do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-503/13 P: Order of the General Court of 19 June 2014  — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Article 14 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal — Principle of the lawful judge — Dismissal of the action at first instance as manifestly inadmissible — Application filed by facsimile bearing a non-handwritten signature of the lawyer — Application filed by facsimile and original filed later not identical — Action brought out of time — Application seeking payment of a certain sum for a quarter of the costs incurred in the proceedings in Case F-56/09 — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2014-06-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, facsimile, judicial proceedings, jurisdiction, legal basis








C_2014315EN.01006201.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/62





Order of the General Court of 19 June 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-503/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Article 14 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal - Principle of the lawful judge - Dismissal of the action at first instance as manifestly inadmissible - Application filed by facsimile bearing a non-handwritten signature of the lawyer - Application filed by facsimile and original filed later not identical - Action brought out of time - Application seeking payment of a certain sum for a quarter of the costs incurred in the proceedings in Case F-56/09 - Appeal manifestly unfounded))
2014/C 315/103
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (single Judge) of 12 July 2013 in Case F-32/12 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published, seeking the setting aside of that order.

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance.






(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013
Case T-382/12: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2014  — Kampol v OHIM — Colmol (Nobel) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Nobel — Earlier national word mark NOBEL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-06-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, household article, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014253EN.01002602.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/26





Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2014 — Kampol v OHIM — Colmol (Nobel)
(Case T-382/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Nobel - Earlier national word mark NOBEL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 253/37
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kampol sp. z o.o. (Świdnica, Poland) (represented by: J. Kępiński, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Colmol-Colchões, SA (Oliveira de Azeméis, Portugal)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 June 2012 (Case R 2286/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Colmol — Colchões, SA and Kampol-K. Humiński & syn sp. z o.o.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Kampol sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012
Case C-79/14: Order of the President of the Court of 19 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover — Germany) — TUIfly GmbH v Harald Walter
Date: 2014-06-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, consumer protection, holiday, transport regulations








C_2014315EN.01004701.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/47





Order of the President of the Court of 19 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover — Germany) — TUIfly GmbH v Harald Walter
(Case C-79/14) (1)

2014/C 315/80
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
Case C-670/13 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2014  — The Cartoon Network, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Boomerang TV SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark BOOMERANG — Earlier Community figurative mark Boomerang TV  — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion)
Date: 2014-06-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, infringement of EU law, judicial proceedings, registered trade mark, television, trade-mark law








C_2014315EN.01003102.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/31





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2014 — The Cartoon Network, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Boomerang TV SA
(Case C-670/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark BOOMERANG - Earlier Community figurative mark Boomerang TV - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion))
2014/C 315/50
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: The Cartoon Network, Inc. (represented by: I. Starr, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Boomerang TV SA

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


The Cartoon Network Inc. is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Case F-24/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 June 2014  — BN v Parliament (Civil Service — Officials — Action for annulment — Official of grade AD 14 occupying a post as Head of Unit — Allegation of psychological harassment against the Director-General — Mobility exercise — Refusal to accept appointment to a post of Advisor in another Directorate-General with the loss of the salary increase for Heads of Unit — Decision on a temporary transfer to another Advisor post — Interest of the service — Principle that the post to which an official is assigned should correspond to his grade — Action for compensation — Harm arising from non-decision-making conduct)
Date: 2014-06-19
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: administrator, indemnification, psychological harassment, reassignment








C_2014253EN.01006701.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/67





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 June 2014 — BN v Parliament
(Case F-24/12) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Action for annulment - Official of grade AD 14 occupying a post as Head of Unit - Allegation of psychological harassment against the Director-General - Mobility exercise - Refusal to accept appointment to a post of Advisor in another Directorate-General with the loss of the salary increase for Heads of Unit - Decision on a temporary transfer to another Advisor post - Interest of the service - Principle that the post to which an official is assigned should correspond to his grade - Action for compensation - Harm arising from non-decision-making conduct))
2014/C 253/93
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: BN (represented initially by: S. Rodrigues, A. Tymen and A. Blot, and subsequently by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and J.F. de Wachter, and subsequently by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and V. Montebello-Demogeot)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision adopted by the President of the European Parliament reassigning the applicant within the same Directorate-General of the Parliament from the post of Head of Unit to a post of Advisor to the Director of a Directorate and the claim for compensation for psychological harassment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Parliament to bear all of its own costs and to pay all the costs incurred by BN.






(1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 36.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7251 — Blackstone/ Gates)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-06-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electricity supply, financial services, merger control








C_2014187EN.01000101.xml










19.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7251 — Blackstone/ Gates)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 187/01
On 12 June 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7251. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.