do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2014/415/CFSP of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause ( OJ L 192, 1.7.2014 )
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: aid to disaster victims, application of EU law, civil defence, interinstitutional cooperation (EU), man-made disaster, mutual assistance, natural disaster, terrorism








L_2014275EN.01000701.xml










17.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 275/7







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2014/415/CFSP of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 192 of 1 July 2014
)


On the cover, in the table of contents:
for:


                     ‘
                     Council Decision 2014/415/CFSP of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for theimplementation by the Union of the solidarity clause
                     ’
                  
,read:


                     ‘2014/415/EU

Council Decision of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation bythe Union of the solidarity clause
                     ’
                  
;on page 53, in the title:
for:


                           ‘COUNCIL DECISION 2014/415/CFSP
of 24 June 2014
                        
on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause’
                        
,read:


                           ‘COUNCIL DECISION
of 24 June 2014
                        
on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause

(2014/415/EU)’
                           

.
Case F-12/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2014 — CQ v Parliament (Civil Service — Temporary staff — Contract conference interpreters (AIC) — Article 90 of the CEOS — Psychological harassment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Internal rules concerning the Advisory committee dealing with harassment and its prevention at the workplace — Confidentiality of the work of that committee — Manifest errors of assessment)
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: information profession, psychological harassment, servant (EU)








C_2014395EN.01006301.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/63






Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2014 — CQ v Parliament
(Case F-12/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Temporary staff - Contract conference interpreters (AIC) - Article 90 of the CEOS - Psychological harassment - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Internal rules concerning the Advisory committee dealing with harassment and its prevention at the workplace - Confidentiality of the work of that committee - Manifest errors of assessment))
(2014/C 395/75)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: CQ (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Dean and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament rejecting the complaint of psychological harassment brought by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CQ to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.






(1)  OJ C 108, 13.4.2013, p. 40.
Case F-117/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 17 September 2014 — Wahlström v Frontex (Civil service — Frontex staff — Temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed term contract — Renewal procedure — Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to be heard — Infringement — Influence on the content of the decision)
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: rights of the defence, servant (EU), work contract








C_2014395EN.01006502.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/65






Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 17 September 2014 — Wahlström v Frontex
(Case F-117/13) (1)

((Civil service - Frontex staff - Temporary staff - Non-renewal of a fixed term contract - Renewal procedure - Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to be heard - Infringement - Influence on the content of the decision))
(2014/C 395/79)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kari Wahlström (Espoo, Finland) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (represented by: S. Vuorensola and H. Caniard, acting as Agents, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff after the annulment, by the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-87/11, of the first decision of non-renewal of his contract.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Executive Director of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, of 19 February 2013, not to renew Mr Wahlström’s contract as a member of the temporary staff;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Declares that the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay Mr Wahlström’s costs.






(1)  OJ C 31, 1/2/2014, p. 23.
Case T-333/10: Order of the General Court of 17 September 2014  — ATC and Others v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Importation of birds — Agreement on the quantified amounts of the award of compensation for the damages suffered — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: avian influenza, bird, contractual liability, health control, import (EU), import restriction, indemnification, infectious disease, surveillance concerning imports








C_2014409EN.01003701.xml










17.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/37





Order of the General Court of 17 September 2014 — ATC and Others v Commission
(Case T-333/10) (1)

((Non-contractual liability - Importation of birds - Agreement on the quantified amounts of the award of compensation for the damages suffered - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 409/53
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicants: Animal Trading Company (ATC) BV (Loon op Zand, Netherlands); Avicentra NV (Malle, Belgium); Borgstein Birds and Zoofood Trading VOF (Wamel, Netherlands); Bird Trading Company Van der Stappen BV (Dongen, Netherlands); New Little Bird’s srl (Anagni, Italy); Vogelhuis Kloeg (Zevenbergen, Netherlands) and Giovanni Pistone (Westerlo, Belgium) (represented by: M. Osse and J. Houdijk, lawyers

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by F. Jimeno Fernández and B. Burggraaf, and subsequently by F. Jimeno Fernández and H. Kranenborg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the adoption first, of Commission Decision 2005/760/EC of 27 October 2005 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain third countries for the import of captive birds (OJ 2005 L 285, p. 60), as extended, and of Commission Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 of 23 March 2007 laying down animal health conditions for imports of certain birds into the Community and the quarantine conditions thereof (OJ 2007 L 84, p. 7).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


Animal Trading Company (ATC) BV, Avicentra NV, Borgstein Birds and Zoofood Trading VOF, Bird Trading Company Van der Stappen BV, New Little Birds Srl, Vogelhuis Kloeg and M. Giovanni Pistone are to bear their own costs.










3.


The European Commission is to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.
Case T-665/14 P: Appeal brought on 17 September 2014 by Robert Klar and Francisco Fernandez Fernandez against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 July 2014 in Case F-114/13, Klar and Fernandez Fernandez v Commission
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Luxembourg, trade union election, union representative








C_2014380EN.01002402.xml










27.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/24





Appeal brought on 17 September 2014 by Robert Klar and Francisco Fernandez Fernandez against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 July 2014 in Case F-114/13, Klar and Fernandez Fernandez v Commission
(Case T-665/14 P)
2014/C 380/32
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellants: Robert Klar (Grevenmacher, Luxembourg) and Francisco Fernandez Fernandez (Steinsel, Luxembourg) (represented by A. Salerno, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellants claim that the Court should:






—


set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 July 2014;










—


refer the case to the Civil Service Tribunal for a determination on the merits;










—


order the European Commission to bear all of the costs of the case.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the appellants rely on a single plea in law alleging that the Civil Service Tribunal incorrectly held that the action was clearly inadmissible, for lack of a properly conducted pre-litigation procedure, in so far as the note of the Appointing Authority for October 2012 is not in view of its wording, or its context, or its form, an act adversely affecting an official, the notification of which set the time-limit running for lodging a complaint.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7300 — COFCO/Noble Agri)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agro-industry, economic concentration, merger control, supplier








C_2014319EN.01000101.xml










17.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7300 — COFCO/Noble Agri)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 319/01
On 12 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7300. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Special Report No 10/2014 ‘The effectiveness of European Fisheries Fund support for aquaculture’
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: European fisheries fund, aquaculture








C_2014319EN.01001601.xml










17.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/16





Special Report No 10/2014 ‘The effectiveness of European Fisheries Fund support for aquaculture’
2014/C 319/07
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 10/2014 ‘The effectiveness of European Fisheries Fund support for aquaculture’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu
A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:





European Court of Auditors




Publications (PUB)




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




Tel. +352 4398-1




E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu




or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7392 — Advent International / Corialis) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: building materials, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, metallurgical industry








C_2014319EN.01002201.xml










17.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/22





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7392 — Advent International / Corialis)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 319/09






1.


On 10 September 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Advent International Corporation (‘Advent’, USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the Corialis group (‘Corialis’, Belgium) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Advent: global private equity firm that manages investments in more than 70 countries across a diverse range of industries and geographies,
—   for Corialis: supplier of aluminium extrusion services and aluminium coated building systems and profiles for windows, doors, conservatories and curtain walls.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7392 — Advent International / Corialis, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case C-7/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Stockholm — Sweden) — Skandia America Corporation (USA), filial Sverige v Skatteverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — VAT group — Internal invoicing for services supplied by a main company with its seat in a third country to its branch belonging to a VAT group within a Member State — Whether services supplied are taxable)
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, VAT, invoicing, provision of services, third country








C_2014421EN.01000701.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/7





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Stockholm — Sweden) — Skandia America Corporation (USA), filial Sverige v Skatteverket
(Case C-7/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - VAT group - Internal invoicing for services supplied by a main company with its seat in a third country to its branch belonging to a VAT group within a Member State - Whether services supplied are taxable))
2014/C 421/09
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Förvaltningsrätten i Stockholm

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Skandia America Corporation (USA), filial Sverige

Defendant: Skatteverket

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Articles 2(1), 9 and 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that supplies of services from a main establishment in a third country to its branch in a Member State constitute taxable transactions when the branch belongs to a group of persons whom it is possible to regard as a single taxable person for value added tax purposes;










2.


Articles 56, 193 and 196 of Directive 2006/112/EC must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such as that in the main proceedings where the main establishment of a company in a third country supplies services for consideration to a branch of that company in a Member State and where the branch belongs to a group of persons whom it is possible to regard as a single taxable person for value added tax purposes in that Member State, that group, as the purchaser of those services, becomes liable for the value added tax payable.






(1)  OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014319EN.01000201.xml










17.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

16 September 2014
2014/C 319/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2949




JPY


Japanese yen


138,67




DKK


Danish krone


7,4448




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79920




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2376




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2085




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,2790




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,555




HUF


Hungarian forint


314,35




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1956




RON


Romanian leu


4,4145




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8635




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4340




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4297




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,0370




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5866




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6326




KRW


South Korean won


1 341,66




ZAR


South African rand


14,1811




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9578




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6200




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 483,02




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1745




PHP


Philippine peso


57,327




RUB


Russian rouble


50,0160




THB


Thai baht


41,748




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0322




MXN


Mexican peso


17,1260




INR


Indian rupee


79,0867






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-441/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Almer Beheer BV, Daedalus Holding BV v Van den Dungen Vastgoed BV, Oosterhout II BVBA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Company law — Directive 2003/71/EC — Article 3(1) — Obligation to publish a prospectus when securities are offered for sale to the public — Enforced sale of securities)
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, dissemination of information, publication, securities








C_2014421EN.01000401.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/4





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Almer Beheer BV, Daedalus Holding BV v Van den Dungen Vastgoed BV, Oosterhout II BVBA
(Case C-441/12) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Company law - Directive 2003/71/EC - Article 3(1) - Obligation to publish a prospectus when securities are offered for sale to the public - Enforced sale of securities))
2014/C 421/05
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Almer Beheer BV, Daedalus Holding BV

Defendants: Van den Dungen Vastgoed BV, Oosterhout II BVBA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and amending Directive 2001/34/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation to publish a prospectus prior to any offer of securities to the public is not applicable to an enforced sale of securities, such as that at issue in the main proceedings.


(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.
Case C-242/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Commerz Nederland NV v Havenbedrijf Rotterdam NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — State aid — Article 107(1) TFEU — Definition of aid — Guarantees provided by a public undertaking to a bank to facilitate lending to third party creditors — Guarantees deliberately provided by the director of that public undertaking in disregard of that undertaking’s statutes — Presumption of opposition by the public body that owns that undertaking — Whether the guarantees may be imputed to the State)
Date: 2014-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, credit guarantee, public sector, terms for aid








C_2014421EN.01001101.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/11





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Commerz Nederland NV v Havenbedrijf Rotterdam NV
(Case C-242/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Competition - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Definition of aid - Guarantees provided by a public undertaking to a bank to facilitate lending to third party creditors - Guarantees deliberately provided by the director of that public undertaking in disregard of that undertaking’s statutes - Presumption of opposition by the public body that owns that undertaking - Whether the guarantees may be imputed to the State))
2014/C 421/14
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Commerz Nederland NV

Respondent: Havenbedrijf Rotterdam NV

Operative part of the judgment

On a proper construction of Article 107(1) TFEU, for the purposes of determining whether or not the guarantees provided by a public undertaking are imputable to the public authority controlling that undertaking, the following are relevant, together with the body of evidence arising from the circumstances of the case in the main proceedings and from the context in which they took place: on the one hand, that the sole director of the company providing those guarantees acted improperly, deliberately kept the provision of those guarantees secret and disregarded the undertaking’s statutes and, on the other, that that public authority would have opposed the provision of the guarantees, had it been informed of it. In a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, those circumstances could, in themselves, exclude such imputability only if it may be inferred that the guarantees at issue were provided without the involvement of that same public authority.


(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.