do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Joined Cases C-533/12 P and C-536/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM) SA v Corsica Ferries France SAS, European Commission, French Republic (C-533/12 P), French Republic v Corsica Ferries France SAS, European Commission, Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM) SA (C-536/12 P) (Appeals — Restructuring aid — European Commission’s margin of assessment — Scope of review by the General Court of the European Union — Market economy private investor test — Requirement for a sectoral and geographical analysis — Sufficiently well-established practice — Long-term economic rationale — Making of additional redundancy payments)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aid for restructuring, private investment, severance pay








C_2014395EN.01000601.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/6






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM) SA v Corsica Ferries France SAS, European Commission, French Republic (C-533/12 P), French Republic v Corsica Ferries France SAS, European Commission, Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM) SA (C-536/12 P)
(Joined Cases C-533/12 P and C-536/12 P) (1)

((Appeals - Restructuring aid - European Commission’s margin of assessment - Scope of review by the General Court of the European Union - Market economy private investor test - Requirement for a sectoral and geographical analysis - Sufficiently well-established practice - Long-term economic rationale - Making of additional redundancy payments))
(2014/C 395/07)
Language of the case: French

Parties

(Case C-533/12 P)

Appellant: Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM) SA (represented by: A. Winckler and F.-C. Laprévote, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: Corsica Ferries France SAS (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, avocats), European Commission, French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, N. Rouam and J. Rossi, acting as Agents)
(Case C-536/12 P)

Appellant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, D. Colas, N. Rouam and J. Rossi, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Corsica Ferries France SAS (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, avocats), European Commission, Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM) SA (represented by: A. Winckler and F.-C. Laprévote, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the appeals;










2)


Orders Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditérrannée (SNCM) SA and the French Republic to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Corsica Ferries France SAS in equal shares.






(1)  OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 954/2014 of 4 September 2014 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Livarot (PDO))
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, cows’ milk cheese, designation of origin, labelling, product designation








L_2014268EN.01000101.xml










9.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 268/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 954/2014
of 4 September 2014
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Livarot (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Livarot’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Livarot’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 4 September 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 of 12 June 1996 on the registration of geographical indications and designations of origin under the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 (OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1).

(3)  
            OJ C 125, 26.4.2014, p. 8.
Case C-150/14 P: Appeal brought on 31 March 2014 by Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 29 January 2014 in Case T-47/13 Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Christin Vieweg
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, cheese, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014372EN.01000201.xml










20.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 372/2





Appeal brought on 31 March 2014 by Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 29 January 2014 in Case T-47/13 Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Christin Vieweg

(Case C-150/14 P)
2014/C 372/02
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald GmbH (represented by: S. Biagosch, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Christin Vieweg
By order of 4 September 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Case C-21/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commercial policy — Anti-dumping duties — Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 — Validity — Imports of products originating in China — Imports of the same products consigned from Thailand — Circumvention — Proof — Refusal to cooperate)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, Thailand, anti-dumping duty, hoisting equipment, import (EU), originating product








C_2014395EN.01000902.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/9






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen
(Case C-21/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Commercial policy - Anti-dumping duties - Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 - Validity - Imports of products originating in China - Imports of the same products consigned from Thailand - Circumvention - Proof - Refusal to cooperate))
(2014/C 395/11)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the question raised by the referring court has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 of 11 June 2009 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not.


(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.
Case C-114/12: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — European Commission v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — External action of the European Union — International agreements — Protection of neighbouring rights of broadcasting organisations — Negotiations for a Convention of the Council of Europe — Decision of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States authorising the joint participation of the Union and its Member States in the negotiations — Article 3(2) TFEU — Exclusive external competence of the Union)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: broadcasting, copyright, external competence (EU), international agreement, negotiation of an agreement (EU)








C_2014395EN.01000201.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/2






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — European Commission v Council of the European Union
(Case C-114/12) (1)

((Action for annulment - External action of the European Union - International agreements - Protection of neighbouring rights of broadcasting organisations - Negotiations for a Convention of the Council of Europe - Decision of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States authorising the joint participation of the Union and its Member States in the negotiations - Article 3(2) TFEU - Exclusive external competence of the Union))
(2014/C 395/02)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, P. Hetsch, L. Gussetti and J. Samnadda, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Passos and D. Warin, Agents)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: H. Legal, J.-P. Hix, F. Florindo Gijón and M. Balta, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, E. Ruffer, D. Hadroušek and J. Králová, Agents), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze, B. Beutler and N. Graf Vitzthum, Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels and J. Langer, Agents), Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Szpunar, B. Majczyna, M. Drwięcki and E. Gromnicka initially, then by B. Majczyna, M. Drwięcki and E. Gromnicka, Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: C. Murrell, acting as Agent, assisted by R. Palmer, Barrister)

Operative part

The Court:






1)


Annuls the Decision of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on the participation of the European Union and its Member States in negotiations for a Convention of the Council of Europe on the protection of the rights of broadcasting organisations, of 19 December 2011;










2)


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs;










3)


Orders the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Parliament to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012.
Corrigendum to Single Resolution Board — Vacancy Notice — Member of the Board (Director of Strategy and Policy Coordination) — COM/2014/10361 — (Official Journal of the European Union C 217 A of 10 July 2014 )
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: aid for restructuring, appointment of members, bank, bankruptcy, job vacancy








CA2014297EN.01000301.xml










4.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 297/3





Corrigendum to Single Resolution Board — Vacancy Notice — Member of the Board (Director of Strategy and Policy Coordination) — COM/2014/10361
(Official Journal of the European Union 
C 217 A of 10 July 2014
)
2014/C 297 A/03
On page 15, ‘Deadline’, ‘Deadline for applications’:







for:


‘3 September 2014’,











read:


‘15 September 2014’.
Case C-452/13: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg — Austria) — Germanwings GmbH v Ronny Henning (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 2, 5 and 7 — Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight — Length of delay — Concept of ‘arrival time’)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, consumer protection, indemnification, traveller








C_2014395EN.01002001.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/20






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg — Austria) — Germanwings GmbH v Ronny Henning
(Case C-452/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Articles 2, 5 and 7 - Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight - Length of delay - Concept of ‘arrival time’))
(2014/C 395/24)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Salzburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Germanwings GmbH

Respondent: Ronny Henning

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2, 5 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘arrival time’, which is used to determine the length of the delay to which passengers on a flight have been subject, refers to the time at which at least one of the doors of the aircraft is opened, the assumption being that, at that moment, the passengers are permitted to leave the aircraft.


(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
Case C-288/13 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 September 2014  — Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Deza a.s., Industrial Química del Nalón SA, Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: chemical product, equal treatment, health risk, market approval, product safety








C_2014409EN.01002102.xml










17.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/21





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Deza a.s., Industrial Química del Nalón SA, Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
(Case C-288/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) - Article 59 and Annex XIII - Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure - Equal treatment))
2014/C 409/29
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Deza a.s., Industrial Química del Nalón SA, Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents, and by J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, advocaten)

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Deza a.s., Industrial Química del Nalón SA and Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.