop rotation of the holding for a minimum of five years — Land ploughed up and sown with a type of herbaceous forage other than that previously grown on it during that period)
Date: 2014-10-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aid to agriculture, arable land, crop rotation, fodder-growing, single payment scheme








C_2014421EN.01000801.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/8





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Martin Grund v Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein
(Case C-47/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy - Common rules for direct support schemes - Single payment scheme - Definition of ‘permanent pasture’ - Land used to grow grass and other herbaceous forage not part of the system of crop rotation of the holding for a minimum of five years - Land ploughed up and sown with a type of herbaceous forage other than that previously grown on it during that period))
2014/C 421/10
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Martin Grund

Defendant: Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein

Operative part of the judgment

The definition of ‘permanent pasture’ set out in Article 2(2)(c) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 of 29 October 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Title III of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers must be interpreted as covering agricultural land which is currently, and has been for five years or more, used to grow grass and other herbaceous forage, even though that land has been ploughed up and seeded with another variety of herbaceous forage other than that which was previously grown on it during that period.


(1)  OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.
Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency for the financial year 2013 — amending budget No 2 ( OJ C 58, 28.2.2014 )
Date: 2014-10-02
Institutions: European Commission, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, executive agency, financial year, publication of accounts








C_2014344EN.01001801.xml










2.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 344/18





Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency for the financial year 2013 — amending budget No 2
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 58 of 28 February 2014
)
2014/C 344/11
On the cover page and page 33:

for:


‘Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency for the financial year 2013 — amending budget No 2’,


read:


‘Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency for the financial year 2013 — amending budget No 2’;

on page 35, Title 3 and Grand total of the expenditure shall read as follows:










‘Title Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2013


Amending budget
No 2


New amount





3




TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT EXPENDITURES



 


 


 




3 1


MEETINGS OF EXPERTS, CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS


1 500


 


1 500




3 2


INFORMATION AND PUBLICATIONS


101 200


 


101 200




3 3


OTHER TECHNICAL EXPENSES AND OF ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT


427 300


 


427 300




 



Title 3 — Total




530 000



 



530 000





 



GRAND TOTAL




9 805 000



 



9 805 000’
Case C-478/13: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2001/18/EC — Deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) — Placing on the market — Article 31(3)(b) — Locations of GMO crops — Obligation to inform the competent authorities — Obligation to establish a public register — Cooperation in good faith)
Date: 2014-10-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Poland, environmental protection, genetically modified organism, infringement of EU law, location of production








C_2014421EN.01001502.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/15





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
(Case C-478/13) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/18/EC - Deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) - Placing on the market - Article 31(3)(b) - Locations of GMO crops - Obligation to inform the competent authorities - Obligation to establish a public register - Cooperation in good faith))
2014/C 421/21
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and M. Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyba, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment







1.


In not laying down an obligation to inform the competent Polish authorities of the locations at which genetically modified organism crops are being grown pursuant to Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, and in not establishing a register of those locations and in not making public the information relating to them, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31(3)(b) of that directive.










2.


The Republic of Poland is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 336, 16.11.2013.