Resolution of the European Parliament of 3 April 2014 with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2012
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: Frontex, budgetary discharge, financial year, general budget (EU)








L_2014266EN.01030301.xml










5.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 266/303








            RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
         
of 3 April 2014
         
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2012


THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,






—


having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2012,










—


having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2012, together with the Agency’s replies (1),










—


having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 (05849/2014 – C7-0054/2014),










—


having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2) (‘the Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 185 thereof,










—


having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (3), and in particular Article 208 thereof,










—


having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 of 26 October 2004 establishing a European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (4), and in particular Article 30 thereof,










—


having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (5),










—


having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6), and in particular Article 108 thereof,










—


having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,










—


having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on the Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0181/2014),










A.


whereas, according to its financial statements, the budget of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (‘the Agency’) for the financial year 2012 was EUR 89 578 000, representing a decrease of 24,21 % compared to 2011,










B.


whereas, according to its financial statements, the overall contribution of the Union to the Agency’s budget for 2012 amounted to EUR 84 000 000, representing a decrease of 24,32 % compared to 2011,










C.


whereas the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2012 are reliable, but could not obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions,






Disclaimer of opinion on the legality and the regularity of the underlying transactions









1.


Regrets that because of the materiality and pervasiveness of the matter described on the basis of a disclaimer of opinion, the Court of Auditors was not able to express an opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts;





Basis for a disclaimer of opinion on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions









2.


Regrets that in the absence of effective ex ante and ex post verifications, there is no reasonable assurance as to the legality and regularity of transactions; regrets that the Court of Auditors could not obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the legality and regularity of the audited grant transactions related to the Agency’s activities in 2012, which amount to EUR 56 000 000, representing 63 % of the operating expenditure;












3.


Regrets that the Court of Auditors found that, notwithstanding the ex post audit strategy adopted in 2012 and three audits carried out, no 2012 expenditure has yet been verified;












4.


Acknowledges from the Agency that its beneficiaries are the national Border Guard authorities of Member States and Schengen associated countries, who have to sign declarations that all information provided is full, reliable and true and certify that their requests for payment are substantiated by adequate supporting documents, when claiming reimbursement; notes that the Agency does not, therefore, consider that effective ex ante controls are absent, but that they are based on declarations made by public authorities and plausibility checks;












5.


Notes that the Agency undertook measures to strengthen the ex ante control framework and has put in place a risk based ex ante control system since June 2013; calls on the Agency and the Court of Auditors to come up with a mutually acceptable solution, which takes into account the Court of Auditors’ audit standards, as well as the Agency’s particular situation;





Budget and financial management









6.


Notes that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2012 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 98,86 % and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 75,23 %;





Commitments and carry-overs









7.


Notes that the Court of Auditors’ annual audit found that EUR 21 800 000 (25 % of committed appropriations) was carried over to 2013, whereas carry-overs related to title III amounted to EUR 19 600 000; recalls that the level of carry-overs is mostly related to the operational and multiannual nature of the Agency’s activities;












8.


Notes with concern that the level of carry-overs is excessive, as it was in 2011, and is at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality; acknowledges, however, that the carry-overs are an inevitable result of the Agency performing its duties;





Transfers









9.


Notes that according to the annual activity report, as well as the Court of Auditors’ audit findings, the Agency made 39 budgetary transfers, amounting to EUR 11 500 000, affecting 70 of the 79 budgetary lines; acknowledges that this is mostly due to the fact that the second budgetary amendment for 2012 addressing increased demands in autumn 2012 was only approved in October 2012; is of the opinion, therefore, that those transfers were necessary and well justified;





Procurement and recruitment procedures









10.


Notes that for the year 2012, neither sampled transactions nor other audit findings have led to any comments on the Agency’s procurement procedures in the Court of Auditors’ annual audit report;












11.


Notes with concern that the Court of Auditors identified in its annual audit report for 2012 shortcomings in the Agency’s recruitment procedures which affect transparency and equal treatment of candidates, namely that questions for written tests and interviews were set after applications had been examined by the selection board and that the selection board did not document all its meetings and decisions;





Prevention and management of conflicts of interests and transparency









12.


Acknowledges that the Agency has put in place several measures to manage and prevent situations of conflicts of interests and developed a detailed disciplinary procedure; calls on the Agency to indicate whether or not it has established a specific policy for the prevention and management of conflicts of interests based on the Commission’s guidelines;












13.


Observes that the CVs and Declarations of Interests of the members of the Management Board, as well as the Declarations of Interests of the Executive Director and senior management, are not publicly available; calls on the Agency to remedy the situation as a matter of urgency;





Internal controls









14.


Regrets that according to the Court of Auditors’ findings, the Agency’s physical inventory was incomplete and did not cover all assets owned and that assets under construction and assets purchased near the end of the year were not taken into account; regrets, moreover, that there was no procedure for the disposal of fixed assets; acknowledges from the Agency that a complete physical inventory has been established, including tangible assets which were written-off;





Internal audit









15.


Acknowledges from the Agency that in 2012 the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS) conducted a risk assessment, which resulted in a Strategic Audit Plan 2013-2015 listing future audit topics;












16.


Notes that the IAS also carried out a follow-up of its earlier audit recommendations to the Agency, and found that two very important recommendations were closed; notes that according to the IAS, the action plan developed by the Agency in order to address the remaining outstanding recommendations will mitigate the risks if it is implemented in a timely manner;





Performance









17.


Requests that the Agency communicate the results and impact its work has on European citizens in an accessible way, mainly through its website.












18.


Refers, in respect of the other observations accompanying its Decision on discharge, which are of a horizontal nature, to its resolution of 3 April 2014 (7) on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.






(1)  
            OJ C 365, 13.12.2013, p. 251.

(2)  
            OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(3)  
            OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

(4)  
            OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 1.

(5)  
            OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

(6)  
            OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.

(7)  Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0299 (see page 359 of this Official Journal).