do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 351/2014 of 3 April 2014 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Queso de Murcia al vino (PDO))
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Region of Murcia, Spain, designation of origin, goats’ milk cheese, labelling, product designation








L_2014104EN.01000701.xml










8.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 104/7








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 351/2014
of 3 April 2014
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Queso de Murcia al vino (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Queso de Murcia al vino’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1097/2002 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 April 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 166, 25.6.2002, p. 8.

(3)  
            OJ C 326, 12.11.2013, p. 11.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3. Cheeses

SPAIN
Queso de Murcia al vino (PDO)
Case C-319/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Oberlandesgericht — Germany) — Udo Rätzke v S+K Handels GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Energy — Energy labelling of televisions — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2010 — Responsibilities of dealers — Television supplied to the dealer without the label before the regulation became applicable — Dealer’s obligation to label that television from the date on which the regulation became applicable and to obtain a label subsequently)
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: application of EU law, distributor, energy consumption, labelling, television








C_2014159EN.01001002.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/10





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Oberlandesgericht — Germany) — Udo Rätzke v S+K Handels GmbH
(Case C-319/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Energy - Energy labelling of televisions - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2010 - Responsibilities of dealers - Television supplied to the dealer without the label before the regulation became applicable - Dealer’s obligation to label that television from the date on which the regulation became applicable and to obtain a label subsequently))
2014/C 159/13
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Thüringer Oberlandesgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Udo Rätzke

Defendant: S+K Handels GmbH

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Thüringer Oberlandesgericht — Interpretation of Article 4(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2010 of 28 September 2010 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of televisions (OJ 2010 L 314, p. 64) — Scope ratione temporis — Obligation of the dealer to ensure that each television at the point of sale bears the label, provided by the suppliers, indicating the energy efficiency class — Televisions supplied to the dealer without labels before the date on which the regulation began to apply

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2010 of 28 September 2010 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of televisions must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation for dealers to ensure that each television, at the point of sale, bears the label provided by the suppliers in accordance with Article 3(1) of that regulation applies only to televisions which have been placed on the market, that is to say, dispatched for the first time by the manufacturer with a view to their distribution in the sales chain, from 30 November 2011.


(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.
Case C-283/13 P: Order of the President of the Court of 3 April 2014  — Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Henkel France v European Commission, Denmark
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, fine, legal expenses, provision of documents, rights of the defence








C_2014253EN.01002301.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/23





Order of the President of the Court of 3 April 2014 — Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Henkel France v European Commission, Denmark
(Case C-283/13 P) (1)

2014/C 253/32
Language of the case: English
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.
Case C-60/13: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 April 2014  — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — European Union’s own resources — Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom — Article 8 — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 — Articles 2, 6, 9, 10 and 11 — Refusal to make own resources available to the European Union — Erroneous Binding Tariff Information documents — Imports of fresh garlic as frozen garlic — Imputability of the error to the national customs authorities — Financial liability of the Member States)
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: United Kingdom, access to EU information, bulb vegetable, import (EU), infringement of EU law, own resources, tariff quota








C_2014159EN.01001001.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/10





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 April 2014 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
(Case C-60/13) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - European Union’s own resources - Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom - Article 8 - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 - Articles 2, 6, 9, 10 and 11 - Refusal to make own resources available to the European Union - Erroneous Binding Tariff Information documents - Imports of fresh garlic as frozen garlic - Imputability of the error to the national customs authorities - Financial liability of the Member States))
2014/C 159/12
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and L. Flynn, Agents)

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Brighouse and J. Beeko, Agents, assisted by K. Beal, QC)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 4(3) TEU, Article 8 of Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom, of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities’ own resources (OJ 2000 L 253, p. 42) and Articles 2, 6, 9, 10 and 11 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 implementing Decision 2000/597, as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2028/2004 of 16 November 2004

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by refusing to make available the amount of GBP 20 061 462,11 corresponding to the duties payable on imports of fresh garlic covered by erroneous binding tariff information, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8 of Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the Communities’ own resources and Articles 2, 6, 9, 10 and 11 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 implementing Decision 2000/597, as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2028/2004 of 16 November 2004;










2.


Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.
Case T-356/12: Judgment of the General Court of 3 April 2014  — Debonair Trading Internacional v OHIM — Ibercosmetica (SÔ:UNIC) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark SÔ:UNIC — Earlier Community and national word marks SO…?, SO…? ONE, SO…? CHIC and non-registered word marks — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion — Family of marks — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rule 15(2)(b)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Admissibility of the opposition)
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetics industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014159EN.01002202.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/22





Judgment of the General Court of 3 April 2014 — Debonair Trading Internacional v OHIM — Ibercosmetica (SÔ:UNIC)
(Case T-356/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark SÔ:UNIC - Earlier Community and national word marks SO…?, SO…? ONE, SO…? CHIC and non-registered word marks - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion - Family of marks - Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Rule 15(2)(b)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Admissibility of the opposition))
2014/C 159/30
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: T. Alkin, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ibercosmetica SA de CV (Mexico City, Mexico)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 June 2012 (Case R 1033/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Debonair Trading Internacional Lda and Ibercosmetica, SA de CV

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 4 June 2012 (Case R 1033/2011-4) in so far as the Board of Appeal rejected as inadmissible the opposition based on Article 8(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark with regard to the signs relied on by Debonair Trading Internacional Lda so far as the United Kingdom and Ireland are concerned;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7203 — Unibail-Rodamco/CPPIB/CentrO)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, shopping centre, trade event








C_2014098EN.01000901.xml










3.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/9





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.7203 — Unibail-Rodamco/CPPIB/CentrO)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 98/05






1.


On 26 March 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Unibail-Rodamco SE (‘Unibail-Rodamco’, France) and the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board (‘CPPIB’, Canada) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking CentrO Holdings (UK) Ltd (‘CentrO Holdings’, the United Kingdom) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


Unibail-Rodamco is a commercial property company, specialised in shopping centres in Europe, in offices and convention and exhibition centres in Paris. Unibail-Rodamco is active in Germany principally through the company MFI AG,










—


CPPIB is an institutional investor which invests in public equities, private equities, real estate, infrastructure and fixed income investments,










—


CentrO Holdings owns CentrO, a shopping and leisure centre located in Oberhausen, in the North Rhine-Westphalia state in Germany.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7203 — Unibail-Rodamco/CPPIB/CentrO, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case C-559/12 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 April 2014  — French Republic v European Commission (Appeals — State aid — Aid in the form of an implied, unlimited guarantee in favour of La Poste as a result of its status as a publicly-owned establishment — Existence of the guarantee — Presence of State resources — Advantage — Burden and standard of proof)
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, State aid, control of State aid, guarantee, proof, public institution, restriction on competition








C_2014159EN.01000801.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/8





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 April 2014 — French Republic v European Commission
(Case C-559/12 P) (1)

((Appeals - State aid - Aid in the form of an implied, unlimited guarantee in favour of La Poste as a result of its status as a publicly-owned establishment - Existence of the guarantee - Presence of State resources - Advantage - Burden and standard of proof))
2014/C 159/10
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, D. Colas and J. Gstalter and by J. Bousin, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2012 in Case T 154/10 France v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought by the French Republic for the annulment of Commission Decision 2010/605/EU of 26 January 2010 on State aid C 56/07 (ex E 15/05) granted by France to La Poste (OJ 2010 L 274, p. 1) — Aid allegedly implemented by France in the form of an unlimited implied guarantee in favour of La Poste resulting from its status as a publicly owned industrial and commercial establishment — Establishment outside the scope of the ordinary law on administration and compulsory liquidation of firms in difficulty — Existence of an advantage — Existence of a transfer of State resources — Burden and standard of proof — Equiparation of the conditions under which State liability is incurred with a guarantee mechanism

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.
Case C-224/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 April 2014  — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands, ING Groep NV, De Nederlandsche Bank NV (Appeal — Financial sector — Serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — State Aid to a banking group — Form — Capital injection as part of a restructuring plan — Decision — Whether the aid compatible with the common market — Conditions — Amendment to the repayment terms of the aid — Private investor test)
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, aid for restructuring, common market, economic recession, financial institution, private investment, reimbursement of aid, share capital








C_2014159EN.01000301.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/3





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 April 2014 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands, ING Groep NV, De Nederlandsche Bank NV
(Case C-224/12 P) (1)

((Appeal - Financial sector - Serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State - State Aid to a banking group - Form - Capital injection as part of a restructuring plan - Decision - Whether the aid compatible with the common market - Conditions - Amendment to the repayment terms of the aid - Private investor test))
2014/C 159/03
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. de Ree, C. Wissels and J. Langer, acting as Agents, and P. Glazener, advocaat), ING Groep NV (represented by: O.W. Brouwer and J. Blockx, advocaten, and M. O’Regan, Solicitor), De Nederlandsche Bank NV (represented by: S. Verschuur and H. Gornall, advocaten, and M. Petite, avocat)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 March 2012 in Joined Cases T-29/10 and T-33/10 Netherlands and ING Groep v Commission by which the General Court granted the applications for the partial annulment of Commission Decision 2010/608/EC of 18 November 2009 on State aid C 10/09 (ex N 138/09) implemented by the Netherlands for ING’s Illiquid Assets Back Facility and Restructuring Plan (OJ 2010 L 274, p. 139)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;










3.


Orders De Nederlandsche Bank NV to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 258, 25.8.2012.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 352/2014 of 3 April 2014 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Queso de Murcia (PDO))
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Region of Murcia, Spain, designation of origin, goats’ milk cheese, labelling, product designation








L_2014104EN.01000901.xml










8.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 104/9








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 352/2014
of 3 April 2014
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Queso de Murcia (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ’Queso de Murcia’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1097/2002 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 April 2014.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 166, 25.6.2002, p. 8.

(3)  
            OJ C 329, 13.11.2013, p. 4.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3. Cheeses

SPAIN
Queso de Murcia (PDO)
Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: EU Official Journal, administrative competition, job vacancy








CA2014098EN.01000901.xml










3.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 98/9






REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 098 A/02
Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.






5


 




6


 




11


 




19


 




21


 




26


 




27


 




30


(PL)




35


 




41


(DE/EN/FR)




42


 




43


 




46


 




47


 




48


 




55


 




56


 




60


 




62


 




65


 




73


(DE/EN/FR)




74


 




81


 




88


 




92


(DE/EN/FR)




97


 




98
Notice of open competition
Date: 2014-04-03
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, assistant, competition (EU), nuclear safety








C_2014098EN.01000801.xml










3.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/8






NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2014/C 98/04
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition:
EPSO/AST/131/14 – ASSISTANTS (AST 3) – Nuclear inspection
The competition notice will be published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 98 A of 3 April 2014.
Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/