do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-162/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d.d. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 72/166/EEC — Article 3(1) — Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ — Accident caused in the courtyard of a farm by a tractor to which a trailer was attached)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: agricultural holding, agricultural vehicle, commercial vehicle, freedom of movement, motor car, third-party insurance, transport accident








C_2014395EN.01001102.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/11






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d.d.
(Case C-162/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 72/166/EEC - Article 3(1) - Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ - Accident caused in the courtyard of a farm by a tractor to which a trailer was attached))
(2014/C 395/14)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Damijan Vnuk

Defendant: Zavarovalnica Triglav d.d.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘use of vehicles’ in that article covers any use of a vehicle that is consistent with the normal function of that vehicle. That concept may therefore cover the manoeuvre of a tractor in the courtyard of a farm in order to bring the trailer attached to that tractor into a barn, as in the case in the main proceedings, which is a matter for the referring court to determine.


(1)  OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.
Case T-296/14 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 September 2014 — Erbslöh v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — National support for the generation of renewable electricity — Commission decision to open the State aid formal investigation procedure — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Prima facie case)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, countertrade, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy consumption, renewable energy, terms for aid








C_2014431EN.01002601.xml










1.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/26





Order of the President of the General Court of 4 September 2014 — Erbslöh v Commission
(Case T-296/14 R)
((Application for interim measures - State aid - National support for the generation of renewable electricity - Commission decision to open the State aid formal investigation procedure - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case))
(2014/C 431/45)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Erbslöh AG (Velbert, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz and B. Wißmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened the State aid formal investigation procedure concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Joined Cases C-256/13 and C-264/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Provincie Antwerpen v Belgacom NV van publiek recht (C-256/13), Mobistar NV (C-264/13) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/20/EC — Article 6 — Conditions attached to the general authorisation and to the rights of use for radio frequencies and for numbers, and specific obligations — Article 13 — Fees for rights of use and rights to install facilities — Regional legislation making undertakings liable to pay a tax on places of business)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: business management, regulation of telecommunications, tax, transmission network








C_2014395EN.01001601.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/16






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Provincie Antwerpen v Belgacom NV van publiek recht (C-256/13), Mobistar NV (C-264/13)
(Joined Cases C-256/13 and C-264/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive 2002/20/EC - Article 6 - Conditions attached to the general authorisation and to the rights of use for radio frequencies and for numbers, and specific obligations - Article 13 - Fees for rights of use and rights to install facilities - Regional legislation making undertakings liable to pay a tax on places of business))
(2014/C 395/19)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Provincie Antwerpen

Respondents: Belgacom NV van publiek recht (C-256/13), Mobistar NV (C-264/13)

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 6 and 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (‘the Authorisation Directive’) must be interpreted as not precluding operators providing electronic communications networks or services from being subject to a general tax on establishments, on account of the presence on public or private property of cellular telephone communication masts, pylons or antennae which are necessary for their activity.


(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Case C-509/13 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2014  — Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Application for registration of a figurative mark with the word element ‘Metro’ in blue and yellow — Opposition by the proprietor of the coloured Community figurative mark containing the word ‘GRUPOMETROPOLIS’  — Rejection of the opposition)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, real estate business, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014409EN.01002501.xml










17.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/25





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG
(Case C-509/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Application for registration of a figurative mark with the word element ‘Metro’ in blue and yellow - Opposition by the proprietor of the coloured Community figurative mark containing the word ‘GRUPOMETROPOLIS’ - Rejection of the opposition))
2014/C 409/36
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: J.-C. Plate, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones SL is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 336, of 16.11.2013.
Case C-119/13 and C-120/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Wedding — Germany) — eco cosmetics GmbH & Co. KG v Virginie Laetitia Barbara Dupuy (C-119/13), Raiffeisenbank St. Georgen reg. Gen. mbH v Tetyana Bonchyk (C-120/13) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 — European order for payment procedure — Invalid service — Effects — European order for payment declared enforceable — Opposition — Review in exceptional cases — Time-limits)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil procedure, claim, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU








C_2014395EN.01001001.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/10






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Wedding — Germany) — eco cosmetics GmbH & Co. KG v Virginie Laetitia Barbara Dupuy (C-119/13), Raiffeisenbank St. Georgen reg. Gen. mbH v Tetyana Bonchyk (C-120/13)
(Case C-119/13 and C-120/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 - European order for payment procedure - Invalid service - Effects - European order for payment declared enforceable - Opposition - Review in exceptional cases - Time-limits))
(2014/C 395/12)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Wedding

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: eco cosmetics GmbH & Co. KG (C-119/13), Raiffeisenbank St. Georgen reg. Gen. mbH (C-120/13)

Defendants: Virginie Laetitia Barbara Dupuy (C-119/13), Tetyana Bonchyk (C-120/13)

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure must be interpreted as meaning that the procedures laid down in Articles 16 to 20 thereof are not applicable where it appears that a European order for payment has not been served in a manner consistent with the minimum standards laid down in Articles 13 to 15 of that regulation.
Where it is only after a European order for payment has been declared enforceable that such an irregularity is exposed, the defendant must have the opportunity to raise that irregularity, which, if it is duly established, will invalidate the declaration of enforceability.


(1)  OJ C 164, 8.6.2013.
Corrigendum to Single Resolution Board — Vacancy Notice — Chairperson of the Board — COM/2014/10359 — (Official Journal of the European Union C 217 A of 10 July 2014 )
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: aid for restructuring, bank, bankruptcy, job vacancy, president of an institution








CA2014297EN.01000101.xml










4.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 297/1





Corrigendum to Single Resolution Board — Vacancy Notice — Chairperson of the Board — COM/2014/10359
(Official Journal of the European Union 
C 217 A of 10 July 2014
)
2014/C 297 A/01
On page 5, ‘Deadline’, ‘Deadline for applications’:







for:


‘3 September 2014’,











read:


‘15 September 2014’.
Case C-289/13 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 September 2014  — Cindu Chemicals BV, Deza a.s., Koppers Denmark A/S, Koppers UK Ltd v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), European Commission (Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of anthracene oil, anthracene low, as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: chemical product, equal treatment, health risk, market approval, product safety








C_2014409EN.01002201.xml










17.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/22





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Cindu Chemicals BV, Deza a.s., Koppers Denmark A/S, Koppers UK Ltd v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), European Commission
(Case C-289/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) - Article 59 and Annex XIII - Identification of anthracene oil, anthracene low, as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure - Equal treatment))
2014/C 409/30
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Cindu Chemicals BV, Deza a.s., Koppers Denmark A/S, Koppers UK Ltd (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents, and by J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, advocaten), European Commission (represented by: E. Manhaeve and P. Oliver, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Cindu Chemicals BV, Deza a.s., Koppers Denmark A/S and Koppers UK Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
Case C-145/13 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2014  — Ghezzo Giovanni & C. Snc di Ghezzo Maurizio & C. v Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Socialpesca Soc. coop. arl, formerly Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Soc. Coop. rl, Cooperativa vongolari Sottomarina Lido Soc. coop. rl, European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Aid to firms established in Venice and Chioggia — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, State aid, Veneto, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_2014409EN.01002001.xml










17.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/20





Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Ghezzo Giovanni & C. Snc di Ghezzo Maurizio & C. v Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Socialpesca Soc. coop. arl, formerly Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Soc. Coop. rl, Cooperativa vongolari Sottomarina Lido Soc. coop. rl, European Commission
(Case C-145/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - State aid - Aid to firms established in Venice and Chioggia - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court))
2014/C 409/27
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Ghezzo Giovanni & C. Snc di Ghezzo Maurizio & C. (represented by: R. Volpe and C. Montagner, avvocatesse)

Other parties to the proceedings: Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Socialpesca Soc. coop. arl, formerly Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Soc. Coop. rl, Cooperativa vongolari Sottomarina Lido Soc. coop. rl, and European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Ghezzo Giovanni & C. Snc di Ghezzo Maurizio & C shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Corrigendum to the Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain rainbow trout originating in Turkey ( OJ C 44, 15.2.2014 )
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Türkiye, anti-dumping duty, complaint to the Commission, fishery product, import (EU), originating product








C_2014297EN.01002401.xml










4.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/24





Corrigendum to the Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain rainbow trout originating in Turkey
(
Official Journal of the European Union C44 of 15 February 2014
)
(2014/C 297/08)
On page 18, point 2. Product under investigation:

for:

‘The product subject to this investigation is rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) live, fresh, chilled, frozen or smoked whether in the form of whole fish (with heads and gills on, gutted, weighing 1,2 kg or less each), or with heads off, gilled or gutted (weighing 1 kg or less each), or in the form of fillets (weighing 400 g or less each).’


read:
‘The product subject to this investigation is rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss):






—


live weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or










—


fresh, chilled, frozen and/or smoked:






—


in the form of whole fish (with heads on), whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or










—


with heads off, whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1 kg or less each, or










—


in the form of fillets weighing 400 g or less each.’
Case C-543/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovakia) — Michal Zeman v Krajské riaditeľstvo Policajného zboru v Žiline (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 91/477/EEC — Issuing of the European firearms pass — National legislation according to which that pass is issued only to holders of a firearms licence issued for hunting or target shooting use)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Slovakia, administrative check, document, firearms and munitions, hunting, national law, personal weapon








C_2014395EN.01000701.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/7






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovakia) — Michal Zeman v Krajské riaditeľstvo Policajného zboru v Žiline
(Case C-543/12) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 91/477/EEC - Issuing of the European firearms pass - National legislation according to which that pass is issued only to holders of a firearms licence issued for hunting or target shooting use))
(2014/C 395/08)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Michal Zeman

Defendant: Krajské riaditeľstvo Policajného zboru v Žiline

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 91/477/EEC of 18 June 1991 on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons, as amended by Directive 2008/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which authorises the issue of a European firearms pass only to holders of weapons used for hunting and target shooting purposes.


(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
Case C-474/12: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Schiebel Aircraft GmbH v Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of establishment — Freedom of movement for workers — Non-discrimination — Article 346(1)(b) TFEU — Protection of a Member State’s essential security interests — Legislation of a Member State under which the statutory representatives of a business engaged within the national territory in the trading of arms, munitions and war material must hold the nationality of that Member State)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arms trade, equal treatment, free movement of workers, public safety, right of establishment








C_2014395EN.01000502.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/5






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Schiebel Aircraft GmbH v Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend
(Case C-474/12) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of establishment - Freedom of movement for workers - Non-discrimination - Article 346(1)(b) TFEU - Protection of a Member State’s essential security interests - Legislation of a Member State under which the statutory representatives of a business engaged within the national territory in the trading of arms, munitions and war material must hold the nationality of that Member State))
(2014/C 395/06)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Schiebel Aircraft GmbH

Defendant: Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 45 TFEU and 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which, in the case of businesses wishing to trade in military weapons and munitions and broker the sale and purchase of such goods, members of their statutory representation bodies, or their managing partner, must hold the nationality of that Member State. It is for the national court, however, to verify whether the Member State which, in order to justify that legislation, relies on the derogation allowed under Article 346(1)(b) TFEU is able to show that such derogation is necessary in order to protect its essential security interests.


(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
Case C-204/14: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tatabányai Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary)) — István Tivadar Szabó v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tax debts accumulated by a commercial company — Director of that company could not be recruited to be a director of another company — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Interpretation requested of provisions of EU law that are inapplicable — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court — Hypothetical questions — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, business management, debt, firm governed by commercial law, judicial review, tax system








C_2014431EN.01000701.xml










1.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/7





Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tatabányai Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary)) — István Tivadar Szabó v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága
(Case C-204/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Tax debts accumulated by a commercial company - Director of that company could not be recruited to be a director of another company - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Interpretation requested of provisions of EU law that are inapplicable - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court - Hypothetical questions - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2014/C 431/12)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Tatabányai Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: István Tivadar Szabó

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága

Operative part of the order







1.


The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to provide an answer to the third question posed by the Tatabányai Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary).










2.


The other questions posed by the aforementioned court are manifestly inadmissible.






(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.