do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7361 — Kaindl/DB ML/CTE) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: container, economic concentration, merger control, wood industry








C_2014283EN.01000301.xml










26.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/3





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7361 — Kaindl/DB ML/CTE)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 283/03






1.


On 18 August 2014, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings M. Kaindl KG (‘Kaindl’, Austria) and DB Mobility Logistics AG (‘DB ML’, Germany), controlled by Deutsche Bahn AG, acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of CTE Container Terminal Enns GmbH (‘CTE’, Austria) by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


Kaindl is a holding company active in the timber processing and trade sectors; through its wholly-owned subsidiary CTS Container Terminal Salzburg GmbH, Kaindl is also active in the logistics sector,










—


DB ML is a provider of mobility and logistics services,










—


CTE: operates the Enns Container Terminal.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2), it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit to it their observations on the proposed operation.
Observations must reach the European Commission no later than 10 days following the date on which this notification is published. They can be sent to the Commission under reference number M.7361 — Kaindl/DB ML/CTE by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014283EN.01000101.xml










26.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

25 August 2014
2014/C 283/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3200




JPY


Japanese yen


137,13




DKK


Danish krone


7,4552




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79567




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1489




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2087




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1515




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,833




HUF


Hungarian forint


312,96




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1785




RON


Romanian leu


4,3952




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8758




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4175




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4457




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,2303




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5787




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6492




KRW


South Korean won


1 346,49




ZAR


South African rand


14,1174




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1242




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6308




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 462,78




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1746




PHP


Philippine peso


57,881




RUB


Russian rouble


47,7272




THB


Thai baht


42,219




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0069




MXN


Mexican peso


17,3243




INR


Indian rupee


79,9326






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7357 — Metal One/Mitsui & Co. Steel/Metal One Mitsui Bussan Resource & Structural Steel Corporation) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, iron and steel industry, merger control








C_2014283EN.01000201.xml










26.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/2





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7357 — Metal One/Mitsui & Co. Steel/Metal One Mitsui Bussan Resource & Structural Steel Corporation)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 283/02






1.


On 18 August 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Metal One, a company controlled by the Mitsubishi Corporation (‘MC Group’), and Mitsui & Co. Steel Ltd (‘MBS’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mitsui & Co. Ltd (‘Mitsui Group’), create and acquire within the meaning of Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over the joint venture Metal One Mitsui Bussan Resource & Structural Steel Corporation (‘MOMBR & SSC’). MOMBR & SSC will integrate five wholly-owned subsidiaries of Metal One and two of MBS.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for MC Group: various industrial and related activities, including Metal One that is active in steel trading,
—   for Mitsui Group: various product sales, logistics and financing as well as infrastructure and other project development, including MBS that is active in trading of steel and iron, handling raw materials for the manufacture of steel and a range of steel products, and
—   for MOMBR & SSC: distribution of steel for construction use and the trade of steel waste and scrap in Japan.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7357 — Metal One/Mitsui & Co. Steel/Metal One Mitsui Bussan Resource & Structural Steel Corporation, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-638/14: Action brought on 26 August 2014  — Frinsa del Noroeste v OHIM — Frisa Frigorífico Rio Doce (FRISA)
Date: 2014-08-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cannery, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014380EN.01001701.xml










27.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/17





Action brought on 26 August 2014 — Frinsa del Noroeste v OHIM — Frisa Frigorífico Rio Doce (FRISA)
(Case T-638/14)
2014/C 380/23
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Frinsa del Noroeste, SA (Santa Eugenia de Riviera, Spain) (represented by: J. Botella Reyna, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Frisa Frigorífico Rio Doce, SA (Espirito Santo, Brazil)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


refuse registration of Community trade mark No 1 0 3 29  721 FRISA to distinguish goods in Class 29 and services in Classes 35 and 39.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark with word element ‘FRISA’ for goods and services in Classes 29, 35 and 39 — Application for Community trade mark No 1 0 3 29  721

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark with word element ‘Frinsa’ for goods in Class 29

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Decision of the Opposition Division annulled and opposition rejected in its entirety

Pleas in law: In its decision of 1 July 2014 in Joined Cases R 1547/2013-4 and R 1851/2013-4, the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) did not proceed to examine the applicant’s arguments since it confined itself to deciding the cases in an identical manner, examining only the proof of use submitted during the proceedings.
Case F-85/14: Action brought on 26 August 2014  — ZZ and Others v Commission
Date: 2014-08-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: allowances and expenses, redemption, regulations for civil servants, servant (EU), travel








C_2014421EN.01006201.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/62





Action brought on 26 August 2014 — ZZ and Others v Commission
(Case F-85/14)
2014/C 421/90
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Inapplicability of Article 7 of Annex V and Article 8 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations, as amended by Regulation No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations and the CEOS and annulment of the decisions withdrawing the reimbursement of travel expenses from the place of employment to the place of origin and abolishing travelling time.

Form of order sought







—


Declare Article 7 of Annex V of the Staff Regulations and Article 8 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations unlawful;










—


annul the decision not to grant any further travelling time or reimbursement of annual travel expenses to the applicants, from the year 2014 onwards;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals
Date: 2014-08-26
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: EU Official Journal, administrative competition, job vacancy








CA2014283EN.01000601.xml










26.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 283/6





REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS
(2014/C 283 A/02)
Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.






5


 




6


 




11


 




19


 




21


 




26


 




27


 




30


(PL)




35


 




41


(DE/EN/FR)




42


 




43


 




46


 




47


 




48


 




55


 




56


 




60


 




62


 




65


 




73


(DE/EN/FR)




74


 




81


 




88


 




92


(DE/EN/FR)




97


 




98


 




99


 




108


 




109


 




116


 




119


 




133


 




134


 




136


 




137


(DE/EN/FR)




140


 




145


 




152


 




160


 




163


 




164


 




176


 




178


 




180


 




182


 




185


 




186


 




188


 




195


 




207


 




209


(DE/EN/FR)




211


 




217


 




219


 




242


 




254


 




255


 




256


(LV)




258


(RO)




262


(EN)




267


(SL)




270


(FR)




272


(DA)




274


(IT)




277


 




283