do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union OJ C 93, 29.3.2014
Date: 2014-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2014102EN.01000101.xml










7.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 102/1





2014/C 102/01
Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union



OJ C 93, 29.3.2014



Past publications


OJ C 85, 22.3.2014


OJ C 78, 15.3.2014


OJ C 71, 8.3.2014


OJ C 61, 1.3.2014


OJ C 52, 22.2.2014


OJ C 45, 15.2.2014

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Case C-170/14 P: Appeal brought on 7 April 2014 by Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 13 February 2014 in Case T-380/12, Demon International v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo
Date: 2014-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014462EN.01001103.xml










22.12.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/11





Appeal brought on 7 April 2014 by Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 13 February 2014 in Case T-380/12, Demon International v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo
(Case C-170/14 P)
(2014/C 462/19)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo (represented by: B. Osti, avvocato)

Other parties to the proceedings: Demon International, LC, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
By order of 6 November 2014, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible.
Case C-172/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Inalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie (Romania) lodged on 7 April 2014  — ING Pensii Societate de Administrare a unui Fond de Pensii Administrat Privat SA v Consiliul Concurenței
Date: 2014-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customers, market-sharing agreement, restriction on competition








C_2014212EN.01001501.xml










7.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 212/15





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Inalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie (Romania) lodged on 7 April 2014 — ING Pensii Societate de Administrare a unui Fond de Pensii Administrat Privat SA v Consiliul Concurenței
(Case C-172/14)
2014/C 212/15
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Inalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ING Pensii Societate de Administrare a unui Fond de Pensii Administrat Privat SA

Defendant: Consiliul Concurenței

Question referred

In relation to a practice by virtue of which clients are shared out, is the specific and definitive number of those clients relevant in deciding whether the condition of a significant distortion of competition for the purposes of Article 101(1)(c) TFEU is fulfilled?
Case C-165/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 7 April 2014  — Alfredo Rendón Marín v Administración del Estado
Date: 2014-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, child, criminal record, dependant, family relationship, interpretation of the law, residence permit








C_2014175EN.01003101.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/31





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 7 April 2014 — Alfredo Rendón Marín v Administración del Estado
(Case C-165/14)
2014/C 175/38
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo, Section: Tercera

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Alfredo Rendón Marín

Defendant: Administración del Estado

Question referred

Is national legislation which excludes the possibility of granting a residence permit to the parent of a European Union citizen who is a child and dependent on that parent, because the parent has a criminal record in the country in which the request is made, compatible with Article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, interpreted in the light of the decisions of 19 October 2004 (Case C-200/02 Zhu-Chen) (1) and 8 March 2011 (Case C-34/09 Ruiz Zambrano), (2) even if this results in the removal of the child from the territory of the European Union, as that child has to follow the parent?


(1)  EU:C:2004:639.

(2)  EU:C:2011:124.
Case C-166/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 7 April 2014  — MedEval — Qualitäts-, Leistungs- und Struktur-Evaluierung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH v Bundesvergabeamt
Date: 2014-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appeal, award of contract, judicial proceedings








C_2014282EN.01001602.xml










25.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/16





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 7 April 2014 — MedEval — Qualitäts-, Leistungs- und Struktur-Evaluierung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH v Bundesvergabeamt
(Case C-166/14)
2014/C 282/22
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: MedEval — Qualitäts-, Leistungs- und Struktur-Evaluierung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH

Defendant: Bundesvergabeamt

Other parties: Bundesminister für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft; Hauptverband der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger; Pharmazeutische Gehaltskasse für Österreich

Question referred

Is EU law — in particular the general principles of equivalence and effectiveness and Council Directive 89/665/EEC (1) of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC with regard to improving the effectiveness of review procedures concerning the award of public contracts — to be interpreted as precluding a national legal situation in which an application for a declaration of an infringement of public procurement law must be made within six months of the conclusion of the contract, if the declaration of an infringement of public procurement law is a precondition not only of annulling the contract but also of bringing a claim for damages?


(1)  OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33.

(2)  OJ 2007 L 335, p. 31.