do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-474/13: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Thi Ly Pham v Stadt Schweinfurt, Amt für Meldewesen und Statistik (Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — Article 16(1) — Detention for the purpose of removal — Detention in prison accommodation — Possibility of detaining a third-country national with ordinary prisoners where he has given his consent)
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: area of freedom, security and justice, illegal migration, imprisonment, removal, return migration








C_2014315EN.01002301.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/23





Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Thi Ly Pham v Stadt Schweinfurt, Amt für Meldewesen und Statistik
(Case C-474/13) (1)

((Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2008/115/EC - Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals - Article 16(1) - Detention for the purpose of removal - Detention in prison accommodation - Possibility of detaining a third-country national with ordinary prisoners where he has given his consent))
2014/C 315/34
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Thi Ly Pham

Defendant: Stadt Schweinfurt, Amt für Meldewesen und Statistik

Operative part of the judgment

The second sentence of Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals must be interpreted as not permitting a Member State to detain a third-country national for the purpose of removal in prison accommodation together with ordinary prisoners even if the third-country national consents thereto.


(1)  OJ C 336, 16.11.2013.
Case C-480/13: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Sysmex Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (Request for a preliminary ruling — Tariff classification — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Headings 3204, 3212 and 3822 — Substance producing, by chemical reaction and exposure to a laser light, a fluorescent effect intended for the analysis of white blood cells)
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, chemical product, common customs tariff








C_2014315EN.01002401.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/24





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Sysmex Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen
(Case C-480/13) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Tariff classification - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 3204, 3212 and 3822 - Substance producing, by chemical reaction and exposure to a laser light, a fluorescent effect intended for the analysis of white blood cells))
2014/C 315/35
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sysmex Europe GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1810/2004 of 7 September 2004, must be interpreted as meaning that a product, composed of solvents and of a polymethine-based substance, which, although it may have a weak and non-permanent dyeing effect on textiles, is not in practice used for its dyeing properties and is intended exclusively for the analysis of white blood cells, by means of the deposition of ions in defined components of those blood cells, which, when exposed to laser light, become fluorescent for a limited period, comes under heading 3822 of the Combined Nomenclature relating to laboratory reagents.


(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.
Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 154/2012 of 28 September 2012 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement ( OJ L 341, 13.12.2012 )
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: Belgium, European Economic Area, animal disease, egg, health certificate, import (EU), intra-EU trade, poultry, revision of an agreement








L_2014211EN.01004702.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/47







Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 154/2012 of 28 September 2012 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 341 of 13 December 2012
)


On page 3, the following recital shall be added:







‘(6)


Annex I to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,’
Case C-438/13: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Romania)) — SC BCR Leasing IFN SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia generală de administrare a marilor contribuabili, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia generală de soluţionare a contestaţiilor (VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 16 and 18 — Financial leasing — Goods under a financial leasing contract — Non-recovery of those goods by the leasing company after the termination of the contract — Missing goods)
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, contract, hire purchase








C_2014315EN.01002101.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/21





Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Romania)) — SC BCR Leasing IFN SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia generală de administrare a marilor contribuabili, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia generală de soluţionare a contestaţiilor
(Case C-438/13) (1)

((VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 16 and 18 - Financial leasing - Goods under a financial leasing contract - Non-recovery of those goods by the leasing company after the termination of the contract - Missing goods))
2014/C 315/31
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SC BCR Leasing IFN SA

Defendants: Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia generală de administrare a marilor contribuabili, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia generală de soluţionare a contestaţiilor

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 16 and 18 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the impossibility, for a leasing company, of recovering from the lessee the goods let under a financial leasing contract following its termination as a result of the lessee’s breach, despite the steps undertaken by that company to recover those goods and despite the lack of any consideration following such termination, may not be treated as a supply of goods for consideration for the purposes of those articles.


(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
Case C-107/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria regionale della Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 4 February 2014  — 3D I srl v Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Cremona
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, judicial proceedings, rights of the defence








C_2014315EN.01003401.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/34





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria regionale della Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 4 February 2014 — 3D I srl v Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Cremona
(Case C-107/14)
2014/C 315/55
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria regionale della Lombardia

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: 3D I srl

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Cremona
By order of 17 July 2014, the Court of Justice (Third Chamber) declared the request for a preliminary ruling inadmissible.
Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 107/2001 of 28 September 2001 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement ( OJ L 322, 6.12.2001 )
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, advertising, approximation of laws, foodstuff, labelling, revision of an agreement








L_2014211EN.01004701.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/47







Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 107/2001 of 28 September 2001 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

(
Official Journal of the European Communities L 322 of 6 December 2001
)


On page 15, point 2 of Article 1 shall be replaced by the following:






‘2.


The text of adaptation (a) shall be replaced by the following:

                                 “The following shall be added to Article 5(3):






—


in Icelandic “geislað” or “meðhöndlað með jónandi geislun”,










—


in Norwegian “bestrålt” or “behandlet med ioniserende stråling”
                                       ”.’
Action brought on 17 July 2014 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland (Case E-11/14)
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Iceland, claim, deadline for payment, financial solvency, national implementing measure








C_2014334EN.01003101.xml










25.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 334/31





Action brought on 17 July 2014 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland
(Case E-11/14)
(2014/C 334/12)
An action against Iceland was brought before the EFTA Court on 17 July 2014 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Markus Schneider and Janne Tysnes Kaasin, acting as Agents of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, Rue Belliard 35, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority requests the EFTA Court to:






1.


Declare that by failing to adopt, and/or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority forthwith of, the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 2 of Annex XII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payments in commercial transactions), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of that Act and Article 7 of the EEA Agreement.










2.


Order Iceland to bear the costs of these proceedings.





Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:






—


The application addresses Iceland’s failure to comply, no later than on 18 February 2014, with a reasoned opinion delivered by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 18 December 2013 regarding that State’s failure to implement into its national legal order Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payments in commercial transactions (‘the Act’), as referred to at point 2 of Annex XII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adapted to the EEA Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto.










—


The EFTA Surveillance Authority submits that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of the Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement by failing to adopt, and/or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority of, the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed.
Thresholds referred to in Directive 2004/17/EC and Directive 2004/18/EC, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1336/2013, expressed in the national currencies of the EFTA States
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: EFTA countries, award of contract, national currency








C_2014227EN.01000901.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 227/9





Thresholds referred to in Directive 2004/17/EC and Directive 2004/18/EC, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1336/2013, expressed in the national currencies of the EFTA States
2014/C 227/06








Thresholds in EUR


Thresholds in NOK


Thresholds in CHF


Thresholds in ISK




134 000


1 014 608


163 038


21 571 317




207 000


1 567 342


251 857


33 322 856




414 000


3 134 684


503 714


66 645 712




5 186 000


39 266 836


6 309 806


834 842 176
Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 121/2012 of 15 June 2012 amending Protocol 31 (on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement ( OJ L 270, 4.10.2012 )
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: EU office or agency, European Economic Area, revision of an agreement, satellite navigation








L_2014211EN.01004901.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/49







Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 121/2012 of 15 June 2012 amending Protocol 31 (on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 270 of 4 October 2012
)


On page 45, Article 1, point (1), subparagraph (g):
for:

               ‘Sections 1 and 2 of Chapter 3 of the Agreement’,
read:

               ‘Sections 1 and 2 of Chapter 3’.
Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 55/2009 of 29 May 2009 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement ( OJ L 232, 3.9.2009 )
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, animal disease, animal nutrition, food additive, health risk, plant health legislation, revision of an agreement, veterinary legislation








L_2014211EN.01004503.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/45







Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 55/2009 of 29 May 2009 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 232 of 3 September 2009
)


On page 3, in the Annex, point 5:
for:

               ‘
               32008 D 0234
               ’,
read:

               ‘
               32008 D 0234(01)
               ’.
Case C-469/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Verona (Italy)) — Shamim Tahir v Ministero dell’Interno and Questura di Verona (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2003/109/EC — Articles 2, 4(1), 7(1) and 13 — ‘Long-term resident’s EU residence permit’  — Terms for conferring long-term resident status — Legal and continuous residence in the host Member State for five years prior to the submission of the permit application — Person with family connections to the long-term resident — More favourable national provisions — Effects)
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: area of freedom, security and justice, family migration, residence permit








C_2014315EN.01002201.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/22





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Verona (Italy)) — Shamim Tahir v Ministero dell’Interno and Questura di Verona
(Case C-469/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2003/109/EC - Articles 2, 4(1), 7(1) and 13 - ‘Long-term resident’s EU residence permit’ - Terms for conferring long-term resident status - Legal and continuous residence in the host Member State for five years prior to the submission of the permit application - Person with family connections to the long-term resident - More favourable national provisions - Effects))
2014/C 315/32
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Verona

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Shamim Tahir

Defendants: Ministero dell’Interno and Questura di Verona

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Articles 4(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, as amended by Directive 2011/51/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011, must be interpreted as meaning that family members, as defined in Article 2(e) of that directive, of a person who has already acquired long-term resident status may not be exempted from the condition laid down in Article 4(1) of that directive, under which, in order to obtain that status, a third-country national must have resided legally and continuously in the Member State concerned for five years immediately prior to the submission of the relevant application.










2.


Article 13 of Directive 2003/109, as amended by Directive 2011/51, must be interpreted as not allowing a Member State to issue family members, as defined in Article 2(e) of that directive, with long-term residents’ EU residence permits on terms more favourable than those laid down by that directive.






(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Case C-459/13: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd — Slovakia) — Milica Široká v Úrad verejného zdravotníctva Slovenskej republiky (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of public health — National legislation imposing an obligation to vaccinate minor children — Right of parents to refuse that vaccination — Article 168 TFEU — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 33 and 35 — Implementation of EU law — None — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, application of EU law, health care, jurisdiction, parental responsibility, public health, vaccination








C_2014315EN.01002902.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/29





Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd — Slovakia) — Milica Široká v Úrad verejného zdravotníctva Slovenskej republiky
(Case C-459/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of public health - National legislation imposing an obligation to vaccinate minor children - Right of parents to refuse that vaccination - Article 168 TFEU - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 33 and 35 - Implementation of EU law - None - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))
2014/C 315/46
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Najvyšší súd

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Milica Široká

Respondent: Úrad verejného zdravotníctva Slovenskej republiky

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia), by decision of 6 August 2013 in Case C-459/13.


(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013
Case C-468/13 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 July 2014  — MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Word mark MOL Blue Card — Opposition — Refusal to register)
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, bank, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014315EN.01003001.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/30





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
(Case C-468/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Word mark MOL Blue Card - Opposition - Refusal to register))
2014/C 315/47
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. (represented by: K. Szamosi, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent), Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (represented by: J. de Oliveira Vaz Miranda de Sousa and N. González-Alberto Rodríguez, abogados)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Case C-169/14: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Castellón (Spain)) — Juan Carlos Sánchez Morcillo, María del Carmen Abril García v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 7 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Consumer contracts — Mortgage loan agreement — Unfair terms — Mortgage enforcement proceedings — Right to an appeal)
Date: 2014-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, real estate credit, unfair terms of contract








C_2014315EN.01002502.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/25





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Castellón (Spain)) — Juan Carlos Sánchez Morcillo, María del Carmen Abril García v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA
(Case C-169/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Article 7 - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Consumer contracts - Mortgage loan agreement - Unfair terms - Mortgage enforcement proceedings - Right to an appeal))
2014/C 315/38
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Castellón

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Juan Carlos Sánchez Morcillo, María del Carmen Abril García

Defendant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, read in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as precluding a system of enforcement, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that mortgage enforcement proceedings may not be stayed by the court of first instance, which, in its final decision, may at most award compensation in respect of the damage suffered by the consumer, inasmuch as the latter, the debtor against whom mortgage enforcement proceedings are brought, may not appeal against a decision dismissing his objection to that enforcement, whereas the seller or supplier, the creditor seeking enforcement, may bring an appeal against a decision terminating the proceedings or ordering an unfair term to be disapplied.


(1)  OJ C 175, 10.6.2014.