do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-608/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014  — Laverana v OHIM (ORGANIC WITH PLANT FLUID FROM OUR OWN PRODUCTION)
Date: 2014-08-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014361EN.01002301.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/23





Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Laverana v OHIM (ORGANIC WITH PLANT FLUID FROM OUR OWN PRODUCTION)
(Case T-608/14)
2014/C 361/35
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Laverana GmbH & Co. KG (Wennigsen, Germany) (represented by J. Wachinger, M. Zöbisch and D. Chatterjee, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 June 2014 in case R 121/2014-4;










—


order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark which contains the word elements ‘ORGANIC WITH PLANT FLUID FROM OUR OWN PRODUCTION’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 9 22  697

Decision of the Examiner: Refused the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law:







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Misuse of powers by a decision on the basis of competition policy considerations
Case C-383/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 11 August 2014  — Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) v Sodiaal International
Date: 2014-08-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative procedure, administrative sanction, limitation of legal proceedings








C_2014361EN.01000601.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/6





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 11 August 2014 — Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) v Sodiaal International
(Case C-383/14)
2014/C 361/06
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer)

Defendant: Sodiaal International

Question referred

Do the provisions of the fourth subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 2988/95 (1), pursuant to which limitation becomes effective at the latest on the day on which a period equal to twice the limitation period expires without the competent authority having imposed a penalty, except where the administrative procedure has been suspended in accordance with Article 6(1) thereof, apply exclusively where the competent authority has not imposed any sanction within the meaning of Article 5 of the regulation, on the expiry of a period equal to twice the limitation period, or do they also apply in the absence of any administrative measure, for the purposes of Article 4 thereof, being taken within that period?


(1)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, p. 1).
Case T-606/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014  — Makhlouf v Council
Date: 2014-08-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, international sanctions, ownership








C_2014361EN.01002202.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/22





Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Makhlouf v Council
(Case T-606/14)
2014/C 361/34
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Ehab Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d'Elzius, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the applicant’s action admissible and well-founded;










—


in consequence, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and its subsequent implementing measures, insofar as they concern the applicant;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)



(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.
Case T-602/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014  — Bena Properties v Council
Date: 2014-08-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, human rights, international sanctions








C_2014372EN.01002201.xml










20.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 372/22





Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Bena Properties v Council
(Case T-602/14)
2014/C 372/27
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Corent d’Elzius, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;










—


consequently, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and its subsequent implementing measures, to the extent that they concern the applicant;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law that are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council
 (1).


(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.
Case T-601/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014  — Othman v Council
Date: 2014-08-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, international sanctions, ownership








C_2014361EN.01002002.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/20





Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Othman v Council
(Case T-601/14)
2014/C 361/30
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Razan Othman (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d'Elzius, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the applicant’s action admissible and well-founded;










—


in consequence, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and its subsequent implementing measures, insofar as they concern the applicant;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council
 (1).


(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.
Case T-595/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014  — Othman v Council
Date: 2014-08-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, indemnification, international sanctions, ownership








C_2014361EN.01001801.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/18





Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Othman v Council
(Case T-595/14)
2014/C 361/25
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Razan Othman (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d'Elzius, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the applicant’s action admissible and well-founded;










—


in consequence, order the European Union to pay compensation of EUR 10  000 for all the damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-592/14 Makhlouf v Council.
Case T-597/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014  — Cham and Bena Properties v Council
Date: 2014-08-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: international sanctions, ownership, powers of the institutions (EU), protection of privacy








C_2014372EN.01002101.xml










20.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 372/21





Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Cham and Bena Properties v Council
(Case T-597/14)
2014/C 372/26
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Cham Holding Co. SA and Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet D’Elzius, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:






—


declare the applicants’ action admissible and well founded;










—


consequently, order the European Union to pay compensation for the loss suffered by the applicants arising from the suspension of the ‘Yasmeen Rotana’ project, in the region of EUR 4 3 0 00  000.










—


order the appointment of an expert to establish the total amount of the loss suffered by the applicants;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on 3 pleas in law that are in essence identical or similar to those relied on Case T-592/14, Makhlouf v Council.