do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-3/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 31 March 2014  — CK v Commission
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, indemnification, staff assessment








C_2014421EN.01006402.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/64





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 31 March 2014 — CK v Commission
(Case F-3/13) (1)

2014/C 421/95
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 129, 4.5.2013, p. 31.
Case T-203/14: Action brought on 31 March 2014 — Mo Industries v OHIM (Splendid)
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, sport, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2014212EN.01003202.xml










7.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 212/32





Action brought on 31 March 2014 — Mo Industries v OHIM (Splendid)
(Case T-203/14)
2014/C 212/41
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mo Industries LLC (Los Angeles, United States) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 January 2014 given in Case R 1542/2013-1;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Splendid’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 6 13  131

Decision of the Examiner: Refused the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) CTMR.
Case T-266/11: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014  — El Gazaerly v Council
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Egypt, indemnification, international sanctions








C_2014184EN.01003802.xml










16.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/38





Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — El Gazaerly v Council
(Case T-266/11) (1)

2014/C 184/61
Language of the case: English
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 219, 23. 7. 2011.
Case T-338/13: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014  — Energa Power Trading v Commission
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Greece, State aid, control of State aid, energy industry








C_2014184EN.01003803.xml










16.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/38





Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — Energa Power Trading v Commission
(Case T-338/13) (1)

2014/C 184/62
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 252, 31. 8. 2013.
Case T-212/14: Action brought on 31 March 2014 — PSL/OHIM — Consortium Ménager Parisien (Representation of a watch)
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014245EN.01001701.xml










28.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/17





Action brought on 31 March 2014 — PSL/OHIM — Consortium Ménager Parisien (Representation of a watch)
(Case T-212/14)
2014/C 245/23
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: PSL Ltd (Kowloon, Hong-Kong) (represented by: R. Dissmann and J. Bogatz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Consortium Ménager Parisien (Paris, France)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 January 2014 in Case R 1495/2012-3;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the court as well as the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeals.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Design representing a watch for goods in Class 10-02 — Community Design No 1 600 560-0001

Proprietor of the Community design: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: Consortium Menager Parisien

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Lack of individual character within the meaning of Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and declared the contested design invalid

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 31 March 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39610(2) Power Cables — Rapporteur: Denmark
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: cartel, electric cable, fine, infringement of EU law, inter-company agreement, market-sharing agreement, price agreement








C_2014319EN.01000401.xml










17.9.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/4





Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 31 March 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39610(2) Power Cables
Rapporteur: Denmark
2014/C 319/04






(1)


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the determination of the value of sales.










(2)


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the periods to be taken into account for imposing the fines.










(3)


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines.










(4)


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment on the mitigating and aggravating circumstances applicable in this case.










(5)


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of fines based on the 2006 Leniency Notice.










(6)


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment of the inability to pay request










(7)


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.










(8)


The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Joined Cases C-215/13 P and C-216/13 P: Order of the President of the Court of 31 March 2014  — Acron OAO, Dorogobuzh OAO v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Fertilizers Europe
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Russia, anti-dumping legislation, chemical fertiliser, chemical salt, import (EU), originating product








C_2014253EN.01002203.xml










4.8.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 253/22





Order of the President of the Court of 31 March 2014 — Acron OAO, Dorogobuzh OAO v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Fertilizers Europe
(Joined Cases C-215/13 P and C-216/13 P) (1)

2014/C 253/31
Language of the case: English
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
Case T-270/13: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014  — SACBO v Commission and INEA (Action for annulment — Community financial aid to projects of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks — Lack of direct concern — Non-actionable measure — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU aid, Italy, airport, energy grid, feasibility study, financial aid, trans-European network, transport network








C_2014175EN.01004402.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/44





Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — SACBO v Commission and INEA
(Case T-270/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Community financial aid to projects of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks - Lack of direct concern - Non-actionable measure - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 175/61
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Società per l'aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA) (Grassobbio, Italy) (represented by: M. Muscardini and G. Greco, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and E. Montaguti, Agents) and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) (represented by: I. Ramallo, Agent, and M. Merola, C. Santacroce and L. Armati, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 18 March 2013 of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency (TEN-T EA) relating to certain expenditure incurred in carrying out a feasibility study concerning the intermodal nature of the Bergamo-Orio al Serio airport (Italy) following the grant of financial aid by the Commission to the Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile (ENAC, Italian national civil aviation authority).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the application by the Republic of Poland for leave to intervene.










3.


The Società per l’aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA).






(1)  OJ C 207, 20. 7. 2013.
(2014/182/EU): Council Decision of 31 March 2014 appointing a Luxembourg member and two Luxembourg alternate members of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Committee of the Regions, Luxembourg, appointment of members








L_2014099EN.01002501.xml










2.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 99/25








            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 31 March 2014
         
appointing a Luxembourg member and two Luxembourg alternate members of the Committee of the Regions
(2014/182/EU)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the Luxembourg Government,

Whereas:







(1)


On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.












(2)


A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Dan KERSCH.












(3)


An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Yves CRUCHTEN. An alternate member's seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Roby BIWER as member of the Committee of the Regions,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:






(a)


as member:






—


Mr Roby BIWER, Conseiller communal de la commune de Bettembourg;




and










(b)


as alternate members:






—


Mr Tom JUNGEN, Bourgmestre de la commune de Roeser,










—


Ms Christine SCHWEICH, Bourgmestre de la commune de Mondercange.










Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 31 March 2014.


For the Council


The President

D. KOURKOULAS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

(2)  
            OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
Case C-151/14: Action brought on 31 March 2014  — European Commission v Republic of Latvia
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Latvia, derogation from EU law, discrimination on the basis of nationality, infringement of EU law, notary, public authorities, right of establishment








C_2014159EN.01001902.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/19





Action brought on 31 March 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Latvia
(Case C-151/14)
2014/C 159/26
Language of the case: Latvian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene and H. Stølbæk)

Defendant: Republic of Latvia

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


hold that it is not permissible to consider that the functions of a notary, as currently regulated by the Latvian legal system, constitute an exercise of official authority of the Member State, within the meaning of the exception set out in the first paragraph of Article 51 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and accordingly, hold that, in setting out a requirement of nationality for appointment as a notary, the Republic of Latvia’s legislation discriminates on grounds of nationality prohibited by Article 49 of the Treaty.










—


hold that, in making an appointment as a notary subject to a requirement of nationality, the Republic of Latvia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 of the Treaty.










—


order the Republic of Latvia to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that the nationality requirement for access to the notarial profession is discriminatory and constitutes a disproportionate restriction on freedom of establishment. Consequently, the Republic of Latvia has failed to fulfill its obligations under Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
The Commission submits that, by their nature, functions assigned to a notary in the Republic of Latvia’s legislation are not related to the exercise of official authority and that, consequently, the requirement of nationality for access to the notarial profession cannot be justified by the exception set out in Article 51 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Case T-265/11: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014  — Elmaghraby v Council
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Egypt, indemnification, international sanctions








C_2014184EN.01003801.xml










16.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/38





Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — Elmaghraby v Council
(Case T-265/11) (1)

2014/C 184/60
Language of the case: English
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 219, 23. 7. 2011.
Case C-148/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 March 2014  — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Nordzucker AG
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU emission allowance, fine, reduction of gas emissions








C_2014235EN.01000202.xml










21.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/2





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 March 2014 — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Nordzucker AG
(Case C-148/14)
2014/C 235/03
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Respondent: Nordzucker AG

Additional party: Der Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Question referred

Must Article 16(3) and (4) of Directive 2003/87/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the excess emissions penalty must also be applied in the case where an operator has, by 30 April of a given year, surrendered a number of allowances corresponding to the total emissions stated in its report on emissions from the installation for the preceding year, and that report has been assessed as satisfactory by the verifier, but where the competent authority, after 30 April, has established that the verified emissions report had erred by understating the total quantity of emissions, the report was duly corrected and the operator surrendered the additional allowances within the new period for surrender?


(1)  Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32).
Case T-209/14: Action brought on 31 March 2014  — Bopp v OHIM (Representation of an octagonal green frame)
Date: 2014-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, facsimile, official document, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014151EN.01003401.xml










19.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/34





Action brought on 31 March 2014 — Bopp v OHIM (Representation of an octagonal green frame)
(Case T-209/14)
2014/C 151/44
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Carsten Bopp (Glashütten, Germany) (represented by C. Russ, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 January 2014 in Case R 1276/2013-1





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark representing an octagonal green frame for services in Class 35 — application No 8 248 965

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law:







—


Infringement of Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009