REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION Benchmarking smart metering deployment in the EU-27 with a focus on electricity
Date: 2014-06-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: electrical energy, electricity supply, electronic device, energy consumption, energy saving, natural gas













EUR-Lex - 52014DC0356 - EN











|



52014DC0356

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION Benchmarking smart metering deployment in the EU-27 with a focus on electricity /* COM/2014/0356 final */









REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION
Benchmarking smart metering deployment in
the EU-27 
with a focus on electricity
Objective
The aim
of this report is to measure progress on the deployment of intelligent metering
in EU Member States in line with the provisions of the Third Energy Package[1]. Subject to the outcome of a
possible economic assessment of long-term costs and benefits, Member States are
required to prepare a timescale (of up to 10 years in the case of electricity) for
the deployment of intelligent metering systems[2].
This report looks at progress in the EU-27[3]
to date and frames recommendations for the way forward. 
There
are two Staff Working Documents accompanying this report. They present the
state-of-play of smart metering implementation in the EU, and include an
overview of the cost-benefit analyses conducted by Member States along with
related country-specific data.
Smart metering in EU legislation 
The
Third Energy Package requires Member States to ensure implementation of
intelligent metering systems for the long-term benefit of consumers. This
implementation may be conditional on a positive economic assessment of the long-term
costs and benefits (cost-benefit analysis – CBA) to be completed by 3 September
2012. For electricity, there is a target of rolling out at least 80% by 2020,
of the positively assessed cases. 
Furthermore,
in line with the spirit, and complementing the provisions of the Third
Package, the Energy Efficiency Directive[4]
supports the development of energy services based on data from smart meters,
demand response[5]
and dynamic prices. It does that while respecting and promoting individuals’
right to the protection of personal data as enshrined in Article 8 of the
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter), as well as
ensuring a high level of consumer protection (Article 38 of the Charter).
The
Third Energy Package does not set a specific implementation target for smart
metering in the gas sector, but the Retail Markets Interpretative Note[6] states that it should be achieved in a
‘reasonable period of time’.
Progress on smart metering deployment in the EU-27 
Analysis
shows that appreciable progress has been made. Following positive CBAs for
electricity in over two thirds of cases, Member States are now committed to
proceeding with (or have already completed) the roll-out of smart metering. There
are close to 45 million smart meters already installed in three Member States (Finland, Italy and Sweden), representing 23% of envisaged installation in the EU
by 2020. According to our estimates, the roll-out commitments amount to an
investment of around €45 billion for the installation by
2020 of close to 200 million smart meters for electricity (representing
approximately 72% of all European consumers) and 45 million meters (around 40%
of consumers) for gas. These figures are encouraging. They demonstrate that
where roll-out of smart metering is positively assessed, the expected
penetration rate for electricity in these Member States exceeds the Third Energy
Package target of 80% but falls short of an EU-wide penetration rate of 80%. This
also indicates that the business case for rolling out smart metering is not yet
overwhelming throughout Europe, and this is something more of a challenge in
the case of gas. 
Overview of the benchmarking results
The
results of Member States’ cost-benefit analyses are as follows:
Electricity
-        
16 Member States (Austria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxemburg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain,
Sweden and the UK[7])
will proceed with large-scale roll-out of smart meters by 2020 or earlier, or
have already done so. In two of them, namely in Poland and Romania, the CBAs yielded positive results but official decisions on roll-out are still
pending;
-        
In seven Member States (Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany,
Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, and Slovakia), the CBAs for large-scale roll-out
by 2020 were negative or inconclusive, but in Germany, Latvia and Slovakia
smart metering was found to be economically justified for particular groups of
customers; 
-        
For four Member States (Bulgaria, Cyprus, Hungary and Slovenia), the CBAs or roll-out plans were not available at the time of writing[8]; and
-        
Legislation for electricity smart meters is in place in the
majority of Member States, providing for a legal framework for deployment and/or
regulating specific matters such as timeline of the roll-out, or setting technical
specifications for the meters, etc. Only five Member States (Belgium, Bulgaria, Hungary, Latvia and Lithuania), have no such legislation in place.
Gas 
-        
Five Member States (Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the UK) have decided to roll-out smart meters by 2020 or earlier; 
-        
Two Member States (France and Austria) have plans to proceed with
a large-scale roll-out but have yet to take official decisions; 
-        
In 12 Member States (Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark,
Finland, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and
Sweden), the results of the CBA were negative; while 
-        
The other Member States have yet to conclude their assessment
(n.b. there is no gas network in Cyprus or Malta). 
Electricity
meter ownership and data handling
-        
In 15 out of the 16 Member States that have decided to proceed
with a large-scale roll-out, the distribution system operators (DSOs) are
responsible for implementation and own the meters, so the operation is to be
financed through network tariffs;
-        
In four Member States (Denmark, Estonia, Poland and the UK) data will be handled by an independent central data hub; and
-        
A similar picture applies in the Member States not proceeding (at
least under current conditions) with large-scale roll-outs by 2020 where – with
the exception of the Czech Republic, Germany and Slovakia, where alternative
options for data handling are being considered – the DSOs may also be responsible
for implementation, ownership and data handling. 
Smart metering — of value to the consumer and to the energy system

While
divergence in key roll-out parameters calls for caution (Table 1 and Table 2), available data indicate that a smart
metering system could cost on average €200 to €250 per customer. Cost per
metering point ranges from under €100 (€77 in Malta, €94 in Italy) to €766 in the Czech Republic. 
Table 1 Summary
statistics — key smart metering roll-out parameters for electricity (based on Member
States’ long-term economic assessments)[9] 
   || Range of values || Average based on data from positively assessed cases 
 Discount rate || 3.1 to 10% || 5.7% + 1.8% (70%[10]) 
 Lifetime || 8 to 20 years || 15 + 4 years (56%) 
 Energy saving || 0 to 5% || 3% + 1.3% (67%) 
 Peak load shifting || 0.8 to 9.9% || n.a. 
 Cost per metering point || €77 to €766 || €223 + €143 (80%) 
 Benefit per metering point || €18 to €654 || €309 + €170 (75%) 
 Consumer benefits (as % of total benefits) || 0.6% to 81% || n.a. 
Table 2 Summary
statistics — key smart metering roll-out parameters for gas (based on Member
States’ long-term economic assessments)
   || Range of values || Average based on all data 
 Discount rate || 3.1 to 10% || n.a. 
 Lifetime || 10 to 20 years || 15 - 20 years (75 %) 
 Energy saving || 0 to 7% || 1.7% + 1% (55%) 
 Cost per metering point || €100 to €268 || €200 + €55 (65%) 
 Benefit per metering point || €140 to €1000 || €160 + €30 (80%) 
Smart
metering systems are expected to deliver an overall benefit per customer of
€160 for gas and €309 for electricity along with assumed energy savings of 3%. The
latter range from 0% in the Czech Republic to 5% in Greece and Malta. Of the countries that have completed roll-outs, Finland and Sweden have indicated energy savings of the order of 1-3%, but no data were available for Italy. 
Smart metering with retail- and consumer- friendly functionalities
at the heart of consumer-centric energy systems
Intelligent metering systems to be deployed must be carefully designed,
and therefore they should: 
-        
be equipped with fit-for-purpose functionalities in line with
standardisation and as proposed in Commission Recommendation 2012/148/EU[11] in order to ensure technical and
commercial interoperability, or ensure the possibility to add functionalities
at a later stage; 
-        
guarantee data privacy and security; 
-        
enable demand response and other energy services to evolve; and 
-        
support retail markets that deliver full benefits to consumers and
the energy system. 
In
eight of the Member States proceeding with large-scale roll-out of smart
metering for electricity by 2020, functionalities are reported to be fully as
recommended in Recommendation 2012/148/EU. 
The
most challenging functionality to deliver relates
to the frequency at which consumption data can be updated and made available to
consumers and third parties on their behalf. This functionality will support direct
feedback on costs to consumers, enable consumers to make informed choices on their
consumption patterns and facilitate the development of new retail services and
products. Seven of the Member States proceeding with large-scale roll-out of smart
metering by 2020 and three of those not intending to roll-out do not comply
with this functionality. If the smart metering system is not able to deliver
this functionality, Member States should ensure that this functionality can be
added later, or that this functionality can be met through other arrangements.
There appears to be no direct link between the range of common
minimum functionalities considered for the smart metering systems to be
deployed and their overall cost. In other words, selecting fewer items from the
set of common minimum functionalities does not necessarily translate into less
expensive systems. In fact, the variation in ‘cost per metering point’ data across
Member States indicates that the total investment is influenced far more by
other parameters, including: 
-        
starting conditions; 
-        
local labour costs; 
-        
geographical configurations;
-        
additional features beyond the minimum set of functionalities; and

-        
overall scenarios, discount rates and appraisal periods considered
in the respective CBAs. 
This makes a compelling case for adhering from the very beginning
to the full set of common minimum functionalities. If the Member State’s CBA does not support this approach, it is highly recommended that the systems to be
deployed are at least capable of being upgraded so as to support ‘smart’
services and products in the future. Choosing a sub-optimal, inflexible,
non-upgradeable system will ultimately lead to higher costs if, for instance,
substantial alteration, or even complete replacement is needed soon after
installation in response to market and consumer requirements. 
At
present, only a few Member States have laid down guidelines on the functional
requirements of smart metering systems. The others leave analysis of the
options to the parties responsible for the roll-out — in the majority of cases,
the distribution system operators — without setting clear incentives or requirements
for functionality features that also benefit consumers. 
Standards and safeguards for data protection and security — key to
realising the full potential of smart metering in the EU
The
internal energy market needs to ensure protection of consumer privacy when providing
access to data for running business processes. It therefore needs to ensure the
right to consumers’
protection of their personal data as guaranteed by Article 8 of the Charter. Work
on this has so far identified the following privacy concerns:
-        
The risk of user profiling through high frequency data reading
i.e. gathering sensitive information on the end-user’s energy footprint; and
-        
Protection of and access to stored data in the light of privacy
and confidentiality policies.
This
report and its accompanying Staff Working Documents discuss issues related to
the solutions developed by the market and relevant national authorities, as
well as at European level[12]
on this aspect, and highlight the key role of standardisation[13] if the full potential of smart
metering as a contribution to smart grids[14]
is to be realised. 
Lessons learned from pilot programmes[15] and operational
experience 
Based
on experiences acquired to date from completed or on-going pilot programmes,
the following aspects should be borne in mind when planning the roll-out of
smart metering:
-        
Capitalise on the smart metering infrastructure being rolled-out:
o   use available standards and the right set of functionalities to ensure
technical and commercial interoperability, guarantee data privacy and security,
and deliver full benefits to consumers and the energy system; and 
o   assess the need for a specific data privacy and security framework,
under national and EU legislation, prior to the roll-out;
-        
Get the consumer on board from the beginning of the process:
o   set up a communication strategy and information campaign; 
o   earn consumer trust and confidence, for which it is crucial that
consumers understand what data are transmitted, and giving them access to them;
o   use metering data to feed information back to the customer and
allow the development of new products and customer-oriented services; and 
o   stimulate consumers’ involvement by providing them with appropriate,
user-friendly tools and mechanisms for making choices, and attractive
incentives to reward their participation; 
-        
Devise measures to incentivise all stakeholders to speed up
the development and uptake of smart metering products and services; 
-        
Develop and implement regulations in good time or take measures to
give confidence to utilities and network operators to invest in
smart metering technology and developing related services; and
-        
Ensure that lessons learned and best
practices from ongoing small-scale roll-outs or pilots are taken into
account in the large-scale roll-out, particularly with respect to
techno-economic issues, consumer involvement and the market development of
smart metering services. 
Limitations of the benchmarking
Most
key roll-out parameters available at this stage are based on projections and
forecasts, as very few EU countries have completed their roll-outs, or got to
an advanced stage. Care must therefore be taken in interpreting the results of
the comparative analysis presented here. As shown in Table 1 and Table 2, key assumptions and values diverge. This
may reflect different local realities and starting conditions, and the
inclusion of additional features in the smart metering systems considered
(adds-on, functionalities beyond the minimum recommended, etc.) but also
methodological differences (discount rate applied, appraisal period, etc.). 
The
benefits for consumers, apart from more accurate billing information, are
difficult to assess, as they depend on consumers’ actual involvement (e.g. in
demand response) and on incentives such as differentiated pricing systems. 
In
some cases, comprehensive data allowing for clear-cut conclusions are lacking.
For instance, at the time of the present analysis and writing, four Member
States had yet to communicate their CBA data. Substantial data on system functionalities
are also lacking. 
Next steps and way forward
The
main findings of this report particularly with respect to market, key
stakeholders relationships and data handling implications of smart metering
will be fed into the Retail Energy Market Initiative which is
currently under development.
Member State authorities considering next steps in
the deployment of smart metering are advised to reflect upon a number of issues
as presented below. These are largely based on lessons learned and experience
acquired to date from ongoing or completed operations. 
Consumers’
trust and confidence
An intensive
communication effort is required to help consumers understand their rights, the
benefits of installing smart meters and participating in demand response
programmes. Consumers should be informed about the functionalities, what data will be collected, and what these data will be used
for.
An
innovative energy services market
Regulation
should facilitate the creation of value for consumers and the energy system as
a whole through smart metering, and promote an innovative energy services
market. Measures should be devised to provide incentives for all
stakeholders involved to ensure the quick
development of smart metering products and services so as to speed up their
uptake. The Internal Energy Market (IEM) Communication[16]
asked Member States to produce action plans which reflect how to modernise the
grid, including rules and obligations for DSOs, synergies with the ICT sector
and promotion of demand response and dynamic prices. 
Data
protection
It
is advisable, prior to roll-out, to assess the need for a specific data privacy
and security framework under national and EU legislation. Furthermore, high
level of personal data protection must remain a central concern in the
development of smart standards.
Data
handling
Particular
emphasis should be placed on: 
-        
the implications for DSOs’ regulated roles, incentives and
obligations; 
-        
fostering more dynamic competition in retail through market rules
allowing dynamic pricing; and 
-        
exploring possibilities in data management and synergies with the
ICT sector.
Smart metering
functionalities
It is strongly recommended that at least the minimum set of
functionalities proposed in Commission Recommendation 2012/148/EU, which are in
line with standardisation work in this field, be adhered to at EU level. This is necessary to ensure technical and commercial
interoperability in smart metering, guarantee data privacy and security, and
enable the creation and development of demand response and other energy services.
It will enable Member States to identify common means of achieving
cost efficiencies in their roll-out plans, facilitate the necessary procurement
and ensure the roll-out of fit-for-purpose smart metering systems that are
worth the investment. Also, Member States are advised to specify these required
functionalities in good time in order to ensure clarity and coherence in the
exercise, in particular for those tasked with the roll-out.
Long-term
economic assessment of costs and benefits
National
authorities, in particular in those Member States not opting for large-scale
roll-out[17]
of smart metering, are recommended to consider a review of the critical
parameters used and assumptions made in their current CBA scenarios using relevant information from pilot programmes and ‘real-life’ experience to refine
technology choices and assumptions as to associated costs and benefits. Member
States that have yet to complete their CBAs or announce roll-out plans[18] are recommended to proceed
swiftly with their analysis and decision-making.
[1]        Annex
I.2 to
the Electricity Directive (2009/72/EC)
and the Gas
Directive (2009/73/EC).
[2]        ‘Smart
metering system’ or ‘intelligent metering system’ means an electronic system
that can measure energy, consumption, providing more information than a
conventional meter, and can transmit and receive data using a form of
electronic communication — definition from Article
2, point
28 of the Energy Efficiency Directive (2012/27/EU), OJ L315, 14.11.2012, p.1.
[3]        EU-27:
Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia,
Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Croatia was not covered in the
analysis as the main data collection was carried out before its accession. 
[4]        Energy
Efficiency Directive (2012/27/EU). 
[5]        ‘Demand
response’ is to be understood as voluntary changes by end-consumers of their
usual electricity use patterns - in response to market signals (such as
time-variable electricity prices or incentive payments) or following the
acceptance of consumers' bids (on their own or through aggregation) to sell in
organised energy electricity markets their will to change their demand for
electricity at a given point in time. Accordingly, demand response should be
neither involuntary nor unremunerated. (Staff Working Document 05.11.2013).
[6]        Interpretative
Note on Directive 2009/72/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in
electricity and Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal
market in natural gas, Staff Working Paper, 22.01.2010.
[7]        Data
on the United Kingdom-Great Britain (UK-GB) are discussed throughout the report
as representative of the UK. The region of Northern Ireland (NI), in terms of
overall metering points, represent a very small proportion of the overall UK
figure – around 1.5% of the UK total - and therefore it is not reflective of
the Member State position as a whole. Furthermore, it is rather difficult to generate
data which are representative of the whole UK due to the varying methodologies
as well as differences in the energy markets between NI and GB. The specific NI
position is also captured as it is incorporated in the respective Country
Fiches’ Staff Working Document accompanying this report. 
[8]            Hungary
notified the Commission services of its cost-benefit-analysis in December 2013.
The current report and accompanying Staff Working Documents refer to CBA data
available by the end of July 2013.
[9]        The ‘discount
rate’ is
applied to costs and benefits of smart metering
investments in the respective scenarios considered.
It takes into account the point in time
to which the monetary values relate
and the risk or uncertainty of anticipated future cash flows. The discount rate
has a significant impact on the assessment of potential smart metering
investments as the costs are incurred predominantly at the beginning of the
scenarios considered whereas the smart intervention often produces
benefits in the long-term.
‘Cost
per metering point’
and ‘benefit
per metering point’ statistics
are based on numbers calculated using
the net
present value of the respective costs (CAPEX and OPEX) and
benefits.
[10]       This
percentage relates to the number of measurements (as part of the data
consulted) that fall within the range of the average value quoted ± the
standard deviation given. The
data set considered for electricity relates
to the positively assessed cost-benefit
analyses from 16
countries that have already completed or will proceed
with large-scale
roll-out.
[11]       Commission
Recommendation 2012/148/EU, OJ L 73, 13.3.2012, p.9;       
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32012H0148. 
[12]       European
Data Protection Reform: 
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/data-protection/news/120125_en.htm.
[13]       M/490
Smart Grids standardisation; CEN/CENELEC/ETSI related smart grids work;  
http://www.cencenelec.eu/standards/Sectors/SustainableEnergy/Management/SmartGrids/Pages/default.aspx. 
[14]       The
European Smart Grid Task Force defines Smart Grids as electricity networks that
can efficiently integrate the behaviour and actions of all users connected to
it — generators, consumers and those that do both — in order to ensure an
economically efficient, sustainable power system with low losses and high
quality and security of supply and safety; 
http://ec.europa.eu/energy/gas_electricity/smartgrids/doc/expert_group1.pdf.
[15]       Smart
Grid projects in Europe: Lessons learned and current developments —2012
update  European
Commission,
2013; http://ses.jrc.ec.europa.eu/jrc-scientific-and-policy-report2013;

European
Smart Metering Landscape Report, Smart Regions Deliverable 2.1, Austrian Energy
Agency (AEA), 2012;  http://www.smartregions.net/default.asp?sivuID=26927.

[16]       COM(2012)663.
[17]       i.e.
Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal and
Slovakia.
[18]       i.e. Bulgaria,
Cyprus and Slovenia.