do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-243/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — ICT v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005801.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/58





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — ICT v Commission
(Case T-243/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/97
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA (ICT) (Borgo a Mozzano, Italy) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA (ICT) is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Judgment of the Court of 7 July 2014 in Case E-5/13 — Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority (Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — Access to documents — Admissibility — Measures of organisation of procedure — EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Rules on access to documents 2012)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: access to EU information, document management, provision of documents, transport company








C_2015068EN.01000401.xml










26.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/4





JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 7 July 2014
in Case E-5/13
Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority
(Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — Access to documents — Admissibility — Measures of organisation of procedure — EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Rules on access to documents 2012)
(2015/C 68/04)
In Case E-5/13, Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority — APPLICATION for annulment of EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) Decisions of 25 January 2013 and 18 February 2013 in ESA Case No 73075 to deny access to documents, belonging to the case files that led to ESA Decision No 321/10/COL (Norway Post — loyalty/discount system), under the new rules on access to documents enacted by ESA on 5 September 2012 in ESA Decision No 300/12/COL (‘RAD 2012’) (not published in the Official Journal), the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 7 July 2014, the operative part of which is as follows:
The Court hereby:






1.


Annuls ESA’s decision of 25 January 2013 in ESA Case No 73075 (DB Schenker) in so far as it refuses full or partial access under Article 4(4) and (6) RAD 2012 to documents belonging to the case files that led to ESA Decision No 321/10/COL (Norway Post — loyalty/discount system) and refuses to grant access to the complete version of ESA Decision No 321/10/COL.










2.


Dismisses the application as to the remainder.










3.


Orders each party and the intervener to bear its own costs.
Case T-231/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Wepa Lille v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005301.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/53





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Wepa Lille v Commission
(Case T-231/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/89
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Wepa Lille (Bousbecque, France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Wepa Lille is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice (EU)








C_2014212EN.01000101.xml










7.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 212/1





Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 212/01

Last publication


OJ C 202, 30.6.2014


Past publications


OJ C 194, 24.6.2014


OJ C 184, 16.6.2014


OJ C 175, 10.6.2014


OJ C 159, 26.5.2014


OJ C 151, 19.5.2014


OJ C 142, 12.5.2014

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Case T-234/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Lucart France v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005501.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/55





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Lucart France v Commission
(Case T-234/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/92
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Lucart France (Torvilliers, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Lucart France is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case C-325/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 7 July 2014  — SBS Belgium NV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: audiovisual programme, copyright, information society








C_2014315EN.01004102.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/41





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 7 July 2014 — SBS Belgium NV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM)
(Case C-325/14)
2014/C 315/67
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: SBS Belgium NV

Respondent: Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM)

Question referred

Does a broadcasting organisation which transmits its programmes exclusively via the technique of direct injection — that is to say, a two-step process in which it transmits its programme-carrying signals in an encrypted form via satellite, a fibre-optic connection or another means of transmission to distributors (satellite, cable or xDSL-line), without the signals being accessible to the public during or as a result of that transmission, and in which the distributors then send the signals to their subscribers so that the latter may view the programmes — make a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society?


(1)  OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.
Case F-62/14: Action brought on 7 July 2014  — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, admission to examinations, competition (EU), translation








C_2014361EN.01003101.xml










13.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/31





Action brought on 7 July 2014 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-62/14)
2014/C 361/46
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Civil service — Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to admit the applicant to the translation tests — EPSO competition (AD/263/13) to establish a reserve recruitment list of Italian translators.

Form of order sought







—


annul the decision of 19/11/2013 not to admit the applicant to the translation tests;










—


if necessary, annul the decision of 27/3/2014 dismissing the applicant’s complaint;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-238/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Delipapier v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005701.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/57





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Delipapier v Commission
(Case T-238/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/96
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Delipapier (Frouard, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Sphère France and of Schweitzer SAS.










3.


Delipapier is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case T-202/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Group’Hygiène v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Professional association — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005002.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/50





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Group’Hygiène v Commission
(Case T-202/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Professional association - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/85
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Group’Hygiène (Paris, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Sphère France SAS and of Schweitzer SAS.










3.


Group’Hygiène is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case T-509/14: Action brought on 7 July 2014  — Decal España v Commission
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, State aid, control of State aid, hire purchase, reimbursement of aid








C_2014292EN.01005601.xml










1.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 292/56





Action brought on 7 July 2014 — Decal España v Commission
(Case T-509/14)
2014/C 292/68
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Decal España, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: M. Silva Sánchez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;










—


in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery;










—


in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;










—


in any event, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities, in full or in such a way as to limit the bar on passing on the burden of recovery to the profitability of the operations; and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.
Case T-232/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — SCA Hygiène Products v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005302.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/53





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — SCA Hygiène Products v Commission
(Case T-232/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/90
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: SCA Hygiène Products (Tremblay-en-France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


SCA Hygiène Products is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case T-517/14: Action brought on 7 July 2014 — Pelikan v OHIM — Hachette Filipacchi Presse (be.bag)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014448EN.01002601.xml










15.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 448/26





Action brought on 7 July 2014 — Pelikan v OHIM — Hachette Filipacchi Presse (be.bag)
(Case T-517/14)
(2014/C 448/34)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (Hannover, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hachette Filipacchi Presse SA (Levallois Perret, France)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: The word mark ‘be.bag’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1192/2013-1

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2014 in Case R 1192/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in part;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case F-61/14: Action brought on 7 July 2014  — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: administrator, occupational status, promotion








C_2014421EN.01006101.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/61





Action brought on 7 July 2014 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-61/14)
2014/C 421/88
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 in the 2013 promotion exercise.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 in the 2013 promotion exercise;










—


Order the Commission to pay all the costs.
Case T-178/12: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Khwanda v Council
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, bus, common foreign and security policy, human rights, international sanctions, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2014329EN.01002501.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/25





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Khwanda v Council
(Case T-178/12) (1)

2014/C 329/36
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.
Case T-224/13: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014  — Melitta France v Commission (Application for annulment — Environment — Directive 94/62/EC — Packaging and packaging waste — Directive 2013/2/EU — Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, packaging product, tube, waste management








C_2014315EN.01005202.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/52





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Melitta France v Commission
(Case T-224/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/88
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Melitta France (Chezy-sur-Marne, France) (represented by: H. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Melitta France is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.