do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 944/2014 of 2 September 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for greater forkbeard in EU and international waters of V, VI and VII by vessels flying the flag of Spain
Date: 2014-09-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, English Channel, Faroes, Spain, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2014265EN.01000101.xml










5.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 265/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 944/2014
of 2 September 2014
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for greater forkbeard in EU and international waters of V, VI and VII by vessels flying the flag of Spain


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 1262/2012 (2) lays down quotas for 2014.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2014.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 2 September 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 1262/2012 of 20 December 2012 fixing for 2013 and 2014 the fishing opportunities for EU vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks (OJ L 356, 22.12.2012, p. 22).




ANNEX






No


24/DSS




Member State


Spain




Stock


GFB/567-




Species


Greater Forkbeard (Phycis blennoides)




Zone


EU and international waters of V, VI and VII




Closing date


12.8.2014
Case F-89/14: Action brought on 2 September 2014  — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2014-09-02
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, action for annulment (EU), expatriate worker, indemnification








C_2014421EN.01006202.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/62





Action brought on 2 September 2014 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-89/14)
2014/C 421/91
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance and ordering it to pay that allowance to him, together with interest, since taking up his duties.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision refusing to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance, adopted on 11/11/2013 as appointing authority (PMO), notified on 19/11/2013;










—


order the defendant to pay him that allowance from the date he took up his duties at the Commission;










—


order the defendant to pay the applicant interest at the rate applied by the ECB for its refinancing operations on the amount corresponding to each of those allowances, from the date when it became due until full payment;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-336/13: Order of the Court of 2 September 2014  — Borghezio v Parliament (Action for annulment — Declaration of the President of the European Parliament, in plenary session, informing the assembly of the exclusion of an MEP from the political group to which he was attached — Act not amenable to review — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2014-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, political group (EP), political rights, rights of the defence








C_2014380EN.01001202.xml










27.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/12





Order of the Court of 2 September 2014 — Borghezio v Parliament
(Case T-336/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Declaration of the President of the European Parliament, in plenary session, informing the assembly of the exclusion of an MEP from the political group to which he was attached - Act not amenable to review - Action manifestly inadmissible))
2014/C 380/16
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Mario Borghezio (Turin, Italy) (represented by: H. Laquay, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N. Görlitz and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Parliament, in the form of a declaration of its President on 10 July 2013, in plenary session, according to which the applicant was, since 3 June 2013, sitting as a non-attached MEP, as a result of his exclusion from the political group ‘Europe of Freedom & Democracy’ as from that date.

Operative part







1)


The action is dismissed.










2)


Mr Mario Borghezio shall bear his own costs, and pay those of the European Parliament, including those incurred in the interim relief proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
Case T-370/14: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2014 — Petropars and Others v Council
Date: 2014-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, environmental protection, international sanctions, occupational safety, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence








C_2014431EN.01004602.xml










1.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/46





Order of the General Court of 2 September 2014 — Petropars and Others v Council
(Case T-370/14) (1)

(2014/C 431/73)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.
Call for nominations with a view to the election of the European Ombudsman
Date: 2014-09-02
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: European Ombudsman, announcement of candidacy, appointment of members








C_2014293EN.01001301.xml










2.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 293/13





CALL FOR NOMINATIONS WITH A VIEW TO THE ELECTION OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
2014/C 293/04
Having regard to Articles 24 and 228 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,
Having regard to the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties adopted by the European Parliament on 9 March 1994 (1) and, in particular, to Articles 6 and 7 thereof, contained in Annex X to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure,
Having regard to Rule 219 of the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure,
Whereas this election of the European Ombudsman by the European Parliament will be for the duration of the 2014-2019 parliamentary term,
Whereas the European Ombudsman is eligible for reappointment,
Whereas the European Ombudsman is chosen from among persons who are Union citizens, have full civil and political rights, offer every guarantee of independence, and meet the conditions required for the exercise of the highest judicial office in their country or have the acknowledged competence and experience to undertake the duties of the Ombudsman,






1.


Nominations are hereby invited with a view to the election of the European Ombudsman by the European Parliament.










2.


Applicants must have the support of a minimum of 40 Members of the European Parliament who are nationals of at least two Member States and must provide all supporting documents needed to show conclusively that they fulfil the conditions required by the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties as well as a solemn undertaking on their part that, if elected, they will not engage in any other occupation, whether gainful or not, during their term of office.










3.


Nominations must be forwarded to the President of the European Parliament no later than 30 September 2014 (2).






M. SCHULZ

President of the European Parliament





(1)  OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15.

(2)  Nominations should be sent to:
The President of the European Parliament
(Nominations to the post of European Ombudsman)
PHS 06A055





Postal address:




Louise Weiss Building




Allée du Printemps




BP 1024/F




67070 Strasbourg Cedex




FRANCE




or





Paul-Henri Spaak Building




Rue Wiertz/Wiertzstraat




1047 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Nominations should state relevant contact details, including an electronic address.
Case T-648/14: Action brought on 2 September 2014 — Infusion Brands v OHIM (DUALTOOLS)
Date: 2014-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, tool industry, trade-mark law








C_2014380EN.01002001.xml










27.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/20





Action brought on 2 September 2014 — Infusion Brands v OHIM (DUALTOOLS)
(Case T-648/14)
2014/C 380/27
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Infusion Brands, Inc. (Myer Lake Circle Clearwater, United States) (represented by: K. Piepenbrink, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 July 2014 given in Case R 398/2014-4;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in white, black and green containing the verbal element ‘DUALTOOLS’ for goods and services in Classes 7, 8 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 1 2 0 27  496

Decision of the Examiner: Partially rejected the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), (c) and 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-538/13: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2014  — Verein Natura Havel and Vierhaus v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Letter of formal notice sent in the context of ongoing infringement proceedings concerning the compliance with EU law of German aviation law — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2014-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU law - national law, Germany, access to EU information, air transport, transport regulations








C_2014380EN.01001401.xml










27.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/14





Order of the General Court of 2 September 2014 — Verein Natura Havel and Vierhaus v Commission
(Case T-538/13) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Letter of formal notice sent in the context of ongoing infringement proceedings concerning the compliance with EU law of German aviation law - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
2014/C 380/18
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Verein Natura Havel eV (Berlin, Germany), and Hans-Peter Vierhaus (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Austilat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by B. Martenczuk and C. Zadra, and subsequently by B. Martenczuk and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 24 June 2013 rejecting the initial request for access to a letter of formal notice sent to the Federal Republic of Germany under Article 258 TFEU and of the Commission’s decision of 3 September 2013 rejecting the confirmatory application for access to that letter.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Verein Natura Havel eV and Hans-Peter Vierhaus are ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.