do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-427/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 18 September 2014  — Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v SIA ‘Veloserviss’
Date: 2014-09-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Latvia, customs regulations, customs territory (EU), interpretation of the law








C_2014421EN.01002101.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/21





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 18 September 2014 — Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v SIA ‘Veloserviss’
(Case C-427/14)
2014/C 421/30
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Defendant: SIA ‘Veloserviss’

Questions referred

Should Article 78(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (1) of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations limits the possibility of undertaking for a second time a post-clearance examination and revising the results of the first post-clearance examination?
May the national law of a Member State establish the procedure for the undertaking of post-clearance examinations provided for in Article 78(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992, establishing the Community Customs Code, and limits on the revision of the results of those examinations?
Should Article 78(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992, establishing the Community Customs Code, be interpreted as meaning that national legislation may legitimately contain limitations on the revision of the results of a first post-clearance examination, if information is received indicating that the provisions governing the customs procedure were applied on the basis of incorrect and incomplete information, a matter which was not known at the time of adopting the decision on the first post-clearance examination?


(1)  OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.
Case C-374/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Valimar’ OOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Varna (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Dumping — Iron or steel ropes and cables originating in Russia — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Articles 2(8) and (9) and 11(2), (3), (9) and (10) — Interim review — Expiry review of the anti-dumping measures — Validity of Regulation (EC) No 1279/2007 — Determination of the export price on the basis of sales to third countries — Reliability of export prices — Taking into consideration of price undertakings — Change in circumstances — Application of a methodology which is different from that used at the time of the original investigation)
Date: 2014-09-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Russia, anti-dumping duty, fixing of prices, import (EU), iron, originating product, steel, wire








C_2014421EN.01000201.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/2





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Valimar’ OOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Varna
(Case C-374/12) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Dumping - Iron or steel ropes and cables originating in Russia - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Articles 2(8) and (9) and 11(2), (3), (9) and (10) - Interim review - Expiry review of the anti-dumping measures - Validity of Regulation (EC) No 1279/2007 - Determination of the export price on the basis of sales to third countries - Reliability of export prices - Taking into consideration of price undertakings - Change in circumstances - Application of a methodology which is different from that used at the time of the original investigation))
2014/C 421/02
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant:‘Valimar’ OOD

Respondent: Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Varna

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the questions referred has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 1279/2007 of 30 October 2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating in the Russian Federation, and repealing the anti-dumping measures on imports of certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating in Thailand and Turkey.


(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.