do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-07-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, European Union, North-West Atlantic Fisheries Organisation, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014246EN.01000601.xml










29.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/6





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
2014/C 246/05
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


10.7.2014




Duration


10.7.2014 - 31.12.2014




Member State


European Union (All Member States)




Stock or Group of stocks


RED/N3M




Species


Redfish (Sebastes spp.)




Zone


NAFO 3M




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


18/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-07-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, France, Norwegian Sea, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014246EN.01000602.xml










29.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/6





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
2014/C 246/06
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


7.7.2014




Duration


7.7-31.12.2014




Member State


France




Stock or Group of stocks


LIN/1/2.




Species


Ling (Molva molva)




Zone


Union and international waters of I and II




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


16/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7228 — Centrica/Bord Gáis Energy)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-07-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Ireland, North America, United Kingdom, economic concentration, energy industry, merger control, subsidiary








C_2014246EN.01000101.xml










29.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7228 — Centrica/Bord Gáis Energy)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 246/01
On 13 June 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7228. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-563/14: Action brought on 29 July 2014 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (ELITEDISPLAY)
Date: 2014-07-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014351EN.01001901.xml










6.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/19





Action brought on 29 July 2014 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (ELITEDISPLAY)
(Case T-563/14)
2014/C 351/23
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hewlett Packard Development Company LP (Dallas, United States) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 May 2014 given in Case R 1539/2013-2;










—


Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ELITEDISPLAY’ for goods and services in Class 9 — Community trade mark application No 11 541 901

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(2) CTMR.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7152 — AdP/Aelia/MZLZ Retail)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-07-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Croatia, France, airport, economic concentration, merger control, retail trade








C_2014246EN.01000102.xml










29.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7152 — AdP/Aelia/MZLZ Retail)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 246/02
On 23 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7152. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-07-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014246EN.01000201.xml










29.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

28 July 2014
2014/C 246/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3433




JPY


Japanese yen


136,74




DKK


Danish krone


7,4565




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79055




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1523




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2150




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,3365




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,481




HUF


Hungarian forint


308,20




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1437




RON


Romanian leu


4,3888




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8204




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4275




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4520




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,4107




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5703




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6674




KRW


South Korean won


1 379,01




ZAR


South African rand


14,1523




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3110




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6372




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 550,26




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2679




PHP


Philippine peso


58,246




RUB


Russian rouble


47,5507




THB


Thai baht


42,720




BRL


Brazilian real


2,9952




MXN


Mexican peso


17,4092




INR


Indian rupee


80,6813






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7310 — Rolls-Royce/Rolls-Royce Power Systems) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-07-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aerospace industry, civil aviation, economic concentration, maritime transport, merger control, vehicle parts








C_2014246EN.01000801.xml










29.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/8





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7310 — Rolls-Royce/Rolls-Royce Power Systems)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 246/08






1.


On 22 July 2014 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc (‘Rolls-Royce’, United Kingdom) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Rolls-Royce Power System Holding GmbH (Germany), the holding company for Rolls-Royce Power Systems AG (‘RRPS’) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Rolls-Royce: development and manufacture of aircraft engines and power systems for aerospace and marine,
—   for RRPS: development, manufacture and sale of medium and high speed diesel and gas reciprocating engines for off-highway applications.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7310 — Rolls-Royce/Rolls-Royce Power Systems, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-584/14: Action brought on 29 July 2014  — Inditex v OHIM — Ansell (ZARA)
Date: 2014-07-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2014339EN.01002701.xml










29.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/27





Action brought on 29 July 2014 — Inditex v OHIM — Ansell (ZARA)
(Case T-584/14)
2014/C 339/32
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) (Arteixo, Spain) (represented by: C. Duch, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zainab Ansell and Roger Ansell (Moshi, Tanzania)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 May 2014 in Case R 1118/2013-2 in so far as it confirmed the revocation for non-use of the Community trade mark ‘ZARA’ No 1 12  755 in respect of the following services in Class 39: ‘services in relation to the transport and distribution of goods, in particular, articles of clothing, shoes and accessories, perfumery and cosmetics’, inasmuch as the Board of Appeal infringed Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 by making the following errors:










—


error of law by the Board of Appeal in regarding the franchisees of Inditex as integral entities of the internal organisation of the company when, in fact, they are legal entities independent of the Inditex Group;










—


error in the assessment of the evidence, inasmuch as the Board of Appeal criticises the appellant for failing to adduce evidence of the turnover generated by the supply of transport services for the purposes of proving external use of the mark, and despite the fact that such evidence was adduced in the proceedings;










—


order OHIM, and if appropriate, the intervener, to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: Word mark ‘ZARA’ for services in Classes 39 and 42 — Community trade mark No 1 12  755

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Applicant

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: Zainab Ansell and Roger Ansell

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application for revocation granted

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-07-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, France, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014246EN.01000701.xml










29.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/7





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
2014/C 246/07
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


7.7.2014




Duration


7.7-31.12.2014




Member State


France




Stock or Group of stocks


LIN/05EI.




Species


Ling (Molva molva)




Zone


Union and international waters of V




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


17/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.