do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-642/14: Action brought on 29 August 2014 — JP Divver Holding Company v OHIM (EQUIPMENT FOR LIFE)
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014431EN.01002901.xml










1.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/29





Action brought on 29 August 2014 — JP Divver Holding Company v OHIM (EQUIPMENT FOR LIFE)
(Case T-642/14)
(2014/C 431/51)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: JP Divver Holding Company Ltd (Newry, Ireland) (represented by: A. Franke, E. Bertram, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark ‘EQUIPMENT FOR LIFE’

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 June 2014 in Case R 64/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Communication from the Commission on the quantity of certain products in the milk and milk products sector available for the period from 1 October to 31 December 2014 under certain quotas opened by the Union
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: New Zealand, import licence, milk product, originating product, tariff quota








C_2014289EN.01000501.xml










29.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/5





Communication from the Commission
on the quantity of certain products in the milk and milk products sector available for the period from 1 October to 31 December 2014 under certain quotas opened by the Union
2014/C 289/04
Import licenses which were allocated for the second half of 2014 for certain quotas referred to in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 (1), did not cover the full quantity available under those quotas. The remaining quantities are laid out in the Annex. They will be available from 1 October to 31 December 2014.


(1)  OJ L 341, 22.12.2001, p. 29.


ANNEX






Products originating in New Zealand




Quota number


Quantity (kilograms)




09.4182


29 947 000




09.4195


23 776 000




09.4514


2 928 000




09.4515


1 641 000
Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/253/13 — Heads of Unit (AD 12) with Croatian citizenship (HR)
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: Croatia, EPSO, competition (EU), supervisor








CA2014289EN.01000201.xml










29.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 289/2





RESERVE LIST (1)

OPEN COMPETITION
EPSO/AD/253/13 — Heads of Unit (AD 12) with Croatian citizenship (HR)
2014/C 289 A/02
 

Field of Law







GRDINIC


Elica





Field of Economics







BOGUNOVIĆ


Borislav




LIHA МАТЕJIČЕK


Aida




MARTINOVIC


Dragica




PERVAN


Ivan





Field of European public administration







BENEŠ


Avis Marija




HAJDUK


Damir




KULIS


Ivan Davor




RAOS


Marinko




SKAKELJA


Neda




The reserve list will be valid until 29 July 2017.


(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 963/2014 of 29 August 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Zázrivské vojky (PGI)]
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Slovakia, cows’ milk cheese, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, Žilina region








L_2014271EN.01001501.xml










12.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 271/15








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 963/2014
of 29 August 2014
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Zázrivské vojky (PGI)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovakia's application to register the name ‘Zázrivské vojky’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Zázrivské vojky’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Zázrivské vojky’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 August 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Tonio BORG
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 109, 11.4.2014, p. 27.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-412/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 29 August 2014  — Dagmar Wedel, Rudi Wedel v Condor Flugdienst GmbH
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, traveller








C_2014448EN.01000301.xml










15.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 448/3





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 29 August 2014 — Dagmar Wedel, Rudi Wedel v Condor Flugdienst GmbH
(Case C-412/14)
(2014/C 448/03)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Dagmar Wedel, Rudi Wedel

Defendant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Must the extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) relate directly to the booked flight?










2.


If the first question is to be answered in the negative, how many earlier flights involving the aircraft to be used for the scheduled flight are relevant to the existence of an extraordinary circumstance? Is there a time-limit to the consideration of extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights? If so, how is that time-limit to be calculated?










3.


If extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights are also relevant to a later flight, must the reasonable measures to be taken by the operating air carrier, in accordance with Article 5(3) of the regulation, relate only to preventing the extraordinary circumstance or also to avoiding a long delay?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: EU Official Journal, competition (EU)








CA2014289EN.01000401.xml










29.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 289/4





REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS
2014/C 289 A/04
Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.






5


 




6


 




11


 




19


 




21


 




26


 




27


 




30


(PL)




35


 




41


(DE/EN/FR)




42


 




43


 




46


 




47


 




48


 




55


 




56


 




60


 




62


 




65


 




73


(DE/EN/FR)




74


 




81


 




88


 




92


(DE/EN/FR)




97


 




98


 




99


 




108


 




109


 




116


 




119


 




133


 




134


 




136


 




137


(DE/EN/FR)




140


 




145


 




152


 




160


 




163


 




164


 




176


 




178


 




180


 




182


 




185


 




186


 




188


 




195


 




207


 




209


(DE/EN/FR)




211


 




217


 




219


 




242


 




254


 




255


 




256


(LV)




258


(RO)




262


(EN)




267


(SL)




270


(FR)




272


(DA)




274


(IT)




277


 




283


 




289


(DE/EN/FR)
Case C-411/14 P: Appeal brought on 29 August 2014 by Romano Pisciotti against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 2 July 2014 in Case T-403/14 Pisciotti v Commission
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, State aid, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, control of State aid








C_2015118EN.01001102.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/11





Appeal brought on 29 August 2014 by Romano Pisciotti against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 2 July 2014 in Case T-403/14 Pisciotti v Commission
(Case C-411/14 P)
(2015/C 118/15)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Romano Pisciotti (represented by: M. Maresca, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 28 January 2015, the Court (Second Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Mr Romano Pisciotti to bear his own costs.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014289EN.01000601.xml










29.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/6





Euro exchange rates (1)

28 August 2014
2014/C 289/05

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3178




JPY


Japanese yen


136,68




DKK


Danish krone


7,4519




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79450




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1990




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2060




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1525




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,775




HUF


Hungarian forint


313,91




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2145




RON


Romanian leu


4,4025




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8549




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4079




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4290




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,2131




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5717




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6459




KRW


South Korean won


1 338,21




ZAR


South African rand


14,0410




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0934




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6318




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 439,93




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1610




PHP


Philippine peso


57,645




RUB


Russian rouble


48,4470




THB


Thai baht


42,120




BRL


Brazilian real


2,9732




MXN


Mexican peso


17,2675




INR


Indian rupee


79,8982






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/252/13 — Heads of Unit (AD9) with Croatian citizenship (HR)
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: Croatia, EPSO, competition (EU), supervisor








CA2014289EN.01000101.xml










29.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 289/1





RESERVE LIST (1)

OPEN COMPETITION
EPSO/AD/252/13 — Heads of Unit (AD9) with Croatian citizenship (HR)
2014/C 289 A/01
 

FIELD OF ECONOMICS







CAR


Nikola




GOLUBIĆ


Krešimir





FIELD OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION







HULJAK


Marija




PERCAN


Davor




SRSEN


Desa




The reserve list will be valid until 29 July 2017.


(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.
Case C-410/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 29 August 2014  — Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH v DAK-Gesundheit
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative transparency, award of contract, simplification of formalities








C_2014409EN.01002901.xml










17.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/29





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 29 August 2014 — Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH v DAK-Gesundheit
(Case C-410/14)
2014/C 409/41
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH

Defendant: DAK-Gesundheit

Questions referred

The following questions are referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union under Article 267 TFEU for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts … (1):






1.


Does the concept of a ‘public contract’ under Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18/EC no longer apply if a contracting authority carries out an authorisation procedure in which it awards the contract without selecting one or more economic operators (‘openhouse model’)?










2.


If the answer to question 1 is that the selection of one or more economic operators is a characteristic of a public contract, the following question arises: is the characteristic of the selection of economic operators within the meaning of Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18/EC to be interpreted, in the light of Article 2 of that directive, as meaning that contracting authorities may refrain from selecting one or more economic operators by way of an authorisation procedure only if the following conditions are satisfied:






—


the carrying out of an authorisation procedure is published at European level,










—


clear rules concerning the conclusion of the contract and acceding to the contract are set,










—


the terms of the contract are set in advance in such a way that no economic operator is able to influence the content of the contract,










—


economic operators are granted the right to accede to the contract at any time;










—


the contracts concluded are published at European level?










(1)  OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.
Addendum to the Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/249/13 — Administrators (AD 7)
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU), macroeconomics








CA2014289EN.01000301.xml










29.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 289/3





ADDENDUM TO THE RESERVE LIST (1)

OPEN COMPETITION
EPSO/AD/249/13 — Administrators (AD 7)
2014/C 289 A/03
 

Field 1. Macroeconomics







ORSEAU


Eloïse Lucie Caroline




The reserve list will be valid until 28 March 2017.


(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.
Case T-649/14: Action brought on 29 August 2014 — NTS Energie- und Transportsysteme v OHIM — Schütz (X-Windwerk)
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, energy industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wind energy








C_2014395EN.01005501.xml










10.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/55






Action brought on 29 August 2014 — NTS Energie- und Transportsysteme v OHIM — Schütz (X-Windwerk)
(Case T-649/14)
(2014/C 395/68)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: NTS Energie- und Transportsysteme GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: S. Mach, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Schütz GmbH & Co. KGaA (Selters, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 May 2014 in Case R 978/2013-1

Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘X-Windwerk’ for services in Classes 39, 40 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 10 719 466

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘Wind Werk’ for goods and services in Classes 7, 9, 37 and 42

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the Opposition Division’s decision was annulled and the application for the Community trade mark was rejected

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
Judgment of the Court of 29 August 2014 in Case E-24/13 — Casino Admiral AG v Wolfgang Egger (Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Obligation of transparency — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: administrative transparency, award of contract, equal treatment, invitation to tender, provision of services, right of establishment








C_2015092EN.01003201.xml










19.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 92/32





JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 29 August 2014
in Case E-24/13
Casino Admiral AG v Wolfgang Egger
(Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Obligation of transparency — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)
(2015/C 92/06)
In Case E-24/13, Casino Admiral AG v Wolfgang Egger — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice from the State Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein (Staatsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein) concerning the interpretation of Articles 31 and 36 of the EEA Agreement and the obligation of transparency derived therefrom in the context of a procedure for awarding a casino concession, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 29 August 2014, the operative part of which is as follows:






1.


In the absence of specific provisions, national authorities remain bound by fundamental rules of EEA law when awarding service concessions. This does not preclude the national authority from attaching relative weighting to the award criteria but there remains a duty to comply with the obligation of transparency. This obligation entails that the relative weighting cannot alter the original award criteria, be of a nature that could have significantly affected the preparation of tenders or be likely to give rise to discrimination against one of the tenderers.










2.


The obligation of transparency does not necessarily require the national authorities to terminate a contract or the national courts to set aside an award decision in every case of breach of that obligation in connection with the award of a service concession. However, the national court must consider, when assessing in the circumstances of the case at hand the available remedies to ensure that the effects contrary to Articles 31 and 36 EEA do not subsist, that the public interest objective of good administration is adequately reflected in the award of concessions, so that awards can be made in a way that is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory. In the absence of EEA rules on remedies it is for the domestic legal system to regulate the legal procedures for safeguarding the rights which individuals derive from that obligation in such a way that those procedures are no less favourable than similar domestic procedures and do not make the exercise of those rights practically impossible or excessively difficult.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 962/2014 of 29 August 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pescabivona (PGI))
Date: 2014-08-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Sicily, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, stone fruit








L_2014271EN.01001401.xml










12.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 271/14








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 962/2014
of 29 August 2014
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pescabivona (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Pescabivona’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pescabivona’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Pescabivona’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 August 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Tonio BORG
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 103, 8.4.2014, p. 13.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).