do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Communication from the Commission on copyright protection of the common face design of the euro coins: updated list of designated authorities
Date: 2014-05-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Latvia, copyright, designs and models, euro, issuing of currency








C_2014140EN.01000101.xml










9.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 140/1





COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
on copyright protection of the common face design of the euro coins: updated list of designated authorities
2014/C 140/01
Following the adoption by Latvia of the euro on 1 January 2014, it is necessary to update the list of designated authorities of the participating Member States to which the copyright of the common face design of the euro coins have been assigned. The Annex to the Communication from the Commission on copyright protection of the common face design of the euro coins (2011/C 41/03) (OJ C 41, 10.2.2011, p. 4) is, therefore, replaced by the Annex to this Communication.


ANNEX
List of designated authorities as mentioned in point 2 of the Communication








BELGIUM



:


Ministère des Finances. Administration de la Trésorerie/Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën, Administratie van de thesaurie/Föderaler öffentlicher Dienst Finanzen, Schatzamt (Ministry of Finance, Treasury Administration)





GERMANY



:


Bundesministerium der Finanzen (Federal Ministry of Finance)





ESTONIA



:


Eesti Pank (Bank of Estonia)





IRELAND



:


Minister for Finance





GREECE



:


Υπουργείο Οικονομίας και Οικονομικών — Γενικό Λογιστήριο του Κράτους — Δ25 Διεύθυνση Κίνησης Κεφαλαίων, Εγγυήσεων Δανείων και Αξιών (Ministry of Economy and Finance — General Accounting Office of the State — 25th Directorate of Capital Transfer, Loans Guarantees & Securities)





SPAIN



:


Dirección General del Tesoro y Política Financiera (Directorate-General of the Treasury and Financial Policy)





FRANCE



:


Ministère de l’économie, de finance et de l’industrie: Direction Générale du Trésor (Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry: General Directorate of Treasury)





ITALY



:


Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze (Ministry of Economic and Financial Affairs)





CYPRUS



:


Central Bank of Cyprus





LATVIA



:


Latvijas Banka (Latvian Central Bank)





LUXEMBOURG



:


Ministère des Finances — Service de la Trésorerie (Ministry of Finance Treasury Department)





MALTA



:


Central Bank of Malta





NETHERLANDS



:


Ministerie van Financiën — Direktie Binnenlands Geldwezen (Ministry of Finance — Domestic Monetary and Financial Affairs Directorate)





AUSTRIA



:


Münze Österreich AG (Austrian Mint)





PORTUGAL



:


Imprensa Nacional. Casa da Moeda (National Printing Office — Mint)





SLOVENIA



:


Ministrstvo za finance (Ministry of Finance)





SLOVAKIA



:


Národná banka Slovenska (National Bank of Slovakia)





FINLAND



:


Valtiovarainministeriö/Finansministeriet (Ministry of Finance)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections  Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty
Date: 2014-05-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Bavaria, Germany, State aid, agricultural holding, aid to agriculture, control of State aid, forestry holding, investment aid, silviculture








C_2014141EN.01000901.xml










9.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/9





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)
2014/C 141/02







Date of adoption of the decision


 




Aid number


SA.37879 (2013/N)




Member State


Germany




Region


BAYERN


Mixed




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Bayern: Waldbewirtschaftungsregelung (11.11.2008)




Legal basis


Richtlinie für Zuwendungen zu waldbaulichen Maßnahmen im Rahmen eines forstlichen Förderprogramms (WALDFÖPR 2007)






—


Bayerische Zukunftsprogramm Agrarwirtschaft und Ländlicher Raum 2007 bis 2013 (BayZAL); Hier: Beihilfen für nichtproduktive Investitionen Forst –Art. 36b) vii) in Verbindung mit Art. 49 VO (EG) Nr. 1698/2005, geändert mit Zustimmung der Europäischen Kommission vom 20.08.08 zum 1. Änderungsantrag vom 25.04.08.










—


Art. 20 bis 22 des Waldgesetzes für Bayern (BayWaldG) in de...








Type of measure


Scheme


—




Objective


Forestry




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: EUR 1,1 (in millions)




Intensity


100 %




Duration (period)


until 31.12.2014




Economic sectors


Forestry and logging




Name and address of the granting authority







Ämter für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten




47 Ämter in Bayern








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.







Date of adoption of the decision


 




Aid number


SA.38057 (2013/N)




Member State


Germany




Region


—


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Beregnungsrichtlinie (Mecklenburg-Vorpommern)




Legal basis


Richtlinie zur Förderung mobiler Beregnungsmaschinen und — anlagen




Type of measure


Scheme


—




Objective


Investments in agricultural holdings




Form of aid


Other




Budget


Overall budget: EUR 1 (in millions)
Annual budget: EUR 0,5 (in millions)




Intensity


25 %




Duration (period)


until 31.12.2015




Economic sectors


AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING




Name and address of the granting authority







Staatliches Amt für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft Schwerin




Bleicherufer 13, 19053 Schwerin








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-05-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014140EN.01000601.xml










9.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 140/6





Euro exchange rates (1)

8 May 2014
2014/C 140/05

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3953




JPY


Japanese yen


141,95




DKK


Danish krone


7,4638




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82330




SEK


Swedish krona


9,0439




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2178




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1780




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,403




HUF


Hungarian forint


304,17




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1932




RON


Romanian leu


4,4373




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8975




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4857




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5175




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,8159




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6122




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7397




KRW


South Korean won


1 426,66




ZAR


South African rand


14,4660




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,6891




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5880




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 100,46




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5357




PHP


Philippine peso


61,316




RUB


Russian rouble


48,9550




THB


Thai baht


45,326




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0902




MXN


Mexican peso


18,0859




INR


Indian rupee


83,6385






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Judgment of the Court of 9 May 2014 in Case E-23/13 — Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC) (Directive 2003/6/EC — Admissibility — Judicial or administrative function — Information request — Requirement in national law to set out the facts that give rise to the suspicion)
Date: 2014-05-09
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Greece, capital market, dissemination of information, insider trading, interpretation of the law








C_2015049EN.01001501.xml










12.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 49/15





JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 9 May 2014
in Case E-23/13
Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC)
(Directive 2003/6/EC — Admissibility — Judicial or administrative function — Information request — Requirement in national law to set out the facts that give rise to the suspicion)
(2015/C 49/08)
In Case E-23/13 Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC) — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice from the Administrative Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein (Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein) concerning the interpretation of Article 16 of Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse), the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 9 May 2014, the operative part of which is as follows:
A requirement that obliges the authority requesting information in accordance with Article 16 of Directive 2003/6/EC to specify the facts giving rise to the suspicion is not compatible with Directive 2003/6/EC.
Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals
Date: 2014-05-09
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: EU Official Journal, administrative competition, job vacancy








CA2014140EN.01000701.xml










9.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 140/7





REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS
(2014/C 140 A/02)
Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.






5


 




6


 




11


 




19


 




21


 




26


 




27


 




30


(PL)




35


 




41


(DE/EN/FR)




42


 




43


 




46


 




47


 




48


 




55


 




56


 




60


 




62


 




65


 




73


(DE/EN/FR)




74


 




81


 




88


 




92


(DE/EN/FR)




97


 




98


 




99


 




108


 




109


 




116


 




119


 




133


 




134


 




136


 




137


(DE/EN/FR)




140
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7180 — Agrifirm/BayWa/Agrimec JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-05-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, agricultural cooperative, agricultural machinery, agricultural product, building materials, economic concentration, energy-generating product, merger control








C_2014140EN.01000501.xml










9.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 140/5





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7180 — Agrifirm/BayWa/Agrimec JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 140/04
On 5 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7180. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7227 — Temasek/Olam International)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-05-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, food processing, investment company, merger control








C_2014140EN.01000301.xml










9.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 140/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7227 — Temasek/Olam International)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 140/02
On 2 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7227. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7199 — Nestlé/Galderma)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-05-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: cosmetics industry, economic concentration, food industry, merger control








C_2014140EN.01000401.xml










9.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 140/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7199 — Nestlé/Galderma)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 140/03
On 5 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7199. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Judgment of the Court of 27 June 2014 in Case E-26/13 — The Icelandic State v Atli Gunnarsson (Free movement of persons — Article 28 EEA — Directive 2004/38/EC — Directive 90/365/EEC — Right of residence — Right to move from the home State — Less favourable tax treatment)
Date: 2014-05-09
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European citizenship, family, foreign national, free movement of persons, residence permit








C_2015068EN.01000301.xml










26.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/3





JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 27 June 2014
in Case E-26/13
The Icelandic State v Atli Gunnarsson
(Free movement of persons — Article 28 EEA — Directive 2004/38/EC — Directive 90/365/EEC — Right of residence — Right to move from the home State — Less favourable tax treatment)
(2015/C 68/03)
In Case E-26/13, The Icelandic State v Atli Gunnarsson — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice from the Supreme Court of Iceland (Hæstiréttur Íslands) concerning the interpretation of Article 28 of the EEA Agreement and Article 7 of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 27 June 2014, the operative part of which is as follows:
It is not compatible with Article 1 of Directive 90/365/EEC and Article 7(1)(b) and (d) of Directive 2004/38/EC that an EEA State does not give spouses who have moved to another EEA State the option of pooling their personal tax credits in connection with the assessment of income tax, whereas they would be entitled to pool their personal tax credits if they lived in the home State, in a situation where one of them receives a pension from the home State, and that pension constitutes all or nearly all of that person’s income, while the other spouse has no income.