do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-609/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Ehrmann AG v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer information and protection — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Nutrition and health claims made on foods — Labelling and presentation of those foods — Article 10(2) — Temporal application — Article 28(5) and (6) — Transitional measures)
Date: 2014-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, foodstuff, health care, labelling, nutrition








C_2014175EN.01001001.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/10





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Ehrmann AG v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV
(Case C-609/12) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer information and protection - Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 - Nutrition and health claims made on foods - Labelling and presentation of those foods - Article 10(2) - Temporal application - Article 28(5) and (6) - Transitional measures))
2014/C 175/11
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ehrmann AG

Defendant: Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Articles 10(1) and (2), 28(5) and 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 9), as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 116/2010 of 9 February 2010 (OJ 2010 L 37, p. 16) — Health claims — Specific conditions — Temporal application

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 116/2010 of 9 February 2010, must be interpreted as meaning that the obligations to provide information laid down in Article 10(2) of that regulation were already in force in 2010 as regards health claims that were not prohibited on the basis of Article 10(1), read in conjunction with Article 28(5) and (6) of that regulation.


(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.
Case T-161/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – Schönegger Käse-Alm v EUIPO – Jumpseat3D plus Germany (Rebell)
Date: 2014-04-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, milk product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202403332EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3332


3.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – Schönegger Käse-Alm v EUIPO – Jumpseat3D plus Germany (Rebell)


(Case T-161/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Rebell - Partial revocation - Genuine use of the trade mark - Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2024/3332)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH (Prem, Germany) (represented by: M.-C. Seiler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Jumpseat3D plus Germany GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 January 2023 (Case R 295/2022-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 January 2023 (Case R 295/2022-1) to the extent that the EU word mark Rebell was declared to be revoked for ‘milk products, in particular butter, butter preparations, clarified butter, butter oils, quark, quark desserts, milk products, dried milk products, dietetic foodstuffs made using milk and milk products’;










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 173, 15.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3332/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-511/12: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administraivo Norte — Portugal) — Joaquim Fernando Macedo Maia and Others v Fundo de Garantia Salarial, IP (Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for a preliminary ruling — Directive 80/987/EEC — Directive 2002/74/EC — Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer — Guarantee institutions — Limitation on the payment obligation of the guarantee institution — Salary claims falling due more than six months before the commencement of legal proceedings seeking a declaration of the employer’s insolvency)
Date: 2014-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: entrepreneur, financial solvency, guaranteed income, pay








C_2014261EN.01000201.xml










11.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/2





Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administraivo Norte — Portugal) — Joaquim Fernando Macedo Maia and Others v Fundo de Garantia Salarial, IP
(Case C-511/12) (1)

((Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Request for a preliminary ruling - Directive 80/987/EEC - Directive 2002/74/EC - Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer - Guarantee institutions - Limitation on the payment obligation of the guarantee institution - Salary claims falling due more than six months before the commencement of legal proceedings seeking a declaration of the employer’s insolvency))
2014/C 261/02
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Central Administraivo Norte

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Joaquim Fernando Macedo Maia, António Pereira Teixeira, António Joaquim Moreira David, Joaquim Albino Moreira David

Defendant: Fundo de Garantia Salarial, IP

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 80/987/EEC of 20 October 1980 relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, as amended by Directive 2002/74/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 September 2002, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which does not guarantee salary claims falling due more than six months preceding the initiation of insolvency proceedings against the employer, even though the employees brought, before the beginning of that period, legal proceedings against their employer with a view to obtaining a judicial determination of the amount outstanding and an enforcement order to recover those sums.


(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-04-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014108EN.01000101.xml










10.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 108/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

9 April 2014
2014/C 108/01
1 euro =










 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3794




JPY


Japanese yen


140,73




DKK


Danish krone


7,4660




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82375




SEK


Swedish krona


8,9953




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2184




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,2195




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,406




HUF


Hungarian forint


305,20




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1708




RON


Romanian leu


4,4629




TRY


Turkish lira


2,9185




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4727




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5082




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,6950




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5890




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7251




KRW


South Korean won


1 432,26




ZAR


South African rand


14,4216




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,5523




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6325




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 656,76




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4520




PHP


Philippine peso


61,534




RUB


Russian rouble


49,2924




THB


Thai baht


44,520




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0459




MXN


Mexican peso


18,0025




INR


Indian rupee


82,9502






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-222/14: Action brought on 10 April 2014 — Deluxe Laboratories v OHIM (deluxe)
Date: 2014-04-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, film industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014175EN.01005101.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/51





Action brought on 10 April 2014 — Deluxe Laboratories v OHIM (deluxe)
(Case T-222/14)
2014/C 175/70
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Deluxe Laboratories, Inc (Burbank, United States) (represented by: S. Serrat Viñas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 January 2014 in Case R 1250/2013-2;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark with word element ‘deluxe’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 11 253 044

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law:







—


Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of the principles of then protection of legitimate expectations, acquired rights and the lawfulness of Community measures
Case C-175/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 April 2014  — Ralph Prankl
Date: 2014-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, administrative formalities, carriage of goods, excise duty, land transport, tobacco








C_2014235EN.01000301.xml










21.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/3





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 April 2014 — Ralph Prankl
(Case C-175/14)
2014/C 235/04
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ralph Prankl

Defendant: Bundesfinanzgericht

Question referred

Are Article 7(1) and (2) and Article 9(1) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products (1) (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1), as amended by Council Directive 92/108/EEC (2) of 14 December 1992 (OJ 1992 L 390, p. 1), to be interpreted as precluding national provisions which provide that where excise goods (cigarettes) have been released for consumption in a (first) Member State and, without an accompanying document in accordance with Article 7(4) of that directive, have been transported by land to another Member State (Member State of destination) through one or more other Member States (transit Member States) in order to be sold in the Member State of destination, excise duty (tobacco duty) is charged also in a transit Member State?


(1)  OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1.

(2)  Council Directive 92/108/EEC of 14 December 1992 amending Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products and amending Directive 92/81/EEC; OJ 1992 L 390, p. 124.