do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-35/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 May 2014  — Plásticos Españoles SA (ASPLA) v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags market — Single and continuous infringement)
Date: 2014-05-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: fine, plastics, restriction on competition








C_2014253EN.01000302.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/3





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 May 2014 — Plásticos Españoles SA (ASPLA) v European Commission
(Case C-35/12 P) (1)

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Plastic industrial bags market - Single and continuous infringement))
2014/C 253/04
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Plásticos Españoles SA (ASPLA) (represented by: E. Garayar Gutiérrez, M. Troncoso Ferrer and E. Abril Fernández, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras and F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 November 2011 in Case T-76/06 ASPLA v Commission dismissing an application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) concerning a cartel on the market for plastic industrial bags, and, in the alternative, for a reduction of the fine imposed on ASPLA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Plásticos Españoles SA (ASPLA) to pay the costs of this appeal.






(1)  OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.
Case F-130/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 May 2014  — CI v Parliament (Civil Service — Remuneration — Family allowances — Dependent child allowance — Double dependent child allowance — Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations — Conditions for grant — Amicable settlement between the parties after the intervention of the European Ombudsman — Implementation — Duty of care)
Date: 2014-05-22
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Ombudsman, European official, cumulative pension entitlement, dependant, family benefit








C_2014223EN.01006602.xml










14.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/66





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 May 2014 — CI v Parliament
(Case F-130/12) (1)

((Civil Service - Remuneration - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Double dependent child allowance - Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations - Conditions for grant - Amicable settlement between the parties after the intervention of the European Ombudsman - Implementation - Duty of care))
2014/C 223/68
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CI (represented by: B. Cortese and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Despotopoulou and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision refusing to grant the double dependant child allowance under Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 5 December 2011 refusing to renew, with effect from 1 June 2008, the double dependent child allowance, and the decision of 20 July 2012 rejecting the claim;










2.


Dismisses the remainder of the action;










3.


Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CI.






(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013, p. 29.
Case T-420/09: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2014  — BSA v OHIM — Loblaws (PRÉSIDENT)
Date: 2014-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014315EN.01007101.xml










15.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/71





Order of the General Court of 22 May 2014 — BSA v OHIM — Loblaws (PRÉSIDENT)
(Case T-420/09) (1)

2014/C 315/116
Language of the case: French
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.
Case C-287/13 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 May 2014  — Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of pitch, coal tar, high temperature as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment)
Date: 2014-05-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: chemical product, equal treatment, scientific report








C_2014261EN.01000601.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/6





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 May 2014 — Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
(Case C-287/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) - Article 59 and Annex XIII - Identification of pitch, coal tar, high temperature as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure - Equal treatment))
2014/C 261/08
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA, Cindu Chemicals BV, Deza, a.s., Industrial Química del Nalón, SA, Koppers Denmark A/S, Koppers UK Ltd, Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Rütgers Poland Sp. z o.o. (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, Agents, and by J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, advocaten)

Operative part of the order

The Court (Eighth Chamber) hereby:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA, Cindu Chemicals BV, Deza a.s., Industrial Química del Nalón SA, Koppers Denmark A/S, Koppers UK Ltd, Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV and Rütgers Poland sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7237 — TPG Capital/The Warranty Group)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-05-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, venture capital








C_2014154EN.01000101.xml










22.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 154/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7237 — TPG Capital/The Warranty Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 154/01
On 16 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7237. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-228/13: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2014  — NIIT Insurance Technologies v OHIM (EXACT) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark EXACT — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment — Article 56 TFEU)
Date: 2014-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, data protection, information technology, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2014212EN.01003001.xml










7.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 212/30





Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2014 — NIIT Insurance Technologies v OHIM (EXACT)
(Case T-228/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark EXACT - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment - Article 56 TFEU))
2014/C 212/37
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: NIIT Insurance Technologies Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Wirtz, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 February 2013 (Case R 1307/2012-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign EXACT as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders NIIT Insurance Technologies Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.
Case C-539/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Employment Tribunal, Leicester — United Kingdom) — Z.J.R. Lock v British Gas Trading Limited (Social policy — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Right to paid annual leave — Composition of remuneration — Basic salary and commission according to turnover realised)
Date: 2014-05-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European social policy, arrangement of working time, paid leave, pay








C_2014253EN.01000801.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/8





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Employment Tribunal, Leicester — United Kingdom) — Z.J.R. Lock v British Gas Trading Limited
(Case C-539/12) (1)

((Social policy - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Right to paid annual leave - Composition of remuneration - Basic salary and commission according to turnover realised))
2014/C 253/10
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Employment Tribunal, Leicester

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Z.J.R. Lock

Defendant: British Gas Trading Limited

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Employment Tribunal, Leicester — United Kingdom — Interpretation of Article 7 of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 1993 L 307, p. 18) as amended by Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9) — Consultant being paid a basic salary together with monthly premiums according to the turnover realised and the number of sale contracts concluded, paid in arrears — Maintenance of the basic salary during annual leave, but not the premiums, except those linked to the services provided before the leave

Operative part of the judgment







1)


Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as precluding national legislation and practice under which a worker whose remuneration consists of a basic salary and commission, the amount of which is fixed by reference to the contracts entered into by the employer as a result of sales achieved by that worker, is entitled, in respect of his paid annual leave, to remuneration composed exclusively of his basic salary.










2)


The methods of calculating the commission to which a worker, such as the applicant in the main proceedings, is entitled in respect of his annual leave must be assessed by the national court or tribunal on the basis of the rules and criteria set out by the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and in the light of the objective pursued by Article 7 of Directive 2003/88.






(1)  OJ C 46, 16.2.2013.
Case C-415/13 P: Order of the President of the Court of 22 May 2014  — Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Impexmetal S.A.
Date: 2014-05-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, machine tool, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014261EN.01001901.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/19





Order of the President of the Court of 22 May 2014 — Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Impexmetal S.A.
(Case C-415/13 P) (1)

2014/C 261/32
Language of the case: Polish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.