do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-170/12: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2014  — Beyond Retro v OHIM — S&K Garments (BEYOND VINTAGE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark BEYOND VINTAGE — Earlier Community word mark BEYOND RETRO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2014194EN.01002102.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/21





Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2014 — Beyond Retro v OHIM — S&K Garments (BEYOND VINTAGE)
(Case T-170/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark BEYOND VINTAGE - Earlier Community word mark BEYOND RETRO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
2014/C 194/27
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Beyond Retro Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: S&K Garments, Inc. (New York, New York, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2012 (Joined Cases R 493/2011-4 and R 548/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Beyond Retro Ltd and S&K Garments, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 January 2012 (Joined Cases R 493/2011-4 and R 548/2011-4) in so far as it concerns the goods covered by the word mark BEYOND VINTAGE in Classes 18 and 25 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended;










2)


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3)


Orders Beyond Retro Ltd to pay one third of the costs incurred by the parties before the Court and orders OHIM to pay two thirds of those costs.






(1)  OJ C 194, 30. 6. 2012.
Case F-88/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2014 — Kolarova v REA (Civil service — Staff of the Research Executive Agency — Preliminary issues — Objection of inadmissibility — Powers conferred on the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment — Delegation to the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) — Appeal against the decisions of the PMO — Appeal against the delegating institution — Manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2014-04-30
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, appointment of staff, delegation of power, dependant, executive agency, research








C_2014184EN.01003902.xml










16.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/39





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2014 — Kolarova v REA
(Case F-88/13)
((Civil service - Staff of the Research Executive Agency - Preliminary issues - Objection of inadmissibility - Powers conferred on the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment - Delegation to the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) - Appeal against the decisions of the PMO - Appeal against the delegating institution - Manifestly inadmissible))
2014/C 184/64
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Desilava Kolarova (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Defendant: Research Executive Agency (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou, Agent and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

The application to annul the dismissal of the applicant’s request for her mother to be treated as a dependent child under Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Ms Kolarova is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the Research Executive Agency.
Case C-280/13: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia N °4 de Palma de Mallorca — Spain) — Barclays Bank SA v Sara Sánchez García, Alejandro Chacón Barrera (Request for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Thirteenth recital in the preamble — Article 1(2) — Consumer contracts — Mortgage loan agreement — Mortgage enforcement proceedings — National statutory and regulatory provisions — Contractual balance)
Date: 2014-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, enforcement of ruling, real estate credit, unfair terms of contract








C_2014194EN.01000802.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/8





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No4 de Palma de Mallorca — Spain) — Barclays Bank SA v Sara Sánchez García, Alejandro Chacón Barrera
(Case C-280/13) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Thirteenth recital in the preamble - Article 1(2) - Consumer contracts - Mortgage loan agreement - Mortgage enforcement proceedings - National statutory and regulatory provisions - Contractual balance))
2014/C 194/09
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No4 de Palma de Mallorca

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Barclays Bank SA

Defendant: Sara Sánchez García, Alejandro Chacón Barrera

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Palma de Mallorca — Interpretation of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) — Consumer protection in relation to mortgage loans — Balance in the parties’ contractual rights and obligations — Principle of consumer protection — National civil procedure rules applicable to the procedure for enforcing a mortgage

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and the principles of EU law relating to consumer protection and a balance in the parties’ rights and obligations must be interpreted as meaning that statutory and regulatory provisions of a Member State, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, are excluded from their scope, when there is no contractual term altering the effect or ambit of those provisions.


(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
Case C-209/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 April 2014  — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union (Common system of financial transaction tax — Authorisation of enhanced cooperation under Article 329(1) TFEU — Decision 2013/52/EU — Action for annulment in respect of infringement of Articles 327 TFEU and 332 TFEU and of customary international law)
Date: 2014-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customary law, enhanced cooperation, financial transaction, infringement of EU law, tax system








C_2014194EN.01000601.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/6





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 April 2014 — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union
(Case C-209/13) (1)

((Common system of financial transaction tax - Authorisation of enhanced cooperation under Article 329(1) TFEU - Decision 2013/52/EU - Action for annulment in respect of infringement of Articles 327 TFEU and 332 TFEU and of customary international law))
2014/C 194/06
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: E. Jenkinson and S. Behzadi Spencer, acting as Agents, and by M. Hoskins QC, P. Baker QC and V. Wakefield, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A.-M. Colaert, F. Florindo Gijón and A. de Gregorio Merino, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: J.-C. Halleux and M. Jacobs, acting as Agents), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze, J. Möller and K. Petersen, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and J.-S. Pilczer, acting as Agents), Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer, acting as Agent), Portuguese Republic (represented by L. Inez Fernandes, J. Menezes Leitão and A. Cunha, acting as Agents), European Parliament (represented by: A. Neergaard and R. van de Westelaken, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, B. Smulders and W. Mölls, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment — Annulment of Council Decision 2013/52/EU of 22 January 2013 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax (OJ 2013 L 22, p. 11) — Infringement of Articles 327 TFEU and 332 TFEU

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the European Parliament and the European Commission to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case T-447/12: Order of the General Court of 30 April 2014  — Visa Europe v Commission
Date: 2014-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: credit, credit purchase, electronic money, tax








C_2014194EN.01003801.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/38





Order of the General Court of 30 April 2014 — Visa Europe v Commission
(Case T-447/12) (1)

2014/C 194/51
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.
Case T-468/08: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2014  — Tisza Erőmű v Commission (State aid — Aid awarded by the Hungarian authorities to certain electricity generators — Power purchase agreements concluded between a public undertaking and certain electricity generators — Decision declaring the State aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of State aid — Advantage — Selective nature — State resources — Imputability to the State — Effect on trade between Member States — Rights of the defence — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Misuse of powers — Article 10 of the Energy Charter Treaty)
Date: 2014-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Hungary, State aid, common market, control of State aid, electrical energy, equal treatment, inter-company agreement, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, public sector, rights of the defence








C_2014194EN.01001901.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/19





Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2014 — Tisza Erőmű v Commission
(Case T-468/08) (1)

((State aid - Aid awarded by the Hungarian authorities to certain electricity generators - Power purchase agreements concluded between a public undertaking and certain electricity generators - Decision declaring the State aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Obligation to state reasons - Concept of State aid - Advantage - Selective nature - State resources - Imputability to the State - Effect on trade between Member States - Rights of the defence - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Misuse of powers - Article 10 of the Energy Charter Treaty))
2014/C 194/23
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Tisza Erőmű kft, formerly AES-Tisza Erőmű kft (Tiszaújváros, Hungary) (represented initially by T. Ottervanger and E. Henny, lawyers, and subsequently by T. Ottervanger)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, N. Khan and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2009/609/EC of 4 June 2008 on the State aid C 41/05 awarded by Hungary through Power Purchase Agreements (OJ 2009 L 225, p. 53).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Tisza Erőmű kft to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.






(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.
Case C-600/13: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Matera — Italy) — Intelcom Service Ltd v Vincenzo Mario Marvulli (Request for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 TFEU, 35 TFEU, 37 TFEU, 56 TFEU and 60 TFEU — Directive 2006/123/EC — National legislation granting notaries the exclusive right to draft and authenticate deeds relating to the sale of immovable property — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Italy, contract, freedom to provide services, monopoly, notary, provision of services, purchase, real property








C_2014261EN.01001002.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/10





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Matera — Italy) — Intelcom Service Ltd v Vincenzo Mario Marvulli
(Case C-600/13) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Articles 34 TFEU, 35 TFEU, 37 TFEU, 56 TFEU and 60 TFEU - Directive 2006/123/EC - National legislation granting notaries the exclusive right to draft and authenticate deeds relating to the sale of immovable property - Manifest inadmissibility))
2014/C 261/17
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di Matera

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Intelcom Service Ltd

Defendant: Vincenzo Mario Marvulli

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling presented by the Giudice di pace di Matera (Italy) by decision of 22 April 2013 is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Case C-216/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Laufen (Germany) lodged on 30 April 2014  — Criminal proceedings against Gavril Covaci
Date: 2014-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: judicial proceedings, language policy, legal domicile








C_2014253EN.01001701.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Laufen (Germany) lodged on 30 April 2014 — Criminal proceedings against Gavril Covaci
(Case C-216/14)
2014/C 253/22
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Laufen

Parties to the main proceedings

Gavril Covaci

Other party: Staatsanwaltschaft Traunstein

Questions referred







1.


Are Articles 1(2), 2(1) and 8 of Directive 2010/64/EU (1) to be interpreted as precluding a court order that requires, under Paragraph 184 of the German Law on the Judicial System, accused persons to bring an appeal only in the language of the court, here in German, in order for it to be effective?










2.


Are Articles 2, 3(1)(c), 6(1) and 6(3) of Directive 2012/13/EU (2) to be interpreted as precluding the accused from being required to appoint a person authorised to accept service, where the period for bringing an appeal begins to run upon service on the person authorised and ultimately it is irrelevant whether the accused is at all aware of the offence of which he is accused?






(1)  Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings, OJ 2010 L 280, p. 1.

(2)  Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings, OJ 2012 L 142, p. 1.
Case C-267/13: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Nutricia NV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Combined Nomenclature — Tariff headings — Medicaments within the meaning of heading 3004 — Notion — Nutritional preparations intended to be administered only enterally under medical supervision to persons undergoing medical treatment — Beverages within the meaning of heading 2202 — Notion — Nutritional liquids intended to be administered enterally and not to be drunk)
Date: 2014-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, beverage, medicinal product








C_2014194EN.01000801.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/8





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Nutricia NV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
(Case C-267/13) (1)

((Combined Nomenclature - Tariff headings - Medicaments within the meaning of heading 3004 - Notion - Nutritional preparations intended to be administered only enterally under medical supervision to persons undergoing medical treatment - Beverages within the meaning of heading 2202 - Notion - Nutritional liquids intended to be administered enterally and not to be drunk))
2014/C 194/08
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Nutricia NV

Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff headings — Medicaments within the meaning of heading 3004 — Notion — Food preparations intended exclusively to be administered enterally, under medical supervision, to persons undergoing medical treatment as a result of a disease or ailment — Beverages within the meaning of heading 2202 — Notion — Liquid foodstuffs for enteral administration, not intended to be drunk

Operative part of the judgment

Tariff heading 3004 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘medicaments’ within the meaning of that heading includes food preparations intended exclusively to be administered enterally (by means of a stomach tube) under medical supervision to persons who are receiving medical care, provided that that product is administered, as part of the control of the disease or ailment affecting them, in order to prevent or control their malnutrition.


(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.