do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014186EN.01000701.xml










18.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/7





Euro exchange rates (1)

17 June 2014
2014/C 186/07

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3568




JPY


Japanese yen


138,40




DKK


Danish krone


7,4563




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79940




SEK


Swedish krona


9,0058




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2188




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1300




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,445




HUF


Hungarian forint


307,34




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1371




RON


Romanian leu


4,4015




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8972




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4492




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4742




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,5174




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5651




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6982




KRW


South Korean won


1 386,98




ZAR


South African rand


14,5637




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,4491




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5770




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 137,22




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3738




PHP


Philippine peso


59,663




RUB


Russian rouble


47,1895




THB


Thai baht


44,020




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0322




MXN


Mexican peso


17,6906




INR


Indian rupee


81,5844






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-478/13: Order of the General Court of 18 June 2014  — NumberFour v OHIM — Inaer Helicópteros (ENFORE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, aeronautical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014339EN.01001801.xml










29.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/18





Order of the General Court of 18 June 2014 — NumberFour v OHIM — Inaer Helicópteros (ENFORE)
(Case T-478/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 339/21
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: NumberFour AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Götz, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Inaer Helicópteros, SA (Mutxamel, Spain) (represented by: C. Giner Mas and R. Rodriguez Zaragoza, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2013 (Case R 1000/2012-5), relating to opposition proceedings between NumberFour AG and Inaer Helicópteros, SA

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs borne by the defendant.






(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7240 — Klépierre/ING/Le Havre Vauban et Le Havre Lafayette)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Netherlands, economic concentration, financial institution, financial services, investment company, merger control, real property, shopping centre








C_2014186EN.01000302.xml










18.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7240 — Klépierre/ING/Le Havre Vauban et Le Havre Lafayette)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 186/03
On 5 June 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7240. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-595/10: Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2014  — Cantina Broglie 1 v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (RIPASSA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark RIPASSA — Earlier national word mark VINO DI RIPASSO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wine








C_2014253EN.01002401.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/24





Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2014 — Cantina Broglie 1 v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (RIPASSA)
(Case T-595/10) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark RIPASSA - Earlier national word mark VINO DI RIPASSO - Relative ground for refusal - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons))
2014/C 253/33
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Cantina Broglie 1 Srl (Peschiera del Garda, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer, allowed to replace A. Zenato)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Verona, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the first Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2010 (Case R 63/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between the Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona and Mr Alberto Zenato

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 September 2010 (Case R 63/2010-1);










2.


Orders OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7287 — CD&R Fund IX/Mauser) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, packaging product








C_2014186EN.01001101.xml










18.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/11





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7287 — CD&R Fund IX/Mauser)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 186/09






1.


On 5 June 2014 the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration according to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund IX, L.P. (‘CD&R Fund IX’, USA) intends to acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation Regulation sole control of the undertaking Mauser Holding GmbH (‘Mauser’, Germany), by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for CD&R Fund IX: private equity investment,
—   for Mauser: mainly active in the production and sale of rigid industrial packaging products.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7287 — CD&R Fund IX/Mauser, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7258 — TTC/Scholtz)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, logistics, merger control, metallurgical industry, motor vehicle industry, real property, shareholder








C_2014186EN.01000401.xml










18.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7258 — TTC/Scholtz)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 186/04
On 11 June 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7258. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-459/14: Action brought on 18 June 2014  — Messi Cuccittini v OHIM — Pires Freitas Campos (LEO)
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, commercial vehicle, fundamental rights, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014329EN.01001802.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/18





Action brought on 18 June 2014 — Messi Cuccittini v OHIM — Pires Freitas Campos (LEO)
(Case T-459/14)
2014/C 329/26
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Lionel Andrés Messi Cuccittini (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Rivas Zurdo and M. Toro Gordillo, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Maria Leonor Pires Freitas Campos (Setúbal, Portugal)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 March 2014 in Case R 1554/2013-1, in so far as by dismissing the applicant’s appeal, it confirmed the decision of the Opposition Division upholding opposition B 2009291 and refusing, in its entirety, Community trade mark application No 1 0 6 13  511‘LEO’;










—


order the party or parties who oppose this action to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Applicant

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark with the word element ‘LEO’ for goods in Classes 32 and 33 — Community trade mark application No 1 0 6 13  511

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Maria Leonor Pires Freitas Campos

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘LEO D’HONOR’ for goods in Class 33

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
Unilateral Statement by the Commission — Unilateral Statement by Israel
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: European Commission, Israel
Subjects: Framework Programme for Research and Development, Israel, agreement (EU), innovation, research and development, scientific cooperation, technical cooperation








L_2014178EN.01000101.xml










18.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 178/1







Unilateral Statement by the Commission (1)


The provisions of this Agreement shall not prevent the European Commission from implementing Commission notice Nr 2013/C-205/05.

Unilateral Statement by Israel (1)


Israel notes that references to Commission Notice No 2013/C-205/05 should not be construed as prejudicing Israel's principled position against it.


(1)  
            OJ L 177, 17.6.2014, p. 1.
Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: EU Official Journal, administrative competition, job vacancy








CA2014186EN.01000701.xml










18.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 186/7





REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS
2014/C 186 A/02
Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.






5


 




6


 




11


 




19


 




21


 




26


 




27


 




30


(PL)




35


 




41


(DE/EN/FR)




42


 




43


 




46


 




47


 




48


 




55


 




56


 




60


 




62


 




65


 




73


(DE/EN/FR)




74


 




81


 




88


 




92


(DE/EN/FR)




97


 




98


 




99


 




108


 




109


 




116


 




119


 




133


 




134


 




136


 




137


(DE/EN/FR)




140


 




145


 




152


 




160


 




163


 




164


 




176


 




178


 




180


 




182


 




185


 




186
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7254 — LetterOne / RWE Dea) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Germany, economic concentration, energy industry, gas industry, investment company, merger control, oil industry, telecommunications industry








C_2014186EN.01001201.xml










18.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/12





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7254 — LetterOne / RWE Dea)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 186/10






1.


On 11 June 2014, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which LetterOne Holding SA of Luxembourg (‘LetterOne’), will acquire indirect sole control of RWE Dea AG of Germany (‘RWE Dea’) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


LetterOne is a private investment holding company focusing on investments in the energy and telecoms sectors,










—


RWE Dea is an international oil and gas company active in 17 countries, which owns stakes in approximately 140 active oil and gas licences and operates natural gas underground storage facilities in Germany.














3.


On preliminary examination, the European Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The European Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the European Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7254 — LetterOne / RWE Dea, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition,




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7214 — PAG/ Ibericar/ Ibericar K)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-06-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Germany, Italy, North America, Spain, United Kingdom, economic concentration, financial services, merger control, motor vehicle industry, retail selling








C_2014186EN.01000402.xml










18.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7214 — PAG/ Ibericar/ Ibericar K)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 186/05
On 10 June 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7214. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.