do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the facilitation of the issuance of visas
Date: 2014-07-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Azerbaijan, EU visa policy, agreement (EU)








L_2014215EN.01000102.xml










21.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 215/1







Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the facilitation of the issuance of visas

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the facilitation of the issuance of visas will enter into force on 1 September 2014 in accordance with Article 14(2) of the Agreement, as the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation will enter into force on that date.
Case C-349/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 21 July 2014  — Minister delegate for the budget v Marlène Pazdziej
Date: 2014-07-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, basis of tax assessment, household, remuneration of work, tax relief, tax system








C_2014339EN.01001101.xml










29.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/11





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 21 July 2014 — Minister delegate for the budget v Marlène Pazdziej
(Case C-349/14)
2014/C 339/12
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Minister delegate for the budget

Defendant: Marlène Pazdziej

Question referred

Do the provisions of the second paragraph of Article [13] of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union preclude any account being taken, for the purposes of calculating a tax household’s notional income, of the remuneration received by an official or other servant of the European Union who is a member of that tax household, where such taking into account is capable of influencing the amount of taxation payable by that tax household? Alternatively, is it necessary to apply the judgment in Case C-229/98 Vander Zwalmen and Massart (1) by analogy, when the purpose of taking such remuneration into account, with a view to the possibility of applying a social measure designed to (a) exempt payment from tax, (b) grant a reduction in the basis of its assessment or, more generally, (c) grant a tax reduction, is only to ascertain whether or not the notional income of the tax household is less than the threshold laid down by national tax law for the grant of the benefit — possibly adjusted by reference to the notional income — of that social measure?


(1)  EU:C:1999:501.
Case T-542/14: Action brought on 21 July 2014  — Grupo Bimbo v OHIM (Form of round sandwich bread)
Date: 2014-07-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, food industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014339EN.01002101.xml










29.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/21





Action brought on 21 July 2014 — Grupo Bimbo v OHIM (Form of round sandwich bread)
(Case T-542/14)
2014/C 339/25
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV (Mexico, Mexico) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 May 2014 in Case R 1911/2013-4, because it is unlawful and infringes the legal provisions in force concerning the Community trade mark; deliver a judgment in accordance with the claims set out in the application, whether on the basis of the intrinsic distinctiveness of the three-dimensional mark applied for or the distinctiveness acquired by use, upholding the present action and ordering the registration of the application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark No 1 1 7 47  987, for goods in class 30 of the International Classification, on the grounds that it is lawful and admissible;










—


once the present action has been upheld and the trade mark in question has been registered, order the party opposing that claim to pay the costs of the proceedings and to reimburse the appeal fees paid to OHIM.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark: Three-dimensional mark in the form of round sandwich bread for goods in class 30 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 7 47  987

Decision of the examiner: Application dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2014-07-21
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2014235EN.01000101.xml










21.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/1





Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 235/01

Last publication


OJ C 223, 14.7.2014


Past publications


OJ C 212, 7.7.2014


OJ C 202, 30.6.2014


OJ C 194, 24.6.2014


OJ C 184, 16.6.2014


OJ C 175, 10.6.2014


OJ C 159, 26.5.2014

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Case C-350/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Trieste (Italy) lodged on 21 July 2014  — Florin Lazar, represented in the proceedings by Luigi Erculeo v Allianz SpA
Date: 2014-07-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: damages, family, indemnification, residence, transport accident








C_2014351EN.01000401.xml










6.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/4





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Trieste (Italy) lodged on 21 July 2014 — Florin Lazar, represented in the proceedings by Luigi Erculeo v Allianz SpA
(Case C-350/14)
2014/C 351/05
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale civile di Trieste

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Florin Lazar, represented in the proceedings by Luigi Erculeo

Defendant: Allianz SpA

Questions referred

How is Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 (1) on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (‘Rome II’) to be interpreted in so far as it provides that ‘the law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of a tort/delict shall be the law of the country in which the damage occurs’? In particular:






1.


How is the term ‘the [place] in which the damage occurs’ within the meaning of Article 4(1) of Regulation No 864/2007 to be interpreted in the context of a claim for compensation for material and non-material damage brought by the family members of a person who has died as a result of a road traffic accident which occurred in the State of the court seised, where those family members are resident in another EU Member State and have suffered the damage itself in that other Member State?










2.


For the purposes of the application of Article 4(1) of Regulation No 864/2007, do the material and non material damage suffered, in their State of residence, by the close relatives of a person who has died as a result of a road traffic accident which occurred in the State of the court seised constitute ‘damage’ within the meaning of the first part of Article 4(1) of that regulation, or ‘indirect consequences’ within the meaning of the second part of that provision?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) OJ 2007 L 199, p. 40.
Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation
Date: 2014-07-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Azerbaijan, agreement (EU), illegal migration, return migration








L_2014215EN.01000101.xml










21.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 215/1







Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic ofAzerbaijan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation will enter into force on 1 September 2014, the procedure provided for in Article 23(2) of the Agreement having been completed on 3 July 2014.