do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-513/14: Action brought on 7 July 2014  — GreenPack v OHIM (greenpack)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cycle and motorcycle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014303EN.01004801.xml










8.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 303/48





Action brought on 7 July 2014 — GreenPack v OHIM (greenpack)
(Case T-513/14)
2014/C 303/56
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: GreenPack GmbH (Henningsdorf, Germany) (represented by P. Ruess und A. Doepner-Thiele, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2014 in Case R 2324/2013-1;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘greenpack’ for goods and services in Class 9 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 9 26  706

Decision of the Examiner: Refused the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejected the appeal

Pleas in law:







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No. 207/2009










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No. 207/2009
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 7 July 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39612(2) — Perindopril (Servier) — Rapporteur: Austria
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: EU competition policy, cardiovascular disease, control of restrictive practices, dominant position, generic drug, market access, market-sharing agreement, patent law, patents licence, sanction (EU)








C_2016393EN.01000301.xml










25.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 393/3





Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 7 July 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39612(2) — Perindopril (Servier)
Rapporteur: Austria
(2016/C 393/03)






1.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.










2.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for Servier.










3.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s approach to base the calculation of fines for the generic undertakings on the value transferred.










4.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the generic undertakings.










5.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the Commission’s Decision in its entirety.










6.


The Advisory Committee recommend the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal.
Case T-236/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — CMC France v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005601.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/56





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — CMC France v Commission
(Case T-236/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/94
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CMC France (Châtenois, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


CMC France is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers given at its meeting of 7 July 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case M.7184 — Marine Harvest/Morpol (Art. 14(2) proc.) — Rapporteur: Croatia
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Concentrations
Subjects: Norway, economic concentration, fine, fishing industry, infringement of EU law, merger control








C_2014455EN.01000301.xml










18.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 455/3





Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers given at its meeting of 7 July 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case M.7184 — Marine Harvest/Morpol (Art. 14(2) proc.)
Rapporteur: Croatia
(2014/C 455/03)






1.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Marine Harvest has negligently infringed Article 4(1) of the Merger Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004).










2.


The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission that Marine Harvest has negligently infringed Article 7(1) of the Merger Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004).










3.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Marine Harvest should be fined pursuant to Article 14(2)(a) and Article 14(2)(b) of the Merger Regulation.










4.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the factors that were considered relevant for the purposes of fixing the amount of the fines for Marine Harvest pursuant to Article 14(2)(a) and Article 14(2)(b) of the Merger Regulation.










5.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the actual level of the fines proposed by the Commission.










6.


The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Case T-237/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — SCA Tissue France v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005602.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/56





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — SCA Tissue France v Commission
(Case T-237/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/95
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: SCA Tissue France (Bois-Columbes, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible..










2.


SCA Tissue France is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case C-326/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 7 July 2014  — Verein für Konsumenteninformation v A1 Telekom Austria AG
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, price index, telecommunications, termination of a contract, universal service








C_2014339EN.01000401.xml










29.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/4





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 7 July 2014 — Verein für Konsumenteninformation v A1 Telekom Austria AG
(Case C-326/14)
2014/C 339/04
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Verein für Konsumenteninformation

Defendant: A1 Telekom Austria AG

Question referred

Is the right, provided for in Article 20(2) of the Universal Service Directive (1), for subscribers to withdraw from their contracts without penalty ‘upon notice of … modifications in the contractual conditions’ also to be provided for in the case where an adjustment to charges derives from contractual conditions which, from the time when the contract is first concluded, provide that future charges are to be adjusted (upwards or downwards) in accordance with changes in an objective consumer price index reflecting movements in the value of money?


(1)  Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2009 L 337, p. 11).
Case T-235/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Gopack v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005502.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/55





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Gopack v Commission
(Case T-235/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/93
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Gopack (Manosque, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Gopack is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case T-223/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005201.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/52





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte v Commission
(Case T-223/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/87
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG (Minden, Germany) (represented by: H. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case T-233/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Paul Hartmann v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005401.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/54





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Paul Hartmann v Commission
(Case T-233/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/91
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Paul Hartmann SA (Châtenois, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Paul Hartmann SA is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case C-329/14: Action brought on 7 July 2014  — European Commission v Republic of Finland
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air conditioning, building, energy consumption, energy saving, environmental standard, heating, national implementing measure, thermal insulation








C_2014292EN.01002102.xml










1.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 292/21





Action brought on 7 July 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Finland
(Case C-329/14)
2014/C 292/26
Language of the case: Finnish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Hetsch, K. Hermann and I. Koskinen, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Finland

Form of order sought







—


declare that, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28(1) of Directive 2010/31/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings, because it has failed to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to transpose Article 2(2) and Article 9(1) into national law or, in any event, to inform the Commission of those measures either as regards mainland Finland and with regard to the Åland Islands it has failed to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to transpose Article 2(2) and Article 9(1) into national law or, in any event, to inform the Commission of those measures;










—


order the Republic of Finland, on the basis of Article 260(3) TFEU to pay a fine of EUR 19  178,25 per day from the date of delivery of the judgment of the Court of Justice to be paid to the European Union’s own resources account, on the ground that it has failed to fulfil its obligation to indicate the measures by which the directive will be transposed into national law.










—


order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which to transpose the Directive expired on 9 July 2012.


(1)  OJ 2010 L 153, p. 13.
Case T-244/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005802.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/58





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica v Commission
(Case T-244/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/98
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica, SL is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.