do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-411/13 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2014  — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Sanco, SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative mark representing a chicken — Opposition of the proprietor of a national figurative mark representing a chicken — Partial rejection of the opposition)
Date: 2014-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, graphic illustration, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014261EN.01000801.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/8





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Sanco, SA
(Case C-411/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Figurative mark representing a chicken - Opposition of the proprietor of a national figurative mark representing a chicken - Partial rejection of the opposition))
2014/C 261/12
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Sanco, SA (represented by: A. Segura Roda, abogado)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.
Case C-329/13: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien — Austria) — Ferdinand Stefan v Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — Directive 2003/4/EC — Validity — Public access to environmental information — Exception to the obligation to disclose environmental information where the disclosure compromises the ability of any person to receive a fair trial — Optional nature of that exception for Member States — Article 6 TEU — Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter)
Date: 2014-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU environmental policy, access to EU information, access to the courts, dissemination of information, rights of the defence








C_2014261EN.01000602.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/6





Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien — Austria) — Ferdinand Stefan v Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft
(Case C-329/13) (1)

((Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 2003/4/EC - Validity - Public access to environmental information - Exception to the obligation to disclose environmental information where the disclosure compromises the ability of any person to receive a fair trial - Optional nature of that exception for Member States - Article 6 TEU - Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter))
2014/C 261/09
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ferdinand Stefan

Defendant: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft

Operative part of the order

Consideration of the questions raised has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC.


(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.
State aid — Decision to close an existing aid case as a result of acceptance of appropriate measures by an EFTA State
Date: 2014-05-08
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, State aid, control of State aid, education, financing, security services, vocational training








C_2014138EN.01002901.xml










8.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/29





State aid — Decision to close an existing aid case as a result of acceptance of appropriate measures by an EFTA State
(2014/C 138/06)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority has proposed appropriate measures, which were accepted by Norway, on the following state aid measure:








Date of adoption of the decision



:


12 February 2014





Decision number



:


55/14/COL





Case number



:


70957





EFTA State



:


Norway





Title



:


Financing of safety training courses by county schools





Legal basis



:


The Education Act of 17 July 1998 No 61





Objective



:


n.a.





Economic sectors



:


Education





Other information



:


Based on measures undertaken and further commitments given by the Norwegian authorities to amend the current financing regime of safety training courses by county schools, the Authority’s concerns regarding the incompatibility of the county schools’ financing of safety training courses were dispelled and the investigation closed.




The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:
http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/
Case F-50/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2014  — A v Commission (Civil Service — Social security — Accident or occupational disease — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Permanent partial invalidity — Application for compensation — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-05-08
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, damage, disability insurance, indemnification, occupational disease, staff regulations (EU)








C_2014194EN.01004101.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/41





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — A v Commission
(Case F-50/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Social security - Accident or occupational disease - Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Permanent partial invalidity - Application for compensation - Manifest inadmissibility))
2014/C 194/60
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: A (represented by: B. Cambier and A. Paternostre, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Joris, acting as Agent, and C. Mélotte, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision ruling on the application for additional compensation, made by the applicant on the basis of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations, in order to obtain full reparation for the material and non-material losses which he suffered following his occupational disease and the numerous irregularities which occurred in the examination of his application based on Article 73 of the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 63.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-05-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014138EN.01000101.xml










8.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

7 May 2014
(2014/C 138/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3927




JPY


Japanese yen


141,68




DKK


Danish krone


7,4641




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82070




SEK


Swedish krona


9,0497




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2186




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,2235




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,412




HUF


Hungarian forint


305,90




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1998




RON


Romanian leu


4,4295




TRY


Turkish lira


2,9133




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4909




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5164




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,7957




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6035




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7396




KRW


South Korean won


1 424,96




ZAR


South African rand


14,6360




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,6833




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5863




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 120,38




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5228




PHP


Philippine peso


61,711




RUB


Russian rouble


49,1860




THB


Thai baht


45,101




BRL


Brazilian real


3,1037




MXN


Mexican peso


18,1319




INR


Indian rupee


83,6525






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-414/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2014  — Bolloré v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Cartels — Market in carbonless paper — Attributability of liability to the parent company for the infringement committed by its subsidiary — Direct participation of the parent company in the infringement — Equal treatment — Duration of the administrative procedure and legal proceedings — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence)
Date: 2014-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative procedure, equal treatment, fine, infringement of EU law, pulp and paper industry, restriction on competition, rights of the defence, subsidiary








C_2014202EN.01000401.xml










30.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 202/4





Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — Bolloré v European Commission
(Case C-414/12 P) (1)

((Appeal - Competition - Cartels - Market in carbonless paper - Attributability of liability to the parent company for the infringement committed by its subsidiary - Direct participation of the parent company in the infringement - Equal treatment - Duration of the administrative procedure and legal proceedings - Reasonable period of time - Rights of the defence))
2014/C 202/04
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Bolloré (represented by: P. Gassenbach, C. Lemaire and O. de Juvigny, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and N. Coutrelis, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2012 in Case T-372/10 Bolloré v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment or amendment of Commission Decision C (2010) 4160 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFUE and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/36.212 — Carbonless paper) — Decision taken following annulment of a first decision — Attribution of liability for the infringement to the parent company as direct perpetrator — Fine — Lawfulness of infringements and penalties — Equal treatment — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Bolloré to pay the costs of the present appeal.






(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.
Case C-483/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof — Belgium) — Pelckmans Turnhout NV v Walter Van Gastel Balen NV and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principles of equality and non-discrimination — Implementation of EU law — Scope of application of EU law — None — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2014-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: application of EU law, equal treatment, jurisdiction, retail trade, trading hours, weekly rest period








C_2014202EN.01000402.xml










30.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 202/4





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof — Belgium) — Pelckmans Turnhout NV v Walter Van Gastel Balen NV and Others
(Case C-483/12) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principles of equality and non-discrimination - Implementation of EU law - Scope of application of EU law - None - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))
2014/C 202/05
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Grondwettelijk Hof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Pelckmans Turnhout NV

Defendants: Walter Van Gastel Balen NV, Walter Van Gastel NV, Walter Van Gastel Lifestyle NV, Walter Van Gastel Schoten NV

Intervening parties: Ministerraad

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Grondwettelijk Hof — Belgium — Interpretation of Article 6(3) TEU, Articles 34, 35, 36, 56 and 57 TFEU, and Articles 15, 16, 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — National legislation requiring retail establishments to close one day per week — Exceptions provided for in respect of retailers established in certain places or marketing certain products

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium).


(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.