do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-337/14: Order of the President of the Court of 23 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Elvira Mandl, Helmut Mandl v Condor Flugdienst GmbH
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, traveller








C_2014431EN.01001702.xml










1.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/17





Order of the President of the Court of 23 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Elvira Mandl, Helmut Mandl v Condor Flugdienst GmbH
(Case C-337/14) (1)

(2014/C 431/28)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.
Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by Croatia of a transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Croatia, air quality, industrial building, industrial pollution, pollution control








C_2014330EN.01000301.xml










23.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 330/3





Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by Croatia of a transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions
2014/C 330/04
On 19 September 2014, the Commission adopted Commission Decision C(2014) 6519 on the notification by the Republic of Croatia of a transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (1).
This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/237fb1d9-9af1-4872-a111-951ea4f15606/Nacrt%20prijelaznog%20nacionalnog%20plana%20RH%20_clanak%2032%20IED%20clean.pdf


(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7357 — Metal One/Mitsui & Co. Steel/Metal One Mitsui Bussan Resource & Structural Steel Corporation)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, iron and steel industry, merger control








C_2014330EN.01000101.xml










23.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 330/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7357 — Metal One/Mitsui & Co. Steel/Metal One Mitsui Bussan Resource & Structural Steel Corporation)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 330/01
On 16 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7357. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-646/11: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2014  — Ipatau v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Belarus — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the European Union — Action for annulment — Time-limit for instituting proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment)
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, rights of the defence








C_2014388EN.01000901.xml










3.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 388/9





Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2014 — Ipatau v Council
(Case T-646/11) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Belarus - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the European Union - Action for annulment - Time-limit for instituting proceedings - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Error of assessment))
2014/C 388/09
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Vadzim Ipatau (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Council Decision 2011/666/CFSP of 10 October 2011 amending Decision 2010/639/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2011 L 265, p. 17), in so far as it concerns the applicant, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1000/2011 of 10 October 2011 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2011 L 265, p. 8) in so far as it concerns the applicant, the Council decision of 14 November 2011 rejecting the applicant’s request to have his name removed from Council Decision 2011/69/CFSP of 31 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against certain officials of Belarus (OJ 2011 L 28, p. 40) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 of 31 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus (OJ 2011 L 28, p. 17), and annulment of Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2012 L 285, p. 1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1017/2012 of 6 November 2012 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2012 L 307, p. 7), in so far they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Vadzim Ipatau to bear, in addition to his own costs, the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.






(1)  OJ C 258, 25.8.2012.
Case T-11/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2014  — Tegometall International v OHIM — Irega (MEGO) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark MEGO — Relative ground for refusal — Earlier opposition proceedings — No application of the principle of res judicata)
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, metalwork, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014388EN.01001301.xml










3.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 388/13





Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2014 — Tegometall International v OHIM — Irega (MEGO)
(Case T-11/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark MEGO - Relative ground for refusal - Earlier opposition proceedings - No application of the principle of res judicata))
2014/C 388/15
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Tegmotall International AG (Lengwil, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Timmann and E. Schaper, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Irega AG (Zuchwil, Switzerland)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2012 (Case R 1522/2011-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between Tegometall International AG and Irega AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 October 2012 (Case R 1522/2011-1);










2.


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Tegometall International AG before the General Court as well as the Board of Appeal.






(1)  OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.
Case T-178/13: Order of the General Court of 23 September 2014  — Jaczewski v Commission (Action for annulment — Agriculture — Interest in bringing proceedings — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Poland, farming sector, single payment scheme








C_2014409EN.01004101.xml










17.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/41





Order of the General Court of 23 September 2014 — Jaczewski v Commission
(Case T-178/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Agriculture - Interest in bringing proceedings - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 409/58
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Grzegorz Jaczewski (Bielany, Poland) (represented by: M. Goss, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and A. Szmytkowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2012) 5049 final of 24 July 2012 approving the grant of complementary national direct payments in Poland for 2012.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Mr Grzegorz Jaczewski is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014330EN.01000201.xml










23.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 330/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

22 September 2014
2014/C 330/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2845




JPY


Japanese yen


140,09




DKK


Danish krone


7,4437




GBP


Pound sterling


0,78660




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1715




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2069




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1475




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,543




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,95




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1816




RON


Romanian leu


4,4043




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8774




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4481




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4135




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,9564




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5826




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6293




KRW


South Korean won


1 340,29




ZAR


South African rand


14,2833




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8880




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6243




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 398,32




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1670




PHP


Philippine peso


57,278




RUB


Russian rouble


49,5265




THB


Thai baht


41,385




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0699




MXN


Mexican peso


17,0100




INR


Indian rupee


78,2094






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-341/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2014  — Groupe Léa Nature v OHIM — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO’BiO ētic) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark SO’BiO ētic — Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks SO…? — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014388EN.01001601.xml










3.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 388/16





Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2014 — Groupe Léa Nature v OHIM — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO’BiO ētic)
(Case T-341/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark SO’BiO ētic - Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks SO…? - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2014/C 388/19
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Groupe Léa Nature SA (Périgny, France) (represented by: S. Arnaud, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos and V. Melgar, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervener before the General Court: Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: T. Alkin, Barrister)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2013 (Case R 203/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Debonair Trading Internacional Lda and Groupe Léa Nature SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 March 2013 (Case R 203/2011-1);










2.


Orders OHIM and Debonair Trading Internacional Lda each to bear their own costs, and to pay the costs of Groupe Léa Nature SA.






(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.
Case C-438/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 23 September 2014  — Nabiel Peter Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: residence, surname, upper class








C_2014462EN.01001301.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/13





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 23 September 2014 — Nabiel Peter Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff
(Case C-438/14)
(2014/C 462/22)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Karlsruhe

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Nabiel Peter Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff

Other parties: Standesamt der Stadt Karlsruhe, Zentraler Juristischer Dienst der Stadt Karlsruhe

Question referred

Are Articles 18 TFEU and 21 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that the authorities of a Member State are obliged to recognise the change of name of a national of that State if he is at the same time a national of another Member State and has acquired in that Member State, during habitual residence, by means of a change of name not associated with a change of family law status, a freely chosen name including several tokens of nobility, where it is possible that a future substantial link with that State does not exist and in the first Member State the nobility has been abolished by constitutional law but the titles of nobility used at the time of abolition may continue to be used as part of a name?
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2014 of 23 September 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for alfonsinos in EU and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Ireland
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Ireland, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2014282EN.01001101.xml










26.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 282/11








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1006/2014
of 23 September 2014
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for alfonsinos in EU and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Ireland


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 1262/2012 (2) lays down quotas for 2014.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2014.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 September 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 1262/2012 of 20 December 2012 fixing for 2013 and 2014 the fishing opportunities for EU vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks (OJ L 356, 22.12.2012, p. 22).




ANNEX






No


34/DSS




Member State


Ireland




Stock


ALF/3X14-




Species


Alfonsinos (Beryx spp.)




Zone


EU and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV




Closing date


28.8.2014
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1005/2014 of 23 September 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for snow crab in Greenland waters of NAFO 1 by vessels flying the flag of Ireland
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, Greenland, Ireland, North-West Atlantic Fisheries Organisation, catch by species, catch quota, crustacean, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2014282EN.01000901.xml










26.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 282/9








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1005/2014
of 23 September 2014
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for snow crab in Greenland waters of NAFO 1 by vessels flying the flag of Ireland


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 (2), lays down quotas for 2014.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2014.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 September 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


33/TQ43




Member State


Ireland




Stock


PCR/N1GRN




Species


Snow crab (Chionoecetes spp.)




Zone


Greenland waters of NAFO 1




Closing date


28.8.2014
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7330 — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries/Siemens/Metal Technologies JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, iron and steel-working machinery, merger control








C_2014330EN.01001101.xml










23.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 330/11





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7330 — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries/Siemens/Metal Technologies JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 330/07






1.


On 15 September 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd (‘MHI’, Japan) and Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (‘Siemens’, Germany) intend to create a full-function joint venture in the metal plant building sector within the meaning of Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for MHI: manufacture and sale of a range of heavy machineries, including metal plant building in which the undertaking is active through Mitsubishi-Hitachi Metals Machinery, Inc.,
—   for Siemens: manufacture and sale of various products in the sectors of energy, healthcare, infrastructure and industry, including metal plant building in which the undertaking is active through its business unit Siemens VAI Metals Technologies,
—   for the joint venture: metal plant building.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7330 — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries/Siemens/Metal Technologies JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).