do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Action brought on 23 September 2014 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Kingdom of Norway (Case E-19/14)
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Norway, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure








C_2014400EN.01001601.xml










13.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/16





Action brought on 23 September 2014 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Kingdom of Norway
(Case E-19/14)
2014/C 400/07
An action against Norway was brought before the EFTA Court on 23 September 2014 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Xavier Lewis, Markus Schneider and Gjermund Mathisen, acting as Agents of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, Rue Belliard 35, B-1040 Brussels.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority requests the EFTA Court to declare that:






1.


The Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 33 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by failing to take, by the date of expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion sent to the Kingdom of Norway by the EFTA Surveillance Authority pursuant to Article 31(2) of that Agreement, the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the Court of 16 July 2012 in Case E-9/11 EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway [2012] EFTA Ct. Rep. 442.










2.


The Kingdom of Norway bears the costs of these proceedings.





Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:







—


The application addresses the failure of Norway to comply, no later than 26 August 2013, with a reasoned opinion, delivered by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 26 June 2013 regarding that state’s failure to fulfil its obligations under Article 33 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (SCA), to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of 16 July 2012 in Case E-9/11 EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway [2012] EFTA Ct. Rep. 442.










—


The EFTA Surveillance Authority states that, by failing to adopt, by the date of the expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion, the necessary measures to comply with the judgment in Case E-9/11, Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 33 SCA as interpreted by the Court in its judgment in Case E-18/10 [2011] EFTA Ct. Rep. 202, paragraphs 29-30.
Case T-195/12: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2014  — Nuna International v OHIM — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp (nuna) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark nuna — Earlier Community word marks NANA and NANU-NANA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, early childhood, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014388EN.01001002.xml










3.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 388/10





Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2014 — Nuna International v OHIM — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp (nuna)
(Case T-195/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark nuna - Earlier Community word marks NANA and NANU-NANA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 388/11
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Nuna International BV (Erp, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Alpera Plazas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 February 2012 (Case R 476/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Nuna International BV.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 15 February 2012 (Case R 476/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Nuna International BV, as regards the ‘strollers; buggies; safety car seats for children’ in Class 12 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, and the ‘baby walkers’ and ‘sleeping bags for baby and children’ in Class 20;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7334 — Oracle/MICROS)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-09-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: database, economic concentration, hotel industry, merger control, retail trade, software








C_2014330EN.01000102.xml










23.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 330/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7334 — Oracle/MICROS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 330/02
On 29 August 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7334. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.