do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-215/14 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 20 August 2014  — Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo v Commission (Interim proceedings — State aid — Airport infrastructure — Public finance granted by the local authorities to a regional airport — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency)
Date: 2014-08-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Poland, State aid, airport, control of State aid, regional aid, reimbursement of aid








C_2014361EN.01000902.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/9





Order of the President of the General Court of 20 August 2014 — Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo v Commission
(Case T-215/14 R)
((Interim proceedings - State aid - Airport infrastructure - Public finance granted by the local authorities to a regional airport - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))
2014/C 361/11
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicants: Gmina Miasto Gdynia (Poland) and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. Z.o.o. (Gdynia, Poland) (represented by: T. Koncewicz and K. Gruszecka-Spychala, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Grespan, S. Noë and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend operation of Commission Decision C(2014) 759 final of 11 February 2014 relating to measure S.A,35388 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN and ex 2012/N) — Poland — Conversion of the Gdynia-Kosakowo airport

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


Costs are reserved.
Case T-628/14: Action brought on 20 August 2014 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (FORTIFY)
Date: 2014-08-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, information technology industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014361EN.01002601.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/26





Action brought on 20 August 2014 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (FORTIFY)
(Case T-628/14)
2014/C 361/39
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hewlett Packard Development Company LP (Dallas, United States) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 June 2014 given in Case R 249/2014-2.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘FORTIFY’ for goods in Class 9 — Community trade mark application No. 1 1 7 71  037

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (2) CTMR.