do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-1/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2014  — Advance Magazine Publishers v OHIM — Montres Tudor (GLAMOUR) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark GLAMOUR — Earlier international mark TUDOR GLAMOUR — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014282EN.01003201.xml










25.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/32





Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2014 — Advance Magazine Publishers v OHIM — Montres Tudor (GLAMOUR)
(Case T-1/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark GLAMOUR - Earlier international mark TUDOR GLAMOUR - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 282/41
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: T. Raab, H. Lauf and V. Ahmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Montres Tudor SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: J.P. de Oliveira Vaz Miranda de Sousa and C. Sueiras Villalobos, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2012 (Case R 213/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Montres Tudor SA and Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
Case T-345/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2014  — Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones v OHIM — Copisa Proyectos y Mantenimientos Industriales (CPI COPISA INDUSTRIAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark CPI COPISA INDUSTRIAL — Earlier Spanish figurative mark Cpi construcción promociones e instalaciones, s.a. and earlier trade name Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones, S.A.-C.P.I. — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1) (b) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No evidence of genuine use of the earlier mark — No evidence of use of the earlier trade name in the course of trade)
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, maintenance, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014282EN.01003601.xml










25.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/36





Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2014 — Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones v OHIM — Copisa Proyectos y Mantenimientos Industriales (CPI COPISA INDUSTRIAL)
(Case T-345/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark CPI COPISA INDUSTRIAL - Earlier Spanish figurative mark Cpi construcción promociones e instalaciones, s.a. and earlier trade name Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones, S.A.-C.P.I. - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1) (b) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No evidence of genuine use of the earlier mark - No evidence of use of the earlier trade name in the course of trade))
2014/C 282/46
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela and J. L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Copisa Proyectos y Mantenimientos Industriales, SA (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: T. González Martínez, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 April 2013 (Case R 1935/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones, SA, and Copisa Proyectos y Mantenimientos Industriales, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones, SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 245, 24.8.2013.
Corrigendum to Directive 2014/47/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union and repealing Directive 2000/30/EC ( OJ L 127, 29.4.2014 )
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: commercial vehicle, environmental protection, motor vehicle, road safety, roadworthiness tests, technical regulations








L_2014197EN.01008702.xml










4.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 197/87







Corrigendum to Directive 2014/47/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union and repealing Directive 2000/30/EC

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 127 of 29 April 2014
)


On page 147, Article 24(1):
for:

               ‘… 20 May 2016 …’,
read:

               ‘… 20 May 2020 …’.
Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: EU Official Journal, administrative competition, job vacancy








CA2014209EN.01000901.xml










4.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 209/9





REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS
2014/C 209 A/03
Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.






5


 




6


 




11


 




19


 




21


 




26


 




27


 




30


(PL)




35


 




41


(DE/EN/FR)




42


 




43


 




46


 




47


 




48


 




55


 




56


 




60


 




62


 




65


 




73


(DE/EN/FR)




74


 




81


 




88


 




92


(DE/EN/FR)




97


 




98


 




99


 




108


 




109


 




116


 




119


 




133


 




134


 




136


 




137


(DE/EN/FR)




140


 




145


 




152


 




160


 




163


 




164


 




176


 




178


 




180


 




182


 




185


 




186


 




188


 




195


 




207


 




209


(DE/EN/FR)
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014209EN.01000101.xml










4.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 209/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

3 July 2014
2014/C 209/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3646




JPY


Japanese yen


139,06




DKK


Danish krone


7,4569




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79650




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3286




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2147




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,4810




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,439




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,39




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1471




RON


Romanian leu


4,3888




TRY


Turkish lira


2,9102




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4552




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4530




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,5770




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5563




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7008




KRW


South Korean won


1 376,98




ZAR


South African rand


14,7099




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,4769




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5875




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 278,74




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3596




PHP


Philippine peso


59,467




RUB


Russian rouble


46,7050




THB


Thai baht


44,212




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0388




MXN


Mexican peso


17,7357




INR


Indian rupee


81,3916






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-322/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Krefeld (Germany) lodged on 4 July 2014  — Jaouad El Majdoub v CarsOnTheWeb.Deutschland GmbH
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Internet, software, trade licence, transmission network








C_2014315EN.01004002.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/40





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Krefeld (Germany) lodged on 4 July 2014 — Jaouad El Majdoub v CarsOnTheWeb.Deutschland GmbH
(Case C-322/14)
2014/C 315/65
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Krefeld

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Jaouad El Majdoub

Defendant: CarsOnTheWeb.Deutschland GmbH

Question referred

Does so-called ‘click wrapping’ fulfil the requirements for there to be a communication by electronic means within the meaning of Article 23(2) of Regulation No 44/2001? (1)



(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).
Case T-84/12: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2014  — Uspaskich v Parliament (Action for annulment and compensation — Privileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision to waive immunity — Re-examination — Decision not to defend immunity — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, damages, indemnification, parliamentary immunity, privilege








C_2014329EN.01001202.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/12





Order of the General Court of 4 July 2014 — Uspaskich v Parliament
(Case T-84/12) (1)

((Action for annulment and compensation - Privileges and immunities - Member of the European Parliament - Decision to waive immunity - Re-examination - Decision not to defend immunity - Inadmissibility - Manifest inadmissibility))
2014/C 329/15
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties


Applicant: Viktor Uspaskich (Kėdainiai, Lithuania) (represented by: A. Raišutis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, M. Windisch and L. Mašalaitė-Chouteau, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and V. Balčiūnaitė, acting as Agents)

Re:

Firstly, an application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 1 December 2011 not to defend the applicant’s parliamentary immunity and to reject his application for re-examination of the decision to waive immunity and, secondly, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part inadmissible.










2.


Mr Viktor Uspaskich shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.










3.


The Republic of Lithuania shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 692/2014 of 23 June 2014 concerning restrictions on the import into the Union of goods originating in Crimea or Sevastopol, in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol ( OJ L 183, 24.6.2014 )
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Russia, Ukraine, import (EU), import restriction, originating product, territorial dispute








L_2014197EN.01008701.xml










4.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 197/87







Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 692/2014 of 23 June 2014 concerning restrictions on the import into the Union of goods originating in Crimea or Sevastopol, in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 183 of 24 June 2014
)


On page 10, Article 3(b):
for:







‘(b)


goods originating in Crimea or Sevastopol which have been made available to the Ukrainian authorities for examination, for which compliance with the conditions conferring entitlement to preferential origin has been verified in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 and Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 (1) or in accordance with the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement.





read:







‘(b)


goods originating in Crimea or Sevastopol which have been made available to the Ukrainian authorities for examination, for which compliance with the conditions conferring entitlement to preferential origin has been verified and for which a certificate of origin has been issued in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 and Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 (2) or in accordance with the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement.







(1)  
            OJ L 118, 22.4.2014, p. 1.’,

(2)  
            OJ L 118, 22.4.2014, p. 1.’.
Case T-521/14: Action brought on 4 July 2014 — Sweden v Commission
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU control, chemical product, drafting of EU law, endocrine disease, marketing standard, transfer of competence








C_2014431EN.01002802.xml










1.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/28





Action brought on 4 July 2014 — Sweden v Commission
(Case T-521/14)
(2014/C 431/50)
Language of the case: Swedish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk and K. Sparrman, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Declare that the European Commission, by failing to adopt delegated acts to specify scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties, has infringed Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs of the action.





Pleas in law and main arguments

Under Article 5(3) of the Biocides Regulation (1), the Commission is to adopt delegated acts to specify scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties by 13 December 2013 at the latest. The applicant submits that, by failing to adopt such delegated acts, the Commission has failed to take measures which it is obliged by law to take. The applicant has requested the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 5(3) of the Biocides Regulation, but in the Commission’s reply, in the view of the applicant, no position was defined as regards that request within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 265 TFEU. The applicant claims that, in addition, as at the time of the application, the Commission has not adopted any measures to end the alleged failure to act. In the view of the applicant, the Commission has a basis for specifying scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties and an application of those criteria which, under the second and third subparagraphs of Article 5(3) of the Biocides Regulation, are to apply until the Commission has adopted delegated acts containing criteria for endocrine-disrupting substances.


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ 2012 L 167, p. 1).
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections  Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, State aid, control of State aid, environmental protection, rural development, silviculture








C_2014210EN.01002801.xml










4.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 210/28





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)
2014/C 210/02







Date of adoption of the decision


15.05.2014




Aid number


SA.38605 (2014/N)




Member State


Denmark




Region


—


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Første skovrejsning på landbrugsarealer med henblik på at anlægge nye offentlige skove. Forlængelse af SA.33976 indtil 31/12/2014




Legal basis


Lov om skove (LBK nr. 678 af 14/06/2013)
BKG om tilskud til offentlig skovrejsning (BKG nr 1027 af 07/11/2012 med senere ændringer)




Type of measure


Scheme


—




Objective


Environmental protection, Forestry, Rural development (AGRI)




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: DKK 8 (in millions)
Annual budget: DKK 8 (in millions)




Intensity


100 %




Duration (period)


until 31.12.2014




Economic sectors


Silviculture and other forestry activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Miljøministeriet, Naturstyrelsen




Haraldsgade 53, DK-2100 KBH Ø








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.
Case T-644/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2014  — Kimman v Commission (Appeal — Cross-appeal — Civil service — Officials — Reports — Appraisal report — 2009 appraisal exercise — Rule that the application corresponds to the complaint — Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations — Opinion of the ad-hoc committee — Distortion — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: infringement of EU law, regulations for civil servants, staff assessment








C_2014282EN.01002601.xml










25.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/26





Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2014 — Kimman v Commission
(Case T-644/11 P) (1)

((Appeal - Cross-appeal - Civil service - Officials - Reports - Appraisal report - 2009 appraisal exercise - Rule that the application corresponds to the complaint - Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations - Opinion of the ad-hoc committee - Distortion - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment))
2014/C 282/33
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Eugène Emile Marie Kimman (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case F-74/10 Kimman v Commission, not yet published, seeking annulment of that judgment.

Operative part of the judgment


The Court:







1.


Annuls the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case F-74/10 Kimman v Commission (F-74/10), first, in that it declares admissible the second plea in law, the six first parts of the third plea in law and the fourth plea in law, except the claim that the work done by the applicant in the interest of the institution had not been taken into account, raised by the appellant in the proceedings at first instance and, second, in that it orders the European Commission to bear, in addition to its own costs, one quarter of the appellant’s costs related to those proceedings;










2.


Dismisses the main appeal;










3.


Rejects the action brought by Mr Eugène Emile Marie Kimman before the Civil Service Tribunal;










4.


Orders Mr Kimman to bear the entirety of the costs both at first instance and of the main appeal;










5.


Orders each party to bear its own costs in the cross-appeal.






(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.
Case C-328/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) lodged on 4 July 2014  — CD Consulting s.r.o. v Anna Pančurová and Others
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, consumer credit, consumer protection, negotiable instrument, unfair terms of contract








C_2014351EN.01000301.xml










6.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/3





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) lodged on 4 July 2014 — CD Consulting s.r.o. v Anna Pančurová and Others
(Case C-328/14)
2014/C 351/03
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Krajský súd v Prešove

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: CD Consulting s.r.o.

Defendants: Anna Pančurová and Others

Question referred

Must Article 6(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and Article 4 of Council Directive 87/102/EEC (2) of 22 December 1986 for the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning consumer credit be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as the legislation at issue in the main proceedings, which in principle does not allow the national court deciding on rights under an endorsed bill of exchange at any stage of the proceedings to examine of its own motion the agreement and the basis of the legal relationship and the possible unfair nature of a contractual term and any breach of the law regulating the consequences of the failure to state the APR in the consumer credit agreement from which the bill of exchange arose?


(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

(2)  OJ 1993 L 42, p. 48.
Case C-451/13: Order of the President of the Court of 4 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Gigaset AG v SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH, SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG
Date: 2014-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, fine








C_2014315EN.01004603.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/46





Order of the President of the Court of 4 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Gigaset AG v SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH, SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG
(Case C-451/13) (1)

2014/C 315/78
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.