do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-43/13: Order of the General Court of 20 March 2014  — Donnici v Parliament (Action for damages — Members of the European Parliament — Verification of credentials — European Parliament’s decision declaring invalid a mandate as a MEP — Annulment of the decision of the Parliament by a judgment of the Court — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)
Date: 2014-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, Statute for Members of the Parliament, action for annulment (EU), indemnification, legal basis








C_2014159EN.01002601.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/26





Order of the General Court of 20 March 2014 — Donnici v Parliament
(Case T-43/13) (1)

((Action for damages - Members of the European Parliament - Verification of credentials - European Parliament’s decision declaring invalid a mandate as a MEP - Annulment of the decision of the Parliament by a judgment of the Court - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law))
2014/C 159/35
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Beniamino Donnici (Castrolibero, Italy) (represented by: V. Vallefuoco and J. Van Gyseghem, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz and S. Seyr, Agents)

Re:

Action for damages seeking compensation for the damage which the applicant suffered because of the adoption of Parliament’s decision of 24 May 2007 on the verification of his credentials and which was annulled by the judgment of the Court of 30 April 2009 in Joined Cases C-393/07 and C-9/08 Italy and Donnici v Parliament, ECR I-3679.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Mr Deniamino Donnici is ordered to pay the costs of these proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
Case T-188/14: Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Grundig Multimedia v OHIM (GentleCare)
Date: 2014-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electrical engineering, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014151EN.01003002.xml










19.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/30





Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Grundig Multimedia v OHIM (GentleCare)
(Case T-188/14)
2014/C 151/39
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Grundig Multimedia AG (Stansstad, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Neuner and S. Walter, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 January 2014 given in Case R 739/2013-5.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘GentleCare’ for goods in Class 7 — Community trade mark application No 11 102 522

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), (c) and 7(2) CTMR.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-03-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014081EN.01000401.xml










20.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/4





Euro exchange rates (1)

19 March 2014
2014/C 81/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3913




JPY


Japanese yen


141,31




DKK


Danish krone


7,4641




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83680




SEK


Swedish krona


8,8339




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2167




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,3175




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,460




HUF


Hungarian forint


310,08




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1982




RON


Romanian leu


4,4915




TRY


Turkish lira


3,0910




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5269




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5545




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,8026




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6142




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7615




KRW


South Korean won


1 488,77




ZAR


South African rand


14,9134




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,6212




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6598




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 740,61




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5667




PHP


Philippine peso


62,404




RUB


Russian rouble


49,9800




THB


Thai baht


44,754




BRL


Brazilian real


3,2493




MXN


Mexican peso


18,3039




INR


Indian rupee


84,7928






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 295/2014 of 20 March 2014 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Antequera (PDO)]
Date: 2014-03-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Andalusia, Spain, designation of origin, labelling, olive oil, product designation








L_2014089EN.01003001.xml










25.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 89/30








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 295/2014
of 20 March 2014
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Antequera (PDO)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Antequera’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 417/2006 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 March 2014.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 72, 11.3.2006, p. 8.

(3)  
            OJ C 299, 15.10.2013, p. 13.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.5.   Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)

SPAIN
Antequera (PDO)
Case T-181/14: Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Nürburgring v OHIM — Biedermann (Nordschleife)
Date: 2014-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014151EN.01002901.xml










19.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/29





Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Nürburgring v OHIM — Biedermann (Nordschleife)
(Case T-181/14)
2014/C 151/37
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Nürburgring GmbH (Nürburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Viefhues and C. Giersdorf, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lutz Biedermann (Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 January 2014 in Case R 163/2013-4;










—


order the defendant and, if applicable, the other interested parties to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘Nordschleife’ for goods and services in Classes 2 to 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 22, 24 to 30, 32 to 34, 39, 41 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 7 379 399

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Lutz Biedermann

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark ‘Management by Nordschleife’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 9, 16, 25, 28 and 41

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
Case F-33/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 March 2014  — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Lawyer’s handwritten signature different from that on the original application received by post — Action out of time — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-03-20
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, indemnification, paid leave, sick leave








C_2014421EN.01005502.xml










24.11.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 421/55





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 March 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-33/13)
((Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Lawyer’s handwritten signature different from that on the original application received by post - Action out of time - Manifest inadmissibility))
2014/C 421/78
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa and L. Mansullo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for payment of financial compensation for the days of leave not taken when he was on sick leave from 4 January 2002 to 31 May 2005.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Mr Marcuccio is order to bear his own costs.
Case T-181/10: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2014  — Reagens v Commission (Access to documents  — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001  — Documents relating to requests that certain undertakings’ inability to pay be taken into account in cartel proceedings  — Refusal of access  — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests of a third party  — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits  — Overriding public interest  — Obligation to carry out a concrete and individual examination  — Partial access)
Date: 2014-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, cartel, industrial chemistry








C_2014142EN.01003002.xml










12.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/30





Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2014 — Reagens v Commission
(Case T-181/10) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to requests that certain undertakings’ inability to pay be taken into account in cartel proceedings - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests of a third party - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Overriding public interest - Obligation to carry out a concrete and individual examination - Partial access))
2014/C 142/38
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Reagens SpA (San Giorgio di Piano, Italy) (represented initially by B. O’Connor, Solicitor, L. Toffoletti, E. De Giorgi and D. Gullo, lawyers, and subsequently by B. O’Connor, L. Toffoletti and E. De Giorgi)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by P. Costa de Oliveira and J. Bourke, and subsequently by P. Costa de Oliveira and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision Gestdem No 2009/5145 of 23 February 2010, refusing the applicant access to certain documents in the file in Case COMP/38589 — Heat stabilisers, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Decision Gestdem No 2009/5145 of 23 February 2010, refusing the applicant access to certain documents in the administrative file in Case COMP/38589 — Heat stabilisers, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, to the extent that it refuses access to the non-confidential versions of the undertakings’ requests and to the European Commission’s first questionnaire;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders Reagens SpA to pay half of its own costs and half of the costs incurred by the Commission;










4.


Orders the Commission to pay half of its own costs and half of the costs incurred by Reagens.






(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
Case T-194/14: Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)
Date: 2014-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, rubber industry, trade-mark law








C_2014151EN.01003301.xml










19.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/33





Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)
(Case T-194/14)
2014/C 151/42
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Bristol Global Co. Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Bozhinova, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bridgestone Corp. (Tokyo, Japan)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 December 2013 given in Case R 916/2013-2.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative trade mark containing the verbal element ‘AEROSTONE’ for goods in Class 12 — Community trade mark application No 10 066 736

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trademarks registrations of the word marks ‘STONE’ for goods in Classes 12, 28, 35 and 37 and ‘BRIDGESTONE’ for goods in Class 12; well-known trade mark and non-registered sign containing verbal element ‘BRIDGESTONE’

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partly upheld the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(4) and 8(5) CTMR.