do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-05-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014153EN.01000201.xml










21.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

20 May 2014
(2014/C 153/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3702




JPY


Japanese yen


138,88




DKK


Danish krone


7,4646




GBP


Pound sterling


0,81400




SEK


Swedish krona


9,0294




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2223




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1360




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,479




HUF


Hungarian forint


305,46




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1893




RON


Romanian leu


4,4330




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8934




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4797




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4921




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,6225




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5978




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7160




KRW


South Korean won


1 404,75




ZAR


South African rand


14,3419




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,5470




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6175




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 708,55




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4109




PHP


Philippine peso


59,921




RUB


Russian rouble


47,3166




THB


Thai baht


44,616




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0362




MXN


Mexican peso


17,7229




INR


Indian rupee


80,3485






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Joined Cases C-475/13 and C-476/13: Order of the President of the Court of 21 May 2014 (requests for preliminary rulings from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Walter Jubin (C-475/13), Heidemarie Retzlaff (C-476/13) v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd
Date: 2014-05-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Germany, airline, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, redemption








C_2014261EN.01001903.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/19





Order of the President of the Court of 21 May 2014 (requests for preliminary rulings from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Walter Jubin (C-475/13), Heidemarie Retzlaff (C-476/13) v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd
(Joined Cases C-475/13 and C-476/13) (1)

2014/C 261/34
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 359, 7.12.2013.
Case T-368/12 P: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014  — Commission v Macchia (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — Fixed-term contract — Decision of non-renewal — Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal — First paragraph of Article 8 of the CEOS — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Concept of ‘interests of the service’  — Prohibition on ruling ultra petita — Principle of the right to be heard)
Date: 2014-05-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, indemnification, servant (EU), temporary employment, work contract








C_2014212EN.01002701.xml










7.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 212/27





Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Commission v Macchia
(Case T-368/12 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Temporary staff - Fixed-term contract - Decision of non-renewal - Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal - First paragraph of Article 8 of the CEOS - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Concept of ‘interests of the service’ - Prohibition on ruling ultra petita - Principle of the right to be heard))
2014/C 212/32
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Luigi Macchia (Varese, Italy) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 June 2012 in Case F-63/11 Macchia v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking that that judgment be set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 June 2012 in Case F-63/11 Macchia v Commission, in so far as it annulled the decision of the Director General of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 12 August 2010 rejecting the request for an extension of Luigi Macchia’s contract as a member of the temporary staff and, consequently, rejected as premature the request for Mr Macchia to be reintegrated within OLAF and the application for compensation in respect of the material harm suffered;










2.


Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;










3.


Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;










4.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.
Case T-347/12 P: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014  — Mocová v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed term contract — Decision not to renew — Rejection of the complaint — Obligation to state reasons — Ground given in the decision rejecting the complaint)
Date: 2014-05-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: servant (EU), temporary employment, work contract








C_2014212EN.01002601.xml










7.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 212/26





Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Mocová v Commission
(Case T-347/12 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed term contract - Decision not to renew - Rejection of the complaint - Obligation to state reasons - Ground given in the decision rejecting the complaint))
2014/C 212/31
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Dana Mocová (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 June 2012 in Case F-41/11 Mocová v Commission II-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal.










2.


Orders Ms Dana Mocová to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the course of the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7161 — DCC Energy/Qstar Försäljning/Qstar/Card Network Solutions)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-05-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Sweden, economic concentration, energy distribution, merger control, oil industry, payment, retail selling, software, wholesale selling








C_2014153EN.01000101.xml










21.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7161 — DCC Energy/Qstar Försäljning/Qstar/Card Network Solutions)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 153/01)
On 24 April 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7161. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-61/13: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014  — Melt Water v OHIM (NUEVA) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark NUEVA — Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Ambiguity in a language version — Uniform interpretation — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Excusable error — Obligations of care and diligence)
Date: 2014-05-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, water








C_2014212EN.01002901.xml










7.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 212/29





Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Melt Water v OHIM (NUEVA)
(Case T-61/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark NUEVA - Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed - Ambiguity in a language version - Uniform interpretation - Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure - Excusable error - Obligations of care and diligence))
2014/C 212/35
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties


Applicant: Research and Production Company ‘Melt Water’ UAB (Klaipėda, Lithuania) (represented by: V. Viešūnaitė and J. Stucka, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 December 2012 (Case R 1794/2012-4) relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign NUEVA as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Research and Production Company ‘Melt Water’ UAB.






(1)  OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.