do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 787/2014 of 16 July 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for horsemackerel and associated by-catches in Union waters of IVb, IVc and VIId by vessels flying the flag of Belgium
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, EU waters, by-catch, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing controls, fishing vessel, sea fish, sea fishing








L_2014214EN.01001001.xml










19.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 214/10








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 787/2014
of 16 July 2014
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for horsemackerel and associated by-catches in Union waters of IVb, IVc and VIId by vessels flying the flag of Belgium


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 (2), lays down quotas for 2014.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2014.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 July 2014.


For the Commission


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


14/TQ43




Member State


Belgium




Stock


JAX/4BC7D




Species


Horsemackerel and associated by-catches (Trachurus spp.)




Zone


Union waters of IVb, IVc and VIId




Closing date


28.6.2014
Case T-534/14: Action brought on 16 July 2014  — Murnauer Markenvertrieb v OHIM — Bach Flower Remedies (MURNAUERS Bachblüten)
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014351EN.01001302.xml










6.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/13





Action brought on 16 July 2014 — Murnauer Markenvertrieb v OHIM — Bach Flower Remedies (MURNAUERS Bachblüten)
(Case T-534/14)
2014/C 351/15
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Murnauer Markenvertrieb GmbH (Egelsbach, Germany) (represented by: F. Traub and H. Daniel, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bach Flower Remedies Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 May 2014 in Case R 2041/2012-2;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Murnauer Markenvertrieb GmbH

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark including the word elements ‘MURNAUERS Bachblüten’ for goods in Classes 3, 5 and 30 — Community trade mark registration No 9 7 49  847

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Bach Flower Remedies Ltd

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and Community figurative marks including the word element ‘Bach’, national word mark ‘Bach’ and the unregistered mark used in the course of business ‘BACH’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 42 and 44

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Plea in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7287 — CD&R Fund IX/Mauser)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, packaging product








C_2014225EN.01000102.xml










16.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7287 — CD&R Fund IX/Mauser)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 225/02)
On 8 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7287. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-538/14: Action brought on 16 July 2014  — Peri v OHIM (Multiprop)
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014329EN.01002202.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/22





Action brought on 16 July 2014 — Peri v OHIM (Multiprop)
(Case T-538/14)
2014/C 329/31
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Peri GmbH (Weißenhorn, Germany) (represented by M. Eck and A. Bognár, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2014 in Case R 1661/2013-1;










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Multiprop’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 19 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 5 87  219

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law:







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Spain, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014225EN.01001302.xml










16.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/13





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2014/C 225/09)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


23.6.2014




Duration


23.6.2014 - 31.12.2014




Member State


Spain




Stock or Group of stocks


POK/56-14




Species


Saithe (Pollachius virens)





Zone


VI; Union and international waters of Vb, XII and XIV




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


09/TQ43






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-292/10: Order of the General Court of 16 July 2014  — Monty Program v Commission
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: common market, economic concentration, information technology industry, merger control, restriction on competition








C_2014329EN.01002402.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/24





Order of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — Monty Program v Commission
(Case T-292/10) (1)

2014/C 329/34
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.
Case C-342/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 16 July 2014  — X-Steuerberatungsgesellschaft v Finanzamt Hannover-Nord
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consultancy, freedom to provide services, tax system








C_2014372EN.01000301.xml










20.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 372/3





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 16 July 2014 — X-Steuerberatungsgesellschaft v Finanzamt Hannover-Nord
(Case C-342/14)
2014/C 372/04
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: X-Steuerberatungsgesellschaft

Defendant: Finanzamt Hannover-Nord

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 5 of Directive 2005/36/EC (1) preclude a restriction of the freedom to provide services in a case where a tax consultancy company formed in accordance with the law of a Member State prepares in the Member State of its establishment, where tax consultancy work is not regulated, a tax return for a recipient of services in another Member State and sends it to the tax authority, and national provisions in that other Member State require that a tax consultancy company be recognised as authorised to provide professional assistance in tax matters and that the tax advisers managing the company must act autonomously?










2.


Can a tax consultancy company, in the circumstances referred to in question 1, rely successfully on Article 16(1) and (2) of Directive 2006/123/EC (2), irrespective of which of the two Member States is the one in which it provides the service?










3.


Is Article 56 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding a restriction, by measures applicable in the Member State of the recipient of services, of the freedom to provide services in the circumstances referred to in question 1, if the tax consultancy company is not established in the Member State of the recipient of the services?






(1)  Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications.

(2)  Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market.
Case T-502/13: Order of the General Court of 16 July 2014  — ASPA v OHIM — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (ARGENTARIA)
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bank, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014329EN.01002601.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/26





Order of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — ASPA v OHIM — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (ARGENTARIA)
(Case T-502/13) (1)

2014/C 329/41
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7301 — PAI Partners/Euro Media Group)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: customers, economic concentration, information technology industry, merger control








C_2014225EN.01000101.xml










16.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7301 — PAI Partners/Euro Media Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 225/01)
On 8 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7301. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case F-114/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 16 July 2014  — Klar and Fernandez Fernandez v Commission (Civil service — Commission’s staff committee — Central committee — Appointment of members of the Luxembourg local section to the central staff committee — Revocation by the local section of the authority of one of its members appointed to the central committee — Refusal by the appointing authority to recognise the lawfulness of the revocation decision — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure — Complaint out of time — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Luxembourg, trade union election, union representative








C_2014315EN.01007401.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/74





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 16 July 2014 — Klar and Fernandez Fernandez v Commission
(Case F-114/13) (1)

((Civil service - Commission’s staff committee - Central committee - Appointment of members of the Luxembourg local section to the central staff committee - Revocation by the local section of the authority of one of its members appointed to the central committee - Refusal by the appointing authority to recognise the lawfulness of the revocation decision - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure - Complaint out of time - Manifest inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/124
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Robert Klar (Grevenmacher, Luxembourg) and Francisco Fernandez Fernandez (Steinsel, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Salerno and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the appointing authority refusing to recognise the lawfulness of the decision of the Luxembourg local staff committee revoking the authority granted to a person mandated to represent it within the Commission’s central staff committee.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Mr Klar and Mr Fernandez Fernandez are to bear their own costs and are ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014, p. 53.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Spain, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2014225EN.01001301.xml










16.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/13





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2014/C 225/08)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


17.5.2014




Duration


17.5.2014 - 31.12.2014




Member State


Spain




Stock or Group of stocks


ALF/3X14-




Species


Alfonsinos (Beryx spp.)




Zone


EU and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


08/DSS






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
European Parliament decision of 16 July 2014 approving the appointment of Jyrki Katainen, Jacek Dominik, Ferdinando Nelli Feroci and Martine Reicherts as Members of the Commission (C8-0030/2014 — 2014/0803(NLE), C8-0083/2014 — 2014/0804(NLE), C8-0084/2014 — 2014(0805(NLE), C8-0085/2014 — 2014/0806(NLE))
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, Committee on Legal Affairs, Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, European Parliament
Subjects: European Commissioner, appointment of members








C_2016224EN.01003901.xml










21.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 224/39





P8_TA(2014)0003
Appointment of four Members of the Commission
European Parliament decision of 16 July 2014 approving the appointment of Jyrki Katainen, Jacek Dominik, Ferdinando Nelli Feroci and Martine Reicherts as Members of the Commission (C8-0030/2014 — 2014/0803(NLE), C8-0083/2014 — 2014/0804(NLE), C8-0084/2014 — 2014(0805(NLE), C8-0085/2014 — 2014/0806(NLE))
(2016/C 224/12)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the second paragraph of Article 246 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,










—


having regard to point 6 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (1),










—


having regard to the resignation of Olli Rehn, Janusz Lewandowski, Antonio Tajani and Viviane Reding as Members of the Commission, with effect from 30 June 2014,










—


having regard to the Council's letters of 20 June and 2 July 2014, whereby the Council consulted Parliament on a decision, to be taken by common accord with the President of the Commission, on the appointment of four Members of the Commission (C8-0030/2014, C8-0083/2014, C8-0084/2014, C8-0085/2014),










—


having regard to the hearings of the Commissioners-designate on 14 July 2014, led by the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Budgets with the association of the Committee on Budgetary Control, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with the association of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, and to the statements of evaluation drawn up following those hearings;










—


having regard to Rule 118 of, and Annex XVI to, its Rules of Procedure,












1.


Approves the appointment of Jyrki Katainen, Jacek Dominik, Ferdinando Nelli Feroci and Martine Reicherts as Members of the Commission for the remainder of the Commission’s term of office until 31 October 2014;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States.






(1)  OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, p. 47.
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
Date: 2014-07-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Malta, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency




C_2014225EN.01000501.xml










16.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/5





New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
(2014/C 225/06)



Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.


Issuing country
: Malta


Subject of commemoration
: 200 years of Malta Police Force


Description of the design
: The coin commemorates the 200th anniversary of the Malta Police Force which was set up by means of proclamation XXII of 1814. Thus the Malta Police Force is one of the oldest in Europe. The national side of the coin depicts the badge of the Malta Police Force with the legend ‘200 Years Malta Police Force’ and the dates 1814-2014.
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.


Number of coins to be issued
: 


Date of issue
: July 2014


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).