do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-321/13: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2014  — Adorisio and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Aid granted to banks during the crisis — Recapitalisation of SNS Reaal and SNS Bank — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Expropriation of holders of subordinated bonds — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — No standing to bring proceedings — Manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2014-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, bank, control of State aid, economic recession, terms for aid








C_2014159EN.01002701.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/27





Order of the General Court of 26 March 2014 — Adorisio and Others v Commission
(Case T-321/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Aid granted to banks during the crisis - Recapitalisation of SNS Reaal and SNS Bank - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Expropriation of holders of subordinated bonds - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - No standing to bring proceedings - Manifestly inadmissible))
2014/C 159/37
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Stefania Adorisio (Rome, Italy) and the 363 other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex to the order (represented by: F. Sciaudone, L. Dezzani, R. Sciaudone, S. Frazzani and D. Contini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 1053 final of 22 February 2013 relating to State aid SA.35382 (2013/N) — Kingdom of the Netherlands — Rescue SNS Reaal 2013

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Ms Stefania Adorisio and the 363 other applicants listed in the Annex hereto shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 233, 10.8.2013.
Case F-8/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2014  — CP v Parliament (Civil service  — Official  — Head of Unit  — Trial period  — Non-confirmation of the post of Head of Unit  — Reassignment to a post other than management  — Internal rules of the Parliament)
Date: 2014-03-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, occupational status, probationary period, reassignment








C_2014142EN.01005601.xml










12.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/56





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2014 — CP v Parliament
(Case F-8/13) (1)

((Civil service - Official - Head of Unit - Trial period - Non-confirmation of the post of Head of Unit - Reassignment to a post other than management - Internal rules of the Parliament))
2014/C 142/75
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CP (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and V. Montebello-Demogeot, Agents)

Re:

The application to annul the decision not to confirm the applicant in his post of Head of Unit and to transfer him to the Directorate General for Internal Policies

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of 23 March 2012 by which the European Parliament did not confirm CP in his post as Head of Unit and transferred him with his post to the Directorate General for Internal Policies;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CP.






(1)  OJ C 108 13/04/2013, p. 39.
Case T-201/14: Action brought on 26 March 2014 — The Body Shop International v OHIM — Spa Monopole (SPA WISDOM)
Date: 2014-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014235EN.01001902.xml










21.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/19





Action brought on 26 March 2014 — The Body Shop International v OHIM — Spa Monopole (SPA WISDOM)
(Case T-201/14)
2014/C 235/26
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: The Body Shop International plc (Littlehampton, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Vernimme, H. Viaene, S. Vandewynckel and D. Gillet, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 January 2014 given in Case R 1516/2012-4;










—


Order the defendant, and, if necessary, the intervener, to pay the costs of proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The wordmark ‘SPA WISDOM’ for goods in Class 3 — Community trade mark application No 8 9 00  748

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The Benelux trademarks Nos 3 89  230, 4 99  046, 3 72  307 for the word mark ‘SPA’ and the Benelux trademark No 6 93  395 for the word mark ‘LES THERMES DE SPA’

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) CTMR
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7083 — John Wood Group/Siemens/JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronics industry, merger control, technology, turbine








C_2014087EN.01001301.xml










26.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 87/13





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.7083 — John Wood Group/Siemens/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 87/08






1.


On 17 March 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which John Wood Group PLC (‘WG’ of USA) and Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (‘Siemens’ of Germany) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture (‘JV’).










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for WG: provides a range of engineering, production support, maintenance management and industrial gas turbine overhaul and repair services to the oil and gas, and power generation industries worldwide,










—


for Siemens: is a global engineering and electronics conglomerate with activities in a number of sectors, including the energy sector,










—


for JV: will provide services for a range of rotating equipment, including mature technology gas turbines, steam turbines, generators, pumps and compressors.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.7083 — John Wood Group/Siemens/JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.7165 — GVI/LBEIP/OHL/Phunciona)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Community of Madrid, European Union, North America, Spain, building industry, economic concentration, investment company, medical institution, merger control, provision of services, supplementary pension








C_2014087EN.01000101.xml










26.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 87/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.7165 — GVI/LBEIP/OHL/Phunciona)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 87/01
On 18 March 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7165. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.