do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-619/14: Action brought on 14 August 2014  — Bionorica v Commission
Date: 2014-08-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer information, crop production, foodstuff, health care, human nutrition, trade information








C_2014409EN.01004802.xml










17.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/48





Action brought on 14 August 2014 — Bionorica v Commission
(Case T-619/14)
2014/C 409/69
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Bionorica SE (Neumarkt, Germany) (represented by: M. Weidner, T. Guttau and N. Hußmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


declare that the defendant, in infringement of Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 9), failed to entrust the European Food Safety Authority with the scientific assessment of health claims relating to plant materials for the drafting of a Community list of permitted claims for plant materials in accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, and all the necessary conditions for the application of those claims,










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law.
Plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 (1)

According to the applicant, the Commission’s failure to act infringes Article 13(3) of Regulation No 1924/2006, which provides that 31 January 2010 is a binding deadline for transposition. The applicant claims that the Commission failed to comply with that deadline. In that regard, the applicant claims that the Commission is not entitled to construe the scientific assessment of health claims relating to plant materials as not being subject to a deadline. The defendant’s failure to act, in the opinion of the applicant, undermines a uniform application of law throughout the European Union and is not compatible with the basic principle of the regulation to create uniform European rules.


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 9).
Case T-613/14: Action brought on 14 August 2014  — Industrias Tomás Morcillo v OHIM — Aucar Trailer (Polycart A Whole Cart Full of Benefits)
Date: 2014-08-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014339EN.01002702.xml










29.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/27





Action brought on 14 August 2014 — Industrias Tomás Morcillo v OHIM — Aucar Trailer (Polycart A Whole Cart Full of Benefits)
(Case T-613/14)
2014/C 339/33
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Industrias Tomás Morcillo, SL (Albuixech, Spain) (represented by: A. Sanz-Bermell y Martínez, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aucar Trailer, SL (Premia de Mar, Spain)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 May 2014 in Case R 1735/2012-1 and, accordingly, dismiss the opposition brought by Aucar Trailer S.L., allowing the grant of Community trade mark No 9 6 90  314‘Polycart A Whole Cart Full of Benefits’ in respect of the goods applied for pursuant to the limitation of 16 November 2012, and dismissing the opposition brought against the same;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark with word elements ‘Polycart A Whole Cart Full of Benefits’ for goods in Classes 12, 17 and 20 — Community trade mark application No 9 6 90  314

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark with word element ‘POLICAR’ for goods and services in Classes 12, 35 and 37

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 of Regulation No 207/2009
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7261 — Goldman Sachs/Blackstone/Ipreo)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-08-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial services, investment company, merger control, software








C_2014267EN.01000101.xml










14.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7261 — Goldman Sachs/Blackstone/Ipreo)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 267/01)
On 30 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7261. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.