do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to the Communication from the Government of the Republic of Poland concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons in the Żory-Rybnik area ( OJ C 232, 18.7.2014 )
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: Poland
Subjects: Poland, Silesia province, extraction of oil, hydrocarbon, petroleum exploration, public contract








C_2014295EN.01001701.xml










3.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/17





Corrigendum to the Communication from the Government of the Republic of Poland concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons in the Żory-Rybnik area
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 232 of 18 July 2014
)
(2014/C 295/07)
The following table on page 9:









‘Name


Block No


1992 layout




X


Y




Żory-Rybnik


part of concession block No 390


242 385,73


470 962,96




243 155,77


471 323,24




243 219,27


471 596,14




243 453,05


471 633,50




243 057,46


473 936,75




241 751,38


472 910,54




243 440,95


471 696,44’





should be replaced by:









‘Name


Block No


1992 layout




X


Y




Żory-Rybnik


part of concession block No 390


242 385,73


470 962,96




243 155,77


471 323,24




243 219,27


471 596,14




243 453,05


471 633,50




243 440,95


471 696,44




243 057,46


473 936,75




241 751,38


472 910,54’





Approved by:
Sławomir M. BRODZIŃSKI

Chief State Geologist
Case T-686/13: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2014  — Unibail Management v OHIM (Representation of two lines and four stars) (Community trade mark — Application for a figurative Community trade mark representing two lines and four stars — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Absence of concrete assessment — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, graphic illustration, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014361EN.01000701.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/7





Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Unibail Management v OHIM (Representation of two lines and four stars)
(Case T-686/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for a figurative Community trade mark representing two lines and four stars - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Absence of concrete assessment - Duty to state reasons))
2014/C 361/07
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Unibail Management (Paris, France) (represented by: L. Bénard, A. Rudoni and O. Klimis, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2013 (case R 300/2013-2) concerning an application for registration of a sign representing two lines and 4 stars as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 September 2013 (case R 300/2013-2) in so far as it dismissed the appeal of Unibail Management for products and services falling within classes 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42;










2.


Orders OHIM to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Case T-687/13: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2014  — Unibail Management v OHIM (Representation of two lines and five stars) (Community trade mark — Application for a figurative Community trade mark representing two lines and five stars — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Absence of concrete assessment — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, shopping centre, trade-mark law








C_2014361EN.01000702.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/7





Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Unibail Management v OHIM (Representation of two lines and five stars)
(Case T-687/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for a figurative Community trade mark representing two lines and five stars - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Absence of concrete assessment - Duty to state reasons))
2014/C 361/08
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Unibail Management (Paris, France) (represented by: L. Bénard, A. Rudoni, and O. Klimis, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2013 (case R 299/2013-2), concerning an application for the registration of a sign representing two lines and five stars as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 September 2013 (case R 299/2013-2) in so far as it dismissed the appeal brought by Unibail Management for products and services falling within classes 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42);










2.


Orders OHIM to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 941/2014 of 3 September 2014 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Роле Трапезица (Role Trapezitsa) (TSG)]
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Bulgaria, consumer information, designation of origin, foodstuff, meat product, product designation








L_2014264EN.01000101.xml










4.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 264/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 941/2014
of 3 September 2014
         
entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Роле Трапезица (Role Trapezitsa) (TSG)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Bulgaria's application to register the name ‘Роле Трапезица’ (Role Trapezitsa) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Роле Трапезица’ (Role Trapezitsa) should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Роле Трапезица’ (Role Trapezitsa) (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.
The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.) set out in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 September 2014.


For the Commission


The President

José Manuel BARROSO
            





(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 101, 5.4.2014, p. 15.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-127/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2014 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Free movement of capital — Articles 21 TFEU and 63 TFEU — EEA Agreement — Articles 28 and 40 — Taxation of inheritances and gifts — Distribution of powers of taxation — Discrimination as between residents and non-residents — Discrimination according to where the immovable property is situated — Burden of proof)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, capital transfer tax, equal treatment, free movement of capital, gift, infringement of EU law, inheritance, real property, residence








C_2014395EN.01000301.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/3






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2014 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
(Case C-127/12) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Free movement of capital - Articles 21 TFEU and 63 TFEU - EEA Agreement - Articles 28 and 40 - Taxation of inheritances and gifts - Distribution of powers of taxation - Discrimination as between residents and non-residents - Discrimination according to where the immovable property is situated - Burden of proof))
(2014/C 395/03)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Roels, R. Lyal and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


declares that, by applying different tax treatment to donations and successions between beneficiaries and donees resident in Spain and those not resident in Spain, between bequeathers resident in Spain and those not resident in Spain, and between donations and similar transfers of immovable property situated within and outside of Spain, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992;










2)


dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3)


orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.
Case T-165/14: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014  — ANKO v Commission and REA
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: contractual liability, misuse of a right, principle of proportionality, reimbursement of aid, works contract








C_2014372EN.01002301.xml










20.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 372/23





Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — ANKO v Commission and REA
(Case T-165/14) (1)

2014/C 372/29
Language of the case: Greek
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 175, 10.6.2014.
Case T-112/11: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014  — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse eV v Commission (Action for annulment — Registration of a protected geographical indication — ‘Edam Holland’  — No interest in bringing proceedings — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, cheese, designation of origin, location of production, mode of production, product designation, product quality








C_2014380EN.01001002.xml










27.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/10





Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse eV v Commission
(Case T-112/11) (1)

((Action for annulment - Registration of a protected geographical indication - ‘Edam Holland’ - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 380/13
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Loschelder and V.Schoene, lawyers)

Defendant: The European Commission (represented by: initially, G. von Rintelen and M. Vollkommer, then G. von Rintelen and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: The Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, J. Langer, M. Noort, B. Koopman and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents); and Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie (Zoetermeer, the Netherlands) (represented by: P. van Ginneken, F. Gerritzen and C. van Veen, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1121/2010 of 2 December 2010 entering a designation in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Edam Holland (PGI)] (OJ 2010 L 317, p. 14).

Operative part of the order







1.


The application is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse eV shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.










3.


The Kingdom of the Netherlands and Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie shall bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, Ireland, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014295EN.01000501.xml










3.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/5





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2014/C 295/05)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


6.8.2014




Duration


6.8.2014-31.12.2014




Member State


Ireland




Stock or Group of stocks


SOL/7FG.




Species


Common sole (Solea solea)




Zone


VIIf and VIIg




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


23/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case C-589/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v GMAC UK plc (Reference for a preliminary ruling — VAT — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 11C(1), first subparagraph — Direct effect — Reduction of the taxable amount — Two transactions concerning the same goods — Supply of goods — Cars, sold on a hire purchase basis, repossessed and sold at auction — Abuse of rights)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, delivery, direct applicability, invitation to tender, misuse of a right, motor car








C_2014395EN.01000901.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/9






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v GMAC UK plc
(Case C-589/12) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - VAT - Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC - Article 11C(1), first subparagraph - Direct effect - Reduction of the taxable amount - Two transactions concerning the same goods - Supply of goods - Cars, sold on a hire purchase basis, repossessed and sold at auction - Abuse of rights))
(2014/C 395/10)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Defendant: GMAC UK plc

Operative part of the judgment

The first subparagraph of Article 11C(1) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those of the case in the main proceedings, a Member State may not prevent a taxable person from invoking the direct effect of that provision in respect of one transaction by arguing that that person may rely on the provisions of national law in relation to another transaction concerning the same goods and that the cumulative application of those provisions would produce an overall fiscal result which neither national law nor Sixth Directive 77/388, applied separately to those transactions, produces or is intended to produce.


(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.
Case T-113/11: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014  — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee v Commission (Action for annulment — Registration of a protected geographical indication — ‘Gouda Holland’  — No interest in bringing proceedings — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, cheese, designation of origin, location of production, mode of production, product designation, product quality








C_2014380EN.01001101.xml










27.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/11





Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee v Commission
(Case T-113/11) (1)

((Action for annulment - Registration of a protected geographical indication - ‘Gouda Holland’ - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 380/14
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Loschelder and V. Schoene, lawyers)

Defendant: The Commission (represented by: initially, G. von Rintelen and M. Vollkommer, then G. von Rintelen and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: The Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, J. Langer, M. Noort, B. Koopman and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents); and Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie (Zoetermeer, the Netherlands) (represented by: P. van Ginneken, F. Gerritzen and C. van Veen, lawyers)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1122/2010 of 2 December 2010 entering a designation in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Gouda Holland (PGI)] (OJ 2010 L 317, p. 22).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee eV shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.










3.


The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie shall bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,15 % on 1 September 2014 — Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest








C_2014295EN.01000201.xml










3.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/2





Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
0,15 % on 1 September 2014
Euro exchange rates (2)

2 September 2014
(2014/C 295/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3115




JPY


Japanese yen


137,63




DKK


Danish krone


7,4477




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79330




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2018




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2072




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1220




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,784




HUF


Hungarian forint


315,49




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2141




RON


Romanian leu


4,4116




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8511




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4129




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4307




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,1645




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5746




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6441




KRW


South Korean won


1 335,88




ZAR


South African rand


14,0767




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0630




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6083




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 407,39




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1766




PHP


Philippine peso


57,333




RUB


Russian rouble


49,1505




THB


Thai baht


42,097




BRL


Brazilian real


2,9553




MXN


Mexican peso


17,2207




INR


Indian rupee


79,5949






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-410/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Baltlanta’ UAB v Lietuvos valstybė (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Structural funds — Economic, social and territorial cohesion — Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Article 38 — Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 — Article 19 — Fisheries — Court proceedings at national level — Obligation on the part of the Member State to take the measures necessary to ensure the successful implementation of the decision relating to the grant of funds following court proceedings)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Structural Funds, economic and social cohesion, fishing industry, judicial proceedings, regional aid








C_2014395EN.01001901.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/19






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Baltlanta’ UAB v Lietuvos valstybė
(Case C-410/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Structural funds - Economic, social and territorial cohesion - Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 - Article 38 - Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 - Article 19 - Fisheries - Court proceedings at national level - Obligation on the part of the Member State to take the measures necessary to ensure the successful implementation of the decision relating to the grant of funds following court proceedings))
(2014/C 395/23)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant:‘Baltlanta’ UAB

Defendant: Lietuvos valstybė

Intervening parties: Nacionalinė mokėjimo agentūra prie Žemės ūkio ministerijos, Lietuvos Respublikos žemės ūkio ministerija, Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerija

Operative part of the judgment

Article 38(1)(e) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds, Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2369/2002 of 20 December 2002, and Sections 6 and 7 of the Guidelines on the closure of assistance (2000 to 2006) from the Structural Funds, adopted by Commission Decision COM(2006)3424 final of 1 August 2006, must be interpreted as neither obliging the State authorities concerned to inform the European Commission of the existence of court proceedings relating to an administrative decision on the eligibility of an application for financial assistance such as that at issue in the main proceedings, nor to take the measures necessary so that funds that have been provided are reserved for the disputed assistance until the question of the award of the assistance has been finally decided.


(1)  OJ C 284, 28.9.2013.