do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7233 — Allianz/Going concern of UnipolSai Assicurazioni)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, merger control








C_2014137EN.01004201.xml










7.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 137/42





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7233 — Allianz/Going concern of UnipolSai Assicurazioni)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 137/08






1.


On 29 April 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Allianz SpA (Italy), controlled ultimately by Allianz Group (Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of a non-life insurance going concern (‘the Target’, Italy) currently owned by UnipolSai Assicurazioni SpA (‘UnipolSai’, Italy), by way of purchase of assets.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   Allianz: life and non-life insurance and asset management,
—   Target: non-life insurance.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7233 — Allianz/Going concern of UnipolSai Assicurazioni to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2014 under certain quotas opened by the Union for products in the poultrymeat, egg and egg albumin sectors
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: common organisation of markets, egg, egg product, import (EU), import licence, poultrymeat, tariff quota








C_2014137EN.01001801.xml










7.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 137/18





Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2014 under certain quotas opened by the Union for products in the poultrymeat, egg and egg albumin sectors
2014/C 137/06
Commission Regulations (EC) No 1384/2007 (1) and (EC) No 1385/2007 (2) opened tariff quotas for imports of products in the poultrymeat sector. The import licence applications lodged during the first seven days of March 2014 for the subperiod 1 April to 30 June 2014 do not, for quotas 09.4091, 09.4092 and 09.4421, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (3), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 July to 30 September 2014; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.


(1)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 40.

(2)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

(3)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.


ANNEX






Quota order number


Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2014
(kg)




09.4091


280 000




09.4092


1 627 000




09.4421


350 000
Case T-322/14: Action brought on 7 May 2014  — mobile.international v OHIM — Rezon (mobile.de)
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014235EN.01002601.xml










21.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/26





Action brought on 7 May 2014 — mobile.international v OHIM — Rezon (mobile.de)
(Case T-322/14)
2014/C 235/36
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: mobile.international GmbH (Kleinmachnow, Germany) (represented by: T. Lührig, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rezon OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 February 2014 in Case R 951/2013-1;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the figurative mark including the word elements ‘mobile.de’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 38 and 42 — Community trade mark No 8 8 38  609

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Rezon OOD

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: national figurative mark including the word elements ‘mobile’ for services in Classes 35, 39 and 42

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal upheld and the case is referred back to the Cancellation Division

Pleas in law:







—


Infringement of Article 57 (2) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 22(2) of Regulation No 2868/95;










—


Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation No 2868/95;










—


Infringement of Article 78(1)(f) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of the rules on abuse of law in conjunction with Article 56(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 and Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009
Case T-359/13: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014  — Spain Doce 13 v OHIM — Ovejero Jiménez and Becerra Guibert (VICTORIA DELEF) (Community trade mark — Registration refused in part — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2014212EN.01003101.xml










7.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 212/31





Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014 — Spain Doce 13 v OHIM — Ovejero Jiménez and Becerra Guibert (VICTORIA DELEF)
(Case T-359/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Registration refused in part - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 212/39
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Spain Doce 13, SL (Crevillente, Spain) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Gregorio Ovejero Jiménez (Alicante, Spain) and María Luisa Cristina Becerra Guibert (Alicante) (represented by: M. Veiga Serrano, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 April 2013 (Case R 1046/2012-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Gregorio Ovejero Jiménez and María Luisa Cristina Becerra Guibert, on the one hand, and Spain Doce 13, on the other.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and pay one half of the defendant’s costs.










3.


The interveners are ordered to bear their own costs and pay one half of the defendant’s costs.






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
Case T-323/14: Action brought on 7 May 2014 — Bankia/OHIM — Banco ActivoBank (Portugal) (Bankia)
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, financial institution, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014261EN.01002501.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/25





Action brought on 7 May 2014 — Bankia/OHIM — Banco ActivoBank (Portugal) (Bankia)
(Case T-323/14)
2014/C 261/48
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Bankia, SA (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: F. De Barba, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Banco ActivoBank (Portugal), SA (Lisboa, Portugal)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Second Chamber of the Board of Appeal of 14 February 2014 in cases R 649/2013-2 and R 744/2013-2, so that the Community trade mark application no1 0 1 25  284‘BANKIA’ be granted for all the goods and services;










—


Condemn the opponent and/or the OHIM to pay the costs incurred by the applicant/appellant in connection with this appeal.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the word element ‘Bankia’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 45 — Community trade mark application no1 0 1 25  284

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Banco ActivoBank (Portugal), SA

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The national word mark ‘BANKY’ for services in Class 36

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was partially upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal of BANKIA S.A. was dismissed and the appeal of Banco ActivoBank (Portugal), SA partially upheld, rejecting the contested trade mark for a wider range of services

Pleas in law: Infringement of Art. 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7200 — Lenovo/IBM x86 Server Business)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, information technology industry, merger control








C_2014137EN.01000101.xml










7.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 137/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7200 — Lenovo/IBM x86 Server Business)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 137/01
On 29 April 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7200. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-317/14: Action brought on 7 May 2014 — Klement/OHIM — Bullerjan (Form of an oven)
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, furnace, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014261EN.01002402.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/24





Action brought on 7 May 2014 — Klement/OHIM — Bullerjan (Form of an oven)
(Case T-317/14)
2014/C 261/47
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Toni Klement (Dippoldiswalde, Germany) (represented by: J. Weiser, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bullerjan GmbH (Isernhagen-Kirchhorst, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 27 February 2014 in Case R 1656/2013-1 so that the appeal brought by the applicant is upheld and Community trade mark 4 0 87  731 is revoked in its entirety;










—


Alternatively, annul the contested decision;










—


Order OHIM and, as the case may be, the Community trade mark proprietor/possible intervener to pay the costs for these proceedings and of the proceedings before OHIM.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: Three-dimensional mark representing an oven, for goods in Class 11 — Community trade mark registration No 4 0 87  731

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Bullerjan GmbH

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for revocation

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 15 of Regulation No 207/2009
Case C-222/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State) lodged on 7 May 2014  — Konstantinos Maistrellis v Minister for Justice, Transparency and Human Rights
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, civil servant, incapacity for work, married person, parental allowance








C_2014235EN.01000801.xml










21.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/8





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State) lodged on 7 May 2014 — Konstantinos Maistrellis v Minister for Justice, Transparency and Human Rights
(Case C-222/14)
2014/C 235/11
Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Konstantinos Maistrellis

Defendant: Minister for Justice, Transparency and Human Rights

Question referred

Must the provisions of Directive 96/34/EC (1) and Directive 2006/54/EC (2), in so far as they are applicable, be interpreted as precluding national regulations, such as the contested provision of the third sentence of Article 53(3) of Law 3528/2007, providing that if the civil servant’s wife does not work or exercise any profession the male spouse is not entitled to parental leave, unless it is considered that due to a serious illness or injury the wife is unable to meet the needs related to the upbringing of the child?


(1)  Council Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996 on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC (OJ 1996 L 145, p. 4).

(2)  Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast) (OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23).
Case T-511/10: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014  — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Requests for quotations — Refusal of access — Replacement of the contested measure in the course of proceedings — Failure to adapt the claim for annulment — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Publications Office of the European Union, access to EU information, contract








C_2014329EN.01001201.xml










22.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/12





Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
(Case T-511/10) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Requests for quotations - Refusal of access - Replacement of the contested measure in the course of proceedings - Failure to adapt the claim for annulment - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 329/14
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens (Greece)) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira, E. Manhaeve and C. ten Dam, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2010)508190 of 12 August 2010 refusing access to requests for quotations concerning certain framework contracts managed by the Publications Office of the European Union.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and the European Commission are to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 15, 15.1.2011.
Case C-458/13: Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Andreas Grund acting as administrator in the insolvency proceedings concerning the assets of SR-Tronic GmbH, Jürgen Reiser, Dirk Seidler v Nintendo Co. Ltd, Nintendo of America Inc.
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: automatic game, copyright, software








C_2014261EN.01001902.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/19





Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Andreas Grund acting as administrator in the insolvency proceedings concerning the assets of SR-Tronic GmbH, Jürgen Reiser, Dirk Seidler v Nintendo Co. Ltd, Nintendo of America Inc.
(Case C-458/13) (1)

2014/C 261/33
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Case C-661/13: Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Astellas Pharma Inc. v Polpharma SA Pharmaceutical Works
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: generic drug, market approval, patent








C_2014261EN.01002101.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/21





Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Astellas Pharma Inc. v Polpharma SA Pharmaceutical Works
(Case C-661/13) (1)

2014/C 261/40
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 129, 28.4.2014.
Case T-139/12: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014  — Adler Mode v OHIM — Cluett, Peabody (Fairfield)
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2014194EN.01003703.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/37





Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014 — Adler Mode v OHIM — Cluett, Peabody (Fairfield)
(Case T-139/12) (1)

2014/C 194/50
Language of the case: English
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.
Case C-9/13: Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014  — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, interveners: Kingdom of Belgium and Kingdom of the Netherlands
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Slovenia, domestic market, harmonisation of standards, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, natural gas, periodic penalty payment








C_2014261EN.01001702.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/17





Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, interveners: Kingdom of Belgium and Kingdom of the Netherlands
(Case C-9/13) (1)

2014/C 261/26
Language of the case: Slovenian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-05-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014137EN.01000201.xml










7.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 137/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

6 May 2014
2014/C 137/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3945




JPY


Japanese yen


141,89




DKK


Danish krone


7,4641




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82115




SEK


Swedish krona


9,0666




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2169




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,2420




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,438




HUF


Hungarian forint


307,03




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2019




RON


Romanian leu


4,4420




TRY


Turkish lira


2,9183




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4932




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5232




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,8103




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5909




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7387




KRW


South Korean won


1 431,82




ZAR


South African rand


14,6440




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,6829




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5863




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 059,02




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5377




PHP


Philippine peso


61,729




RUB


Russian rouble


49,4230




THB


Thai baht


45,094




BRL


Brazilian real


3,1202




MXN


Mexican peso


18,1675




INR


Indian rupee


83,8060






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.