do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-138/14 P: Appeal brought on 21 March 2014 by Firma Handlowa Faktor B. i W. Gęsina and Gęsina Wojciech against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2014 in Case T-468/12, Faktor B. i W. Gęsina v Commission
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, equal treatment








C_2014462EN.01001102.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/11





Appeal brought on 21 March 2014 by Firma Handlowa Faktor B. i W. Gęsina and Gęsina Wojciech against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2014 in Case T-468/12, Faktor B. i W. Gęsina v Commission
(Case C-138/14 P)
(2014/C 462/18)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellant: Firma Handlowa Faktor B. i W. Gęsina and Gęsina Wojciech (represented by: H. Mackiewicz, adwocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 30 September 2014, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Firma Handlowa Faktor B. i W. Gęsina und Gęsina Wojciech to bear its own costs.
Case T-132/12: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2014 — Scooters India v OHIM — Brandconcern (LAMBRETTA) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark LAMBRETTA — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, means of communication, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2014395EN.01003601.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/36






Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2014 — Scooters India v OHIM — Brandconcern (LAMBRETTA)
(Case T-132/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark LAMBRETTA - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2014/C 395/42)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Scooters India Ltd (Lucknow, India) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Brandconcern BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Casucci and N. Ferretti, lawyers)

Re:

Action for annulment brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2012 (Case R 2308/2010-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Brandconcern BV and Scooters India Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 12 January 2012 (Case R 2308/2010-1);










2.


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Scooters India Ltd, including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;










3.


Orders Brandconcern BV to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.
Case F-37/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 30 September 2014 — Ojamaa v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Appointing authority — Act adversely affecting an official — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, appointment of staff, paid leave, sick leave








C_2014395EN.01006801.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/68






Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 30 September 2014 — Ojamaa v Parliament
(Case F-37/14) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Appointing authority - Act adversely affecting an official - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2014/C 395/83)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Priit Ojamaa (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and N. Chemaï, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision not to allow 16 days of leave not taken in 2012 to be carried over to 2013, after the applicant had been on long-term sick leave for a serious illness.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Mr Ojamaa is to bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.






(1)  OJ C 184 of 16/06/2014, p. 47.
2014/690/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 30 September 2014 repealing Decision 2006/464/EC on provisional emergency measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Community of Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (notified under document C(2014) 6566)
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: deciduous tree, import (EU), import restriction, insect, plant disease, plant health control, protection of plant life








L_2014288EN.01000501.xml










2.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 288/5








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION
         
of 30 September 2014
         
repealing Decision 2006/464/EC on provisional emergency measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Community of Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu


(notified under document C(2014) 6566)



(2014/690/EU)



THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (1), and in particular the fourth sentence of Article 16(3) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The measures set out by Commission Decision 2006/464/EC (2) did not prevent the spread of Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (oriental chestnut gall wasp) as appears from the yearly surveys carried out by the Member States pursuant to that Decision. Those surveys further show that Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu is widely spread in a large part of its potential area of establishment within the Union territory. In addition, the conditions for movement of susceptible plants set out in Decision 2006/464/EC are not feasible and appropriate for that large part of the Union territory.












(2)


Decision 2006/464/EC should therefore be repealed.












(3)


The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Decision 2006/464/EC is repealed.


Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.




Done at Brussels, 30 September 2014.


For the Commission

Tonio BORG
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Decision 2006/464/EC of 27 June 2006 on provisional emergency measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Community of Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (OJ L 183, 5.7.2006, p. 29).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7391 — HUAYU Automotive Systems/KSPG/KS AluTech JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry








C_2014340EN.01000101.xml










30.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7391 — HUAYU Automotive Systems/KSPG/KS AluTech JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 340/01
On 23 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7391. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 208/2014 of 30 September 2014 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1276]
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, chemical product, environmental protection, health control, marketing, pesticide, revision of an agreement, vocational training




L_2015202EN.01009601.xml










30.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 202/96








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
         
No 208/2014
of 30 September 2014
         
amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1276]


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (1), as corrected by OJ L 161, 29.6.2010, p. 11, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following is inserted after point 1k (Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:






‘1l.



32009 L 0128: Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 71), as corrected by OJ L 161, 29.6.2010, p. 11.
The provisions of the Directive shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
With regard to Norway, the words “
                     26 November 2012
                     ” in Article 4(2) shall be replaced by the words “
                     1 January 2016
                     ”.’
                  






Article 2
The texts of Directive 2009/128/EC, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 203/2014 of 30 September 2014 (2), whichever is the later.


Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 30 September 2014.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Kurt JÄGER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 71.

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

(2)  See page 57 of this Official Journal.
Case F-35/12: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 30 September 2014  — DM v BEREC (Civil service — Member of the contract staff — Conditions of engagement — Medical examination on engagement — Article 100 of the CEOS — Deferment of medical cover — Contract terminated at the end of the probationary period — Claims for annulment which have become devoid of purpose — Deferment of medical cover on the engagement of the member of staff concerned by another agency of the European Union — No effect — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EU office or agency, European official, dismissal, medical examination, probationary period, servant (EU)








C_2014421EN.01005401.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/54





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 30 September 2014 — DM v BEREC
(Case F-35/12) (1)

((Civil service - Member of the contract staff - Conditions of engagement - Medical examination on engagement - Article 100 of the CEOS - Deferment of medical cover - Contract terminated at the end of the probationary period - Claims for annulment which have become devoid of purpose - Deferment of medical cover on the engagement of the member of staff concerned by another agency of the European Union - No effect - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 421/75
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: DM (represented by: initially, D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, then D. Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Defendant: The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (represented by: M. Chiodi, Agent, D. Waelbroeck, A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to defer the applicant’s medical cover from the date of his entry into service and of the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no further need to adjudicate on the dispute.










2.


The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications is to bear its own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by DM.






(1)  OJ C 138 of 12/05/2012, p. 37.
Case T-51/12: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2014 — Scooters India v OHIM — Brandconcern (LAMBRETTA) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark LAMBRETTA — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2014395EN.01003402.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/34






Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2014 — Scooters India v OHIM — Brandconcern (LAMBRETTA)
(Case T-51/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark LAMBRETTA - Genuine use of the mark - Partial revocation - Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2014/C 395/40)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Scooters India Ltd (Lucknow, India) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Brandconcern BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Casucci, N. Ferreti and C. Galli, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 December 2011 (Case R 2312/2010-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Brandconcern BV and Scooters India Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 1 December 2011 (Case R 2312/2010-1);










2.


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Scooters India Ltd, including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;










3.


Orders Brandconcern BV to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
Case T-410/13: Order of the General Court of 30 September 2014  — Bitiqi and Others v Commission and Others (Action for annulment — Common Foreign and Security Policy — ‘Rule of law’ mission conducted by the European Union in Kosovo (Eurlex Kosovo) — Decisions of the head of the mission not to renew the employment contracts — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Kosovo, common foreign and security policy, diplomatic representation, rule of law, work contract








C_2014421EN.01004301.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/43





Order of the General Court of 30 September 2014 — Bitiqi and Others v Commission and Others
(Case T-410/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - ‘Rule of law’ mission conducted by the European Union in Kosovo (Eurlex Kosovo) - Decisions of the head of the mission not to renew the employment contracts - Manifest lack of jurisdiction))
2014/C 421/60
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Burim Bitiqi (London, United Kingdom); Arlinda Gjebrea (Pristina, Kosovo); Anna Gorska (Warsaw, Poland); Agim Hajdini (London); Josefa Martínez Estéve (Valencia, Spain); Denis Vasile Miron (Bucharest, Romania); James Nicholls (Swindon, United Kingdom); Zornitsa Popova Glodzhani (Varna, Bulgaria); Andrei Mihai Popovici (Bucharest); and Amaia San José Ortiz (Llodio, Spain) (represented: initially by A. Coolen, D. de Abreu Caldas, É. Marchal and J. N. Louis, then by D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J. N. Louis, avocats)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and A. C. Simon, acting as Agents); European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt, É. Chaboureau and M. Silva, acting as Agents); AND Eulex Kosovo (represented by: B. Borchardt, acting as Agent, and by A. Fouquet Dörte, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decisions of the head of the mission ‘Rule of law’ conducted by the European Union in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) of 27 May and 2 July 2013 not to renew the applicants’ employment contracts.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Burim Bitiqi, Arlinda Gjebrea, Anna Gorska, Agim Hajdini, Josefa Martínez Estéve, Denis Vasile Miron, James Nicholls, Zornitsa Popova Glodzhani, Andrei Mihai Popovici, Amaia San José Ortiz are ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo.










3.


The Council of the European Union is ordered to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: EU Official Journal, administrative competition, job vacancy








CA2014340EN.01000301.xml










30.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 340/3





REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS
2014/C 340 A/02
Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.






5


 




6


 




11


 




19


 




21


 




26


 




27


 




30


(PL)




35


 




41


(DE/EN/FR)




42


 




43


 




46


 




47


 




48


 




55


 




56


 




60


 




62


 




65


 




73


(DE/EN/FR)




74


 




81


 




88


 




92


(DE/EN/FR)




97


 




98


 




99


 




108


 




109


 




116


 




119


 




133


 




134


 




136


 




137


(DE/EN/FR)




140


 




145


 




152


 




160


 




163


 




164


 




176


 




178


 




180


 




182


 




185


 




186


 




188


 




195


 




207


 




209


(DE/EN/FR)




211


 




217


 




219


 




242


 




254


 




255


 




256


(LV)




258


(RO)




262


(EN)




267


(SL)




270


(FR)




272


(DA)




274


(IT)




277


 




283


 




289


(DE/EN/FR)




293


(NL)




295


(MT)




297


 




299


 




304


 




321


(DE/EN/FR)




325


(SL)




332


 




334


 




340
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7268 — CSAV/HGV/Kühne Maritime/Hapag-Lloyd AG)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Chile, Germany, carriage of goods, distribution business, economic concentration, holding company, logistics, maritime transport, merger control, subsidiary








C_2014340EN.01000102.xml










30.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7268 — CSAV/HGV/Kühne Maritime/Hapag-Lloyd AG)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 340/02
On 11 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7268. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7241 — Advent International/Bain Capital Investors/Nets Holding)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Norway, Sweden, economic concentration, electronic money, investment company, merger control








C_2014340EN.01000201.xml










30.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7241 — Advent International/Bain Capital Investors/Nets Holding)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 340/03
On 8 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7241. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.