do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-261/12: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014  — Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon v Commission (Actions for damages — Public service contract — Tender procedure — Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Commission for protection of competition in Serbia — Rejection of a tender — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Serbia, indemnification, invitation to tender, powers of the institutions (EU), services contract








C_2014380EN.01001201.xml










27.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/12





Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon v Commission
(Case T-261/12) (1)

((Actions for damages - Public service contract - Tender procedure - Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Commission for protection of competition in Serbia - Rejection of a tender - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
2014/C 380/15
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE (Chalandri, Greece) (represented by: A. Krystallidis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and P. van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for damages seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the decision of the Delegation of the European Union in the Republic of Serbia to annul the decision to award the contract to the applicant in tender procedure EuropeAid/131427/C/SER/RS, concerning the strengthening of the institutional capacity of the Commission for protection of competition in Serbia (OJ 2011/S 147-243259).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, North Sea, Norwegian Sea, United Kingdom, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014295EN.01000401.xml










3.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/4





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2014/C 295/04)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


4.8.2014




Duration


4.8.2014 - 31.12.2014




Member State


United Kingdom




Stock or Group of stocks


BLI/24-




Species


Blue ling (Molva dypterygia)




Zone


Union and international waters of II and IV




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


22/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-386/13: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014  — Kėdainių rajono Okainių and Others v Council and Commission (Action for annulment — Common Agricultural Policy — Direct support schemes for farmers — Authorisation for granting complementary national direct payments in Lithuania for 2012 — Time limit for bringing an action — Point from which time runs — Inadmissibility — Plea of illegality)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Lithuania, aid to agriculture, common agricultural policy, farmer








C_2014380EN.01001301.xml










27.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/13





Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Kėdainių rajono Okainių and Others v Council and Commission
(Case T-386/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common Agricultural Policy - Direct support schemes for farmers - Authorisation for granting complementary national direct payments in Lithuania for 2012 - Time limit for bringing an action - Point from which time runs - Inadmissibility - Plea of illegality))
2014/C 380/17
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties


Applicant: Kėdainių rajono Okainių ŽŪB (Okainiai, Lithuania) and the 134 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the order (represented by: I. Vėgėlė, lawyer)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Vaičiukaitė and E. Karlsson, acting as Agents); and European Commission (represented by: H. Kranenborg and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas, K. Vainienė, A. Karbauskas, R. Makelis and K. Anužis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application seeking, first, the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2012) 4391 final of 2 July 2012 authorising the making of complementary national direct payments in Lithuania for 2012 and, secondly, a declaration of the partial illegality of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ 2009 L 30, p. 16).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Kėdainių rajono Okainių ŽŪB and the 134 other applicants appearing in the annex shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.










3.


The Republic of Lithuania shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
Special Report No 7/2014 ‘Has the ERDF successfully supported the development of business incubators?’
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, incorporation, job creation








C_2014295EN.01000301.xml










3.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/3





Special Report No 7/2014 ‘Has the ERDF successfully supported the development of business incubators?’
(2014/C 295/03)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 7/2014 ‘Has the ERDF successfully supported the development of business incubators?’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu
A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:





European Court of Auditors




Publications (PUB)




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




Tel. +352 4398-1




E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu




or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.
Case T-583/13: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Shire Pharmaceutical Contracts v Commission (Action for annulment — Medicinal products for paediatric use — Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 — Article 37 — Extension of the period of market exclusivity of off-patent orphan medicinal products — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: illness, medical research, medicinal product, paediatrics








C_2014431EN.01002301.xml










1.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/23





Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Shire Pharmaceutical Contracts v Commission
(Case T-583/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Medicinal products for paediatric use - Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 - Article 37 - Extension of the period of market exclusivity of off-patent orphan medicinal products - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility))
(2014/C 431/39)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Shire Pharmaceutical Contracts Ltd (Hampshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Bacon, Barrister, M. Utges Manley and M. Vickers, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and V. Walsh, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision purportedly contained in the letter which the Commission sent to the applicant on 2 September 2013, as subsequently confirmed by the letter of 18 October 2013, concerning whether the medicinal product Xagrid was eligible for the reward provided for in Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (OJ 2006 L 378, p. 1)

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Shire Pharmaceutical Contracts Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 377, 21.12.2013.