do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-501/12: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring v OHIM — Tillotts Pharma (OCTASA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark OCTASA — Earlier national word marks PENTASA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014175EN.01003901.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/39





Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring v OHIM — Tillotts Pharma (OCTASA)
(Case T-501/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark OCTASA - Earlier national word marks PENTASA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 175/52
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring A/S (Copenhagen, Denmark) (represented initially by I. Fowler, Solicitor, A. Renck and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers, and subsequently by I. Fowler, A. Renck and D. Slopek, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Tillotts Pharma AG (Ziefen, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Alkin, Barrister)

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 September 2012 (Case R 1214/2011-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring A/S and Tillotts Pharma AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 September 2012 (Case R 1214/2011-4);










2.


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring A/S;










3.


Orders Tillotts Pharma AG to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring.






(1)  OJ C 26, 26. 1. 2013.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/283/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Belgium ( OJ L 125, 21.5.2010 )
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belgium, budget deficit, gross domestic product, public debt, stability pact








L_2014106EN.01004302.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/43







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/283/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Belgium

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
)


In the contents and on page 34, in the title:
for:


                  ‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Belgium (2010/283/EU)’,

read:


                  ‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Belgium (2010/283/EU)’;

on page 35, concluding formula:
for:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.


For the Council


The President

E. SALGADO
                           ’,



read:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.


For the Council


The President

A. BORG
                           ’.
Case T-144/12: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — Comsa v OHIM — COMSA (COMSA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark COMSA — Earlier company name Comsa, SA — Relative ground for refusal — Lack of use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Similarity of the services — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, renewable energy, trade-mark law








C_2014175EN.01003601.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/36





Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Comsa v OHIM — COMSA (COMSA)
(Case T-144/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark COMSA - Earlier company name Comsa, SA - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance - Similarity of the services - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 175/47
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Comsa, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented initially by M. Aznar Alonso, and subsequently by A. Gómez López, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Constructora de obras municipales, SA (COMSA) (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2012 (Joined cases R 518/2011-2 and R 795/2011-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Comsa, SA and Constructora de obras municipales, SA (COMSA).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 10 January 2012 (Joined cases R 518/2011-2 and R 795/2011-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Comsa, SA and Constructora de obras municipales, SA (COMSA), in so far as it annulled the decision of the Opposition Division with respect to the services in Class 42 and authorised registration of the mark applied for in relation to those same services;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder.










3.


Orders Comsa to bear its own costs and to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by OHIM. Orders OHIM to bear one quarter of its costs.






(1)  OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.
Case T-276/08: Order of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — Al-Aqsa v Council
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, economic sanctions, international sanctions, restriction of liberty, terrorism








C_2014194EN.01003701.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/37





Order of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Al-Aqsa v Council
(Case T-276/08) (1)

2014/C 194/48
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 236, 13.9.2008.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/291/EU of 19 January 2010 establishing whether effective action has been taken by Greece in response to the Council Recommendation of 27 April 2009 ( OJ L 125, 21.5.2010 )
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Greece, anti-crisis plan, budget deficit, gross domestic product, public debt, public finance, stability pact








L_2014106EN.01004901.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/49







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/291/EU of 19 January 2010 establishing whether effective action has been taken by Greece in response to the Council Recommendation of 27 April 2009
         

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
)


In the contents and on page 50, in the title:
for:


                  ‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 establishing whether effective action has been taken by Greece in response to the Council Recommendation of 27 April 2009 (2010/291/EU)’,

read:


                  ‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 establishing whether effective action has been taken by Greece in response to the Council Recommendation of 27 April 2009 (2010/291/EU)’;

on page 51, concluding formula:
for:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.


For the Council


The President

E. SALGADO
                           ’,



read:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.


For the Council


The President

A. BORG
                           ’.
Case T-150/12: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — Greece v Commission (State aid — Interest-free loans, accompanied by a State guarantee, granted by the Greek authorities to cereal-collecting agricultural cooperatives — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Obligation to state reasons — Advantage — Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Greece, State aid, agricultural cooperative, cereals, domestic market, economic recession, loan








C_2014175EN.01003701.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/37





Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Greece v Commission
(Case T-150/12) (1)

((State aid - Interest-free loans, accompanied by a State guarantee, granted by the Greek authorities to cereal-collecting agricultural cooperatives - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Obligation to state reasons - Advantage - Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State))
2014/C 175/48
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: Ι. Chalkias, X. Basakou and Α. Vasilopoulou)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by S. Thomas and D. Triantafyllou, and subsequently by M. Triantafyllou and P. Němečkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/320/EU of 25 January 2012 concerning aid granted by Greece to cereal-producing farmers and cereal-collecting cooperatives (OJ L 164, p. 10).

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The application is rejected.










2.


The Hellenic Republic is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 184, 23. 6. 2012.
Case T-623/11: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community trade mark MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE — Earlier national figurative marks representing a cow, Original Sahne Muh-Muhs HANDGESCHNITTEN HANDGEWICKELT and SAHNE TOFFEE LUXURY CREAM FUDGE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, food industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014175EN.01003502.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/35





Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE)
(Case T-623/11) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community trade mark MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE - Earlier national figurative marks representing a cow, Original Sahne Muh-Muhs HANDGESCHNITTEN HANDGEWICKELT and SAHNE TOFFEE LUXURY CREAM FUDGE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 175/46
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Pico Food GmbH (Tamm, Germany) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Vuijst and P. Geroulakos, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bogumił Sobieraj (Milanówek, Poland) (represented by: O. Bischof, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2011 (Case R 553/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between PICO Food GmbH and Bogumił Sobieraj.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Pico Food GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 32, 4. 2. 2012.
Special Report No 1/2014 ‘Effectiveness of EU-supported public urban transport projects’
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, means of public conveyance, urban transport








C_2014106EN.01000301.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 106/3





Special Report No 1/2014 ‘Effectiveness of EU-supported public urban transport projects’
2014/C 106/03
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 1/2014 ‘Effectiveness of EU-supported public urban transport projects’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website (http://eca.europa.eu).
A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:





European Court of Auditors




Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG









Tel. +352 4398-1




E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu




or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/290/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovakia ( OJ L 125, 21.5.2010 )
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Slovakia, budget deficit, gross domestic product, public debt, stability pact








L_2014106EN.01004801.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/48







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/290/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovakia

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
)


In the contents and on page 48, in the title:
for:


                  ‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovakia (2010/290/EU)’,

read:


                  ‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovakia (2010/290/EU)’;

on page 49, concluding formula:
for:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.


For the Council


The President

E. SALGADO
                           ’,



read:



                           ‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.


For the Council


The President

A. BORG
                           ’.
Notice concerning the entry into force, between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland, of the Arrangement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway and the Swiss Confederation on the participation by those States in the work of the committees which assist the European Commission in the exercise of its executive powers as regards the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EFTA countries, Schengen Agreement, agreement (EU), application of EU law, comitology, power of implementation








L_2014106EN.01000101.xml










9.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/1







Notice concerning the entry into force, between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland, of the Arrangement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway and the Swiss Confederation on the participation by those States in the work of the committees which assist the European Commission in the exercise of its executive powers as regards the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis


The above mentioned Arrangement (1) was signed in Brussels on 22 September 2011. As the procedures necessary for the entry into force of this Arrangement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland have been completed on 24 March 2014, this Arrangement will enter into force as far as the Republic of Iceland is concerned, in accordance with Article 7 of the Arrangement, on 1 May 2014.


(1)  
            OJ L 103, 13.4.2012, p. 4.
Case T-217/14: Action brought on 9 April 2014  — Gmina Kosakowo v Commission
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Poland, State aid, airport, control of State aid, infringement of EU law, private investment, reimbursement of aid, tenant farming








C_2014202EN.01002601.xml










30.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 202/26





Action brought on 9 April 2014 — Gmina Kosakowo v Commission
(Case T-217/14)
2014/C 202/33
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Gmina Kosakowo (Municipality of Kosakowo) (Kosakowo, Poland) (represented by: M. Leśny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision taken by the European Commission on 11 February 2014 in Case SA. 35388 by which Poland was ordered to recover from the Gdynia-Kosakowo airport improperly paid State aid;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action the applicant puts forward three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law:






—


Mistaken determination of the factual situation taken as the basis on which the contested decision was adopted;














2.


Second plea in law:






—


Breach of Article 107(1) TFEU through the unfounded assumption that the Municipality of Kosakowo had handed over public aid in a manner contrary to that provision in a situation in which the assumption of shares by that entity in the company Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. constituted the settlement of a transaction relating to a contract for the lease of land; in addition, improper conduct by the European Commission of the private investor test;














3.


Third plea in law:






—


Breach of the following procedural provisions: of Article 107(1) TFEU, in conjunction with Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, through the improper conduct of the private investor test; of Article 7(5), in conjunction with Article 13(1), of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 by reason of the mistaken determination of the amount of aid to be reimbursed, to which was also added expenditure for security and infrastructure; and also of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU because of the lack of proper reasoning for the contested decision, which lacks elements essential to enable its grounds to be determined.
Case F-59/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 April 2014  — Rouffaud v EEAS (Civil Service — Auxiliary member of contract staff — Reclassification of the contract — Pre-litigation procedure — Rule that the complaint must be consistent with the action — Amendment of the grounds of challenge in the case)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: administrative procedure, servant (EU), temporary employment, work contract








C_2014159EN.01003901.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/39





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 April 2014 — Rouffaud v EEAS
(Case F-59/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Auxiliary member of contract staff - Reclassification of the contract - Pre-litigation procedure - Rule that the complaint must be consistent with the action - Amendment of the grounds of challenge in the case))
2014/C 159/53
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Thierry Rouffaud (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented initially by: A. Coolen, É. Marchal, S. Orlandi and D. Abreu Caldas, and subsequently by: S. Orlandi and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s application to have his successive fixed-term employment contracts reclassified as a contract of indefinite duration and to have his period completed as an auxiliary member of the contract staff recognised as a period of service completed as a member of the contract staff.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Rouffard to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European External Action Service.






(1)  OJ C 233, 10.8.2013, p. 14.
Case T-488/12: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — CITEB and Belgo-Metal v Parliament (Public works contracts — Tender procedure — Work for the renovation and extension of the Eastman building in Brussels — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Notification of the evaluation committee’s report — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2014-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, improvement of housing, invitation to tender, works contract








C_2014175EN.01003802.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/38





Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — CITEB and Belgo-Metal v Parliament
(Case T-488/12) (1)

((Public works contracts - Tender procedure - Work for the renovation and extension of the Eastman building in Brussels - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Notification of the evaluation committee’s report - Duty to state reasons))
2014/C 175/51
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Cit Blaton SA (CITEB) (Schaerbeek, Belgium); and Belgo-Metal (Wetteren, Belgium) (represented by: R. Simar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: F. Poilvache and L. Fedel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 7 September 2012 rejecting the tender made by the applicants in response to a contract notice of 19 May 2012, published in the Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2012/S 92-1563620) under reference NINLO.AO-2012-005-BRU-UPIB-02, concerning the carrying out of work for the renovation and extension of the Eastman building in Brussels (Belgium) and awarding that contract to another tenderer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Cit Blaton SA (CITEB) and Belgo-Metal to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.