do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-503/11: Order of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — Al-Aqsa v Council
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, economic sanctions, international sanctions, restriction of liberty, terrorism








C_2014194EN.01003702.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/37





Order of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Al-Aqsa v Council
(Case T-503/11) (1)

2014/C 194/49
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.
Case T-386/12: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — Elite Licensing v OHIM — Aguas De Mondariz Fuente del Val (elite BY MONDARIZ) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark elite BY MONDARIZ — Earlier Community and international figurative marks ELITE — Language of appeal proceedings — Time-limits — Admissibility of an appeal to the Board of Appeal — Rule 48(2), Rule 49(1) and Rule 96(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, mineral water, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014175EN.01003801.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/38





Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Elite Licensing v OHIM — Aguas De Mondariz Fuente del Val (elite BY MONDARIZ)
(Case T-386/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community figurative mark elite BY MONDARIZ - Earlier Community and international figurative marks ELITE - Language of appeal proceedings - Time-limits - Admissibility of an appeal to the Board of Appeal - Rule 48(2), Rule 49(1) and Rule 96(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2014/C 175/50
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Elite Licensing Company SA (Fribourg, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Albrecht, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Aguas De Mondariz Fuente del Val, SL (Mondariz, Spain) (represented by: T. Andrade Boué, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 June 2012 (Case R 9/2011-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Elite Licensing Company SA and Aguas de Mondariz Fuente del Val, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 June 2012 (Case R 9/2011-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Elite Licensing Company SA and Aguas de Mondariz Fuente del Val, SL;










2.


Orders OHIM to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by Elite Licensing Company;










3.


Orders Aguas de Mondariz Fuente del Val to pay its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.
Council Decision of 9 April 2014 adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2014
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: amending budget, budgetary expenditure, budgetary resources, draft budget (EU)








C_2014113EN.01002201.xml










15.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/22






COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 April 2014
adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2014
2014/C 113/03
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,
Whereas:






—


the Union’s budget for the financial year 2014 was definitively adopted on 20 November 2013 (2),










—


on 11 February 2014, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget for the financial year 2014,




HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Sole Article
The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2014 was adopted on 9 April 2014.
Following the judgement of the European Court of Justice of 11 July 1985 in joined cases 87, 130/77, 22/83, 9 and 10/84 (3), the Council recalls that budgetary remarks are not binding and are without prejudice to existing provisions in legislative acts.
The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/.

Done at Brussels, 9 April 2014.


For the Council


The President

D. KOURKOULAS





(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 51, 20.2.2014, p. 1.

(3)  ECJ [1985], pp. 11-2524, in particular paragraph 56.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014106EN.01000201.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 106/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

8 April 2014
2014/C 106/02
1 euro =










 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3774




JPY


Japanese yen


140,90




DKK


Danish krone


7,4659




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82420




SEK


Swedish krona


8,9653




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2200




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,2360




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,415




HUF


Hungarian forint


305,26




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1704




RON


Romanian leu


4,4555




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8855




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4760




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5055




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,6809




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5885




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7263




KRW


South Korean won


1 445,29




ZAR


South African rand


14,4149




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,5353




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6380




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 547,28




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4628




PHP


Philippine peso


61,604




RUB


Russian rouble


48,9420




THB


Thai baht


44,527




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0304




MXN


Mexican peso


17,8587




INR


Indian rupee


82,8162






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-174/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 9 April 2014  — Saudaçor — Sociedade Gestora de Recursos e Equipamentos de Saúde dos Açores S.A. v Fazenda Pública
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Azores, Portugal, VAT, health service, provision of services, public limited company, public service, tax exemption








C_2014212EN.01001502.xml










7.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 212/15





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 9 April 2014 — Saudaçor — Sociedade Gestora de Recursos e Equipamentos de Saúde dos Açores S.A. v Fazenda Pública
(Case C-174/14)
2014/C 212/16
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal)

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Saudaçor — Sociedade Gestora de Recursos e Equipamentos de Saúde dos Açores S.A.

Respondent: Fazenda Pública

Questions referred







1.


May a national court give substance to the concept of body governed by public law within the meaning of the first paragraph of Article 13(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006, by reference to the legislative concept of body governed by public law laid down in Article 1(9) of Directive 2004/18/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004?










2.


Is an entity established as a limited company, with exclusively public capital and 100 % owned by the Autonomous Region of the Azores, and whose object is the exercise of consultancy and management activities in matters relating to the Regional Health System, with the purpose of developing and reorganising it, through the performance of programme agreements concluded with the Autonomous Region of the Azores, which holds, by delegation, the public-authority powers conferred in those matters on the Autonomous Region, which was originally responsible for providing the public health service, covered by the concept of a body governed by public law acting as a public authority for the purpose of the first paragraph of Article 13(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006?










3.


In the light of the provisions of that directive, may the consideration received by that company, which consists in the making available of the financial resources necessary for the performance of those programme agreements, be regarded as payment for the services provided, for the purposes of liability to VAT?










4.


If so, does that company satisfy the requirements necessary in order to be entitled to rely upon the rule governing not being regarded as a taxable person laid down in Article 13(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006?






(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/287/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in the Netherlands ( OJ L 125, 21.5.2010 )
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Netherlands, budget deficit, gross domestic product, public debt, stability pact








L_2014106EN.01004502.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/45







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/287/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in the Netherlands

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
)


In the contents and on page 42, in the title:
for:


                  ‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in the Netherlands (2010/287/EU)’,

read:


                  ‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in the Netherlands (2010/287/EU)’;

on page 43, concluding formula:
for:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.


For the Council


The President

E. SALGADO
                           ’,



read:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.


For the Council


The President

A. BORG
                           ’.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/288/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Portugal ( OJ L 125, 21.5.2010 )
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Portugal, budget deficit, gross domestic product, public debt, stability pact








L_2014106EN.01004601.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/46







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/288/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Portugal

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
)


In the contents and on page 44, in the title:
for:


                  ‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Portugal (2010/288/EU)’,

read:


                  ‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Portugal (2010/288/EU)’;

on page 45, concluding formula:
for:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.


For the Council


The President

E. SALGADO
                           ’,



read:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.


For the Council


The President

A. BORG
                           ’.
Case T-249/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — MHCS v OHIM — Ambra (DORATO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark DORATO — Earlier Community and national figurative trade marks representing bottle neck labels — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rule 50(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, labelling, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014175EN.01004101.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/41





Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — MHCS v OHIM — Ambra (DORATO)
(Case T-249/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark DORATO - Earlier Community and national figurative trade marks representing bottle neck labels - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rule 50(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))
2014/C 175/55
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: MHCS (Épernay, France) (represented by: P. Boutron, N. Moya Fernández and L.-É. Balleydier, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, N. Bambara and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Ambra SA (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. KaczanParchimowicz, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 February 2013 (Case R 1877/2011-2), relating to opposition proceedings between MHCS and Ambra SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders MHCS to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Ambra SA for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).






(1)  OJ C 207, 20. 7. 2013.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/286/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Italy ( OJ L 125, 21.5.2010 )
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Italy, budget deficit, gross domestic product, public debt, stability pact








L_2014106EN.01004501.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/45







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/286/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Italy

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
)


In the Contents page and on page 40 in the title:
for:


                  ‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Italy (2010/286/EU)’,

read:


                  ‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Italy (2010/286/EU)’;

On page 41, in the concluding formula:
for:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.


For the Council


The President

E. SALGADO
                           ’,



read:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.


For the Council


The President

A. BORG
                           ’.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/282/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Austria ( OJ L 125, 21.5.2010 )
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Austria, budget deficit, gross domestic product, public debt, stability pact








L_2014106EN.01004301.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/43







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/282/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Austria

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
)


In the contents and on page 32, in the title:
for:


                  ‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Austria (2010/282/EU)’,

read:


                  ‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Austria (2010/282/EU)’;

on page 33, concluding formula:
for:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.


For the Council


The President

E. SALGADO
                           ’,



read:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.


For the Council


The President

A. BORG
                           ’.
Case T-288/12: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — EI du Pont de Nemours v OHIM — Zueco Ruiz (ZYTeL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative mark ZYTeL — Earlier Community word mark and well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention ZYTEL — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, chemical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014175EN.01003702.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/37





Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — EI du Pont de Nemours v OHIM — Zueco Ruiz (ZYTeL)
(Case T-288/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative mark ZYTeL - Earlier Community word mark and well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention ZYTEL - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2014/C 175/49
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: EI du Pont de Nemours and Company (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Enrique Zueco Ruiz (Zaragoza, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 March 2012 (Case R 464/2011-2) relating to opposition proceedings between EI du Pont de Nemours and Company and Mr Enrique Zueco Ruiz

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders EI du Pont de Nemours and Company to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 273, 8. 9. 2012.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/289/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia ( OJ L 125, 21.5.2010 )
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Slovenia, budget deficit, gross domestic product, public debt, stability pact








L_2014106EN.01004701.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/47







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/289/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
)


In the contents and on page 46, in the title:
for:


                  ‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia (2010/289/EU)’,

read:


                  ‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia (2010/289/EU)’;

on page 47, concluding formula:
for:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.


For the Council


The President

E. SALGADO
                           ’,



read:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.


For the Council


The President

A. BORG
                           ’.
Case T-502/12: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — Ferring v OHIM — Tillotts Pharma (OCTASA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark OCTASA — Earlier national, Benelux and international word marks PENTASA and OCTOSTIM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014175EN.01004001.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/40





Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Ferring v OHIM — Tillotts Pharma (OCTASA)
(Case T-502/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark OCTASA - Earlier national, Benelux and international word marks PENTASA and OCTOSTIM - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 175/53
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ferring BV (Haarlem, Netherlands) (represented initially by I. Fowler, Solicitor, A. Renck and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers, and subsequently by I. Fowler, A. Renck and D. Slopek, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Tillotts Pharma AG (Ziefen, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Alkin, Barrister)

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 September 2012 (Case R 1216/2011-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Ferring BV and Tillotts Pharma AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 September 2012 (Case R 1216/2011-4);










2.


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Ferring BV;










3.


Orders Tillotts Pharma AG to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Ferring.






(1)  OJ C 26, 26. 1. 2013.