do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Decision of 10 June 2014 on appointing a member of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Medicines Agency, appointment of members, committee (EU)








C_2014176EN.01000501.xml










11.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 176/5





COMMISSION DECISION
of 10 June 2014
on appointing a member of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 176/05
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (1), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
Having regard to the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency of 14 March 2014,
Whereas:






(1)


The term of office of one member of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, hereinafter ‘the Committee’, set up in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000, expires on 31 August 2014. It is necessary, therefore, to appoint one member to the Committee.










(2)


The European Medicines Agency has recommended one person for nomination.










(3)


The member of the Committee should be appointed for a period of three years starting on 1 September 2014,




HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Sole Article
On the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency, the following is hereby appointed member of the Committee for a term of three years, from 1 September 2014:
Prof. Bruno SEPODES

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2014.


For the Commission


On behalf of the President

Tonio BORG

Member of the Commission





(1)  OJ L 18, 22.1.2000, p. 1.
Case T-427/13: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014  — Gruppo Norton v OHIM — Marín Nicolás (Gruppo Norton S.r.l.) (Community trade mark — Opposition Proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Gruppo Norton S.r.l. — Earlier national figurative mark NORTON HISPAŃO — Rule 49(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronics industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014253EN.01003001.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/30





Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Gruppo Norton v OHIM — Marín Nicolás (Gruppo Norton S.r.l.)
(Case T-427/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition Proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Gruppo Norton S.r.l. - Earlier national figurative mark NORTON HISPAŃO - Rule 49(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
2014/C 253/43
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Gruppo Norton Srl (Carini, Italy) (represented by: M. García Lirola, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Victoriano Marín Nicolás (Alcantarilla, Spain) (represented by: M. Ruiz Vázquez, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 31 May 2013 (Case R 341/2013-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Mr Victoriano Marín Nicolás and Gruppo Norton Srl.

Operative part of the order







1)


The action is dismissed.










2)


Gruppo Norton Srl is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
Case T-406/14: Action brought on 10 June 2014  — Promoinmo v Commission
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, State aid, contract terms, control of State aid, division of powers, equal treatment, hire purchase, infringement of EU law, principle of proportionality, reimbursement of aid, tax system








C_2014253EN.01005201.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/52





Action brought on 10 June 2014 — Promoinmo v Commission
(Case T-406/14)
2014/C 253/68
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Promoinmo, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. López Gómez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;










—


in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery;










—


in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;










—


in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-401/14 Duro Felguera SA v Commission.
Case T-411/14: Action brought on 10 June 2014 — Coca-Cola v OHIM (Shape of a bottle)
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014282EN.01003902.xml










25.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/39





Action brought on 10 June 2014 — Coca-Cola v OHIM (Shape of a bottle)
(Case T-411/14)
2014/C 282/52
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: The Coca-Cola Company (Atlanta, United States) (represented by: D. Stone and A. Dykes, Solicitors, and S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 March 2014 given in Case R 540/2013-2;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: Three-dimensional mark representing a shape of a bottle for goods in Classes 6, 21, 32 — Community trade mark application No 1 0 5 32  687

Decision of the Examiner: Found the trade mark not eligible for registration in respect of a part of the goods applied for

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) CTMR .
Case T-172/14 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Stahlwerk Bous v Commission (Interim measures — State aid — National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source — Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Urgency — Fumus boni juris)
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy production, renewable energy








C_2014329EN.01001401.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/14





Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Stahlwerk Bous v Commission
(Case T-172/14 R)
((Interim measures - State aid - National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source - Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Fumus boni juris))
2014/C 329/17
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Stahlwerk Bous GmbH (Bous, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The judgment of 7 April 2014 in Case T-172/14 R Stahlwerk Bous v Commission is set aside.










3.


Costs are reserved.
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice (EU)








C_2014175EN.01000101.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/1





Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 175/01

Last publication


OJ C 159, 26.5.2014


Past publications


OJ C 151, 19.5.2014


OJ C 142, 12.5.2014


OJ C 135, 5.5.2014


OJ C 129, 28.4.2014


OJ C 112, 14.4.2014


OJ C 102, 7.4.2014

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Case T-109/13: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014  — Othman v Council
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, human rights, international sanctions








C_2014253EN.01006602.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/66





Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Othman v Council
(Case T-109/13) (1)

2014/C 253/91
Language of the case: French
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.
Case T-183/14 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Schmiedag v Commission (Interim measures — State aid — National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source — Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Urgency — Fumus boni juris)
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy production, renewable energy








C_2014329EN.01001701.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/17





Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Schmiedag v Commission
(Case T-183/14 R)
((Interim measures - State aid - National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source - Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Fumus boni juris))
2014/C 329/23
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Schmiedag GmbH (Hagen, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The judgment of 7 April 2014 in Case T-179/14 R Schmiedag v Commission is set aside.










3.


Costs are reserved.
Case T-173/14 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — WeserWind v Commission (Interim measures — State aid — National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source — Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Urgency — Fumus boni juris)
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy production, renewable energy








C_2014329EN.01001402.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/14





Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — WeserWind v Commission
(Case T-173/14 R)
((Interim measures - State aid - National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source - Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Fumus boni juris))
2014/C 329/18
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: WeserWind GmbH Offshore Construction Georgsmarienhütte (Bremerhaven, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, lawyers)

Re:

Application for suspension of the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The judgment in Case T-173/14 R WeserWind v Commission is set aside










3.


Costs are reserved.
Case T-407/14: Action brought on 10 June 2014  — Gres La Sagra v Commission
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, State aid, contract terms, control of State aid, division of powers, equal treatment, hire purchase, infringement of EU law, principle of proportionality, reimbursement of aid, tax system








C_2014253EN.01005301.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/53





Action brought on 10 June 2014 — Gres La Sagra v Commission
(Case T-407/14)
2014/C 253/69
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Gres La Sagra, SL (Alameda de la Sagra, Toledo, Spain) (represented by: A. López Gómez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;










—


in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery;










—


in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;










—


in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-401/14 Duro Felguera SA v Commission.
Commission Decision of 10 June 2014 on appointing members of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Medicines Agency, appointment of members, committee (EU)








C_2014176EN.01000401.xml










11.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 176/4





COMMISSION DECISION
of 10 June 2014
on appointing members of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 176/04
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (1), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
Having regard to the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency of 14 March 2014,
Whereas:






(1)


One member of the Committee appointed by the Commission on the basis of a recommendation from the European Medicines Agency was elected as the COMP Chair on 4 September 2012. One other member appointed by the Commission on the basis of the recommendation from the European Medicines Agency resigned on 16 May 2013. It is necessary, therefore, to appoint two members to the Committee.










(2)


The European Medicines Agency has recommended two persons for nomination,










(3)


The members of the Committee should be appointed for a period of three years starting on 1 June 2014,




HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Sole Article
On the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency, the following are hereby appointed members of the Committee for a term of three years, from 1 June 2014:
Dr Ingeborg BARIŠIĆ,
Dr Giuseppe CAPOVILLA.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Tonio BORG

Member of the Commission





(1)  OJ L 18, 22.1.2000, p. 1.
Case T-408/14: Action brought on 10 June 2014  — Venatto Design v Commission
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, State aid, contract terms, control of State aid, division of powers, equal treatment, hire purchase, infringement of EU law, principle of proportionality, reimbursement of aid, tax system








C_2014253EN.01005302.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/53





Action brought on 10 June 2014 — Venatto Design v Commission
(Case T-408/14)
2014/C 253/70
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Venatto Design, SL (Toledo, Spain) (represented by: A. López Gómez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;










—


in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery;










—


in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;










—


in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-401/14 Duro Felguera SA v Commission.
Case T-179/14 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Schmiedewerke Gröditz v Commission (Interim measures — State aid — National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source — Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Urgency — Fumus boni juris)
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy production, renewable energy








C_2014329EN.01001602.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/16





Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Schmiedewerke Gröditz v Commission
(Case T-179/14 R)
((Interim measures - State aid - National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source - Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Fumus boni juris))
2014/C 329/22
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Schmiedewerke Gröditz (Gröditz, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The judgment of 7 April 2014 in Case T-179/14 R Schmidewerke Gröditz is set aside.










3.


Costs are reserved.
Cases T-433/11 and T-98/12: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014  — Makhlouf v Council
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, human rights, international sanctions








C_2014253EN.01006601.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/66





Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Makhlouf v Council
(Cases T-433/11 and T-98/12) (1)

2014/C 253/90
Language of the case: French
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.
Case C-282/14: Request for a preliminary ruling made by the Sąd Rejonowy w Rzeszowie (Poland), lodged on 10 June 2014 — Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowe ‘Stylinart’ sp. z o.o. v Skarb Państwa — Wojewoda Podkarpacki, Skarb Państwa — Prezydent Miasta Przemyśla
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Poland, expropriation, fundamental rights, indemnification








C_2015171EN.01000701.xml










26.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/7





Request for a preliminary ruling made by the Sąd Rejonowy w Rzeszowie (Poland), lodged on 10 June 2014 — Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowe ‘Stylinart’ sp. z o.o. v Skarb Państwa — Wojewoda Podkarpacki, Skarb Państwa — Prezydent Miasta Przemyśla
(Case C-282/14)
(2015/C 171/10)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Rzeszowie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowe ‘Stylinart’ sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Skarb Państwa — Wojewoda Podkarpacki, Skarb Państwa — Prezydent Miasta Przemyśla
By order of 11 December 2014, the Court of Justice of the EU ruled that it manifestly lacked jurisdiction to reply to the question referred by the Sąd Rejonowy w Rzeszowie.
Case T-174/14 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Dieckerhoff Guss v Commission (Interim measures — State aid — National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source — Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Urgency — Fumus boni juris)
Date: 2014-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy production, renewable energy








C_2014329EN.01001501.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/15





Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Dieckerhoff Guss v Commission
(Case T-174/14 R)
((Interim measures - State aid - National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source - Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Fumus boni juris))
2014/C 329/19
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Dieckerhoff Guss GmbH (Gevelsberg, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The judgment in Case T-174/14 R Dieckerhoff Guss v Commission is set aside










3.


Costs are reserved.